Journals / Yalova Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Differences between the Sacred and the Secular in Body and Movement

Beden ve Hareketin Kutsal ile Seküler Arasındaki Farkları

Mustafa Narin(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5414-7049
Hakan Kolayiş(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8398-4003
Pages
512–534
Publication Date
2025-10-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results suggest that women, older people and non-religious individuals are more sensitive to bodily privacy in sport-related contexts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines how bodily privacy, understood as a culturally and ideologically situated concept, shapes individuals' attitudes towards sport participation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey of 1,111 respondents from 26 statistical regions of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results suggest that women, older people and non-religious individuals are more sensitive to bodily privacy in sport-related contexts.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dindarlık · beden kültürü · aktivite pratikleri

Abstract

This article examines how bodily privacy, understood as a culturally and ideologically situated concept, shapes individuals' attitudes towards sport participation. Centering on the intersections of gender, religiosity and age, the research asks how these identity categories interact with privacy norms to influence bodily behaviors in sport settings. Drawing on Foucault's theory of discipline, Bartky's feminist critique of internalized surveillance, and Giddens' framework on the modern self, the study treats privacy as a regulatory social space rather than a personal choice. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey of 1,111 respondents from 26 statistical regions of Turkey. Factor structure was determined by Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses and group differences were examined by ANOVA and interaction models. Results suggest that women, older people and non-religious individuals are more sensitive to bodily privacy in sport-related contexts. The three-way interaction (gender × age × religiosity) reveals significant group differences; for example, young religious women exhibit significant spatial withdrawal and discomfort in mixed sport settings. The contribution of this study is to empirically elaborate how bodily privacy operates at the intersection of social identity categories and regulates access to public physical spaces such as sport. Rather than treating sport as a neutral or merit-based arena, the findings position it as a site of moral negotiation, spatial exclusion and symbolic struggle over bodily presence. The article argues that scholarship and policy should pay attention to how norms about the body, especially those mediated by religious and gendered expectations, structure who feels allowed to move, perform and belong within sport.

Özet

Bu makale, kültürel ve ideolojik olarak konumlanmış bir kavram olarak anlaşılan bedensel mahremiyetin, bireylerin spora katılım tutumlarını nasıl şekillendirdiğini incelemektedir. Çalışma, toplumsal cinsiyet, dindarlık ve yaş kesişimlerini merkeze alarak bu kimlik kategorilerinin mahremiyet normlarıyla nasıl etkileşime girerek spor ortamlarında bedensel davranışları etkilediğini sorgulamaktadır. Araştırma, Foucault’nun disiplin kuramı, Bartky’nin içselleştirilmiş gözetim üzerine feminist eleştirisi ve Giddens’ın modern benlik çerçevesinden yararlanarak mahremiyeti kişisel bir tercih değil, düzenleyici bir toplumsal alan olarak ele almaktadır. Veriler, Türkiye’nin 26 istatistikî bölgesinden 1.111 katılımcıyla gerçekleştirilen kesitsel bir anket çalışmasından elde edilmiştir. Faktör yapısı Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizleri ile belirlenmiş, grup farklılıkları ise ANOVA ve etkileşim modelleriyle incelenmiştir. Bulgular, kadınların, yaşlı bireylerin ve dindar olmayan kişilerin sporla ilişkili bağlamlarda bedensel mahremiyete daha duyarlı olduklarını göstermektedir. Üç yönlü etkileşim (toplumsal cinsiyet × yaş × dindarlık), anlamlı grup farklılıklarını ortaya koymaktadır; örneğin, genç dindar kadınlar karma spor ortamlarında belirgin mekânsal geri çekilme ve rahatsızlık sergilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın katkısı, bedensel mahremiyetin toplumsal kimlik kategorilerinin kesişiminde nasıl işlediğini ve spor gibi kamusal fiziksel mekânlara erişimi nasıl düzenlediğini ampirik olarak ortaya koymaktır. Sporu tarafsız veya liyakate dayalı bir alan olarak görmek yerine, bulgular sporu bedensel varlık üzerinde ahlaki müzakerenin, mekânsal dışlamanın ve sembolik mücadelenin yaşandığı bir mekân olarak konumlandırmaktadır. Makale, bedenle ilgili normların –özellikle dini ve toplumsal cinsiyet beklentileri aracılığıyla şekillenenlerin– kimin hareket edebileceğini, performans gösterebileceğini ve spor içinde aidiyet hissedebileceğini belirlediğine dikkat çekilmesi gerektiğini ileri sürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Narin, M., Kolayiş, H. (2025). Differences between the Sacred and the Secular in Body and Movement. Yalova Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 512–534. https://doi.org/10.70007/yalovaspor.1769841

