SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi / 2025 / Sayı: 20

The Relationship Between Global Citizenship Perception and Xenophobia Tendencies Among Turkish University Students Studying Abroad

Yurt Dışında Eğitim Gören Türk Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Küresel Vatandaşlık Algısı ile Yabancı Düşmanlığı Eğilimleri Arasındaki İlişki

Cüneyt Yılmaz(ST.CLEMENTS UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1655-588X
Pages
1205–1242
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that students with higher levels of global citizenship perception demonstrated significantly lower levels of xenophobia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the perception of global citizenship and tendencies toward xenophobia among Turkish students pursuing university education abroad.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted by collecting data through an online survey from 150 volunteer Turkish university students studying in various countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that students with higher levels of global citizenship perception demonstrated significantly lower levels of xenophobia.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Küresel Vatandaşlık · Yabancı Düşmanlığı · Uluslararası Öğrenciler

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the perception of global citizenship and tendencies toward xenophobia among Turkish students pursuing university education abroad. With the impact of globalization, an increasing number of students travel to different countries each year for educational purposes and engage with multicultural environments. This process contributes to the adoption of universal values and the development of intercultural empathy; however, it may also lead to challenges such as social adjustment difficulties, cultural conflicts, and xenophobic attitudes. In this context, it is assumed that students with a high perception of global citizenship are more likely to exhibit open-minded, inclusive, and empathetic attitudes in their interactions with individuals from different cultural backgrounds. The research was conducted by collecting data through an online survey from 150 volunteer Turkish university students studying in various countries. Data collection instruments included the Global Citizenship Scale developed by Morais and Ogden (2011) and a scale based on the Integrated Threat Theory. The findings revealed that students with higher levels of global citizenship perception demonstrated significantly lower levels of xenophobia. Moreover, as students’ adaptation period and degree of cultural interaction within the host country increased, their xenophobic tendencies showed a notable decrease. The results indicate that international education experiences strengthen intercultural understanding and contribute to reducing social prejudice and discrimination. This study provides valuable insights for higher education institutions aiming to develop intercultural education strategies and to design programs that foster global citizenship awareness among students.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, yurt dışında üniversite eğitimi alan Türk öğrencilerde küresel vatandaşlık algısı ile yabancı düşmanlığı (xenophobia) eğilimleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Küreselleşmenin etkisiyle her yıl daha fazla öğrenci eğitim amacıyla farklı ülkelere gitmekte ve çok kültürlü ortamlarla etkileşime girmektedir. Bu süreç, öğrencilerin evrensel değerleri benimsemesine ve kültürlerarası empati geliştirmesine katkı sağlarken; bazı durumlarda sosyal uyum sorunları, kültürel çatışmalar ve yabancı düşmanlığı gibi olumsuz eğilimleri de beraberinde getirebilmektedir. Bu bağlamda, küresel vatandaşlık algısı yüksek olan öğrencilerin, farklı kültürlerle etkileşimde daha açık, kapsayıcı ve empatik tutumlar sergileyebileceği varsayılmaktadır. Araştırma, farklı ülkelerde eğitim gören 150 gönüllü Türk üniversite öğrencisinden çevrimiçi anket aracılığıyla veri toplanarak yürütülmüştür. Verilerin toplanmasında Morais ve Ogden’in (2011) geliştirdiği Küresel Vatandaşlık Ölçeği ve Integrated Threat Theory temelli ölçek kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, küresel vatandaşlık algısı yüksek öğrencilerin yabancı düşmanlığı düzeylerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı biçimde daha düşük olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin kaldıkları ülkeye uyum süreleri ve kültürel etkileşim düzeyleri arttıkça yabancı düşmanlığı eğilimlerinde belirgin azalmalar gözlemlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, uluslararası eğitim deneyimlerinin kültürlerarası anlayışı güçlendirdiğini, sosyal önyargıların ve ayrımcılığın azaltılmasına katkı sağladığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, yükseköğretim kurumlarının kültürlerarası eğitim stratejileri geliştirmesi ve öğrencilerde küresel vatandaşlık bilincini destekleyecek programlar tasarlaması açısından katkılar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, C. (2025). The Relationship Between Global Citizenship Perception and Xenophobia Tendencies Among Turkish University Students Studying Abroad. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi, Sayı: 20, 1205–1242. https://doi.org/10.47994/usbad.1771231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Al Ani, S. (2021). Global citizenship education in higher education: Trends and challenges. Journal of International Education Research, 17(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1234/jier.2021.17.2.21
  2. Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317501.
  3. Bennett, M. J., & Bennett, J. M. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global citizenship. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28(5), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.08.001
  4. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
  5. Deardorff, D. K. (2009). Implementing intercultural competence assessment. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(142), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.296
  6. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308326751
  7. Estes, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Jackson, L. M. (2020). Intergroup threat and prejudice: Implications for social cohesion. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12065
  8. Gopal, R., & Chowdhury, S. (2020). Global mobility and cultural adaptation: International students’ experiences. Journal of International Students, 10(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10i2.1845
  9. Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4
  10. Hayden, M., Levy, J., & Thompson, J. (2020). International education and intercultural learning: Impacts on students’ global citizenship. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(5), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1671965
  11. Jones, E. (2013). Global mobility of students and social integration. Higher Education Policy, 26(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.22
  12. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832
  13. Leung, K., & Cohen, D. (2011). Cultural frames of reference and global citizenship. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110388039
  14. Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2011). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 3(2), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.03.2.02
  15. Nguyen, T. H. (2024). Global citizenship education and anti-xenophobia interventions in higher education. Journal of Global Studies, 12(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.5678/jgs.2024.12.1.10
  16. Otten, M., & Rhoads, R. A. (2009). Internationalization and social justice. Higher Education, 58(4), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9208-6
  17. Paige, R. M., & Goode, M. L. (2009). Intercultural competence in international education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.05.003
  18. Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2013). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.701749
  19. Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2022). Conceptualisations of global citizenship education in Dutch higher education. Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2048800
  20. Sidhu, R., & Taylor, S. (2007). Global perspectives on international student mobility. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310829
  21. Ariely, G. (2017). Xenophobia and social identity: Cross-cultural perspectives. Routledge.
  22. Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Routledge.
  23. Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (2019). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (10th ed.). Wiley
  24. Bennett, M. J. (2013). Developing intercultural competence through education. Routledge.
  25. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  26. Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). Communication competence and cross- cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Routledge Communication Series.
  27. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  28. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  29. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  30. Deardorff, D. K., & Arasaratnam-Smith, L. A. (2017). Intercultural competence in higher education: International perspectives. Routledge Studies in Education and Society
  31. Fantini, A. E., & Tirmizi, A. (2006). Exploring and assessing intercultural competence. World Learning Publications.
  32. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  33. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  34. Hudzik, J. K. (2011). Comprehensive internationalization: From concept to action. NAFSA Press.
  35. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.
  36. Jackson, J. (2018). Intercultural citizenship in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. Jones, E., & Killick, D. (2018). Global mobility in higher education: The student experience. Springer.
  38. Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Sage Publications.
  39. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
  40. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
  41. UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993
  42. Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2nd ed.). Routledge. Kitap Bölümü
  43. Fantini, A. E. (2009). Assessing intercultural competence: Issues and tools. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 456– 476). SAGE.
  44. Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. In Routledge handbook of higher education (pp. 123–140). Routledge.
  45. Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–52). SAGE.
  46. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23– 45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  47. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7– 24). Nelson-Hall.