Journals / Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

The Cross-Border Networks of Iranian Migrants in Van and the Role of These Networks in the Migration Process

Van’daki İranlı Göçmenlerin Sınır Aşan Ağları ve Ağın Göç Sürecindeki Rolü

Cihat Uğurlu(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7980-9141
Orhan Deniz(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
140–162
Publication Date
2026-09-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, which employed qualitative research methods, the data obtained from in-depth interviews revealed that participants utilised networks to gather information on financing and the migration process before leaving Iran; upon reaching Van, a transit city, they obtained information regarding accommodation, employment and bureaucratic procedures; and regarding their ultimate goal of settling in third countries, it was found that they attempted to expedite the process through networks, received financial support, and were directed to informal channels when necessary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increasing number of wars, internal conflicts, economic devastation, climate-related disasters and other threats caused by risks to personal safety around the world result in the displacement of thousands of people every year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Having been a major source of migration for over 40 years, Iran has consequently given rise to a significant diaspora community and has led to a significant proportion of people relying on social networks for support during their migration journeys.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, which employed qualitative research methods, the data obtained from in-depth interviews revealed that participants utilised networks to gather information on financing and the migration process before leaving Iran; upon reaching Van, a transit city, they obtained information regarding accommodation, employment and bureaucratic procedures; and regarding their ultimate goal of settling in third countries, it was found that they attempted to expedite the process through networks, received financial support, and were directed to informal channels when necessary.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İran’dan göç · Van · Van’ın konumu

Abstract

The increasing number of wars, internal conflicts, economic devastation, climate-related disasters and other threats caused by risks to personal safety around the world result in the displacement of thousands of people every year. In Iran, one of the places where human rights violations are most prevalent, a large number of people also leave their country each year in search of a new life elsewhere. Having been a major source of migration for over 40 years, Iran has consequently given rise to a significant diaspora community and has led to a significant proportion of people relying on social networks for support during their migration journeys. Due to its proximity and relatively easy access, Van ranks among the top destinations preferred by Iranian migrants. It has been established that the majority of migrants arriving in Van from Iran take action with the support of these networks at every stage of the migration process. In this study, which employed qualitative research methods, the data obtained from in-depth interviews revealed that participants utilised networks to gather information on financing and the migration process before leaving Iran; upon reaching Van, a transit city, they obtained information regarding accommodation, employment and bureaucratic procedures; and regarding their ultimate goal of settling in third countries, it was found that they attempted to expedite the process through networks, received financial support, and were directed to informal channels when necessary.

