Journals / Eurasian Journal of Toxicology / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 3

A Retrospective Analysis of Suicide Attempts Presenting to the Emergency Department

Acil Servise Başvuran İntihar Vakalarının Retrospektif Analizi

Süleyman Kırık(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1477-6363
Mehmet Göktuğ Efgan(İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi)0000-0002-0794-1239
Şahin Aydınöz(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0009-3444-4244
Ejder Saylav Bora(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2448-2337
Tutku Duman Şahan(izmir çeşme alper çizgenakat devlet hastanesi)0000-0001-9641-4176
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-10
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 57 patients (3.7%) died during in-hospital follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Suicide attempts remain a major public health concern worldwide and account for a substantial proportion of emergency department (ED) admissions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This retrospective, descriptive study included patients aged 18 years and older who presented to a university hospital emergency department due to suicide attempts between January 2020 and September 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 57 patients (3.7%) died during in-hospital follow-up.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Suicide · Emergency Service · Risk Factors

Abstract

Objective: Suicide attempts remain a major public health concern worldwide and account for a substantial proportion of emergency department (ED) admissions. Emergency departments play a critical role in both the acute medical stabilization and the psychiatric assessment of patients following suicide attempts. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients presenting to a university hospital emergency department due to suicide attempts, to describe the methods used, and to assess factors associated with in-hospital outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, descriptive study included patients aged 18 years and older who presented to a university hospital emergency department due to suicide attempts between January 2020 and September 2025. Cases were identified through the hospital information system using relevant keywords and ICD diagnostic codes. Demographic variables (age, sex, marital status, educational level, and employment status), clinical characteristics (psychiatric diagnosis and family history of suicide), and attempt-related features (number of attempts and method used) were recorded. In-hospital outcomes were classified as discharge or death. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27.0. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate, while categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 1,544 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 37.74±14.77 years, and 47.4% of the patients were female. Overall, 57 patients (3.7%) died during in-hospital follow-up. Patients in the deceased group were significantly older than those who were discharged (41.80±15.32 vs. 37.59±14.73 years, p=0.032). The method of suicide attempt was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (p=0.001), with higher death rates observed in high-lethality methods such as hanging and jumping from height. Educational level also differed significantly between groups (p=0.043). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, marital status, employment status, psychiatric diagnosis, number of attempts, or family history of suicide. Conclusion: In this study, in-hospital mortality following suicide attempts was associated with older age, the lethality of the method used, and educational level. These findings underscore the importance of method- and age-based risk assessment in the emergency department and highlight the need for closer monitoring and targeted preventive strategies for high-risk patients.