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Akgün, Z. (2020). The relationship between compliance with gender norms, motivation types and life satisfaction in women: the case of synak province. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 100(100), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.29228/asos.39804
  2. Alaeddinoğlu, V., Yıkılgan, A., Sivrikaya, M. H., Kandil, N., Budak, D., Dertli, Ş.,. & Mavibaş, M. (2024). Sustainability and qualitative research in sport management. Free Publications: https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub485
  3. Amara, M. & Henry, I. (2010). Sport, muslim identities and cultures in the uk, an emerging policy issue: case studies of leicester and birmingham. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(4), 419-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2010.502743
  4. Aybek, A. (2023). Investigation of sportsmanship orientations of professional soccer players and handball players. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Sciences. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1269260
  5. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
  6. Bayraktar, Ö. (2020). Subject and power relations in Foucault's biopolitics: a strategic game beyond the state. Kesit Akademi, 25(25), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.29228/kesit.46790
  7. Benn, T. & Dagkas, S. (2013). The olympic movement and islamic culture: conflict or compromise for muslim women?. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(2), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.656677
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1978). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Csordas, T. J. (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Çelik, F. & Sayan-Cengiz, F. (2023). Tracing women's experiences of public space in Izmir on the axis of generation and class from 1960s to 2000s. Fe Dergi Feminist Ele, 15(1), 147-171. https://doi.org/10.46655/federgi.1096758
  11. Dökücü, D. & Ayten, A. (2024). What is the effect of religiosity on making political decisions? a quantitative study on adults. Eskiyeni, (52), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.37697/eskiyeni.1412293
  12. Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (1986). Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Blackwell.
  13. Ellison, C. and Gay, D. (1990). Region, religious commitment, and life satisfaction among black Americans. Sociological Quarterly, 31(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1990.tb00321.x
  14. Ersöz, F. B. and Öge, A. (2021). Communication as an element ensuring social integration in the qur'an. Journal of Analytic Divinity, 5(1), 177-204. https://doi.org/10.46595/jad.869589
  15. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
  16. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56-80.
  17. Gibbons, A. E., Thorpe, H., Hemi, K. V., Pedlar, C., Bruinvels, G., & Hamilton, B. (2024). "It's such a taboo subject, everybody's scared to talk about it": Fijian sportswomen's experiences of menstruation. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 48(5), 290-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/01937235241269975
  18. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
  19. Henry, I. (2013). Sport and multiculturalism. Routledge.
  20. Kanbir, F. (2022). Women's body and representation in contemporary tattoo narratives (Büyükçekmece beach example). Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 32(1), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.983933
  21. Landes, J. B. (1988). Women and the public sphere in the age of the French Revolution. Cornell University Press.
  22. Leng, J., Wang, C., & Hu, P. (2024). Embodied spatial metaphor of cultural concept from the perspective of cultural tightness-looseness: cultural compatibility concept is closer to the body. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 27(4), 899-910. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12646
  23. Mizuno, Y., Masuoka, H., Kibe, M., Kosaka, S., Natsuhara, K., Hirayama, K.,. & Umezaki, M. (2021). Impact of modernization on urinary concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and selenium in rural residents of northern laos. American Journal of Human Biology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23685
  24. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  25. Özden, S. and Gölbaşı, Z. (2018). Determination of attitudes of health workers towards gender roles. Kocaeli University Journal of Health Sciences, 4(3), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.420223
  26. Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. SAGE. Strandbu, Å., Bakken, A., & Sletten, M. A. (2020). Exploring the minority-majority gap in sport participation: different patterns for boys and girls?. Sport, Outdoor Life and the Nordic World, 92-110. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009047-7
  27. Summers, J., Hassan, R., Ong, D. L. T., & Hossain, M. (2018). Australian muslim women and fitness choices - myths debunked. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(5), 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-07-2017-0261
  28. Topuz, Y. V. (2022). Examining the relationship between social media visibility and brand strength and value: an empirical investigation on global brands. Abant Journal of Social Sciences, 22(2), 620-631. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1094526
  29. Tsiotas, D. & Tselios, V. (2023). Understanding peripherality in a multidimensional geographical, socioeconomic, and institutional context: evidence from greece. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(7), 1424-1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12712
  30. Uğur, Z. B. & Aydın, F. (2022). Are religious people happy or non-religious people unhappy in religious contexts?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(2), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221082334
  31. Umar, E. K. & Taşçı, Ç. (2025). Romantic relationship experiences of women who identify themselves as overweight. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1489379
  32. Wallace, B. T., Nowosatka, L., Drafts-Johnson, L., Weber, E., & Yang, J. (2024). Wrestling with the academy: Future directions for the cultural politics of sport. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 48(1-2), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/01937235241249343
  33. Walseth, K., & Fasting, K. (2003). Islam's view on physical activity and sport: Egyptian women interpreting Islam. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 38(1), 45-60.
  34. Wilhelm, L., Hartmann, A. S., Becker, J. C., Waldorf, M., & Vocks, S. (2020). Are there associations between religious affiliation and drive for muscularity? a cross-sectional survey of young muslim women, christian women and atheist women from germany. BMC Women's Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01138-8
  35. Zada, H., Shah, N., & Bibi, Z. (2023). Effects of infrastructure impediments on dropout of female students: a cross-sectional based study of district bajaur khyber pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 7(IV). https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2023(7-iv)22
  36. Zhuang, Z. (2023). Symbolic expression of asian groups in international sports events from the perspective of visual culture. Communications in Humanities Research, 13(1), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/13/20230338
  37. Alaeddinoğlu, V., Yıkılgan, A., Sivrikaya, M. H., Kandil, N., Budak, D., Dertli, Ş.,. & Mavibaş, M. (2024). Sustainability and qualitative research in sport management. Free Publications: https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub485
  38. Mizuno, Y., Masuoka, H., Kibe, M., Kosaka, S., Natsuhara, K., Hirayama, K.,. & Umezaki, M. (2021). Impact of modernization on urinary concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and selenium in rural residents of northern laos. American Journal of Human Biology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23685