Journals / Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik Uygulamaları ve Teknolojik Gelişmeler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

The Reflection Of Energy Consumption Habits On Interior Spatial Configuration: Behavioral Sustainability Fatma Ceyda Güney Yüksel *

Enerji Tüketim Alışkanlıklarının İç Mekân Kurgusuna Yansıması: Davranışsal Sürdürülebilirlik

Pages
201–211
Publication Date
2025-12-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the same time, it is argued that the concept of sustainability in the discipline of interior architecture should be shaped not only in the axis of parameters such as materials and technology, but also in the context of behavioral data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study comparatively examines the current consumption habits in Turkey and user-centered sustainable design practices in Europe and evaluates how behavioral feedback systems affect spatial decisions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, it has been revealed on the basis of the literature that behavioral data should be considered as a strategic input in the field of sustainable interior design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the same time, it is argued that the concept of sustainability in the discipline of interior architecture should be shaped not only in the axis of parameters such as materials and technology, but also in the context of behavioral data.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilirlik · Enerji Tüketimi · İç Mekan Tasarımı

Abstract

This study comparatively examines the current consumption habits in Turkey and user-centered sustainable design practices in Europe and evaluates how behavioral feedback systems affect spatial decisions. In this context, it has been observed that the literature has turned towards interior design models supported by behavioral data. Therefore, it has been revealed on the basis of the literature that behavioral data should be considered as a strategic input in the field of sustainable interior design. Within the scope of the study, the role of energy awareness levels on the user habits of lighting, heating, ventilation and layout decisions, especially on the organization of the space, will be evaluated. At the same time, it is argued that the concept of sustainability in the discipline of interior architecture should be shaped not only in the axis of parameters such as materials and technology, but also in the context of behavioral data.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, hem Türkiye'deki mevcut tüketim alışkanlıkları hem de Avrupa’daki kullanıcı merkezli sürdürülebilir tasarım uygulamaları karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiş ve davranışsal geri bildirim sistemlerinin mekânsal kararları nasıl etkilediği değerlendirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda literatürün, davranışsal verilerle desteklenen iç mekân tasarım modellerine yöneldiği gözlemlenmiştir. Dolayısıyla, sürdürülebilir iç mekân tasarımı alanında davranışsal verilerin stratejik bir girdi olarak ele alınması gerektiği literatür temelinde ortaya konmuştur. Çalışma kapsamında enerji farkındalığı düzeylerinin mekanın düzenlenmesine başta olmak üzere, aydınlatma, ısıtma, havalandırma ve yerleşim kararlarının kullanıcı alışkanlıklarının üzerindeki rolü değerlendirilecektir. Aynı zamanda iç mimarlık disiplininde, sürdürülebilirlik kavramının sadece malzeme ve teknoloji gibi parametreler ekseninde değil, davranışsal veriler bağlamında da şekillenmesi gerektiği savunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yüksel, F. C. G. (2025). The Reflection Of Energy Consumption Habits On Interior Spatial Configuration: Behavioral Sustainability Fatma Ceyda Güney Yüksel *. Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik Uygulamaları ve Teknolojik Gelişmeler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.51764/smutgd.1807178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006
  2. ACEEE. (2017). Energy impacts of smart thermostats and home energy management systems. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
  3. Alfirević, Đ., Simonović Alfirević, S., & Nikolić, S. (2025). Impact of internal openness on the sustainability of residential space. Open House International, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-04-2024-0144
  4. Altomonte, S., & Schiavon, S. (2013). Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment, 68, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008
  5. Arxiv. (2016). Energy monitoring feedback studies in Turkish households. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04157
  6. Balaji, B., Koh, J., Weibel, N., & Agarwal, Y. (2016). Genie: A longitudinal study comparing physical and software-augmented thermostats in office buildings (arXiv:1601.07229). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.07229.000000
