SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Business Innovation and Governance / 2026 / Cilt: 9

MANAGERIAL POWER IN REMOTE WORK: THE ROLE OF ICT-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION

UZAKTAN ÇALIŞMADA YÖNETSEL GÜÇ: BİLGİ İLETİŞİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ ARACILI İLETİŞİMİN ROLÜ

Begüm Kanat Tiryaki(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7410-1216
Nazlı Ayşe Ayyıldız Ünnü(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8427-5727
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Managerial power emerges as a dynamic, communication-centered process shaped by digital interaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid growth of remote work has increased organizations’ reliance on digitally mediated communication, reshaping how managerial power operates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on French and Raven’s bases of social power, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 managers from different sectors and hierarchical levels who managed teams via digital platforms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Managerial power emerges as a dynamic, communication-centered process shaped by digital interaction.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yönetsel Güç · Uzaktan Çalışma · Bilgisayar Destekli İletişim

Abstract

The rapid growth of remote work has increased organizations’ reliance on digitally mediated communication, reshaping how managerial power operates. This qualitative study examines how remote work reconfigures managerial power through communication. Drawing on French and Raven’s bases of social power, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 managers from different sectors and hierarchical levels who managed teams via digital platforms. Findings show that remote work weakens power based on physical presence and direct supervision while strengthening expert, referent, and relational power enacted through information sharing, trust-building, explanatory communication and adaptive interaction. Managerial power emerges as a dynamic, communication-centered process shaped by digital interaction.

Özet

Uzaktan çalışmanın hızlı biçimde yaygınlaşması, örgütlerin dijital olarak aracılanmış iletişime olan bağımlılığını artırmış ve yönetsel gücün nasıl işlediğini dönüştürmüştür. Bu nitel çalışma, uzaktan çalışmanın yönetsel gücü iletişim üzerinden nasıl yeniden yapılandırdığını incelemektedir. French ve Raven’ın sosyal güç temellerine dayanan araştırmada, dijital platformlar aracılığıyla ekip yöneten, farklı sektör ve hiyerarşik düzeylerden 13 yöneticiyle yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Bulgular, fiziksel varlık ve doğrudan denetime dayalı güç biçimlerinin zayıfladığını; buna karşılık bilgi paylaşımı, güven inşası, açıklayıcı iletişim ve uyumlu etkileşim yoluyla kullanılan uzmanlık, referans ve ilişkisel gücün güçlendiğini göstermektedir. Yönetsel güç, dijital etkileşimle şekillenen dinamik ve iletişim merkezli bir süreç olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tiryaki, B. K., Ünnü, N. A. A. (2026). MANAGERIAL POWER IN REMOTE WORK: THE ROLE OF ICT-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION. Journal of Business Innovation and Governance, Cilt: 9. https://doi.org/10.54472/jobig.1886161

