SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uşak Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

DİJİTALLEŞMENİN KARANLIK YÖNÜ: BİREYSEL, TOPLUMSAL VE ÖRGÜTSEL ETKİLERİ

Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3297-1659
Şerife Karagöz(AVRASYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
166–186
Publication Date
2025-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bu olumsuz etkiler, dijital iyi oluş uygulamaları, etik ve sorumlu dijitalleşme çerçeveleri, dijital liderlik ve eğitim programları aracılığıyla hafifletilebilmektedir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dijitalleşme, bireylerin, örgütlerin ve toplumların yaşam biçimlerini kökten dönüştüren hızlı ve yaygın bir dönüşüm sürecidir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmenin yalnızca sunduğu fırsatlar değil, aynı zamanda bireysel, örgütsel ve toplumsal düzeylerde ortaya çıkan olumsuz etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bu olumsuz etkiler, dijital iyi oluş uygulamaları, etik ve sorumlu dijitalleşme çerçeveleri, dijital liderlik ve eğitim programları aracılığıyla hafifletilebilmektedir.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dijitalleşme · dijital yorgunluk · dijital iyi oluş

Özet

Dijitalleşme, bireylerin, örgütlerin ve toplumların yaşam biçimlerini kökten dönüştüren hızlı ve yaygın bir dönüşüm sürecidir. Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmenin yalnızca sunduğu fırsatlar değil, aynı zamanda bireysel, örgütsel ve toplumsal düzeylerde ortaya çıkan olumsuz etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bireysel düzeyde dijital yorgunluk, teknoloji bağımlılığı, dijital dışlanma, siber zorbalık ve teknostres gibi psikolojik ve davranışsal sorunlar ön plana çıkmaktadır. Örgütsel düzeyde algoritmik yönetim, çalışan özerkliğinin azalması, siber güvenlik riskleri, dijital yetenek uçurumu ve iş yükü artışı gibi zorluklar gözlemlenmektedir. Toplumsal düzeyde ise dijital uçurum, yanlış bilgi ve manipülasyon, gözetim kapitalizmi ve çevresel maliyetler dijitalleşmenin karanlık yönlerini oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, dijitalleşmenin olumsuz etkilerinin bireylerin psikolojik sağlığını, örgütlerin işleyişini ve toplumların sosyal yapısını etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bu olumsuz etkiler, dijital iyi oluş uygulamaları, etik ve sorumlu dijitalleşme çerçeveleri, dijital liderlik ve eğitim programları aracılığıyla hafifletilebilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzunbacak, H. H., Karagöz, Ş. (2025). DİJİTALLEŞMENİN KARANLIK YÖNÜ: BİREYSEL, TOPLUMSAL VE ÖRGÜTSEL ETKİLERİ. Uşak Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 166–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/1623671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (94)

  1. Abildgaard, J. S., & Karlsen, I. (2024). Individual or organizational implementation? A quasi-experimental study on the impact of different forms of implementation of a well-being app. In F. Frost, K. Teoh, F. St-Hilaire, A. Denman, C. Leduc, M. Muñoz, & D. Ripa (Eds.), Book of proceedings: 16th Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology: Contributions of OHP to social justice (Article S134). European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology. https://eaohp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/EAOHP-2024-BoP_Final.pdf
  2. Ahmed, F. A., Chaudhary, F., & Shahzad, S. (2025). Cyberbullying and online harassment: A criminological and legal perspective. Policy Research Journal, 3(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14809105
  3. Akgün, F. (2019). Öğretim elemanlarının bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerine yönelik kabulleri ve teknostres algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi- Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 9(2), 40-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/jesr.2019.92.1
  4. Alsaleh, A. (2024). The impact of technological advancement on culture and society. Scientific Reports, 14, 32140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83995-z
  5. Amudhan, S., Prakasha, H., Mahapatra, P., Burma, A. D., Mishra, V., Sharma, M. K., & Rao, G. N. (2021). Technology addiction among school-going adolescents in India: Epidemiological analysis from a cluster survey for strengthening adolescent health programs at district level. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), fdaa257. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa257
  6. Andrae, A. S., & Edler, T. (2015). On global electricity usage of communication technology: Trends to 2030. Challenges, 6(1), 117-157.