Özet

Amaç: İntihar girişimleri, dünya genelinde önemli bir halk sağlığı sorunu olmaya devam etmekte olup, acil servis başvurularının kayda değer bir bölümünü oluşturmaktadır. Acil servisler, intihar girişimi sonrası hastaların hem akut tıbbi stabilizasyonu hem de ruhsal değerlendirilmesi açısından kritik bir rol üstlenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir üniversite hastanesi acil servisine intihar girişimi nedeniyle başvuran hastaların sosyodemografik ve klinik özelliklerini retrospektif olarak incelemek, kullanılan yöntemleri ortaya koymak ve hastane içi sonlanımla ilişkili faktörleri değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif ve tanımlayıcı çalışma, Ocak 2020–Eylül 2025 tarihleri arasında bir üniversite hastanesi acil servisine intihar girişimi nedeniyle başvuran 18 yaş ve üzeri hastaları kapsamaktadır. Olgular, hastane bilgi yönetim sistemi üzerinden ilgili anahtar sözcükler ve ICD tanı kodları kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Hastalara ait yaş, cinsiyet, medeni durum, eğitim düzeyi ve çalışma durumu gibi demografik veriler ile psikiyatrik tanı öyküsü, ailede intihar öyküsü, girişim sayısı ve kullanılan intihar yöntemi kaydedilmiştir. Hastane içi sonlanımlar taburcu ve exitus olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler IBM SPSS Statistics sürüm 27.0 kullanılarak yapılmış; sürekli değişkenler için Student t-testi veya Mann–Whitney U testi, kategorik değişkenler için ki-kare testi veya Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact testi uygulanmıştır. İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p<0,05 olarak kabul edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 1544 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 37,74±14,77 yıl olup, %47,4’ü kadındır. Hastaların 57’si (%3,7) hastane içi izlemde exitus ile sonuçlanmıştır. Exitus grubundaki hastaların yaş ortalaması taburcu edilenlere göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksektir (41,80±15,32 vs. 37,59±14,73; p=0,032). Kullanılan intihar yöntemi hastane içi mortalite ile anlamlı ilişki göstermiştir (p=0,001); özellikle ası ve yüksekten atlama gibi yüksek letaliteli yöntemlerde exitus oranları daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Eğitim durumu ile hastane içi sonlanım arasında da anlamlı fark saptanmıştır (p=0,043). Cinsiyet, medeni durum, çalışma durumu, psikiyatrik tanı, girişim sayısı ve aile öyküsü açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı fark izlenmemiştir. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, intihar girişimi sonrası hastane içi mortalitenin ileri yaş, kullanılan yöntemin letalitesi ve eğitim düzeyi ile ilişkili olduğu gösterilmiştir. Bulgular, acil serviste intihar girişimiyle başvuran hastalarda özellikle yöntem ve yaş temelli risk değerlendirmesinin önemini vurgulamakta ve yüksek riskli olgular için daha yoğun izlem ve önleyici stratejilerin gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kırık, S., Efgan, M. G., Aydınöz, Ş., Bora, E. S., Şahan, T. D. (2026). A Retrospective Analysis of Suicide Attempts Presenting to the Emergency Department. Eurasian Journal of Toxicology, Volume: 7 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.51262/ejtox.1842488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. World Health Organization. Suicide. Fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
  2. World Health Organization. Suicide worldwide in 2021: global health estimates. Geneva: WHO; 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240110069
  3. Brådvik L. Suicide Risk and Mental Disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):2028. Published 2018 Sep 17. doi:10.3390/ijerph15092028
  4. Sutar R, Kumar A, Yadav V. Suicide and prevalence of mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world data on case-control psychological autopsy studies. Psychiatry Res. 2023;329:115492. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115492
  5. Keten H, Hakkoymaz H, Aslan Ü, vd. Evalution Of Suicide Attempt Cases Admitted To Emergency Department. J Contemp Med. Mayıs 2015;5(2):102-105. doi:10.16899/ctd.18672
  6. İdil, H., Ocak, N. Y., & Dönmez, D. A. (2024). Suicide Attempts Evaluated in the Emergency Department. Anatolian Journal of General Medical Research.
  7. Canpolat Ö, Yıldırım İ, Kafadar H et al. Evaluatıon Of Suıcıde Cases Applıed To Emergency Servıce. Acta Haematol Oncol Turc. 2020;53(2):281-287. doi:10.5505/aot.2020.63308
  8. Danış, F., & Kılınç, Y. B. (2024). Retrospective Evaluation of Adolescent Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Suicidal Attempt. Anatolian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 108-111.
  9. Gizli Çoban Ö, Gül ME, Önder A. Evaluation of Children and Adolescents Admitted to Emergency Service with Suicide Attempt. J Pediatr Emerg Intensive Care Med. 2022;9(3):153-157. doi:10.4274/cayd.galenos.2021.69875
  10. Bommersbach TJ, Stone LC, Wilcox HC. National trends in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm: United States, 2011–2020. Am J Psychiatry. 2024;181(2):123-132
  11. Efgan, M. G., Çinaroglu, O. S., Payza, U., Kanter, E., & Bilgin, S. (2023). Comparison of Suicide Attempt Cases Admitted to Emergency Services during COVID-19 and Before. Ann. Clin. Anal. Med, 14, 165-170.
  12. Kim SH, Kim HS, Lee CH, et al. Trends in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and self-harm in Korea: 2016-2021 analysis. Injury Epidemiology. 2023;10:54.
  13. Goldman-Mellor S, Wang C, Kerr DCR, et al. Association of suicide and other mortality with emergency department presentation for deliberate self-harm. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1):e187841.
  14. Strashny A, Cairns C, Ashman JJ. Emergency department visits with suicidal ideation: United States, 2016–2020. NCHS Data Brief. 2023;461:1-8.
  15. Fawcett EJ, Karakasi MV, Jones MD. Hospital presenting suicidal ideation: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:650.
  16. Cai ZJ, Lee YY, Robertson N, et al. The lethality of suicide methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;312:313-321.
  17. Bostwick JM, Pankratz VS. Affective disorders and suicide risk: a re-examination. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(12):1925-1932.
  18. Kılıç S, Zeybek A, Yüksel M, Şahin M. An Evaluation of the Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Hanging Cases. Glob Emerg Crit Care. 2023 Aug 21;2(2):63-66. doi: 10.4274/globecc.galenos.2023.57442.
  19. Kim Y, Wilcox HC, Thompson JR, et al. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations for suicidality among children and adolescents in the U.S. (2016–2021). JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3):e237435.
  20. Kim SH, Park SM, Lee SI, et al. Analysis of attempted suicide episodes presenting to health services: characteristics and risk factors. Int J Mental Health Systems. 2020;14:78.
  21. Baca-García E, Díaz-Suárez A, García-Resa E, et al. Variables associated with hospitalization decisions by emergency psychiatrists after a patient’s suicide attempt. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(6):814-822.
  22. Arslan, C. E., Yüksel, M., Kaya, H., Ay, M. O., Çalışkan, F. B., & Bulut, M. (2022). Analysis of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with A Suicide Attempt. Anatolian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 5(4), 171-174.
  23. Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, Hennen J. Epidemiology of suicide: recent developments. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(2):259-273.
  24. Chun J, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of suicide attempts presenting to emergency departments: a multicenter study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2023;30(4):290-297.
  25. Runeson B, Tidemalm D, Dahlin M, et al. Methods of attempted suicide as predictors of subsequent successful suicide: a national cohort. BMJ. 2010;341:c3222.
  26. Aktaş RS, Işık M, Gizli G, et al. Analysis of patients with suicide attempt presenting to emergency departments in Turkey: demographic and clinical characteristics. East J Med. 2022;27(2):227-234.
  27. Sabater-Maestro J, López-Goñi JJ, Azcárate-Jiménez L, et al. Suicidal behaviour recurrence in psychiatric emergency departments: a prospective multicentre study. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2020;13(4):192-201