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Ayers, M. R. (1975). The Ideas of Power and Substance in Locke's Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), Vol. 25, No. 98, 1-27.
  2. Baltes, B., Dickson, M., Sherman, M., Bauer, C., LaGanke, J. (2002). Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2961
  3. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership, Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14-49.
  4. Berger, B. K. (2005). Power Over, Power With, and Power to Relations: Critical Reflections on Public Relations, the Dominant Coalition, and Activism, Journal of Public Relations Research, 17:1, 5-28.
  5. Bierstedt, R. (1950). An Analysis of Social Power, American Sociological Review, Vol. 15, No. 6, 730-738.
  6. Boland, B., De Smet, A., Palter, R., Sanghvi, A. (2020). Reimagining the office and work life after COVID-19, McKinsey & Company.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  8. Brown, J.H. & Raven, B.H. (1994). “Power and Compliance in Doctor/Patients Relationship,” Journal of Health Psychology, 6(1).
  9. Cook, D. (2023). What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work, World Leisure Journal, 65(2).
  10. Cohen, A. (1976). Two-dimensional man: An essay on the anthropology of power and symbolism in complex society, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  11. Clegg, S.R. (Ed.), Hardy, C. (Ed.), Nord, W.N. (Ed.) (2002). Handbook of Organization Studies, 1st Edition.
  12. Dahl, R.A. (1957). The concept of power, Journal of the Society for General Systems Research, Vol. 2, Issue 3, 201-2015.
  13. Eberhard, B., Podio, M., Alonso, et. al. (2017). Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth industrial revolution (I4.0), International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10, 47-66.
  14. Emanuel, N., & Harrington, E. (2024). Working remotely? Selection, treatment, and the market for remote work, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 16(4), 528-559.
  15. Evans, P. B. (1985). Bringing the state back in. New York.
  16. Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single tactics and combinations of tactics, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638-652.
  17. French, J.R.P. & Jr., Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power, in D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, 150–167.
  18. Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416
  19. Hay, C. (1997). Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and the Concept of Power, Politics, 17(1), 45-52. International Labour Organization (2021). From potential to practice: Preliminary findings on the numbers of workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, Policy Brief.
  20. Isaac, J. C. (1987). Beyond the three faces of power: A realist critique, Polity, 20(1), 4-31.
  21. Kelman, H. C. (1953). Attitude change as a function of response restriction, Human Relations, 6(3), 185-214.
  22. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (Vol. 8). Verso books.
  23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
  24. Mack, S., & Goretzki, L. (2017). How management accountants exert influence on managers – a micro-level analysis of management accountants’ influence tactics in budgetary control meetings, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 328-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-07-2016-0058
  25. Melé, D. & Rosanas, J.M. (2003). Power, Freedom and Authority in Management: Mary Parker Follett’s ‘Power-With’, Philosophy of Management, Volume 3, Number 2.
  26. Manroop, L., Zheng, H., Malik, A., Milner, M., Schulz, E., & Banerji, K. (2025). Human resource management in times of crisis: Strategies for a post COVID-19 workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 54(1), 101060.
  27. Mintzberg, H. (1983). The case for corporate social responsibility, Journal of Business Strategy, 4(2), 3-15.
  28. Morriss, P., (2006), Steven Lukes on the Concept of Power, Political Studies Association Political Studies Review, 4(2), 124–135.
  29. Olawale, O., Ajayi, F. A., Udeh, C. A., & Odejide, O. A. (2024). Remote work policies for IT professionals: Review of current practices and future trends, International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(4), 1236-1258.
  30. Pansardi, P. (2012). Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power?, Journal of Political Power, 5:1, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278
  31. Panteli, N., & Tucker, R. (2009). Power and trust in global virtual teams, Communications of the ACM, 52(12), 113-115.
  32. Patton MQ. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA:
  33. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Understanding power in organizations, California Management Review, 34(2), 29-50.
  34. Ramirez Jr, A., Zhang, S., McGrew, C., & Lin, S. F. (2007). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction revisited: A comparison of participant–observer perspectives, Communication Monographs, 74(4), 492-516.
  35. Raven, B.H. (1992). The Bases of Power: Origins and Recent Developments, Journal of Social Issues, Volume 49, Issue 4, 227-251.
  36. Raven, B.H., Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsk, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and Measuring a Power Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 4, 307-332.
  37. Raven, B.H. (2008). The Bases of Power and the Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1-22.
  38. Read, J.H.,(2012).Is Power Zero-Sum or Variable-Sum? Old Arguments and New Beginnings, Political Science Faculty Publications, 4.
  39. Reed, I. A., (2013). Power: Relational, Discursive, and Performative Dimensions, Sociological Theory, 31(3) 193–218, DOI: 10.1177/0735275113501792
  40. Salancik, G.R., Pfeffer, J., (1977). Who Gets Power-And How They Hold on to It: A Strategic-Contingency Model of Power, Organizatioanl Dynamics.
  41. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B., (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, London: John Wiley & Sons,
  42. Simon, B., & Oakes, P. (2006). Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination, Human Relations, 59(1), 105-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706062760
  43. Stinebrickner, B. (2015). Robert A. Dahl and the essentials of Modern Political Analysis: Politics, influence, power, and polyarchy, Journal of Political Power, 8:2, 189-207.
  44. Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3).
  45. Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future, Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(3), 17-29.
  46. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective, Communication Research, Vol. 19, 52-90.
  47. Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 416–423.
  48. Yukl, G., Kim, H., & Falbe, C. M. (1996). Antecedents of influence outcomes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.309
  49. Zhao, X., Shang, Y., Lin, J., Tan, J., Li, H., & Liu, T. (2016). Leader's relational power: Concept, measurement and validation, European Management Journal, 34(5), 517-529.