SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Beyond Trust: The Mediating Role of Brand Activism in the Effect of Brand Trust on the Intention to Purchase Licensed Products

Güvenin Ötesinde: Marka Güveninin Lisanslı Ürün Satın Alma Niyetine Etkisinde Marka Aktivizminin Aracılık Rolü

Gökçer Aydın(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KIŞ SPORLARI VE SPOR BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, SPOR YÖNETİMİ (DR))0009-0005-5545-6608
Gökhan Aydın(Atatürk Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi)0000-0001-6183-3688
Pages
88–97
Publication Date
2026-02-03
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that brand trust was relatively high, activism perception moderate, and purchase intention moderate-to-high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates how football fans’ trust in their club’s brand affects their intention to purchase licensed products and examines the mediating role of brand activism perception.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 327 football fans in Erzurum who regularly follow their team’s matches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that brand trust was relatively high, activism perception moderate, and purchase intention moderate-to-high.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka güveni · marka aktivizmi · lisanslı ürün satın alma niyeti

Abstract

This study investigates how football fans’ trust in their club’s brand affects their intention to purchase licensed products and examines the mediating role of brand activism perception. Drawing on Social Identity Theory and the Commitment-Trust framework, the research argues that fans’ identification with their team strengthens trust and loyalty, while brand activism -defined as a brand’s explicit stance on social, political, or environmental issues- can influence consumer behavior when perceived as sincere. Data were collected from 327 football fans in Erzurum who regularly follow their team’s matches. Participants completed validated scales measuring brand trust, brand activism perception, and licensed product purchase intention. Analyses were conducted using Hayes’ PROCESS Macro Model 4 with bootstrapping. Results showed that brand trust was relatively high, activism perception moderate, and purchase intention moderate-to-high. Correlation analyses revealed significant positive relationships among all three variables. Mediation analysis indicated that brand trust significantly predicted both activism perception and purchase intention, while activism perception itself also positively influenced purchase intention. Importantly, brand activism partially mediated the relationship between trust and purchase intention, with the model explaining 36.7% of the variance. Findings suggest that trust not only directly increases fans’ willingness to purchase licensed products but also enhances perceptions of activism, which further strengthens purchase intentions. For sports clubs, this highlights the importance of building and maintaining trust as a prerequisite for effective activism strategies. Aligning activist initiatives with fans’ values and integrating them into licensed product strategies can enhance both brand credibility and economic outcomes. Future studies should test this model in different sports contexts, with longitudinal and cross-cultural designs.

Özet

Bu çalışma, futbol taraftarlarının kulüp markasına duyduğu güvenin lisanslı ürün satın alma niyetini nasıl etkilediğini ve bu ilişkide marka aktivizmi algısının aracılık rolünü incelemektedir. Sosyal Kimlik Teorisi ve Güven–Bağlılık yaklaşımına dayanan araştırma, taraftarların takımlarıyla özdeşleşmelerinin güveni ve bağlılığı güçlendirdiğini; markaların sosyal, politik veya çevresel konularda sergilediği aktivist duruşların ise tüketici davranışlarını etkileyebildiğini vurgulamaktadır. Araştırmaya Erzurum’da yaşayan ve takımlarının maçlarını düzenli olarak takip eden 327 taraftar katılmıştır. Katılımcılar, marka güveni, marka aktivizmi algısı ve lisanslı ürün satın alma niyetini ölçen ölçekleri yanıtlamıştır. Veriler, Hayes’in PROCESS Macro Model 4 aracılığıyla bootstrapping yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, taraftarların marka güveni düzeylerinin yüksek, aktivizm algılarının orta ve satın alma niyetlerinin orta–yüksek seviyede olduğunu göstermiştir. Korelasyon analizleri, değişkenler arasında anlamlı ve pozitif ilişkiler ortaya koymuştur. Aracılık analizi ise marka güveninin hem aktivizm algısını hem de satın alma niyetini anlamlı biçimde yordadığını, ayrıca aktivizm algısının da satın alma niyetini pozitif etkilediğini göstermiştir. Model, satın alma niyetindeki varyansın %36.7’sini açıklamış ve kısmi aracılık etkisi doğrulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, güvenin sadece doğrudan satın alma niyetini artırmakla kalmayıp, aynı zamanda aktivizm algısını güçlendirerek bu niyeti dolaylı yoldan da etkilediğini göstermektedir. Spor kulüpleri açısından bu bulgu, güven inşa etmenin aktivizm stratejilerinin başarısı için ön koşul olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Taraftarların değerleriyle uyumlu ve lisanslı ürün stratejileriyle bütünleşen aktivizm girişimleri, hem marka inandırıcılığını hem de ekonomik çıktıları artırma potansiyeline sahiptir. Gelecek araştırmalarda farklı spor branşları, boylamsal tasarımlar ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırmalar önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, G., Aydın, G. (2026). Beyond Trust: The Mediating Role of Brand Activism in the Effect of Brand Trust on the Intention to Purchase Licensed Products. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22282/tojras.1786297

