SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Business Innovation and Governance / 2024 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

BRAIN ROT: OVERCONSUMPTION OF ONLINE CONTENT (AN ESSAY ON THE PUBLICNESS SOCIAL MEDIA)

BEYİN ÇÜRÜMESİ: ÇEVRİMİÇİ İÇERİĞİN AŞIRI TÜKETİMİ (SOSYAL MEDYANIN KAMUSALLIĞI ÜZERİNE BİR DENEME)

Aylin İdikut Özpençe(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4087-5202
Pages
48–60
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Brain Rot, Social Media, Global Public Goods, Digitalization JEL Codes: H41, H87, D83, D85

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The term "brain rot" first appeared in 1854.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But it has evolved to define a modern concern about how it will shape our digital lives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Brain Rot, Social Media, Global Public Goods, Digitalization JEL Codes: H41, H87, D83, D85
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beyin Çürümesi · Sosyal Medya · Küresel Kamusal Mallar

Abstract

The term "brain rot" first appeared in 1854. But it has evolved to define a modern concern about how it will shape our digital lives. Anxiety and despair about the expected negative effects because of overconsumption of online content are of increasing interest both in academia and among policymakers to investigate the causes and consequences of this behavior. Based on the public goods feature of information and speech, I think that social media also has a public good feature. Because the starting point of social media is talking and sharing information. Brain rot, which emerges as a negative externality because of excessive consumption of social media (which I call dirty consumption), is the tragedy of the commons. It should be the subject of public solutions on a global scale and should be seen as a global public good. Keywords: Brain Rot, Social Media, Global Public Goods, Digitalization JEL Codes: H41, H87, D83, D85

Özet

"Brain rot" terimi ilk olarak 1854 yılında ortaya çıkmıştır. Ancak, bu terim, dijital yaşamlarımızı nasıl şekillendireceğine dair modern bir endişeyi tanımlamak için evrim geçirmiştir. Çevrimiçi içeriklerin aşırı tüketimi nedeniyle beklenen olumsuz etkiler hakkında duyulan kaygı ve umutsuzluk, hem akademik çevrelerde hem de politika yapıcılar arasında bu davranışın nedenlerini ve sonuçlarını araştırma konusunda artan bir ilgiyle karşılanmaktadır. Bilgi ve ifade özgürlüğünün kamu malı özellikleri göz önüne alındığında, sosyal medyanın da bir kamu malı özelliği taşıdığına inanıyorum. Çünkü sosyal medyanın başlangıç noktası konuşmak ve bilgi paylaşmaktır. Aşırı sosyal medya tüketimi nedeniyle ortaya çıkan "brain rot" (ben buna kirli tüketim diyorum), ortakların trajedisini temsil etmektedir. Bu durum, küresel ölçekte kamu çözümlerinin konusu olmalı ve küresel bir kamu malı olarak görülmelidir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Brain Rot, Sosyal Medya, Küresel Kamu Malları, Dijitalleşme JEL Kodları: H41, H87, D83, D85