  7. Balcioğlu, Y. S., & Artar, M. (2024). The evolution of digital leadership: Content and sentiment analysis of the New York Times coverage. Current Psychology, 43(28), 23953–23970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06149-4
  8. Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., Yamamoto, T., McDonald, R., D'Angelo, E., Althaf, S., … Deubzer, O. (2022). The global e-waste monitor 2022: Electronic waste rising five times faster than documented e-waste recycling. International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR). https://ewastemonitor.info/
  9. Bieser, J., & Hilty, L. M. (2022). Assessing the indirect carbon footprint of the IT sector using a life cycle approach. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000538003
  10. Bregenzer, A., & Jimenez, P. (2021). Risk factors and leadership in a digitalized working world and their effects on employees' stress and resources: Web-based questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e24906. https://doi.org/10.2196/24906
  11. Brennen, S., & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. In K. B. Jensen et al. (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (pp. 556-566). Wiley.
  12. Büchi, M. (2021). Dijital refah teorisi ve araştırması. Yeni Medya ve Toplum, 26(1), 172-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211056851
  13. Büchler, N., ter Hoeven, C. L., & van Zoonen, W. (2020). Understanding constant connectivity to work: How and for whom is constant connectivity related to employee well-being? Information and Organization, 30(3), 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100302
  14. Cala, V. C., & Ortega, F. (2024). Understanding the sociocultural dynamics of loneliness in Southern Spanish youth. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 48(3), 547-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-024-09861-9
  15. Carter, C., Danford, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H., Smith, A., & Taylor, P. (2011). ‘All they lack is a chain’: Lean and the new performance management in the British civil service. New Technology, Work and Employment, 26(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2011.00261.x
  16. Cazan, A. M. (2020). The digitization of working life: Challenges and opportunities. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 18(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.24837/pru.v18i1.457
  17. Çerasi, C. Ç., & Huseynov, F. (2024). The dark side of digitalization: Ethical issues and user concerns. In Proceedings of the 14th International Baskent Congress on Social, Humanities, Administrative, and Educational Sciences (pp. 809-815). BZT Turan Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.30546/19023.978-9952-8541-2-1.2024.2041
  18. Chiappetta, M. (2017). The technostress: Definition, symptoms and risk prevention. Senses and Sciences, 4(1), 358-361. https://doi.org/10.14616/sands-2017-1-358361
  19. Cuzzamu, E. B., & Reyes, A. C. (2022). Analysing the impact of modern devices and technology on people’s relationships. Technoarete Transactions on Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.36647/TTASSH/02.04.A006
  20. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
  21. Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E. (2015). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), E4512-E4521. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419828112
  22. Erten, P., & Özdemir, O. (2020). The Digital Burnout Scale Development Study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(2), 668-683. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.597890
  23. Eubanks, V. (2018, January). The digital poorhouse. Harper’s Magazine. Retrieved from https://harpers.org/archive/2018/01/the-digital-poorhouse/
  24. Feijao, C., Flanagan, I., Van Stolk, C., & Gunashekar, S. (2021). The global digital skills gap: Current trends and future directions. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1533-1.html
  25. Ghelani, D. (2022). Cyber security, cyber threats, implications and future perspectives: A review. American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 12-19.
  26. Glock, G. (2025). Digitalization reshaping job autonomy? New evidence from the BIBB/BAuA employment survey 2024. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-025-00480-7
  27. Goel, A., Masurkar, S., & Pathade, G. R. (2024). An overview of digital transformation and environmental sustainability: threats, opportunities, and solutions. Sustainability, 16(24), 11079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411079
  28. Gorwa, R. (2019). Poland: Unpacking the ecosystem of social media manipulation. In S. C. Woolley & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Computational Propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media (pp. 86–103). New York, NY; London, UK: Oxford University Press.
  29. Gui, M., Fasoli, M., & Carradore, R. (2017). “Digital well-being”: Developing a new theoretical tool for media literacy research. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2017-1-8
  30. Güler, H. N. (2023). Dijital liderlik çalışmalarının analizi. Topkapı Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 11-20.
  31. Hjelholt, M. F. (2022). Digitalizing at the expense of others: The hidden costs of digital welfare. Innovative Social Sciences Journal, 8(1), 1-8.