  7. Başar, R. (2023, July 26–28). Nesnelerin İnterneti (IoT) ile güncel yaklaşımlar: İSKİ akıllı sayaç örneği [Paper presentation]. 5th International Antalya Scientific Research and Innovative Studies Congress, Antalya, Türkiye, 164–174.
  8. Boyce, P., Hunter, C., & Howlett, O. (2003). The benefits of daylight through windows. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
  9. Ecobee. (2023). Ecobee Comments – ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Smart Thermostats [PDF]. U.S. EPA. https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/Ecobee%20Comments_2.pdf
  10. Energy Vanguard. (2014, October). Does the Nest Learning Thermostat save energy? Energy Vanguard. https://www.energyvanguard.com/blog/does-the-nest-learning-thermostat-save-energy/
  11. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. (2023). Ulusal Enerji Verimliliği Eylem Planı 2023. https://www.enerji.gov.tr
  12. Ferrante, A. (2012). Cross ventilation and vertical air extraction at the building’s scale. In Zero and low energy housing for the Mediterranean climate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Cross-ventilation-and-vertical-air-extraction-at-the-buildings-scale_fig3_254218274
  13. G. Brandon, A. Lewis (1999). REDUCING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FIELD STUDY, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19 ( 1999 ), s. 75 – 85.
  14. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2010). Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00194.x
  15. Grand View Research. (2024). Smart home market size, share & trends analysis report. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/
  16. International Energy Agency – Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme (IEA-EBC). (2008). Daylight in buildings: A source book on daylighting systems and components (Annex 29). https://www.iea-ebc.org/Data/publications/EBC_Annex_29_PSR.pdf
  17. Koçak, E., & Aydoğan, M. (2016). Türkiye’de hanehalklarının elektrik tüketiminde belirleyici faktörler. Enerji, Piyasa ve Düzenleme Dergisi, 6(2), 49–78. https://www.epdd.org.tr/
  18. Makina Mühendisleri Odası (MMO). (n.d.). Konutlarda enerji tüketimi ve verimlilik raporu. https://www.mmo.org.tr/
  19. Marinosci, C., Pellegrino, A., & Cammarano, S. (2016). Daylight strategies to enhance visual comfort and reduce lighting energy consumption in buildings. Sustainability, 8(8), 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080778
  20. Marinosci, C., Maier, T., & Pflug, H. (2016). Daylight control systems and user behavior: An analysis of performance and energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 126, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.018
  21. Negarestan A. (2025). Natural Light in Interior Architecture: Enhancing Mental Health. Management Strategies and Engineering Sciences,7(3), 66-76.
  22. Reinhart, C. F., & Walkenhorst, O. (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings, 33(7), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5
  23. SB Solar. (n.d.). Türkiye’de hanehalkı elektrik tüketimi üzerine rapor. https://www.sbsolar.com.tr/
  24. Steemers, K. (2003). Energy and the city: Density, buildings and transport. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00075-0
  25. Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Doering, A., Ford, R., Hopkins, D., & Lawson, R. (2010). Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6120–6129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.069
  26. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  27. Telecom Review Europe. (2024). Smart home adoption in Europe: Penetration trends and forecasts. https://telecomreview.com/
  28. The Interior Design Institute. (2024). Sustainable design with natural light. https://www.theinteriordesigninstitute.com/us/en/blog-sustainable-design-with-natural-light
  29. Tsesmelis, T., Hasan, I., Cristani, M., Del Bue, A., & Galasso, F. (2021). An integrated light management system with real‐time light measurement and human perception. Lighting Research & Technology, 53(1), 74 88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153520947464
  30. TÜİK. (2022). Hanehalkı tüketim harcaması verileri. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/
  31. Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., & Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. (2015). Smart homes and their users: A systematic analysis and key challenges. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(2), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0920-z
  32. Yeşil Ekonomi. (2023). Türkiye’nin enerji tüketimi kaynaklara göre dağılımı. https://www.yesilekonomi.com/
  33. G. Brandon, A. Lewis (1999). REDUCING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FIELD STUDY, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19 ( 1999 ), s. 75 – 85.