🔖

Cite This Article

Özpençe, A. İ. (2024). BRAIN ROT: OVERCONSUMPTION OF ONLINE CONTENT (AN ESSAY ON THE PUBLICNESS SOCIAL MEDIA). Journal of Business Innovation and Governance, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.54472/jobig.1605072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Aygar H, Goktas S, Akbulut Zencirci S, Alaiye M, Onsuz MF, Metintas S. (2019). Association Between Fear of Missing Out in Social Media and Problematic Internet Use in University Students, Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 32, 302-308.
  2. Balcı, Ş., Akgül, T.E. and Astam, F.K. (2024). University Students Addiction Adventure beyond the Screen: The Relationship between TikTok Usage Motives and Addiction, Journal of Erciyes Communication, 11(2), 715-737. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1442074.
  3. Ballarotto, G., Marzilli, E., Cerniglia, L., Cimino, S., and Tambelli, R. (2021). How Does Psychological Distress Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Internet Addiction and Instagram Addiction in Emerging Adults? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111382.
  4. Beranuy, M., Carbonell, X. and Griffiths, M.D. (2013). A Qualitative Analysis of Online Gaming Addicts in Treatment, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 149-161.
  5. Betteridge, B., Chien, W., Hazels, E. and Simone, J. (5 September 2023). How does Technology Affect the Attention Spans of Different Age Groups?, OxJournal, https://www.oxjournal.org/how-does-technology-affect-the-attention-spans-of-different-age-groups/.
  6. Chakraborty, A. (2016). Facebook Addiction: An Emerging Problem, American Journal of Psychiatry Residents’ Journal, 11(12), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2016.111203.
  7. Chappell, B. (2024). Writer Thoreau Warned of Brain Rot in 1854. Now it’s the Oxford Word of 2024. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2024/12/02/nx-s1-5213682/writer-thoreau-warned-of-brain-rot-in-1854-now-its-the-oxford-word-of-2024 (Accessed, December 02, 2024).
  8. Cheng, L., Fang, G. and Zhang, X. (2022). Impact of Social Media Use on Critical Thinking Ability of University Students, Library Hi Tech, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2021-0393.
  9. Collins, B., Marichal, J. and Neve, R. (2020). The Social Media Commons: Public Sphere, Agonism, and Algorithmic Obligation, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(4), 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1742266.
  10. Cosma A, Molcho M, Pickett W. (2024). A Focus on Adolescent Peer Violence and Bullying in Europe, Central Asia and Canada. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children international report from the 2021/2022 survey, Volume 2. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2024. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  11. Çela, E. (2015). Social Media as a New Form of Public Sphere, European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 2(3), 126-131.
  12. Çetinkaya, A., Kırık, A.M. and Gündüz, U. (2021). Fear of Missing Out and Problematic Social Media Use: A Research Among University Students in Turkey, Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, 12(47), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2021.04.001.x.
  13. Dadiotis, A. and Roussos, P. (2024). Relationship Between FoMO, Problematic social Media Use, Self-esteem, Negative Affectivity, and Physical Exercise: A Structual Equation Model, Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 9, 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-023-00340-3.
  14. Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media and the Public Sphere, 12(1), 57-101. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552.
  15. Frye, B.L. (2022). Toxic Public Goods, Law Faculty Scholarly Articles, 715, 74(1), 1-14. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/715.
  16. Gal, M. and Rubinfeld, D. (2016). The Hidden Costs of Free Goods: Implications for Antitrust Enforcement, Antitrust Law Journal, 80(3), 521-562.
  17. Göker, Z. (2008). Kamusal Mallar Tanımında Farklı Görüşler, Maliye Dergisi, 155 (Temmuz-Aralık), 108-118.
  18. Handfield, T. (2024). Regulating Social Media as Public good: Limiting Epistemic Segregation, Social Epistomology, 38(6), 743-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2156825.
  19. Hartas, D. (2019). The Social Context of Adolescent Mental Health and Wellbeing: Parent, Friends and Social Media, Research Papers in Education, 36(5), 542-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1697734
  20. Hong, Y., Hu, Y. And Burtch, G. (2015). How does Social Media Affect Contribution to Public versus Private Goods in Crowdfunding Campaigns?, Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth 2015, https://yuhenghu.com/paper/icis15.pdf.
  21. Howarth, J. (December 3, 2024). https://explodingtopics.com/blog/top-social-media-platforms (Accessed December 5, 2024).
  22. Hutton JS, Dudley J, Horowitz-Kraus T, DeWitt T, Holland SK. (2020). Associations Between Screen-Based Media Use and Brain White Matter Integrity in Preschool-Aged Children, JAMA Pediatr., 174(1): e193869. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3869.
  23. İlhan, V. and Ulusoy, A. (2013). Television Addiction and Audience: is it Possible not to Watch TV?, International Journal of Social Science, 6(5), 1127-1154. https://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1443.
  24. Karayılmazlar, E. (2006). Uluslararası Kamusal Mallara İlişkin Kavramsal Sorunların Kamu Maliyesi Perspektifinden Tartışılması, Vergi Dünyası, 25 (300), 148-159.