  32. Hynes, W. (2021). Technological globalization and cultural erosion. Global Media Journal, 19(2), 45-59.
  33. Ioannou, A., Lycett, M., & Marshan, A. (2024). The role of mindfulness in mitigating the negative consequences of technostress. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 523-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10239-0
  34. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
  35. Jaidka, K., Chen, T., Chesterman, S., Hsu, W., Kan, M. Y., Kankanhalli, M., … Yue, A. (2025). Misinformation, disinformation, and generative AI: Implications for perception and policy. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689372
  36. Kabakus, A. K., Bahcekapili, E., & Ayaz, A. (2025). The effect of digital literacy on technology acceptance: An evaluation on administrative staff in higher education. Journal of Information Science, 51(4), 930-941. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231160028
  37. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366-410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
  38. Kıymık, H. (2025). Dijital çağda muhasebe güvenliği: Kişisel verilerin korunması kanunu ihlallerinin anatomisi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (107), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1642395
  39. Kuhn, C., Khoo, S. M., Czerniewicz, L., Lilley, W., Bute, S., Crean, A., … MacKenzie, A. (2023). Understanding digital inequality: A theoretical kaleidoscope. In Constructing postdigital research: Method and emancipation (pp. 333–373). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_17
  40. Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172
  41. López, A., Pastor-Galindo, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2024). Frameworks, modeling and simulations of misinformation and disinformation: A systematic literature review. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09343
  42. López, A., Pastor-Galindo, J., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2024). Frameworks, Modeling and Simulations of Misinformation and Disinformation: A Systematic Literature Review, arXiv, preprint arxiv:2406.09343.
  43. Luigjes, J., Lorenzetti, V., de Haan, S., Youssef, G. J., Murawski, C., Sjoerds, Z., … Yücel, M. (2019). Defining compulsive behavior. Neuropsychology Review, 29(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09404-9
  44. Makanadar, A. (2024). Digital surveillance capitalism and cities: Data, democracy and activism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03941-2
  45. Marsh, E., Perez Vallejos, E., & Spence, A. (2024). Digital workplace technology intensity: Qualitative insights on employee wellbeing impacts of digital workplace job demands. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 2, 1392997. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2024.1392997
  46. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit–a European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130–136.
  47. Melo, N. (2025). Algorithmic colonialism and the appropriation of indigenous data: Safeguarding cultural epistemologies in the digital age [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202505.1403.v1
  48. Mengay, A. (2020). Digitalization of work and heteronomy. Capital & Class, 44(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820904032
  49. Moore, P. V. (2018). The quantified self in precarity: Work, technology and what counts. Routledge.
  50. Nabbosa, V., & Kaar, C. (2020, May). Societal and ethical issues of digitalization. In Proceedings of the 2020 international conference on Big Data in Management (pp. 118–124). https://doi.org/10.1145/3437075.3437093
  51. Ndemo, B. (2024, August 8). Addressing digital colonialism: A path to equitable data governance. UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab. https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/analytics/addressing-digital-colonialism-path-equitable-data-governance
  52. Noponen, N., Feshchenko, P., Auvinen, T., Luoma-aho, V., & Abrahamsson, P. (2024). Taylorism on steroids or enabling autonomy? A systematic review of algorithmic management. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1695–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00345-5
  53. O’Lemmon, M. (2024). The worst mistake 2.0? The digital revolution and the consequences of innovation. AI & Society, 39(3), 1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01599-5
  54. Öz, T., & Mete, Y. A. (2021). Eğitim örgütlerinde siber zorbalık tutumları ile örgütsel dışlanma arasındaki ilişki. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Yönetim ve Organizasyon Özel Sayısı), 1194–1222. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.894335
  55. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
  56. Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050104
  57. Peiró, J. M., & Martínez-Tur, V. (2022). ‘Digitalized’ competences: A crucial challenge beyond digital competences. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 38(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a22
  58. Pérez-Torres, V. (2024). Social media: A digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence. Current Psychology, 43(26), 22170–22180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05980-z
  59. Puska, A. A., Baroni, L. A., & Pereira, R. (2024). Decoding the sociotechnical dimensions of digital misinformation: A comprehensive literature review [Preprint]. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11853
  60. Reeves, C., & Sinnicks, M. (2024). Totally administered heteronomy: Adorno on work, leisure, and politics in the age of digital capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 193(2), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05570-2
  61. Romi, I. M. (2024). Analysing university students’ digital skills gap and its implications for SDGs: An empirical investigation. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 4(3), e02189. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n03.pe02189
  62. Sabahçı, B. (2023). The concept of panopticon and surveillance society in virtual environments. Amasya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(13), 111–134.
