SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

The effect of the Mantle of the Expert approach in acquisition of the value of responsibility and collaborative skills in life science course

Hayat Bilgisi dersinde yer alan sorumluluk değeri ve iş birliği becerisinin kazandırılmasında Uzman Mantosu Yaklaşımı’nın etkisi

Caner Özdemir(ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3511-0942
Tolga Erdogan(Milano Eğitim Ataşeliği)0000-0001-9102-4646
Pages
27–49
Publication Date
2025-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Suggestions have been made to explore the impact of this approach on communication and self-management skills and values in future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aims to analyze the impact of Mantle of the Expert Approach (MoE) on teaching responsibility and cooperation skills in the 3rd grade primary school Life Science course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The quantitative study group consisted of 68 3rd grade primary school students, while the qualitative study group included 10 students selected from the quantitative group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Suggestions have been made to explore the impact of this approach on communication and self-management skills and values in future studies.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hayat bilgisi dersi · yaratıcı drama · uzman mantosu yaklaşımı

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the impact of Mantle of the Expert Approach (MoE) on teaching responsibility and cooperation skills in the 3rd grade primary school Life Science course. The research followed a mixed research method. Convergent parallel design was used to collect, analyze, and interpret data. The quantitative study group consisted of 68 3rd grade primary school students, while the qualitative study group included 10 students selected from the quantitative group. The study's data were collected using scales, observation forms, and interview forms developed by the researchers. Quantitative data were analyzed using ANCOVA while qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The research found a significant difference in favor of the experimental group's gain in responsibility and cooperation skills. Observations and interviews showed that the experimental group students had increased responsibility values and cooperation skills compared to the control group students, along with positive thoughts development. The research concludes that the MoE should be utilized in the Life Science course and other primary school lessons. It is crucial to promote the MoE and support teachers in using it with adequate training. Additionally, it is important to prioritize the MoE in skills and values education in schools. Suggestions have been made to explore the impact of this approach on communication and self-management skills and values in future studies.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilkokul 3. sınıf Hayat Bilgisi dersinde yer alan sorumluluk değeri ve iş birliği becerisinin kazandırılmasında Uzman Mantosu Yaklaşımının etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma, karma araştırma yöntemine uygun olarak yürütülmüştür. Verilerin toplanması, analiz edilmesi ve yorumlanmasında yakınsayan paralel desenden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel boyutundaki çalışma grubunu 68 ilkokul 3. sınıf öğrencisi; nitel boyutundaki çalışma grubunu ise, nicel boyutta belirlenen öğrenciler arasından seçilen 10 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen Sorumluluk Değeri Değerlendirme Ölçeği, İş Birliği Becerisi Değerlendirme Ölçeği, gözlem formu ve mülakat formu aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen nicel veriler kovaryans analizine (ANCOVA); nitel veriler ise içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonunda, sorumluluk değeri ve iş birliği becerisi kazanmada deney grubu lehine anlamlı farklılık olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Araştırmada yapılan gözlemler ve mülakatlar sonucunda ise deney grubunda yer alan öğrencilerin kontrol grubunda yer alan öğrencilere göre sorumluluk değeri ve iş birliği becerisinde artışlar ve olumlu düşünceler geliştiği tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda hem Hayat Bilgisi dersinde hem de ilkokulda yer alan başka derslerde Uzman Mantosu Yaklaşımından yararlanılması gerektiği, öğretmenlerin Uzman Mantosu Yaklaşımı kullanmalarının teşvik edilmesi ve gereken eğitimleri almaları konusunda desteklenmesinin önemli olduğu, okullarda beceri ve değer eğitiminde Uzman Mantosu Yaklaşımına daha fazla yer verilmesinin önem arz ettiği, iletişim ve öz yönetim ile ilgili beceri ve değerlerin kazandırılmasında Uzman Mantosu Yaklaşımının etkisinin farklı çalışmalarda ele alınabileceği yönünde öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdemir, C., Erdogan, T. (2025). The effect of the Mantle of the Expert approach in acquisition of the value of responsibility and collaborative skills in life science course. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1514657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (78)

