SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BALAGH - Journal of Islamic and Humanities Studies / 2024 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Decoding the Language: A Study on Scientific Research Methods and Their Applications in Linguistic Research

Dil Şifresini Çözme: Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Dil Araştırmaları Alanındaki Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Ahmed Mahmoud Zakaria Tawfık(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5900-2949
Pages
100–129
Publication Date
2024-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The second presents practical examples of applying each research methodology in the linguistic context, and the research concludes with a summary of the key ideas and conclusions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research focuses on four main research methodologies: the descriptive method, the historical method, the comparative method, and the contrastive method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By exploring these methods, the research seeks to clarify the characteristics of each, its advantages, and the linguistic fields it suits, in addition to reviewing the practical applications of each.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The second presents practical examples of applying each research methodology in the linguistic context, and the research concludes with a summary of the key ideas and conclusions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Arap Dili ve Belâgatı · Betimleyici Yöntem · Tarihsel Yöntem

Abstract

The research focuses on four main research methodologies: the descriptive method, the historical method, the comparative method, and the contrastive method. By exploring these methods, the research seeks to clarify the characteristics of each, its advantages, and the linguistic fields it suits, in addition to reviewing the practical applications of each. The importance of this research lies in its focus on the methodological aspect of language study, which is vital but may sometimes not receive sufficient attention. The research is divided into two main sections: the first deals with explaining the four main research methodologies, where a definition of each method, its history, conditions of use, strengths, and weaknesses are provided. The second presents practical examples of applying each research methodology in the linguistic context, and the research concludes with a summary of the key ideas and conclusions.

Özet

Bu araştırma, bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve dil araştırmalarındaki uygulamaları üzerine sistematik bir incelemeyi ele almaktadır. Dil araştırmacıları tarafından kullanılan farklı yöntemlerin kapsamlı bir analizini sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, dört ana araştırma yöntemine odaklanmaktadır: betimleyici yöntem, tarihsel yöntem, karşılaştırmalı yöntem ve karşıtlık yöntemi. Bu yöntemleri inceleyerek, her birinin özelliklerini, avantajlarını ve hangi dil alanlarına uygun olduğunu açıklamayı hedeflemektedir. Ayrıca, her yöntemin pratik uygulamalarını gözden geçirmektedir. Araştırmanın önemi, dil çalışmalarında metodolojik yönlere ışık tutmasından kaynaklanmaktadır. Bu yön, hayati öneme sahip olmasına rağmen bazen yeterince dikkate alınmayabilir. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemlerini keşfederek, araştırmacılar araştırma becerilerini geliştirebilir ve çalışmalarına en uygun yöntemleri seçebilirler. İki ana bölüme ayrılmıştır: Birinci bölüm, dört ana araştırma yönteminin açıklanmasını ele almakta, her yöntemin tanımı, tarihi, kullanım şartları, güçlü ve zayıf yönleri sunulmaktadır. İkinci bölüm, her araştırma yönteminin dil bağlamındaki pratik uygulamalarına örnekler sunmakta ve araştırma, en önemli düşünceler ve sonuçların bir özeti ile son bulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tawfık, A. M. Z. (2024). Decoding the Language: A Study on Scientific Research Methods and Their Applications in Linguistic Research. BALAGH - Journal of Islamic and Humanities Studies, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 100–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/1610168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Al-Azawi, Ni'mah Rahim. Manahij Al-Bahth Al-Lughawi Bayna Al-Turath Wa Al-Mu'asirah. Amman: Al-Majma' Al-Ilmi, 2000.
  2. Abd Al-Tawab, Ramadan. Al-Madkhal Ila 'Ilm Al-Lugha Wa Manahij Al-Bahth Al-Lughawi. Cairo: Maktabat Al-Khanji, 1997.
  3. Bdeir, Suhair. Al-Bahth Al-Ilmi: Ta'rifuhu, Khatawatuhu, Manahijuhu, Adawatuhu, Al-Mafahim Al-Ihtisatiyah, Kitabat Al-Taqrir. Cairo: Dar Al-Ma'arif, 1989.
  4. Bell, Judith. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education, Health and Social Science. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press, 4th ed., 2005.
  5. Bloch, Marc. The Historians Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1954.
  6. Bryman, Alan. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 4. ed., 2012.
  7. Carr, Edward Hallet. What Is History? Penguin Books, 1961.
  8. Cohen, Louis et al. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge, Eighth edition., 2007.
  9. Creswell, John W. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Methods Approach. New York: Sage, 2014.
  10. Hijazi, Mahmoud Fahmy. Madkhal Ila 'Ilm Al-Lugha. Cairo: Dar Quba, 1998.
  11. Fisiak, Jacek. Contrastive Linguistics and the Language Teacher (Language Teaching Methodology Series). Janus Book Pub Alemany Pr Pergamon Institute, 1st Ed., 1981.
  12. Freeman - Charles. The Closing of the Western Mind: The Rise of Faith and the Fall of Reason. Vintage Books, 2002.
  13. Garraghan, Gilbert J. A Guide to Historical Method. ed. Jean Delanglez. New York: Fordham University Press, 1946.
  14. Granger, Sylviane et al. Corpus-Based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003.
  15. Hartog, François - Lloyd, Janet. The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History. University of California Press, 1988.
  16. Hock, Hans Henrich - Joseph, Brian D. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2nd rev. ed., 2009.
  17. Hoenigswald, Henry M. “On the History of the Comparative Method.” Anthropological Linguistics 5/1 (1963), 1–11.
  18. Iggers, Georg G. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Wesleyan, 1st Ed., 1997.
  19. James, Carl. Contrastive Analysis. Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1980.
  20. Kelley, Donald R. Faces of History: Historical Inquiry from Herodotus to Herder. Yale University Press, 1998.
  21. Kothari, C. R. Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., 2nd rev. ed., 2004.
  22. Mackey, Alison - Gass, Susan M. Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. New York, NY: Routledge, Second edition., 2015.
  23. Marwick, Arthur. The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
  24. Ragin, Charles C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, 2014.
  25. Rheinstein, Max. “Teaching Tools in Comparative Law: A Book Survey.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 1/1/2 (1952), 95–114.
  26. Al-Ridini, Muhammad Ali Abd Al-Karim. Fusul Fi 'Ilm Al-Lugha Al-'Am. Algiers: Dar Al-Huda, 2009.
  27. Robins, R. H. A Short History of Linguistics. Routledge, 4th Ed., 1997.
  28. Weiss, Michael. “The Comparative Method.” The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. 127–145. Routledge, 2015.
  29. Yaqout, Ahmad Suleiman. Fi 'Ilm Al-Lugha Al-Taqabuli: Dirasa Tatbiqiyah. Alexandria: Dar Al-Ma'rifah Al-Jami'iah, 1985.