Journals / Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Appendicitis or Epiploic Appendicitis? Is Differential Diagnosis Possible with Laboratory Parameters?

Apandisit mi, Epiploik Apandisit mi? Laboratuvar Parametreleri ile Ayırıcı Tanı Mümkün mü?

Tutku Duman Şahan(IZMIR CESME ALPER CIZGEKANAT STATE HOSPITAL)0000-0001-9641-4176
Mehmet Göktuğ Efgan(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0794-1239
Süleyman Kırık(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1477-6363
Zeynep Karakaya(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0562-8297
Simge Topçu Tabakçı(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-1860-3704
Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2026-04-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular, inflammatory indices such as PLR and SII may support clinical decision-making and help reduce the rate of unnecessary surgeries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Acute abdomen is a common emergency department presentation requiring rapid diagnosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, accurate differentiation is essential to avoid unnecessary surgeries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular, inflammatory indices such as PLR and SII may support clinical decision-making and help reduce the rate of unnecessary surgeries.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Akut apandisit · Epiploik apandisit · Enflamatuar belirteçler

Abstract

Objective: Acute abdomen is a common emergency department presentation requiring rapid diagnosis. Although acute appendicitis is the leading cause, rare conditions such as epiploic appendicitis, which present with similar symptoms, should be considered in the differential diagnosis. While acute appendicitis often requires surgery, epiploic appendicitis typically resolves with conservative treatment. Therefore, accurate differentiation is essential to avoid unnecessary surgeries. This study aimed to compare laboratory parameters between acute appendicitis and epiploic appendicitis and to assess their diagnostic utility. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥18 years who presented with acute right lower quadrant pain between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025. Diagnoses were confirmed via CT or surgery. Demographic data, complete blood count, CRP, and inflammatory markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR], hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet index [HALP], systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], BUN-to-albumin ratio [BAR], and CRP-to-albumin ratio [CAR]) were compared between the groups. Results: The study included 203 patients: 152 with acute appendicitis and 51 with epiploic appendicitis. The acute appendicitis group had significantly higher leukocyte (p=0.004), neutrophil (p<0.001), hemoglobin (p=0.009), and CRP (p<0.001) levels. Significant differences were also observed in NLR, PLR, SII, HALP, and BAR (all p<0.001). Conclusion: Laboratory parameters can aid in differentiating acute appendicitis from epiploic appendicitis. In particular, inflammatory indices such as PLR and SII may support clinical decision-making and help reduce the rate of unnecessary surgeries.

Özet

Amaç: Akut karın, acil servislerde sıklıkla karşılaşılan ve hızlı tanı gerektiren klinik durumlardan biridir. Akut apandisit en sık görülen neden olmakla birlikte, benzer semptomlara sahip epiploik apandisit gibi nadir hastalıklar da ayırıcı tanıda göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Akut apandisit genellikle cerrahi müdahale gerektirirken, epiploik apandisit tipik olarak konservatif tedavi ile düzelir. Bu nedenle, gereksiz ameliyatları önlemek için doğru ayırıcı tanı çok önemlidir. Bu çalışma, akut apandisit ile epiploik apandisit arasında laboratuvar parametreleri açısından farklar olup olmadığını değerlendirmek ve bu parametrelerin ayırıcı tanıda tanısal değerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif, gözlemsel, kesitsel çalışmada, 01.01.2022 ile 31.03.2025 tarihleri arasında acil servise akut sağ alt kadran ağrısı ile başvuran ve tanısı BT veya cerrahi operasyonla doğrulanan 18 yaş ve üzeri hastalar değerlendirilmiştir. Demografik veriler, tam kan sayımı, CRP ve inflamatuar belirteçler (NLR, PLR, HALP, SII, BAR, CAR) iki grup arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 203 hastanın 152’sine akut apandisit, 51’ine epiploik apandisit tanısı konuldu. Akut apandisit grubunda lökosit (p=0.004), nötrofil (p<0.001), haemoglobin (p=0,009) ve CRP (p<0.001) düzeyleri, epiploik apandisit grubuna göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Ek olarak, NLR, PLR, SII, HALP ve BAR gibi inflamatuar belirteçlerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar gözlendi (tümü p<0.001). Sonuç: Laboratuvar parametreleri, akut apandisit ile epiploik apandisiti ayırt etmede yardımcı olabilir. Özellikle PLR ve SII gibi inflamatuar indeksler klinik karar verme sürecine katkıda bulunabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahan, T. D., Efgan, M. G., Kırık, S., Karakaya, Z., Tabakçı, S. T. (2026). Appendicitis or Epiploic Appendicitis? Is Differential Diagnosis Possible with Laboratory Parameters?. Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.52818/cjmr.1757994

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Di Saverio S., Birindelli A., Kelly MD., et al. Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 2016; 11(1):34. Doi:10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5.
  2. Singh AK., Gervais DA., Hahn PF., Sagar P., Mueller PR., Novelline RA. Acute epiploic appendagitis and its mimics. Radiographics 2005; 25(6):1521-34. Doi:10.1148/rg.256055030
  3. Forget P., Khalifa C., Defour JP., Latinne D., Van Pel MC., De Kock M. What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio? BMC Res Notes 2017; 10(1):12. Doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2335-5.
  4. Qi Q., Zhuang L., Shen Y., et al. A novel systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) for predicting the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer after chemotherapy. Cancer 2016; 122(14):2158-67. Doi:10.1002/cncr.30057.
  5. Acevedo-Castillo C., Macias-Cruz H., Ramirez-Cisneros A., Bautista-Coronado U., Moran-Guerrero J., Guzman E. Epiploic appendagitis: Systematic review of a distinctive pathology. Am Surg 2024; 90:3074-81. Doi:10.1177/00031348241256062.
  6. Rao P., Rhea J., Wittenberg J., Warshaw A. Misdiagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis. Am J Surg 1998; 176(1):81-5. Doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00103-2.
  7. Hwang J., Kim S., Song H., et al. Differential diagnosis of left-sided abdominal pain: Primary epiploic appendagitis vs colonic diverticulitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(40):6842-8. Doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6842.
  8. Sahan TD., Karakaya Z,. Bora ES., Efgan MG., Topal FE. Inflammatory indexes in emergency patients with hypertensive pulmonary oedema: A critical insight. Am J Emerg Med 2025; 91:93-9. Doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.025.
  9. Chen X., Yang Y., Wang Y.,et al. HALP score predicts prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1073. Doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01073.
  10. Ranzani OT., Zampieri FG., Forte DN., Azevedo LC., Park M. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts 90-day mortality of septic patients. PLoS One 2013; 8(3):e59321. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059321.