Journals / Doğu Karadeniz Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Özel Sayı

Exploring Bladder, Prostate, and Endometrial Cancer Risk in RRMS Patients: ATM, CREB1, and miR-19b-3p are Shared Biomarkers

RRMS Hastalarında Mesane, Prostat ve Endometrial Kanser Riskinin Araştırılması: ATM, CREB1 ve miR-19b-3p Ortak Biyobelirteçler

Tuba Denkçeken(SANKO ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4663-5410
Elif Onur(SANKO ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1690-3170
Pages
247–264
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study highlights biomarkers in RRMS patients that may contribute to an increased risk of these cancers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the most common phenotype of MS.
📊
Key Findings & Data:GEO2R was applied to analyze datasets, and DEGs and DEMs were classified based on fold change.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study highlights biomarkers in RRMS patients that may contribute to an increased risk of these cancers.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:RRMS · BLCA · PRAD

Abstract

Aim: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the most common phenotype of MS. Bladder urothelial cancer (BLCA) is a highly prevalent malignancy of the urinary system. Prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in males. Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) is a prevalent malignancy in females. Identifying the risk of BLCA, PRAD, and UCEC in RRMS patients is crucial. This study aims to identify potential biomarkers that pose a risk for BLCA, PRAD, and UCEC in RRMS patients and have a common role. Materials and Methods: Expression profiles of RRMS patients were obtained from the GEO and ArrayExpress databases. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) and mRNAs (DEGs) were identified using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-based Unsupervised-Feature-Extraction (UFE) method. GEO2R was applied to analyze datasets, and DEGs and DEMs were classified based on fold change. Target genes of up/downregulated DEMs were identified, and common gene clusters with corresponding up/downregulated DEGs were determined. Further bioinformatics analyses were conducted to identify hub-miRNAs and hub-genes. Results: 321 control and 293 RRMS samples were analyzed. DEMs and DEGs were identified using both the PCA-based UFE and GEO2R, and their intersections were determined. Target genes of DEMs were selected based on validation and prediction in at least two databases. Negatively correlated target genes of up/downregulated DEMs were identified, and common gene clusters were established. STRING analysis was performed, and a negative regulatory network was constructed using Cytoscape. Validation of hub-genes and hub-miRNAs in BLCA, PRAD, and UCEC was conducted using UALCAN and OncomiR. Discussion: Decreased ATM and CREB1 have been identified as direct targets of hsa-miR-19b-3p. They were identified as potential biomarkers in RRMS and further validated in BLCA, PRAD, and UCEC. This study highlights biomarkers in RRMS patients that may contribute to an increased risk of these cancers.

