SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Etkili Hemşirelik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

Experiences of Patients Living with Peritoneal Dialysis: A Descriptive Qualitative Study

Periton Diyalizi Uygulayan Hastaların Deneyimleri: Tanımlayıcı Kalitatif Çalışma

Gizem Göktuna(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BÖLÜMÜ, HEMŞİRELİK ESASLARI ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0003-4141-3250
Gülşah Arslan(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BÖLÜMÜ, HEMŞİRELİK ESASLARI ANABİLİM DALI)
Güler Nasuhbeyoğlu(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ HASTANESİ SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0003-1889-2580
Pages
161–175
Publication Date
2024-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering these experiences in patient care, they can facilitate the adaptation of the patient and help to cope with negative emotions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Peritoneal dialysis is a renal replacement therapy in which individuals themselves manage their treatment processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In-depth face-to-face interviews with the participants (n = 16) were conducted using semi-structured interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering these experiences in patient care, they can facilitate the adaptation of the patient and help to cope with negative emotions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Periton Diyalizi · Hasta Deneyimleri · Hemşirelik

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal dialysis is a renal replacement therapy in which individuals themselves manage their treatment processes. During this treatment, patients who receive peritoneal dialysis go through a lot of experiences. Objectives: The study aims to describe the experiences of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Methods: This study used a qualitative descriptive design. In-depth face-to-face interviews with the participants (n = 16) were conducted using semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using the content analysis method. Results: Three main themes emerged as a result of the content analyses: “experiences affecting adaptation”, “daily life activities”, and “emotional experiences”. Conclusion: Thanks to these learned experiences, nurses can give more individualized patient care. Arrangements can be made in areas that are difficult in daily life activities. Considering these experiences in patient care, they can facilitate the adaptation of the patient and help to cope with negative emotions.

Özet

Giriş: Periton diyalizi bireylerin tedavi süreçlerini kendilerinin yönettiği bir renal replasman tedavisidir. Bu tedavi sırasında periton diyalizi uygulayan hastalar pek çok deneyim yaşamaktadırlar. Amaç: Bu çalışma, periton diyalizi alan hastaların deneyimlerini tanımlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Bu araştırma tanımlayıcı kalitatif bir çalışmadır. Katılımcılarla (n=16) yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile yüz yüze derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılarak veriler toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler içerik analizi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Yapılan içerik analizi sonucunda “uyumu etkileyen deneyimler”, “günlük yaşam aktiviteleri” ve “duygusal deneyimler” olmak üzere üç ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuç: Öğrenilen deneyimler sayesinde hemşireler daha bireyselleştirilmiş hasta bakımı verebilirler. Günlük yaşam aktivitelerinde zorlanılan alanlarda düzenlemeler yapılabilir. Hasta bakımında bu deneyimler dikkate alındığında hastanın uyumu kolaylaştırılabilir ve olumsuz duygularla baş etmesine yardımcı olunabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Göktuna, G., Arslan, G., Nasuhbeyoğlu, G. (2024). Experiences of Patients Living with Peritoneal Dialysis: A Descriptive Qualitative Study. Etkili Hemşirelik Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.46483/jnef.1468485