  63. Savić, D. (2023). Information fatigue syndrome and digital burnout. In Conference on Grey Literature: Publishing Grey Literature in the Digital Century. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368685726_Information_Fatigue_Syndrome_and_Digital_Burnout
  64. Scholze, A., & Hecker, A. (2023). Digital job demands and resources: Digitization in the context of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(16), 6581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166581
  65. Sert, H., Taskin Yilmaz, F., Karakoc Kumsar, A., & Aygin, D. (2019). Effect of technology addiction on academic success and fatigue among Turkish university students. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, 7(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2019.1585598
  66. Shao, C., Hui, P. M., Wang, L., Jiang, X., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Ciampaglia, G. L. (2018). Anatomy of an online misinformation network. PloS One, 13(4), e0196087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196087
  67. Silva, H. M. (2025). The reconfiguration of social bonds in the digital age: Virtual connections vs. face-to-face relationships. Nature Anthropology, 3(1), 10003. https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10003
  68. Singun, A. J. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00430-9
  69. Skumanich, A., & Kim, H. K. (2024). Modes of analyzing disinformation narratives with AI/ML to assist in mitigating the weaponization of social media. In Workshop Proceedings of the 18th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
  70. Sovacool, B. K., Ali, S. H., Bazilian, M., Radley, B., Nemery, B., Okatz, J., & Mulvaney, D. (2020). Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science, 367(6473), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz6003
  71. Stana, R., & Nicolajsen, H. W. (2022). If digitalization is the answer, then what was the question? A case study of how technostress is made. Selected Papers of the IRIS, 13, 80–92. https://aisel.aisnet.org/iris2022/7
  72. Supriyadi, T., Sulistiasih, S., Rahmi, K. H., et al. (2025). The impact of digital fatigue on employee productivity and well-being: A scoping literature review. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(2), 3420. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3420
  73. Tan, K. L., Chi, C. H., & Lam, K. Y. (2023). Survey on digital sovereignty and identity: From digitization to digitalization. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616400
  74. Tayiz, V., Vangölü, M. S., Özok, H. İ., & Tanhan, F. (2025). Concept of digital well-being. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 17(4), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1544897
  75. Tei, S., Fujino, J., & Murai, T. (2025). Navigating the self online. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1499039. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499039
  76. Thibaud, E. (2025). Reflections on techno-solutionism in education: Manifestations and causes. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2025.2528852
  77. Trittin-Ulbrich, H., Scherer, A. G., Munro, I., & Whelan, G. (2021). Exploring the dark and unexpected sides of digitalization: Toward a critical agenda. Organization, 28(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420968184
  78. Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature [Preprint]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
  79. UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions.
  80. Véliz, C. (2020). Privacy is power: Why and how you should take back control of your data. Bantam Press.
  81. Vaghefi, I., Lapointe, L., & Boudreau-Pinsonneault, C. (2017). A typology of user liability to IT addiction. Information Systems Journal, 27(2), 125–169.
  82. Vanden Abeele, M. M. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31, 932–955.
  83. Vendramin, N., & Nardelli, G. (2020, October). Virtual work challenges experienced by knowledge workers in organizations undergoing digitalization. Paper presented at Transdisciplinary Workplace Research Conference 2020, Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany. Retrieved from https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/607da915d9001d013e3badd4
  84. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
  85. Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 227–243.
  86. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  87. Waldron, P. (2023, April 13). One-size-fits-all content moderation fails the Global South. Cornell Chronicle. Retrieved from https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2023/04/one-size-fits-all-content-moderation-fails-global-south
  88. West, S. M. (2019). Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Business & Society, 58(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185
  89. Wood, A. J. (2021). Algorithmic management consequences for work organisation and working conditions (JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology, No. 2021/07). European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/233886
  90. Xianghan, Z., & Zhengwei, L. (2025). Research on the impact of algorithmic management on employee work behavior in platform enterprises. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 8(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.30560/jems.v8n2p99
  91. Young, D. (2019). Digital cultures and indigenous knowledge systems. Media, Culture & Society, 41(4), 531–549.
  92. Zamani, E. D., & Rousaki, A. (2024). Reconsidering government digital strategies within the context of digital inequalities: The case of the UK Digital Strategy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03921-6
  93. Zeike, S., Choi, K. E., Lindert, L., & Pfaff, H. (2019). Managers’ well-being in the digital era: Is it associated with perceived choice overload and pressure from digitalization? An exploratory study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101746
  94. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.