Özet

Amaç: Relapsing-remitting multipl skleroz (RRMS), MS'in en yaygın fenotipidir. Mesane ürotelyal kanseri (BLCA), üriner sistemin oldukça yaygın bir malignitesidir. Prostat adenokarsinomu (PRAD), erkeklerde kanserle ilişkili morbidite ve mortalitenin önde gelen nedenidir. Uterin korpus endometriyal karsinomu (UCEC), kadınlarda yaygın bir malignitedir. RRMS hastalarında BLCA, PRAD ve UCEC riskini belirlemek çok önemlidir. Bu çalışma, RRMS hastalarında BLCA, PRAD ve UCEC için risk oluşturan ve ortak bir role sahip olan potansiyel biyobelirteçleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: RRMS hastalarının ekspresyon profilleri GEO ve ArrayExpress veritabanlarından elde edildi. Diferansiyel ekprese miRNA'lar (DEM'ler) ve mRNA'lar (DEG'ler), Temel Bileşen Analizi (PCA) tabanlı Denetimsiz Özellik Çıkarımı (UFE) yöntemi kullanılarak belirlendi. GEO2R veri kümelerini analiz etmek için uygulandı ve DEG'ler ve DEM'ler kat değişimine göre sınıflandırıldı. Yukarı/aşağı düzenlenmiş DEM'lerin hedef genleri tanımlandı ve karşılık gelen yukarı/aşağı düzenlenmiş DEG'lere sahip ortak gen kümeleri belirlendi. Hub-miRNA'ları ve hub-genleri tanımlamak için ileri biyoenformatik analizler yapıldı. Bulgular: 321 kontrol ve 293 RRMS örneği analiz edildi. DEM'ler ve DEG'ler hem PCA tabanlı UFE hem de GEO2R kullanılarak tanımlandı ve kesişimleri belirlendi. DEM'lerin hedef genleri en az iki veritabanındaki doğrulama ve tahmine göre seçildi. Yukarı/aşağı düzenlenmiş DEM'lerin negatif korelasyonlu hedef genleri belirlendi ve ortak gen kümeleri oluşturuldu. STRING analizi yapıldı ve Cytoscape kullanılarak negatif düzenleyici bir ağ oluşturuldu. BLCA, PRAD ve UCEC'deki hub-genlerin ve hub-miRNA'ların doğrulaması UALCAN ve OncomiR kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Sonuç: Azalmış ATM ve CREB1, hsa-miR-19b-3p'nin doğrudan hedefleri olarak tanımlanmıştır. Bunlar RRMS'de potansiyel biyobelirteçler olarak tanımlanmış ve BLCA, PRAD ve UCEC'de valide edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, RRMS hastalarında bu kanserlerin artma riskine katkıda bulunabilecek biyobelirteçleri vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Denkçeken, T., Onur, E. (2025). Exploring Bladder, Prostate, and Endometrial Cancer Risk in RRMS Patients: ATM, CREB1, and miR-19b-3p are Shared Biomarkers. Doğu Karadeniz Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Özel Sayı, 247–264. https://doi.org/10.59312/ebshealth.1722327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Angèle, S., Falconer, A., Edwards, S. M., Dörk, T., Bremer, M., Moullan, N., & The Cancer Research Uk/British Prostate Group/Association of Urological Surgeons, S. o. O. C. (2004). ATM polymorphisms as risk factors for prostate cancer development. British Journal of Cancer, 91(4), 783-787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602007
  2. Ascherio, A., & Munger, K. L. (2007). Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: the role of infection. Ann Neurol, 61(4), 288-299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21117
  3. Bahmanyar, S., Montgomery, S. M., Hillert, J., Ekbom, A., & Olsson, T. (2009). Cancer risk among patients with multiple sclerosis and their parents. Neurology, 72(13), 1170-1177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000345366.10455.62
  4. Bosco-Lévy, P., Foch, C., Grelaud, A., Sabidó, M., Lacueille, C., Jové, J., & Blin, P. (2022). Incidence and risk of cancer among multiple sclerosis patients: A matched population-based cohort study. Eur J Neurol, 29(4), 1091-1099. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15226
  5. Chandrashekar, D. S., Bashel, B., Balasubramanya, S. A. H., Creighton, C. J., Ponce-Rodriguez, I., Chakravarthi, B. V. S. K., & Varambally, S. (2017). UALCAN: A Portal for Facilitating Tumor Subgroup Gene Expression and Survival Analyses. Neoplasia, 19(8), 649-658. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002
  6. Clarke, R. A., Fang, Z. M., Lee, C. S., Sarris, M., Murrell, D., & Kearsley, J. H. (2002). Multiple sclerosis in a radiosensitive family with low levels of the ATM protein. Australas Radiol, 46(3), 267-274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1673.2002.01058.x
  7. Davis, S., & Meltzer, P. S. (2007). GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics, 23(14), 1846-1847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm254 %J Bioinformatics
  8. De Santis, G., Ferracin, M., Biondani, A., Caniatti, L., Rosaria Tola, M., Castellazzi, M., & Granieri, E. (2010). Altered miRNA expression in T regulatory cells in course of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol, 226(1-2), 165-171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.06.009
  9. Deng, X., Ljunggren-Rose, A., Maas, K., & Sriram, S. (2005). Defective ATM-p53-mediated apoptotic pathway in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol, 58(4), 577-584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20600
  10. Denkçeken, T. P., E.; Benlier, N. (2020). Cisplatin treatment in pulmonary sarcoidosis: An In silico approach. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 10(10), 900-904. doi:https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2020.10.07193202024072020
