SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAINTENANCE PAID TO THE MAJOR CHILD WHO CONTINUES HIS OR HER EDUCATION AS A DUTY OF ASSISTANCE IN SOME JUDGMENTS OF THE CASSATION COURT

EĞİTİMİNE DEVAM EDEN ERGİN ÇOCUĞA ÖDENEN NAFAKANIN BAZI YARGITAY KARARLARINDA YARDIM NAFAKASI OLARAK NİTELENDİRİLMESİ

TUBA BİRİNCİ UZUN
Pages
89–125
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the article 328 paragraph 2, if the child continues his orher education although the child comes of age, the parents must pay for his orher maintenance, to the extent conscionable in the overall circumstances, untilthe child completes his or her education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to the article 327 paragraph 1 of Turkish Civil Code, theparents must provide for the child’s maintenance, including the costs of raisingthe child, his or her education and measures taken for his or her protection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the article 328 paragraph 2, if the child continues his orher education although the child comes of age, the parents must pay for his orher maintenance, to the extent conscionable in the overall circumstances, untilthe child completes his or her education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In fact, the conditionsrequired for these maintenances are different from each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bakım nafakası · eğitim nafakası · yardım nafakası

Abstract

According to the article 327 paragraph 1 of Turkish Civil Code, theparents must provide for the child’s maintenance, including the costs of raisingthe child, his or her education and measures taken for his or her protection. Thisduty begins for mother at the birth of the child and for father by the formation ofparent-child relationship. This duty lasts for both parents until the child comesof age. According to the article 328 paragraph 2, if the child continues his orher education although the child comes of age, the parents must pay for his orher maintenance, to the extent conscionable in the overall circumstances, untilthe child completes his or her education. This article is a new article which didnot exist in the former Turkish Civil Code numbered 743. This article extendsthe duty of maintenance until the child completes his or her education.Therefore, the support made within the context of this article is a duty ofmaintenance. However, in some judgments, the Cassation Courtmischaracterized this support as a duty of assistance. In fact, the conditionsrequired for these maintenances are different from each other.

Özet

TMK md. 327 f. 1 hükmü uyarınca, ana ve baba çocuğun bakımı, eğitimi ve

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, T. B. (2018). THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAINTENANCE PAID TO THE MAJOR CHILD WHO CONTINUES HIS OR HER EDUCATION AS A DUTY OF ASSISTANCE IN SOME JUDGMENTS OF THE CASSATION COURT. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 89–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/160641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Acabey, Mehmet Beşir: Soybağı (Kurulması, Genel Olarak Sonuçları, Özellikle Evlilik Dışında Çocuğun Mirasçılığı), 1. Basım, Güncel Hukuk Yayınları, İzmir 2002.
  2. Akıntürk, Turgut/Ateş, Derya: Aile Hukuku, Beta Yayınları, 20. Basım, İstanbul 2017.
  3. Antalya, Gökhan/Sağlam, İpek: Miras Hukuku, 3. Basım, Legal Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2015.
  4. Ayan, Mehmet: Miras Hukuku, 9. Basım, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2016.
  5. Baygın, Cem: Soybağı Hukuku, 1. Basım, On İki Levha Yayınları, İstanbul 2010.
  6. Birinci Uzun, Tuba: “Aile Soyadı Çıkmazı: Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin Çocuğun Soyadının Velayeti Kendisine Bırakılan Annesi Tarafından Değiştirilmesi Hakkındaki 25 Haziran 2015 Tarihli ve 2013/3434 Başvuru Sayılı Kararının İncelenmesi”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Sayı: 4, 2016, s. 97-137.
  7. Bozdağ, Gonca Gülfem: Türk Hukukunda ve Uluslararası Hukukta Nafaka, 1. Basım, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara 2015.
  8. Bozovalı, Haluk: Mevzuattaki Son Değişikliklerle Öğretide ve Uygulamada Türk Medeni Hukukunda Bakım Nafakaları, Kazancı Hukuk Yayınları, İstanbul 1990.
  9. Breitschmid, Peter: Personen- und Familienrecht – Partnerschaftsgesetz Art. 1-456 ZGB- PartG, in: Peter Breitschmid/Alexandra Jungo (Hrsg.), CHK - Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, 3. Auflage, Zürich 2016.
  10. Çakırca, Seda İrem: “Kardeşler Arasında Nafaka Yükümlülüğü”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:64, Sayı:1, 2015, s. 65-101.
  11. Dural, Mustafa/Öz, Turgut: Türk Özel Hukuku, Cilt: IV: Miras Hukuku, 11. Basım, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul 2017.
  12. Dural, Mustafa/Öğüz, Tufan/Gümüş, Mustafa Alper: Türk Özel Hukuku Cilt: III: Aile Hukuku, 13. Basım, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul 2018.
  13. Ergenekon, Yılmaz: Türk Medeni Hukukunda Yardım Nafakaları, 1. Basım, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara 1966.
  14. Fankhauser, Roland: Art. 328 in: Jolanta Kren Kostkiewicz, Stephan Wolf, Marc Amstutz, Roland Fankhauser (Hrsg.), ZGB Kommentar Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, OFK - Orell Füssli Kommentar (Navigator.ch), 3. überarbeitete Auflage, 2016.
  15. Genç, Akif: Türk Medeni Hukukunda Yardım Nafakası, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul 2012.
  16. Gmünder, Evelyne: Art. 277, in: Jolanta Kren Kostkiewicz, Stephan Wolf, Marc Amstutz, Roland Fankhauser (Hrsg.), ZGB Kommentar Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, OFK - Orell Füssli Kommentar (Navigator.ch), 3. überarbeitete Auflage, 2016.
  17. Gökkaya, Vildan: “Eğitimi Devam Eden Ergin Çocuğa Ana ve Babası Tarafından Verilen (Eğitim Nafakasının) Nafakanın Hukuki Niteliğ