Journals / Uluslararası Temel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Examination of Primary School Teachers' Opinions on the Mathematics Digital Education Platform

Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Matematik Dijital Eğitim Platformuna İlişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi

Pages
17–29
Publication Date
2026-04-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to the positive effects of the digital platform, there are also some negative effects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In mathematics education, technological tools can be used to visualize mathematical shapes, give three-dimensional form to figures, organize data, and provide opportunities for analysis and calculation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 2022, the Ministry of National Education in Türkiye launched a mathematics mobilization under the motto “Mathematics Everywhere.” The mathematics mobilization covers many topics such as mathematics workshops, material development, teacher training, digital platform for teacher training (URL-1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to the positive effects of the digital platform, there are also some negative effects.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Matematik seferberliği · matematik öğretimi · matematik dijital eğitim platform

Abstract

In mathematics education, technological tools can be used to visualize mathematical shapes, give three-dimensional form to figures, organize data, and provide opportunities for analysis and calculation. It is believed that teachers of mathematics, an inherently abstract subject, can enhance student success by relating lessons to real life, concretizing abstract concepts, and using multimedia and digital educational platforms that appeal to multiple senses. In 2022, the Ministry of National Education in Türkiye launched a mathematics mobilization under the motto “Mathematics Everywhere.” The mathematics mobilization covers many topics such as mathematics workshops, material development, teacher training, digital platform for teacher training (URL-1). The purpose of this study is to determine the opinions of primary school teachers about the mathematics digital education platform created within the scope of mathematics mobilization (URL-2, URL-3). The case study approach, one of the qualitative research methods, was used to examine teachers’ views. The research was conducted with 13 primary school teachers working in public primary schools in Malatya. Face-to-face and semi- structured interview forms were used to collect data from the teachers in the study. The findings showed that teachers used digital educational platforms in mathematics lessons, that these platforms contributed positively to mathematics teaching and to students’ learning, that they could be used at every stage of instruction and across all grade levels, that teachers considered themselves competent in using them, and that these platforms could also positively influence students’ academic achievement and attitudes toward the lesson. In addition to the positive effects of the digital platform, there are also some negative effects.