  11. Duca, R. B., Massillo, C., Dalton, G. N., Farré, P. L., Graña, K. D., Gardner, K., & De Siervi, A. (2021). MiR-19b-3p and miR-101-3p as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Am J Cancer Res, 11(6), 2802-2820.
  12. Edgunlu, T. G., Yilmaz, S. G., Emre, U., Tasdelen, B., Kuru, O., Kutlu, G., & Erdal, M. E. (2022). miR-181a-5p is a potential candidate epigenetic biomarker in multiple sclerosis. Genome, 65(11), 547-561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2022-0040
  13. Feldman, D., Krishnan, A. V., Swami, S., Giovannucci, E., & Feldman, B. J. (2014). The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nature Reviews Cancer, 14(5), 342-357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3691
  14. Geng, G., Yu, X., Jiang, J., & Yu, X. (2020). Aetiology and pathogenesis of paraneoplastic autoimmune disorders. Autoimmunity Reviews, 19(1), 102422. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102422
  15. Ghajarzadeh, M., Keshtkar, A. A., Azimi, A., Sahraian, M. A., Mohammadifar, M., & Ramagopalan, S. V. (2019). The Effect of Vitamin D Supplements on Clinical and Para-Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Systematic Review. JMIR Res Protoc, 8(4), e12045. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/12045
  16. Ghajarzadeh, M., Mohammadi, A., & Sahraian, M. A. (2020). Risk of cancer in multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmunity Reviews, 19(10), 102650. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102650
  17. Guo, L., Yin, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). CREB1, a direct target of miR-122, promotes cell proliferation and invasion in bladder cancer. Oncol Lett, 16(3), 3842-3848. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9118
  18. Haunsberger, S. J., Connolly, N. M., & Prehn, J. H. (2017). miRNAmeConverter: an R/bioconductor package for translating mature miRNA names to different miRBase versions. Bioinformatics, 33(4), 592-593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw660
  19. Hongell, K., Kurki, S., Sumelahti, M. L., & Soilu-Hanninen, M. (2019). Risk of cancer among Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord, 35, 221-227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.08.005
  20. Hu, Z., Fu, Y., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Jiang, Q. (2023). Association between multiple sclerosis and prostate cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Oncol Lett, 25(2), 83. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13669
  21. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C., Wellcome Trust Case Control, C., Sawcer, S., Hellenthal, G., Pirinen, M., Spencer, C. C., & Compston, A. (2011). Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature, 476(7359), 214-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10251
  22. Jick, S. S., Li, L., Falcone, G. J., Vassilev, Z. P., & Wallander, M. A. (2014). Mortality of patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study in UK primary care. Journal of Neurology, 261(8), 1508-1517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7370-3
  23. Kingwell, E., Bajdik, C., Phillips, N., Zhu, F., Oger, J., Hashimoto, S., & Tremlett, H. (2012). Cancer risk in multiple sclerosis: findings from British Columbia, Canada. Brain, 135(Pt 10), 2973-2979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws148
  24. Kular, L., Needhamsen, M., Adzemovic, M. Z., Kramarova, T., Gomez-Cabrero, D., Ewing, E., & Jagodic, M. (2019). Neuronal methylome reveals CREB-associated neuro-axonal impairment in multiple sclerosis. Clin Epigenetics, 11(1), 86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0678-1
  25. Lalmohamed, A., Bazelier, M. T., Van Staa, T. P., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Leufkens, H. G. M., De Boer, A., & De Vries, F. (2012). Causes of death in patients with multiple sclerosis and matched referent subjects: a population-based cohort study. European Journal of Neurology, 19(7), 1007-1014. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03668.x
  26. Liu, Z., Fan, T., Mo, X., Kan, J., & Zhang, B. (2024). Association between multiple sclerosis and cancer risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study. PLoS One, 19(3), e0298271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298271
  27. Liu, Z., Yang, Y., Yang, Z., Xia, S., Lin, D., Xiao, B., & Xiu, Y. (2020). Novel circRNA_0071196/miRNA‑19b‑3p/CIT axis is associated with proliferation and migration of bladder cancer. Int J Oncol, 57(3), 767-779. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2020.5093
  28. Marinaccio, M., Christopher, C., Valeria, P., Zaza, C., Falcicchio, G., Pellicciari, R., & Cicinelli, E. (2023). Single brain metastasis as onset of stage I endometrial carcinoma in patient affected by multiple sclerosis: the first case in literature. Archives of Surgery and Clinical Research, 7(1), 012-015. doi:https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.ascr.1001068
  29. Marrie, R. A., Maxwell, C., Mahar, A., Ekuma, O., McClintock, C., Seitz, D., & Groome, P. A. (2021). Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates in Multiple Sclerosis: A Matched Cohort Study. Neurology, 96(4), e501-e512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000011219