Özet

Dünya üzerinde artan savaşlar, iç çatışmalar, ekonomik yıkımlar, iklimle ilişkili afetler ve can güvenliği tehlikesinin neden olduğu diğer tehditler, her yıl binlerce insanın yerinden olmasına neden olmaktadır. İnsan hakkı ihlallerinin en fazla yaşandığı yerlerden biri olan İran’da da her yıl çok sayıda kişi, yaşadığı ülkeyi terk ederek başka yerlerde yeni bir yaşam arayışına yönelmektedir. 40 yılı aşkın bir süredir yoğun bir şekilde göç veren İran, bu vesileyle önemli bir diaspora topluluğunun oluşmasına neden olmuş ve yaşanan göç eylemlerinde insanların çok önemli bir kısmının sosyal ağlardan destek alarak hareket etmesine yol açmıştır. Bu hareketliliklerde Van, yakın ve ulaşımın nispeten kolay olmasından dolayı İranlı göçmenlerin en fazla tercih ettiği yerlerin başında gelmektedir. İran’dan Van’a gelen göçmenlerin çoğunluğunun göç sürecinin tüm aşamalarında bu ağlardan destek alarak göç ettikleri belirlenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yönteminin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada derinlemesine görüşmelerle elde edilen verilerde katılımcıların İran’dan çıkmadan önce finansman ve göç sürecine ilişkin bilgi edinerek ağlardan yararlandıkları tespit edilmişken, transit kent olan Van’a ulaştıklarında barınma, iş ve bürokratik sürece dair bilgi edindikleri ve nihai hedef olan üçüncü ülkelere yerleşme konusunda ise süreci ağlar üzerinden hızlandırmaya çalıştıkları, maddi destek aldıkları, gerektiğinde gayri resmi kanallara yönlendirildikleri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uğurlu, C., Deniz, O. (2026). The Cross-Border Networks of Iranian Migrants in Van and the Role of These Networks in the Migration Process. Turkish Journal of Diaspora Studies, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 140–162. https://doi.org/10.52241/tjds.1943850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Akbari, H. (2021). Exploratory social-spatial network analysis of global migration structure. Social Networks, 64, 181–193.
  2. Azadi, P., Mirramezani, M., & Mesgaran, M. B. (2020). Migration and brain drain from Iran (Working Paper No. 9). Stanford Iran 2040 Project, Stanford University.
  3. Bilecen, B., & Lubbers, M. J. (2021). The networked character of migration and transnationalism. Global Networks, 21, 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12317.
  4. Blumenstock, J. E., Chi, G., & Tan, X. (2025). Migration and the value of social networks. The Review of Economic Studies, 92(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad113.
  5. Bozorgmehr, M. (1998). From Iranian studies to studies of Iranians in the United States. Iranian Studies, 31(1), 4–30.
  6. Calvó-Armengol, A., & Jackson, M. O. (2004). The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. American Economic Review, 94(3), 426–454. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464542.
  7. Chaichian, M. A. (2012). The new phase of globalization and brain drain: Migration of educated and skilled Iranians to the United States. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(1/2), 18–39.
  8. Cohen, R. A., & Yefet, B. (2021). The Iranian diaspora and the homeland: Redefining the role of a centre. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(3), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1605893.
  9. Danzer, A. M., & Ülkü, H. (2011). Integration, social network and economic success of immigrants: A case study of the Turkish community in Berlin. Kyklos, 64, 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2011.00510.x.
  10. Dastjerdi, M., Olson, K., & Ogilvie, L. (2012). A study of Iranian immigrants’ experiences of accessing Canadian health care services: A grounded theory. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11, 55. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1475-9276-11-55.
  11. Dekker, R., & Engbersen, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks, 14, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040.
  12. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., & Faber, M. (2016). The use of online media in migration networks. Population, Space and Place, 22, 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1938.
  13. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J., & Vonk, H. (2018). Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. Social Media + Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2056305118764439.
  14. Demir, E. (2023). Uluslararası göç teorileri üzerine sosyoekonomik bir değerlendirme. Turkish Academic Research Review – Türk Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(4), 1407–1428. https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1348918.
  15. Esfandiari, H. (2018). Reform or revolution? Iran’s path to democracy. Foreign Affairs, 97(1), 143–149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44822022.
  16. Fischer, D. (2018). Social networking sites in the aftermath of a crisis — the enabling role for self-organization. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss. 2018.012.
  17. Garip, F., & Asad, A. L. (2015). Migrant networks. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–13). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0220.
  18. Garip, F., & Asad, A. L. (2016). Network effects in Mexico–U.S. migration: Disentangling the underlying social mechanisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(10), 1168–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216643131.
  19. Ghorashi, H., & Tavakoli, N. (2006). Paradoxes of transnational space and local activism: Iranians organizing across borders. Focaal — European Journal of Anthropology, (47), 90–102.
  20. Institute for Economics & Peace. (2025). Global Peace Index. Retrieved March 30, 2026, from https: / / www. economicsandpeace.org/global-peace-index/.
  21. January, B. (2008). The Iranian Revolution. Twenty-First Century Books.
  22. Kaufmann, K. (2018). Navigating a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1437205.
  23. Kotyrlo, E. (2020). Impact of modern information and communication tools on international migration. International Migration, 58, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12677.
  24. Manchin, M., & Orazbayev, S. (2018). Social network and the intention to migrate. World Development, 109, 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.011.
  25. Martinez-Brawley, E., & Zorita, P. M.-B. (2014). The neglect of network theory in practice with immigrants in the Southwest. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.3836.
  26. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.
  27. Minorty Right Group. (2018). Right denied: Violations against ethnic and religious minorities in İran. Retrieved April 29, 2026, from https://minorityrights.org/resources/rights-denied-violations-against-ethnic-and-religiousminorities-in-iran/.
  28. Mobasher, M. M. (2012). Iranians in Texas: Migration, politics, and ethnic identity. University of Texas Press.
  29. Morsut, C., Kuran, C., Kruke, B. I., Nævestad, T.-O., Orru, K., & Hansson, S. (2022). A critical appraisal of individual social capital in crisis response. Risks, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 13, 176–199. https: //doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12236.
  30. Munshi, K. (2020). Social networks and migration. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082019-031419.
  31. Ramadan, R. (2017). Questioning the role of Facebook in maintaining Syrian social capital during Syrian crisis. Heliyon, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00483.
  32. Riva, S., & Hoffstaedter, G. (2021). The aporia of refugee rights in a time of crises: The role of brokers in accessing refugee protection in transit and at the border. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00212-2.
  33. Sreberny, A., & Gholami, R. (2019). The politics of diasporic integration: The case of Iranians in Britain. In J. Retis & R. Tsagarousianou (Eds.), The handbook of diasporas, media, and culture (pp. 207–224). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119236771.ch14.
  34. Sreberny-Mohammadi, A., & Mohammadi, A. (1987). Post-revolutionary Iranian exiles: A study in impotence. Third World Quarterly, 108–129.
  35. Statebase. (2024). Democracy Index / Iran. Retrieved March 30, 2026, from https://statbase.org/data/irn-democracyindex/.
  36. Statebase. (2025). World Press Freedom Index / 2025. Retrieved March 30, 2026, from https://statbase.org/data/irnpress-freedom-index/.
  37. Statista. (2025). Freedom, democracy, corruption: Iran’s poor record. Retrieved March 30, 2026, from https://www.statista.com/chart/35915/iran-international-indices/.
  38. Tenty, T. A., & Houston, C. (2013). The Iranian diaspora in Sydney: Migration experience of recent Iranian immigrants. Iranian Studies, 46(4), 625–640. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24482871.
  39. The Guardian. (2025). Hardline migration policies are fuelling people smuggling, report finds. Retrieved April 3, 2026, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/04/hardline-anti-migration-policies-peoplesmuggling.
  40. Tofangsazi, B. (2020). From the Islamic Republic to the Green Movement: Social movements in contemporary Iran. Sociology Compass, 14(1), e12746.
  41. UNHCR. (2025). Global Trends. Retrieved April 2, 2026, from https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends.
  42. United Nations. (2025). International Migrant Stock 2024. Retrieved April 2, 2026, from https://www.un.org/ development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock.
  43. Vacca, R., Bilecen, B., & Lubbers, M. J. (2025). Social networks in migration and migrant incorporation: New developments and challenges. International Migration, 63(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13373.
  44. Vanneste, T. (2015). Immigration networks. In The sage encyclopedia of economics and society (pp. 919–920, Vol. 4).
  45. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452206905.n362.
  46. Zijlstra, J., & van Liempt, I. (2017). Smart(phone) travelling: Understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 3, 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmbs.2017.083245.
  47. Institute for Economics & Peace. (2025). Global Peace Index. Retrieved March 30, 2026, from https: / / www. economicsandpeace.org/global-peace-index/.