  1. Adıgüzel, H. Ö. (2000). A new method and discipline in education: Creative drama, writings from 1985-1995. Natural Publishing.
  2. Adıgüzel, H. Ö. (2006). Concept of creative drama, its components and stages. Creative Drama Journal, 1(1), 17-30.
  3. Afdal, G. (2007). Participative research in religious education. An argument for a dialectical understanding of theory and practice. C. Bakker & H.-G. Heimbrock (Eds). Researching RE Teacher, RE Teachers as a researcher (pp. 93-107). Münster: Waxman.
  4. Alak, G. (2011). Evaluation of life sciences curriculum elements according to teachers' opinions [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ataturk University.
  5. Aral, N, Baran, G., Alisinanoğlu, F., Aktaş, Y., Başar, F., & Köksal, A. (1999). The effect of creative drama education on receptive language development in children aged five to six. Contemporary Drama Association Bulletin, 3(4), 10-13.
  6. Av-Hartuç, D. (2015). An application proposal regarding the teaching of primary school 2nd grade life sciences course with the drama method [Unpublished master's thesis]. Dokuz Eylül University.
  7. Aygün, Ş, Atalay, N, Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). Development of the 21st century skills competency perception scale for teacher candidates: validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 40(40), 160-175.
  8. Bacanlı, H. (2007). Cognitive and affective goals: A model proposal. Kaymakcan, R. et al. (Ed.). In Values and Education (pp. 263-273). Values Education Center Publications.
  9. Bahçe, A. (2010). Evaluation of the levels of acquisition of values in life science teaching according to teachers' opinions [Unpublished master's thesis]. Selcuk University.
  10. Barcin, F. (2018). The effect of creative drama techniques used in pre-school education on children's acquisition of values [Unpublished master's thesis]. Gaziantep University.
  11. Barlas, B. (2015). Determination of the effectiveness of life science course outcomes in gaining common and course-specific skills based on teachers' opinions [Unpublished master's thesis]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
  12. Bilek, E. (2009). The effect of dramatization method on students' social-emotional adaptation and academic achievement in the third-grade primary school life sciences course [Unpublished master's thesis]. Celal Bayar University.
  13. Binbaşıoğlu, C. (2003). Life science teaching. Nobel Publishing Distribution.
  14. Bolton, G. (1984). Drama as education. Longman Press.
  15. Brady, L. (2008). Strategies in values education: Horse or cart? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(5), 81-89.
  16. Bruyère, J. M. (2017). Drama, a springboard for writing at the kindergarten level. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. University of Toronto.
  17. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Experimental patterns. PegemA Publishing.
  18. Can, Ö. (2008). Opinions of fourth and fifth grade teachers on values education practices in social studies course (Unpublished master's thesis). Hacettepe University.
  19. Carroll, J. (2009). Mantle of the expert and epistemic games. In 6th International Drama in Education Research Institute (p. 108). IDEA/Routledge.
  20. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (1996). A guide to teaching practice, (fourth edition), Routledge.
  21. Courtney, R. (1995). Drama and emotion: An aesthetic theory. McGill-Queen's University Press.
  22. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Pearson.
  23. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Understanding mixed methods research. In J. Creswell (Ed.), Designing and conducting mixed methods research (pp. 1-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2014). Mixed methods research: Design and conduct. Y. Dede & SB Demir (Trans. Ed.), Anı Publishing.
  25. Çelen, I. (2008). Expert role approach in drama in education and teaching English: A research on fourth grade primary school students [Unpublished master's thesis]. Adnan Menderes University.
  26. Çelen, İ., & Akar-Vural, R. (2009). Drama and English teaching in education: A research on fourth grade primary school students. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 425-438.
  27. Demir, R. M. (2008). The effect of the learning model at the stations on the achievement of high-level skills in the life sciences course [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hacettepe University.
  28. Deryakulu, D., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Re-examination of the factor structure of the epistemological belief scale: Comparison of epistemological beliefs according to gender and type of program studied. Educational Research, 5(18), 57–70.
  29. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Sage.
  30. Dilmaç, B. (2007). Testing the human values education given to a group of science high school students with the human values scale [Unpublished master's thesis]. Selcuk University.
  31. Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1997). The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children (4th ed.), Cambridge University Press.
  32. Eryılmaz, MA (2016). Opinions of classroom teachers on values education practices in third grade life sciences courses [Unpublished master's thesis]. Gazi University.
  33. Esemen, A. (2020). Evaluation of the relationship between life sciences curriculum gains and root values. Maarif Mektepleri International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 16-29.
  34. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative learning. In Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences, ACS Symposium Series. 970, 34-53.
  35. Freeman, G. D., Sullivan, K., & Fulton, C. R. (2003). Effects of creative drama on self-concept, social skills, and problem behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(3), 131-138.
  36. Ginott, H. G. (2009). Between parent and child: The best-selling classic that revolutionized parent-child communication. Harmony.
  37. Gönen, M. (2010). Using the drama method in child education. Adıgüzel, H. Ö (Ed.). A gift to Tamer Levent, creative drama. In articles 1999-2002 (pp. 34-42). Naturel Kitap Publishing Distribution.
  38. Gündoğan, A. (2017). 2015 Examination of the life sciences curriculum in the context of social skills. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 12(23), 437-456.
  39. Güney, S. (2009). The use of drama techniques in the 4th and 5th grades of primary education (Example of Dede Korkut stories) [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ataturk University, Erzurum.
