Journals / Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding Method on Cleft Segments and Alveolar Widths of Babies with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

TEK TARAFLI DUDAK-DAMAK YARIĞINA SAHİP BEBEKLERDE NAZOALVEOLER ŞEKİLLENDİRME YÖNTEMİNİN YARIK SEGMENTLER VE ALVEOL GENİŞLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2007-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently nasoalveolar molding method applied babies with unilateral cleft lip and palate produces positive effect on cleft segments, back and medial alveolar widths

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effects of nasoalveoler molding method that is used for the babies with unilateral cleft lip and palate on the cleft segments and back and medial alveolar widths .Within the scope of this study, the nasoalveoler molding treatment that is suggested by Grayson has been applied to 13 patients who have unilateral cleft lip and palate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The average treatment duration is determined as 4 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently nasoalveolar molding method applied babies with unilateral cleft lip and palate produces positive effect on cleft segments, back and medial alveolar widths
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dudak-damak yarığı · nazoalveoler şekillendirme · tek taraflı yarık

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effects of nasoalveoler molding method that is used for the babies with unilateral cleft lip and palate on the cleft segments and back and medial alveolar widths .Within the scope of this study, the nasoalveoler molding treatment that is suggested by Grayson has been applied to 13 patients who have unilateral cleft lip and palate. The registrations have been recorded on babies at the beginning of the treatment and before the lip operation. The average treatment duration is determined as 4 months. Six measurements have been performed to evaluate the cleft segments and alveolar widths on the intraoral models acquired. The paired t-test was used in the comparison of the changes seen at the beginning and end of the treatment. The measurements of the cleft wideness there occurred statistically significant changes and that the cleft segments closed during the treatment. On the beginning and end evaluation of the back and medial alveolar widths indicators revealed no statistically significant changes. It is stated that the cleft wideness is reduced with the nasoalveoler molding, in posterior and middle width measurements of the maxillary arch. It is also stated there are little increases not significant as statistical more than narrowing. Consequently nasoalveolar molding method applied babies with unilateral cleft lip and palate produces positive effect on cleft segments, back and medial alveolar widths

Özet

Bu retrospektif çalışmanın amacı, tek-taraflı dudak-damak yarığına sahip bebeklerde uygulanan nazoalveoler segmentler, arka ve orta alveoler genişlikler üzerindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Çalışma kapsamında tek-taraflı dudak-damak yarığına sahip 13 hastaya Grayson tarafından önerilen nazoalveoler şekillendirme işlemi uygulanmıştır. Bebeklerden tedavi başı ve dudak ameliyatı öncesinde kayıtlar (yüz ve ağız içi modelleri, ağız içi ve dışı fotoğrafları) alınmıştır. Ortalama tedavi süresi 4 ay olarak belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen ağız içi modeller üzerinde yarık segmenti ve alveol genişliklerini değerlendirmek için toplam 6 ölçüm yapılmıştır. Tedavi başı ve tedavi sonunda meydana gelen değişikliklerin karşılaştırılmasında eşleştirilmiş t-testi kullanılmıştır. Yarık genişliğini gösteren ölçümlerde tedavi süresince istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değişikliklerin olduğu ve yarık segmentlerin kapandığı belirlenmiştir. Arka ve orta alveoler genişlik göstergelerinin başlangıç ve tedavi sonu değerlendirilmesinde ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değişiklikler tespit edilmemiştir. Nazoalveoler şekillendirme ile yarık genişliğinin azaltıldığı, maksiller arkın posterior ve orta genişliğinde daralmadan ziyade istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmayan küçük artışların olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak tek-taraflı dudak-damak yarığına sahip bebeklerde uygulanan nazoalveoler şekillendirme yönteminin; yarık segmentler, arka ve orta alveoler genişlikler üzerinde olumlu etkilerinin olduğu belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

YAĞCI, A., UYSAL, T. (2007). Evaluation of the Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding Method on Cleft Segments and Alveolar Widths of Babies with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/155343

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Cornel MC, Spreen JA, Meijer I, et al. Some epidemiological data on oral clefts in the northern Netherlands, 1981-1988. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992, 20:147-152. Doğan S. Dudak-damak yarıklı bebeklerde erken dudak operasyonunun maksiller alveoler yarık boyutu üzerine olan etkisi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 1990, 3:7-13. Enlow DH. Handbook of Facial Growth (2 nd ed), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1982. Hook E. Incidence and Prevalence as Measures of the Frequency of Congenital Malformations and Genethic Outcomes. Cleft Palate J 1988, 25:97-101.
  2. Houston WJB, Tulley WJ. A Textbook of Orthodontics, Butterworth, Boston 1989.
  3. Borçbakan C. Dudak Damak Yarıkları, Hacettepe Taş Kitapçılık, Ankara 1980. Ferguson MWJ. Developmental mechanics in normal and abnormal palate formation with particular reference to the pathogenesis and prevention of cleft palate. British J Orthod 1982, 8:115-137. Kaufman FL. Managing the cleft lip and palate patients. Pediatr Clin North Am 1991, 38: 535-545.
  4. Gorlin RJ, Pindbrog JJ. Syndromes of the Head and Neck. McGraw-Hill, New York 1964.
  5. Clarke L, Hepworth WB, Carey JC, et al. Chondrodystrophic mice with coincidental agnathia: evidence for the tongue obstruction hypothesis in cleft palate. Teratology 1988, 38:565-570. Jones MC. Etiology of facial clefts: prospective evaluation of 428 patients. Cleft Palate J 1988, 25:16-20.
  6. Schendel SA, Pearl RM, De'Armond SJ. Pathophysiology of cleft lip muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989, 83:777-784.
  7. Johnston MC, Bronsky PT, Millicovsky G. Embryogenesis of Cleft Lip and Palate. WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1990, pp 2515. Sando WC, Jurkiewicz MJ. Cleft Lip. Plastic Surgery–Principles and Practice. Mosby, St Louis 1990, pp 59–81. McNeil CK. Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate. Dent Rec 1950, 70:126-132. Latham RA. Orthopedic advancement of the cleft maxillary segment: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate J 1980, 17:227-233. Gnoinski WM. Early maxillary orthopaedics as a supplement to conventional primary surgery in complete cleft lip and palate cases- long-term results. J Maxillofac Surg 1982, 10:165-172.
  8. Hotz MM, Gnoinski WM. Effects of early maxillary orthopaedics in coordination with delayed surgery for cleft lip and palate. J Maxillofac Surg 1979, 7:201-210.
  9. Grayson BH, Cutting C, Wood R. Preoperative columella lengthening in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993, 92:1422- 1423. Altuğ AT, Grayson B, Cutting C. Tek taraflı dudak, alveol ve damak yarıklarında cerrahi