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Atulkar, S. (2020). Brand trust and brand loyalty in mall shoppers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(5), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2019-0095
  2. Baek, W. Y., Song, H. S., Kim, D. H., & Byon, K. K. (2020). Cause-related marketing and purchase intention toward team-licensed products: Moderating effects of sport consumers’ altruism. Sustainability, 12(8), 3183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083183
  3. Bardakçı, S., & Gürbüz, R. B. (2020). Marka güven ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1684–1692.
  4. Bhagwat, Y., Warren, N. L., Beck, J. T., & Watson, G. F. IV. (2020). Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920937000
  5. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609
  6. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166284
  7. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
  8. Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Aleman, J., & Luis, L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11–12), 1238–1258. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006475
  9. Delgado‐Ballester, E. (2004). Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories: A multigroup invariance analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 38(5–6), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410529222
  10. Edelman. (2023). Edelman trust barometer 2023 [Available from: https://www.edelman.com/trust/2023/trust-barometer]
  11. Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/383434
  12. Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_15
  13. Francioni, B., De Cicco, R., Curina, I., & Cioppi, M. (2025). When brand activism meets adversity: Consumer reactions to performance-and value-related crises of varying severity. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2024-5530
  14. Funk, D. C., Beaton, A., & Alexandris, K. (2012). Sport consumer motivation: Autonomy and control orientations that regulate fan behaviours. Sport Management Review, 15(3), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.11.001
  15. Funk, D. C., Mahony, D. F., & Ridinger, L. (2002). Characterizing consumer motivation as individual difference factors: Augmenting the Sport Interest Inventory (SII) to explain level of spectator support. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/106169340201100104
  16. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  17. Inoue, Y., & Kent, A. (2012). Investigating the role of corporate credibility in corporate social marketing: A case study of environmental initiatives by professional sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 15(3), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.002
  18. Kim, M. S., & James, J. (2016). The theory of planned behaviour and intention of purchase sport team licensed merchandise. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 6(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-02-2014-0005
  19. Kunkel, T., Doyle, J. P., Funk, D. C., Du, J., & McDonald, H. (2016). The development and change of brand associations and their influence on team loyalty over time. Journal of Sport Management, 30(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2015-0129
  20. Lagoudaki, G., Tsitskari, E., Karagiorgos, T., Yfantidou, G., Tzetzis, G., & Tsiotras, G. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and consumer behavior in sports: Exploring and adapting a participatory sports scale. Sustainability, 16(14), 5825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145825
  21. Lee, C., Bang, H., & Shonk, D. J. (2021). Professional team sports organizations’ corporate social responsibility activities: Corporate image and chosen communication outlets’ influence on consumers’ reactions. International Journal of Sport Communication, 14(2), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0298
  22. Lee, S., Lee, Y., & Kang, M. (2025). Association between team identification and sport consumption behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Global Sport Management, 10(2), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2023.2246137
  23. Li, J., Montgomery, N., & Mousavi, R. (2022). How a brand's social activism impacts consumers' brand evaluations: The role of brand relationship norms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10832. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.10832