  40. Gürol, A., & Serhatlıoğlu, B. (2009). The role of creative drama in imparting values. I. National Kindness Symposium (June 2009). Fırat University, Elazığ.
  41. Huxtable, C. (2009). Mantle of the expert and the key competencies: an exciting and valuable partnership (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Otago.
  42. Johnson, D. W., Johnson RT, & Smith, K. A. (1998). Maximizing interaction through cooperative learning. Aseeprism, 7, 24-34.
  43. Kabapınar, Y. (2007). Teaching life sciences and social studies in primary education. Maya Publishing.
  44. Kaf, O. (1999). The effect of creative drama method on gaining some social skills in life sciences course [Unpublished master's thesis]. Cukurova University.
  45. Karaca, NH, & Ocak, G. (2011). Evaluation of the suitability level of life sciences textbooks for skills according to teachers' opinions (Afyonkarahisar province sample). Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 4(1), 108-125.
  46. Karadağ, E., Korkmaz, T., & Çalışkan, N. (2007). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the drama method in teaching life sciences according to cognitive domain levels. Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal. 8(1), 179-195.
  47. Karakaya, N. (2007). Drama in primary education and an exemplary application. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 27(1), 103-139.
  48. Kılıç, Z., & Gültekin, M. (2015). Effective learning practices in developing students' life skills in life sciences course. Trakya University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 261-281.
  49. Lickona, T. (1991). An integrated approach to character development in the elementary school classroom. Morale, Character, and Civic Education, 67-83.
  50. MEB (2018). Life sciences course curriculum for primary school 1st, 2nd, and 3rd grades. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/2018122171428547-HAYAT%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0S%C4%B0%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI.pdf
  51. Milstein, D. (1999). Relationship between the culture of school, the culture of the individual teachers and school curriculum, Digital Dissertation, Pub. No: AAT 9954535.
  52. Morgan, N., & Saxton, J. (1995). Teaching drama, mind of wonders, Redwood Books, Trowbridge.
  53. Narin, D. (2007). Teacher opinions on how the primary school life sciences course curriculum provides citizenship knowledge, skills, and values [Unpublished master's thesis]. Eskisehir Anadolu University.
  54. Navarro, R. (2011). Drama and social change in education: theoretical perspectives. Creative Drama Magazine, 6(11), 27-48.
  55. Nelson, D. B., & Low, G. R. (2004). Personal liability map (PRM), Oakwood Solutions, LLC.
  56. Nichols, M. P. (2006). Communicate with your child without arguing. HYB.
  57. Onur, G. (2008). The effect of teaching classroom and school rules to 2nd and 3rd grade primary school students with drama technique within the framework of the life sciences course program on retention [Unpublished master's thesis]. Uludağ University.
  58. Özen, Z. (2011). Dorothy Heathcote's creative drama approaches [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ankara university.
  59. Özen, Z., & Adıgüzel, Ö. (2017). Dorothy Heathcote's approaches to creative drama. Creative Drama Magazine, 12(1), 2-28.
  60. Özen, Z., & Adıgüzel, Ö. (2018). A new drama approach that questions the relationship between school-real life and taking responsibility: commission model. Creative Drama Magazine, 13(2), 153-172.
  61. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). Curriculum and instruction: A 21st century skills implementation guide. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/p21-stateimp_curriculuminstruction.pdf
  62. Ruyter, D. J. (2002). The right to meaningful education: The role of values and beliefs. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 23(1), 33-42.
  63. Sayers, R. (2012). Mantle of the expert: The legacy of Dorothy Heathcote. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
  64. Schmer, C., & Ward-Smith, P. (2011) Learning outcomes associated with group assignments, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3).
  65. Selanik-Ay, T. (2005). The effects of creative drama and traditional teaching methods on student success and retention level in primary school life sciences teaching [Unpublished master's thesis]. Pamukkale University.
  66. Selanik-Ay, T., & Acar, Ş. (2016). Opinions of classroom teachers on teaching entrepreneurship skills. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(58), 960-976.
  67. Sezerel, H., & Gökbulut, Ö. HE. (2015). Internet Addiction and processual drama: Preventable development of an addiction. Creative Drama Magazine, 10(1), 103-116.
  68. Sezerel, H., & Özoğul, T. (2019). Putting the student at the center: MoE in tourist guide education. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Business Administration Journal, 20(1), 167-197.
  69. Hot, A., & Eker, C. (2016). Examination of life sciences curriculum achievements in terms of self-regulation skills. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal, 12(1), 129-144.
  70. Sönmez, V. (2005). Life science teaching and teacher's guide. National Education Printing House.
  71. Sternberg, P. (1998). Theater for conflict resolution: in the classroom and beyond. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  72. Superka, D. P., & Johnson, P. L. (1975). Values Education: Approaches and Materials Boulder, CO: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education and the Social Science Education Consortium. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED103284).
  73. TDK. (2024). Big Turkish Dictionary. http://www.tdk.gov.tr
  74. Ütkür, N., & Açıkalın, M. (2018). Yaratıcı drama yönteminin hayat bilgisi dersinde kullanılmasının öğrencilerin başarılarına etkisinin ve öğrenci görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 253-269.
  75. Wilson, R. S. A. (2002). Developing social skills and self-esteem in children with special needs. Primary Educator, 8, 3.
  76. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. (9th Edition). Seckin Publishing.
  77. Yıldırım, N., & Turan, S. (2015). Opinions of classroom teachers on the process of imparting values in the life sciences course curriculum. Theory and Practice in Education, 11(2), 420-437.
  78. Yıldız, V. (1999). Differences between cooperative learning and traditional learning groups. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 16(17), 155-163.