  25. Kemp, S. (October 2024). Digital 2024: October Global Statshot Report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-october-global-statshot.
  26. Kersbergen, K.V. and Vis, B. (2022). Digitalization as a Policy Response to Social Acceleration: Comparing
  27. Democratic Problem Solving in Denmark and the Netherland, Government Information Quartely, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707.
  28. Klobas, J,E., McGill, T.J., Moghavvemi, S. and Paramanathan, T. (2018). Compulsive YouTube Usage: A Comparison of Use Motivation and Personality Effects, Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 129-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.038.
  29. Liu, Z. (2022). Reading in the Age of Digital Distraction, Journal of Documentation, 78(6), 1201-1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2021-0130.
  30. Mıynat, M. and Cüre, M.F. (2023). Dijitalleşme Sürecinde Kamusal Politikaların Oluşumunda Paradigma Değişimi: Dijital Kamusal Mallar, Turkuaz Uluslararası Sosyo-Ekonomik Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 41-63.
  31. Musgrave, R.A. and Musgrave, P.B. (1989). Public Finance in Theory and Practice, New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  32. Montag, C. and Markett, S. (2023). Social Media Use and Everyday Cognitive Failure: Investigating The Fear of Missing Out and Social Networks Use Disorder Relationship, BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 872. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05371-x.
  33. Newport Institute (03 December 2024). https://www.newportinstitute.com/resources/co-occurring-disorders/brain-rot/. (Accessed December 03, 2024)
  34. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing The Commons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 0-521-40599-8. Özpençe, Ö. ve Özpençe, A. İ. (2011). Dijital Kamusal Mal ve Dijitalizm, Uluslararası 9. Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312495403_Dijital_Kamusal_Mal_ve_Dijitalizm.
  35. Özpençe, Ö. (2014). Digital Public Goods, Sosyoekonomi, 2, 140203, 57-80.
  36. Pomeras, J., Ortega, A. and Abdala, M.B. (2020). Digitalization as a Common Good, Global Solutions Journal, 7, 148-154, https://www.cippec.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Global-Solutions-Journal-7-Pomares-Abdala.pdf.
  37. Qin, Y., Omar, B. and Musetti, A. (2022). The addiction behavior of Short-form Video App TikTok: The Information Quality and System Quality Perspective, Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 932805, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932805.
  38. Rajesh, T. and Rangaiah, B. (2022). Relationship between Personality Traits and Facebook Addiction: A Meta Analysis, Heliyon, 8(8): e10315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10315.
  39. Rakić JG, Hamrik Z, Dzielska A, Felder-Puig R, Oja L, Bakalár P et al. (2024). A Focus on Adolescent Physical Activity, Eating Behaviours, Weight Status and Body Image in Europe, Central Asia and Canada. Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children International Report from the 2021/2022 Survey, Volume 4. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  40. Rosa, H. (2015). Social Acceleration A New Theory of Modernity, Columbia University Press: New York.
  41. Sahu, M., Gandhi, S. and Sharma, M.K. (2019). Mobile Phone Addiction Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review, Journal of Addictions Nursing, 30(4), 261-268, https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000309.
  42. Samuelson, P.A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, The Review of Economics and Statistic, 36(4), 387-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895.
  43. Selen, U. (2020). Global Public Goods & The Sovereignty Responsibility Approach, Equinox, Journal of Economics, Business & Political Studies, VII (2), 193-213.
  44. Shanmugasundaram M. and Tamilarasu A. (2023). The Impact of Digital Technology, Social Media, and Artificial Intelligence on Cognitive Functions: a Review. Frontier Cognition, 2:1203077, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2023.1203077.
  45. Sperry, B. (2024). A Law & Economics Approach to Socail Media Regulation, International Center for Law & Economics, https://laweconcenter.org/resources/a-law-economics-approach-to-social-media-regulation/.
  46. Steedman, I. (1989). Free Goods. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds)General Equilibrium. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19802-3_17, p.138.
  47. Stiglitz, J.E. (2021). The Media: Information as a Public Good, the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, Casina Pio IV, Vatican City, May 10-12, 2021.
  48. Thoreau, H.D. (1854). Walden; or, Life in the Woods, Boston: Ticknor and Fields, Boston Stereotype Foundry. Turel, O., Serenko, A. and Giles, P. (2011). Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: An Emprical Investigation of Online Auction Users, MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1043-1061.
  49. WEB_1: https://corp.oup.com/word-of-the-year/ (Accessed December 02, 2024). https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/ (Accessed December 02, 2024).
  50. Yayan, E. H., Dağ, Y. S., Düken, M. E., and Ulutaş, A. (2019). Investigation of Relationship between Smartphone Addiction and Internet Addiction in Working Children in Industry, Journal of Human Sciences, 16(1), 143–154. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/5397.
  51. Yusufoğlu, A. and Özpençe, Ö. (2015). A Solution Proposal for the Arising Problems of the Presentation of Global Public Goods, International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 15-35.