  24. Lock, D., & Heere, B. (2017). Identity crisis: A theoretical analysis of ‘team identification’ research. European Sport Management Quarterly, 17(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2017.1306872
  25. Menard, S. (2001). Applied logistic regression analysis. SAGE Publications.
  26. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700106
  27. Moorman, C. (2020). Commentary: Brand activism in a political world. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620945260
  28. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620945260
  29. Onurlubaş, E., & Altunışık, R. (2024). Marka güveninin satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde marka aşkının aracılık rolü. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, 18, 116–135.
  30. Özsoy, A., & Karlı, Ü. (2022). Spor taraftarı aşk ve nefret ölçeği ile spor takımı lisanslı ürün satın alma niyeti ölçeğinin geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1089938
  31. Palau-Saumell, R., Matute, J., & Forgas-Coll, S. (2022). The roles of team identification and psychological ownership in fans’ intentions to purchase team-licensed and a sponsor’s products: The case of FC Barcelona members. Sport Management Review, 25(5), 791–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1991676
  32. Pan, P.-L., & Phua, J. (2021). Connecting sponsor brands through sports competitions: An identity approach to brand trust and brand loyalty. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 11(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-01-2019-0003
  33. Rajaobelina, L., Prom Tep, S., Arcand, M., & Ricard, L. (2021). The relationship of brand attachment and mobile banking service quality with positive word-of-mouth. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(8), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2020-2747
  34. Rivaroli, S., Spadoni, R., & Bregoli, I. (2022). What grounds our loyalty towards “authentic brand activism” of a sustainable food brand? Sustainability, 14(12), 7341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127341
  35. Roberts, K. (2005). Lovemarks: The future beyond brands. Powerhouse Books.
  36. Sadeghi Boroujerdi, S., Mansouri, H., Hasnah Hassan, S., & Nadri, Z. (2023). The influence of team social responsibility in the attitudinal loyalty of football fans: The mediating role of team identity and team trust. Asian Journal of Sport History & Culture, 2(3), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/27690148.2023.2270541
  37. Şahin, A. (2024). Marka aktivizminin tüketici satın alma davranışına etkisi: Türk ve global markalar üzerine bir değerlendirme. Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal), 10(10), 1712–1720. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13990429
  38. Şahin, A. (2025). Marka aktivizminin tüketici satın alma davranışlarına etkisi. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi.
  39. Sarkar, C., & Kotler, P. (2020). Brand activism: From purpose to action. Idea Bite Press.
  40. Shi, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, H, Ding, J., & Wang, Z. (2024). How sports involvement and brand fit influence the effectiveness of sports sponsorship from the perspective of predictive coding theory: An event-related potential (ERP)-based study. Brain Sciences, 14(9), 940.
  41. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14090940
  42. Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004
  43. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  44. Tajfel, H., Turner, J., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 94–109).
  45. Tan, C. S. (2023). The name of the game: The effect of socio-political activism in sport on fan boycott intention. International Journal of Sport Management, 24(3), 237–265.
  46. Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359
  47. Walker, M., & Kent, A. (2009). Do fans care? Assessing the influence of corporate social responsibility on consumer attitudes in the sport industry. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.23.6.743
  48. Yıldız, E., & Koç, M. E. (2017). Marka mirası ve marka güveninin satın alma niyeti, müşteri tatmini ve marka sadakati üzerindeki etkileri. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (Pazarlama Kongresi Özel Sayısı), 86–104.
  49. Yoshida, M., Gordon, B., Nakazawa, M., & Biscaia, R. (2014). Conceptualization and measurement of fan engagement: Empirical evidence from a professional sport context. Journal of Sport Management, 28(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2013-0199