Özet

Matematik öğretiminde teknolojik araçlarla matematikteki şekiller görselleştirilebilmekte ve şekillere üç boyut kazandırılabilmekte, veri düzenlemesi yapılabilmekte, çözümleme ve hesap yapma olanağı sağlanabilmektedir. Soyut bir yapıya sahip olan matematik dersinin öğretimini gerçekleştirecek olan öğretmenlerin, derslerini hayatla ilişkilendirmesi, somutlaştırması, birçok duyuya hitap ederek çoklu ortamlarda ve dijital eğitim platformlarından faydalanarak matematik öğretimini gerçekleştirmesi başarıyı da beraberinde getireceği düşünülmektedir. 2022 yılında Türkiye’de Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı tarafından “Her Yerde Matematik” anlayışıyla matematik seferberliği başlatılmıştır. Matematik seferberliği matematik atölyeleri, materyal geliştirme, öğretmen eğitimi, öğretmen eğitiminin dijital platformu gibi birçok konuyu kapsamaktadır (URL-1). Bu araştırmanın amacı matematik seferberliği kapsamında oluşturulan matematik dijital eğitim platformuna ilişkin sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşlerinin belirlenmesidir (URL-2, URL-3). Öğretmenlerin görüşleri incelenirken nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Araştırma Malatya ilinde resmi ilkokullarda görev yapan 13 sınıf öğretmeni ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya katılan öğretmenlerle yüz yüze ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formları kullanılarak veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmenlerin matematik dersinde dijital eğitim platformunu kullandıkları, bu platformun matematik dersine, öğrencilerin matematiği öğrenmelerine olumlu katkı sağladığı, dijital platformların dersin her aşamasında ve bütün sınıf kademelerinde kullanılabileceği, öğretmenlerin bu platformu kullanma konusunda kendilerini yeterli gördükleri, bu platformların öğrencilerin akademik başarılarını ve derse yönelik tutumlarını da olumlu etkileyebileceği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca dijital platformun olumlu etkilerinin yanı sıra bir takım olumsuz etkilerinin de olduğu belirtilen görüşler arasındadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akkaya, S., Erkan, A., Tosik, H. (2026). Examination of Primary School Teachers' Opinions on the Mathematics Digital Education Platform. Uluslararası Temel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.38089/iperj.2026.249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Baykul, Y. (2021). Mathematics teaching in primary schools. Pegem Academy.
  2. Biber, A. Ç. (2019). Mathematics and its teaching. In A. Kaçar (Ed.), Mathematics teaching in primary schools (pp. 2-11). Pegem Academy.
  3. Boz, I. & Özerbaş, M.A. (2020). Opinions of classroom teachers on the use of technology in mathematics lessons. Journal of Science Education Art and Technology, 4 (2), 56-66.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2014). Scientific research methods. Pegem Academy.
  5. Çankaya, S. & Karamete, A. (2008). The effect of educational computer games on students' attitudes towards mathematics course and educational computer games. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal, 4 (2), 115-127.
  6. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. California: Sage Publication.
  7. Duatepe-Paksu, A., Kazak, S. & Çontay, EG (2022). Evaluation of mathematics activities carried out in out-of-school environments: "Mathematics Everywhere Project". Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Education Journal, 9 (2), 541-558.
  8. Dursun, Ş. & Dede, Y. (2004). Factors affecting students' success in mathematics in terms of mathematics teachers' opinions. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 24 (2), 217-230.
  9. Dursun, Ş., & Peker, M. (2003). Problems encountered by sixth grade primary school students in mathematics class. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Letters Journal of Social Sciences, 27 (1), 135-142.
  10. Ekiz, D. (Ed.). (2007). Scientific research methods. Undergraduate Publishing.
  11. Gökbulut, Y. & Yücel Yavaş, E. (2014). The effect of game-supported mathematics teaching on the achievement and retention of 4th grade fractions. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9 (2), 673-689.
  12. Karakış, H. (2014). The effect of computer-aided activities developed for the 4th grade fractions unit of primary school on student achievement and attitude. Master's Thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, Balıkesir.
  13. Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2006). Science and technology teachers' levels of using teaching materials: The example of Amasya province. Atatürk University Bayburt Faculty of Education Journal, 1 (1), 90-101.
  14. Kılıçaslan, E. A., Toksoy, S.E., & Tuğaç, M.N. (2022). Platforms and digital tools used in online learning environments: From the perspective of primary school mathematics teachers. Uludağ University Faculty of Education Journal, 35 (2), 407-425.
  15. Kuzgun, H. & Özdinç, F. (2017). Examining teachers' opinions on the use of technology in pre-school education. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 83-102.
  16. MEB (2019). Ministry of National Education Out-of-School Learning Environments Guide. Access address: http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/
  17. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). qualitative data analysis an expanded source book. California: Sage Publications
  18. Mutluoğlu, A., and Erdoğan, A. (2016). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge ( TPAB ) levels of primary school mathematics teachers according to their teaching style preferences. OPUS-International Journal of Social Research, 6 (10), 101-126.
  19. Nezih, Ö. & Çakır, H. (2016). Opinions of secondary school mathematics teachers on the use of information technologies in mathematics teaching. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal, 12 ( 1), 74-94.
  20. Olkun, S. & Toluk, Z. (2013). Activity-based mathematics teaching in primary education. Anı Publishing. Öksüz, C. & Ak, Ş. (2009). Pre-service teachers' perceptions about the use of technology in primary school mathematics teaching. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Education Journal, 6 (2), 1-19.
  21. Öksüz, C. & Karakoç, Ş. A. (2010). Validity and reliability study of the scale to determine the level of technology use in mathematics lessons in primary schools. Electronic Journal of Social Science, 9 (32), 372-383.
  22. Sarı, M. H., & Akbaba Altun, S. (2015). A qualitative research on classroom teachers' use of technology in mathematics teaching. international Journal Of Eurasia social Sciences, 6 (19), 24-49.
  23. URL-1.https://www.meb.gov.tr/matematik-seferberligi-basladi/haber/26241/tr
  24. URL-2.http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/www/matematik-seferberligi-calismalari-kapsaminda-hazirlanma-matematikdijital-egitim-platformu-hizmete-acildi/icerik/1592
  25. URL-3. https://matematik.eba.gov.tr/icerik/matematik-dijital-egitim-platformu-764
  26. Yazıcı, E.B. & Özerbaş, M.A. (2022). Examining classroom teachers' usage of digital education platforms. Sakarya University Faculty of Education Journal, 22 (1), 1-14.
  27. Yenilmez, K. (2020). Of mathematics definition and nature. A. Kaçar (Ed.). in primary school basis math. Pegem Academy.
  28. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Social in the sciences qualitative research methods. Distinguished Publishing. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods(Vol. 5). sage.
  29. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. California: Sage Publication.
  30. Gökbulut, Y. & Yücel Yavaş, E. (2014). The effect of game-supported mathematics teaching on the achievement and retention of 4th grade fractions. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9 (2), 673-689.
  31. Karakış, H. (2014). The effect of computer-aided activities developed for the 4th grade fractions unit of primary school on student achievement and attitude. Master's Thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, Balıkesir.
  32. Kuzgun, H. & Özdinç, F. (2017). Examining teachers' opinions on the use of technology in pre-school education. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 83-102.
  33. MEB (2019). Ministry of National Education Out-of-School Learning Environments Guide. Access address: http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/
  34. Mutluoğlu, A., and Erdoğan, A. (2016). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge ( TPAB ) levels of primary school mathematics teachers according to their teaching style preferences. OPUS-International Journal of Social Research, 6 (10), 101-126.
  35. Nezih, Ö. & Çakır, H. (2016). Opinions of secondary school mathematics teachers on the use of information technologies in mathematics teaching. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal, 12 ( 1), 74-94.
  36. Olkun, S. & Toluk, Z. (2013). Activity-based mathematics teaching in primary education. Anı Publishing. Öksüz, C. & Ak, Ş. (2009). Pre-service teachers' perceptions about the use of technology in primary school mathematics teaching. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Education Journal, 6 (2), 1-19.
  37. Öksüz, C. & Karakoç, Ş. A. (2010). Validity and reliability study of the scale to determine the level of technology use in mathematics lessons in primary schools. Electronic Journal of Social Science, 9 (32), 372-383.
  38. Sarı, M. H., & Akbaba Altun, S. (2015). A qualitative research on classroom teachers' use of technology in mathematics teaching. international Journal Of Eurasia social Sciences, 6 (19), 24-49.
  39. Yenilmez, K. (2020). Of mathematics definition and nature. A. Kaçar (Ed.). in primary school basis math. Pegem Academy.
  40. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Social in the sciences qualitative research methods. Distinguished Publishing. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods(Vol. 5). sage.