  30. Marrie, R. A., Reider, N., Cohen, J., Stuve, O., Trojano, M., Sorensen, P. S., & Cutter, G. (2015). A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of cancer in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler, 21(3), 294-304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514564489
  31. Menkhorst, E., So, T., Rainczuk, K., Barton, S., Zhou, W., Edgell, T., & Dimitriadis, E. (2023). Endometrial stromal cell miR-19b-3p release is reduced during decidualization implying a role in decidual-trophoblast cross-talk. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1149786
  32. Pala, E., & Denkceken, T. (2020). Evaluation of miRNA Expression Profiles in Schizophrenia Using Principal-Component Analysis-Based Unsupervised Feature Extraction Method. J Comput Biol, 27(8), 1253-1263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2019.0412
  33. Pala, E. D., T. (2020). Identification of chemoresistance-associated miRNAs in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Med-Science, 9(1), 160-163. doi:https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2019.08.9158
  34. Pierret, C., Mulliez, A., Le Bihan-Benjamin, C., Moisset, X., Bousquet, P.-J., & Leray, E. (2024). Cancer Risk Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology, 103(9), e209885. doi:https://doi.org/doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000209885
  35. Sagir, F., Ersoy Tunali, N., Tombul, T., Koral, G., Cirak, S., Yilmaz, V., & Tuzun, E. (2021). miR-132-3p, miR-106b-5p, and miR-19b-3p Are Associated with Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Production and Clinical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 25(11), 720-726. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2021.0183
  36. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., & Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 13(11), 2498-2504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303
  37. Shriwash, N., Aiman, A., Singh, P., Basir, S. F., Shamsi, A., Shahid, M., & Islam, A. (2024). Understanding the role of potential biomarkers in attenuating multiple sclerosis progression via multiomics and network-based approach. PLoS One, 19(12), e0314428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314428
  38. Sievers, C., Meira, M., Hoffmann, F., Fontoura, P., Kappos, L., & Lindberg, R. L. (2012). Altered microRNA expression in B lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis: towards a better understanding of treatment effects. Clin Immunol, 144(1), 70-79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2012.04.002
  39. Smyth, G. K. (2005). limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor, 397-420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23
  40. Sun, L., Wang, R. C., Zhang, Q., & Guo, L. L. (2020). ATM mutations as an independent prognostic factor and potential biomarker for immune checkpoint therapy in endometrial cancer. Pathol Res Pract, 216(8), 153032. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2020.153032
  41. Szklarczyk, D., Gable, A. L., Lyon, D., Junge, A., Wyder, S., Huerta-Cepas, J., & Mering, C. V. (2019). STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res, 47(D1), D607-D613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1131
  42. Taguchi, Y. H. (2016). Identification of More Feasible MicroRNA-mRNA Interactions within Multiple Cancers Using Principal Component Analysis Based Unsupervised Feature Extraction. Int J Mol Sci, 17(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050696
  43. Taguchi, Y. H. (2017). Principal Components Analysis Based Unsupervised Feature Extraction Applied to Gene Expression Analysis of Blood from Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever Patients. Sci Rep, 7, 44016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44016
  44. Taguchi, Y. H., & Wang, H. (2017). Genetic Association between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Cancer. Genes (Basel), 8(10). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8100243
  45. Team, R. D. C. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In (pp. 1-409). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  46. Watson, M. J., Berger, P. L., Banerjee, K., Frank, S. B., Tang, L., Ganguly, S. S., & Miranti, C. K. (2021). Aberrant CREB1 activation in prostate cancer disrupts normal prostate luminal cell differentiation. Oncogene, 40(18), 3260-3272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01772-y
  47. Wong, N. W., Chen, Y., Chen, S., & Wang, X. (2017). OncomiR: an online resource for exploring pan-cancer microRNA dysregulation. Bioinformatics, 34(4), 713-715. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx627
  48. Yin, M., Grivas, P., Ali, S. M., Hsu, J., Vasekar, M. K., Emamekhoo, H., & Joshi, M. (2017). ATM/RB1 mutations to predict shorter overall survival (OS) in bladder cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(6_suppl), 393-393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.6_suppl.393
  49. Zhou, Y., Börcsök, J., Adib, E., Kamran, S. C., Neil, A. J., Stawiski, K., & Mouw, K. W. (2023). ATM deficiency confers specific therapeutic vulnerabilities in bladder cancer. Sci Adv, 9(47), eadg2263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg2263