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Ahmadi, S. M., Jalali, A., & Jalali, R. (2018). Factors associated with the choice of peritoneal dialysis in Iran: Qualitative study. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(7), 1253-1259.https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.255
  2. Baillie, J., & Lankshear, A. (2015). Patient and family perspectives on peritoneal dialysis at home: Findings from an ethnographic study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(1-2), 222-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12663
  3. Bieber, S. D., Burkart, J., Golper, T. A., Teitelbaum, I., & Mehrotra, R. (2014). Comparative outcomes between continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis: A narrative review. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 63(6), 1027-1037. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.11.025
  4. Bridger, S. (2017). Peritoneal dialysis access management: More than skin deep. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 44(5), 401-409.
  5. Burla, L., Knierim, B., Barth, J., Liewald, K., Duetz, M., & Abel, T. (2008). From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nursing Research, 57(2), 113-117.https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d
  6. Chen, S. T., Yao, Y., Tseng, Y. S., & Sun, F. K. (2022). Developing a theory to help guide end‐stage renal disease patients to adapt to peritoneal dialysis: A grounded theory study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(1-2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15890
  7. Covic, A., Bammens, B., Lobbedez, T., Segall, L., Heimbürger, O., Van Biesen, W., Fouque, D., & Vanholder, R. (2010). Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: Clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 25, 1757-1759. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq206
  8. Dahlerus, C., Quinn, M., Messersmith, E., Lachance, L., Subramanian, L., Perry, E., Cole, J., Zhao, J., Lee, C., McCall, M., Paulson, L., & Tentori, F. (2016). Patient perspectives on the choice of dialysis modality: Results from the Empowering Patients on Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) Study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 68(6), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1053/j. ajkd.2016.05.010
  9. Derrett, S., Darmody, M., Williams, S., Rutherford, M., Schollum, J., & Walker, R. (2010). Older peoples’ satisfaction with home‐based dialysis. Nephrology, 15(4), 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01286.x
  10. Duncanson, E., Chur-Hansen, A., & Jesudason, S. (2022). Patient perspectives of coping with automated peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 42(4), 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608211043411
  11. Erlang, A. S., Nielsen, I. H., Hansen, H. O., & Finderup, J. (2015). Patients experiences of involvement in choice of dialysis mode. Journal of Renal Care, 41(4), 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12141
  12. Fresenius Medical Care. (2022). Annual report 2022. https://www.freseniusmedicalcare.com/fileadmin/data/com/pdf/Media_Center/Publications/Annual_Reports/FME_Annual_Report_2022_EN.pdf
  13. Gilbertson, E. L., Krishnasamy, R., Foote, C., Kennard, A. L., Jardine, M. J., & Gray, N. A. (2019). Burden of care and quality of life among caregivers for adults receiving maintenance dialysis: a systematic review. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 73(3), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.006
  14. Leung, S. S., & Shiu, A. T. (2007). Experience of Hong Kong patients awaiting kidney transplantation in mainland China. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(11c), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02070.x
  15. Losso, R. L., Minhoto, G. R., & Riella, M. C. (2015). Sleep disorders in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis: Comparison between hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis. International Urology and Nephrology, 47(2), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0860-5
  16. Manera, K. E., Craig, J. C., Johnson, D. W., &Tong, A. (2018). The power of the patient voice: conducting and using qualitative research to improve care and outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International,38(4), 242-245.https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2017.00280
  17. Mizuno, M., Suzuki, Y., Sakata, F., & Ito, Y. (2016). Which clinical conditions are most suitable for induction of automated peritoneal dialysis? Renal Replacement Therapy, 2(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s41100-016-0057-8
  18. Morton, R. L., Devitt, J., Howard, K., Anderson, K., Snelling, P., & Cass, A. (2010). Patient views about treatment of stage 5 CKD: A qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 55(3), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.011
  19. Muringai, T., Noble, H., McGowan, A., & Chamney, M. (2008). Dialysis access and the impact on body image: Role of the nephrology nurse. British Journal of Nursing, 17(6), 362-366. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.6.28900
  20. Murray, M. A., Bissonnette, J., Kryworuchko, J., Gifford, W., & Calverley, S. (2013). Whose choice is it? Shared decision making in nephology care. Seminars in Dialysis, 26(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12056
  21. Nakamura-Taira, N., Muranaka, Y., Miwa, M., Kin, S., & Hirai, K. (2013). Views of Japanese patients on the advantages and disadvantages of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. International Urology and Nephrology, 45(4), 1145-1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0322-x
  22. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2018). Renal replacement therapy and conservative management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng107/resources/renal-replacement-therapy-and-conservative-management-pdf-66141542991301
  23. Öyekçin, D. G., Gülpek, D., Sahin, E. M., & Mete, L. (2012). Depression, anxiety, body image, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment associated with dialysis type in chronic renal failure. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 43(3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.2190/PM.43.3.c
  24. Petersson, I., & Lennerling, A. (2017). Experiences of living with assisted peritoneal dialysis–A qualitative study. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 37(6), 605-612. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2017.00045
  25. Pugh‐Clarke, K., Read, S. C., & Sim, J. (2017). Symptom experience in non‐dialysis‐dependent chronic kidney disease: A qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Renal Care, 43(4), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12208
  26. Sadala, M. L. A., Miranda, M. G., Lorençon, M., & de Campos Pereira, E. P. (2010). Nurse–patient communication while performing home dialysis: The patients’perceptions. Journal of Renal Care, 36(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6686.2010.00135.x
  27. Salas-Gama, K., Díaz-Gómez, J. M., & Ribas, I. B. (2022). Appropriateness of the dialysis modality selection process: A cross-sectional study. Medicine, 101(42), e31041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031041
  28. Sinnakirouchenan, R., & Holley, J. L. (2011). Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: Risks, benefits, and access issues. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 18(6), 428-432. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.001
  29. Sitjar-Suñer, M., Suñer-Soler, R., Masià-Plana, A., Chirveches-Pérez, E., Bertran-Noguer, C., & Fuentes-Pumarola, C. (2020). Quality of life and social support of people on peritoneal dialysis: Mixed methods research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124240
  30. Süleymanlar, G., Ateş, K., & Seyahi, N. (2020). Registry of the Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation in Turkey, Ministry of Health and Turkish Socıety of Nephrology Joint Report. Retrieved from http://www. nefroloji.org.tr/uploads/folders/file/registry_2019.pdf
  31. Tong, A., Lesmana, B., Johnson, D. W., Wong, G., Campbell, D., & Craig, J. C. (2013). The perspectives of adults living with peritoneal dialysis: Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 61(6), 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.08.045
  32. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  33. Yapa, H. E., Purtell, L., Chambers, S., & Bonner, A. (2020). The relationship between chronic kidney disease, symptoms and health‐related quality of life: A systematic review. Journal of Renal Care, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12303
  34. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (11th ed.). Seçkin Publishing.
  35. Yılmaz, M., & Özaltın, G. (2011). The sexual behaviors of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis treatment. Sexuality and Disability, 29, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-011-9199-3
  36. Yılmaz, M. (2010). Opinions of unmarried patients receiving peritoneal dialysis treatment about sexuality. Sexuality and Disability, 28, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-010-9174-4