SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bankacılar / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 88

The relationship between nominal ınterest rates and ınflation in emerging markets: evidence from panel cointegration tests

Yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde nominal faiz oranları ile enflasyon arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: panel koentegrasyon testlerinden kanıtlar

Önder BÜBERKÖKÜ
Pages
80–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings have important implications for policymakers in these emerging markets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the long-run relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation within the framework of Fisher's (1930) hypothesis for seven emerging markets, namely Russia, China, Turkey, Poland, South Africa, Mexico and Indonesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The long-run cointegrating relationship is investigated using Pedroni (2004) and Koa (1999) panel cointegration tests and the cointegrating coefficient is estimated according to Pedroni's (2001) panel group mean FMOLS, DOLS and OLS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings have important implications for policymakers in these emerging markets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the long-run relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation within the framework of Fisher's (1930) hypothesis for seven emerging markets, namely Russia, China, Turkey, Poland, South Africa, Mexico and Indonesia. The long-run cointegrating relationship is investigated using Pedroni (2004) and Koa (1999) panel cointegration tests and the cointegrating coefficient is estimated according to Pedroni's (2001) panel group mean FMOLS, DOLS and OLS. The results provide strong evidence for the weak version of Fisher's (1930) hypothesis. They show that although the interest rate and inflation are cointegrated, the cointegrating coefficient is less than unity. These findings have important implications for policymakers in these emerging markets.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Rusya, Çin, Türkiye, Polonya, G.Afrika, Meksika ve Endonezya'dan oluşan yedi yükselen piyasa ekonomisinde Fisher (1930) hipotezi çerçevesinde, nominal faiz oranları ile enflasyon arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla Pedroni (1999,2004) ve Kao (1999) panel koentegrasyon testleri kullanılmıştır. Uzun dönem katsayı tahminin de ise Pedroni(2001) panel GM-FMOLS,GM- DOLS ve GM-OLS yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma bulguları incelenen yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde Fisher (1930) hipotezinin zayıf formunun geçerli olduğunu ve genel olarak uzun dönemde enflasyondaki bir birimlik artışın nominal faiz oranlarını yaklaşık 0.64 birim artırdığını göstermektedir. Bulguların politika yapıcalar açısından önemli sonuçlar içerdiği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜBERKÖKÜ, Ö. (2014). The relationship between nominal ınterest rates and ınflation in emerging markets: evidence from panel cointegration tests. Bankacılar, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 88, 80–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/150464

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ahmad, S. (2010). The Long-Run Fisher Effect in Developing Economies. Studies in Economics and Finance, 27(4), 268 – 275 Alves, D.C.O ve Bueno, R.D. (2003).
  2. Short-Run, Long-Run and Cross Elasticities of Gasoline Demand in Brazil. Energy Economics, 25 (2), 191-199
  3. Atkins, F.J. ve Chan, M. (2004). Trend Breaks and the Fisher Hypothesis in Canada and The United States. Applied Economics, 36(17), 1907-1913
  4. Basher, S.A. ve Mohsin, M. (2004). PPP Tests in Cointegrated Panels: Evidence from Asain Developing Countries. Applied Economic Letters, 11(3), 163-166
  5. Berument, H. ve Jelassi, M.M. (2002). The Fisher Hypothesis: A Multi-Country Analysis. Applied Economics, 34, 1645-1655
  6. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data.In B.H.Baltagi (Ed) Advances in Econometrics: Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Cheng, W.H. ve Hung J.C. (2011). Skewness and Leptokurtosis in GARCH-Typed VaR Estimation of Petroleum and Metal Asset Returns. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(1), 160-173
  7. Coppock, L. ve Poitras, M. (2000). Evaluating the Fisher Effect in the Long-Term Cross-Country Averages. International Review of Economics and Finance, 9, 181-192
  8. Engle, R. ve Granger, C. (1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276
  9. Fahmy, Y.A.F ve Kandil, M. (2003). The Fisher Effect: New Evidence and Implications. International Review of Economics and Finance, 12(4), 451-465
  10. Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan Gül, E. ve Acikalın, S. (2008). An Examination of the Fisher Hypothesis: The Case of Turkey. Applied Economics, 40(24), 3227-3231
  11. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometric Journal, 3(2), 48- 161 Hlouskova, J. ve Wagner, M. (2006). The Performance of Panel Unit Root and Stationary Tests: Results from a Large Scale Simulation Study. Econometrics Reviews, 25, 85-116
  12. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1-44
  13. Ketenci, N. (2013). The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in Grouping of OECD Members: A Panel Approach Research in Economics, 67(1), 76-87
  14. Köse, N., Emirmahmutoğlu, F. ve Aksoy S. (2012). The Interest Rate and Inflation Relationship under an Inflation Targeting Regime: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Asain Economics, 23(4), 476- 485 Lee, K.F. (2009). An Empirical Study of the Fisher Effe