SavedAdd your journal

Journals / JENAS Journal of Environmental and Natural Studies / 2024 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 (In Honour of Nesrin Algan)

Value-Added Agriculture, Circular Economy, and Sustainable Development: Economic, Environmental, and Social Perspectives

Katma Değerli Tarım, Döngüsel Ekonomi ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma: Ekonomik, Çevresel ve Sosyal Perspektifler

Gülay Özkan(Nottingham Trent University)0000-0001-6878-1673
Pages
287–298
Publication Date
2024-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It also shows how local policy and economic development leaders can play a crucial role in supporting these processes to strengthen rural economies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study provides an in-depth examination of the relationship between value-added agriculture, circular economy and sustainable development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Value-added agriculture is the process of enhancing the value of traditional agricultural products through processing, transformation, or different marketing strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also shows how local policy and economic development leaders can play a crucial role in supporting these processes to strengthen rural economies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gıda Güvenliği · Sosyal Eşitlik · Tarımsal Yenilik

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth examination of the relationship between value-added agriculture, circular economy and sustainable development. Value-added agriculture is the process of enhancing the value of traditional agricultural products through processing, transformation, or different marketing strategies. This process not only increases the economic gains of farmers in the agricultural sector but also supports environmental sustainability and social justice. The study emphasizes that value-added agriculture does not only provide income growth but also promotes local economic development and supports eco-friendly practices. Value-added agriculture gains value through elements such as organic production, local food movements, and environmentally friendly processing techniques. Moreover, it plays a crucial role in increasing food access for low-income communities. However, the study also addresses challenges such as high production costs and barriers to market access. Overcoming these challenges requires innovative agricultural policies and practices. A circular economy presents additional opportunities for farmers and other entrepreneurs to create value for customers while improving the environment and promoting social norms of equity and interaction. Ultimately, value-added agriculture offers a sustainable development model both economically and environmentally, and innovative approaches in this field hold potential for a stronger and more efficient agricultural sector in the future. Beyond providing economic benefits, value-added agriculture also plays a critical role in improving food security for communities and promoting eco-friendly production methods. This research highlights how sustainable agricultural practices and the circular economy approach strengthen the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of local businesses. It also shows how local policy and economic development leaders can play a crucial role in supporting these processes to strengthen rural economies.

Özet

Bu çalışma, tarımda katma değer yaratmanın döngüsel ekonomi ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma ile ilişkisini derinlemesine incelemektedir. Katma değerli tarım, geleneksel tarım ürünlerinin işlenmesi, dönüştürülmesi veya farklı pazarlama stratejileri ile değerinin artırılması sürecidir. Bu süreç, tarım sektöründe çiftçilerin ekonomik kazançlarını artırmalarının yanı sıra çevresel sürdürülebilirliği ve sosyal adaleti de destekler. Çalışmada, katma değerli tarımın sadece gelir artışı sağlamadığı, aynı zamanda yerel ekonomik kalkınmayı teşvik ettiği ve çevre dostu uygulamaları desteklediği vurgulanmaktadır. Katma değerli tarım, organik üretim, yerel gıda hareketleri ve çevre dostu işleme teknikleri gibi unsurlar ile değer kazanır. Ayrıca, düşük gelirli topluluklar için gıda erişiminin artırılmasında önemli bir rol oynar. Bununla birlikte, bu süreçte karşılaşılan yüksek üretim maliyetleri, pazar erişimindeki engeller gibi zorluklar da ele alınmaktadır. Bu zorlukların aşılabilmesi için yenilikçi tarım politikaları ve uygulamalarına ihtiyaç vardır. Döngüsel bir ekonomi, çiftçilere ve diğer girişimcilere müşteriler için değer yaratırken çevreyi iyileştirmeleri ve eşitlik ve etkileşimin sosyal normlarını teşvik etmeleri için ek fırsatlar sunar. Sonuç olarak, katma değerli tarım hem ekonomik hem de çevresel açıdan sürdürülebilir bir kalkınma modeli sunmaktadır ve bu alandaki yenilikçi yaklaşımlar, gelecekte daha güçlü ve verimli bir tarım sektörü için potansiyel taşımaktadır. Katma değerli tarım, sadece ekonomik faydalar sağlamanın ötesinde, toplumların gıda güvenliğini artırmada ve çevre dostu üretim yöntemlerini yaygınlaştırmada da kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu araştırma, sürdürülebilir tarım uygulamaları ve döngüsel ekonomi yaklaşımının, yerel işletmelerin ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal sürdürülebilirliklerini nasıl güçlendirdiğini vurgulamaktadır. Aynı zamanda, yerel politika ve ekonomik kalkınma liderlerinin bu süreçleri destekleyerek kırsal ekonomilerin güçlendirilmesinde önemli bir rol oynayabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, G. (2024). Value-Added Agriculture, Circular Economy, and Sustainable Development: Economic, Environmental, and Social Perspectives. JENAS Journal of Environmental and Natural Studies, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 (In Honour of Nesrin Algan), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.53472/jenas.1587727

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Benedek, Z., Fertő, I., Szente, V. (2020). The multiplier effects of food relocalization: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(9), 3524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093524
  2. Briggeman, B.C., Lusk, J.L. (2011). Preferences for fairness and equity in the food system. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq033
  3. Bocken, N.M., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
  4. Borrello, M., Pascucci, S., Caracciolo, F., Lombardi, A., Cembalo, L. (2020). Consumers are willing to participate in circular business models: A practice theory perspective to food provisioning. Journal of Cleaner Production 259, 121013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121013
  5. Brown E., Woollacott. J., Depro, B. (2018). AAMC Economic impact analysis using IMPLAN Technical Documentation, Association of American Medical Colleges Washington, D.C. https://www.aamc.org/media/36041/download?attachment
  6. Brown, T. K. (2016, Ağustos 28. 8). How US welfare compares around the globe, BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37159686. Erişim Tarihi: 19.11.2024
  7. Clark, S. (2020). Financial viability of a non-farm processing and retail enterprise: A case study of value added agriculture in rural Kentucky (USA). Sustainability, 12(2), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020708
  8. Clark, J. K., Jablonski, B.B.R., Inwood, S., Irish, A., Freedgood, J. (2021). A contemporary concept of the value(s)-added food and agriculture sector and rural development. Community Development, 52(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1854804
  9. Dixon, J. Omwega, A. M., Friel, S., Burns, C., Donati, K., Carlisle, R. (2007). The health equity dimensions of urban food systems. Journal of Urban Health, 84, 118–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9176-4
  10. Dudensing, R. (2023). Role of Value-Added Agriculture in Promoting Regenerative Processes within a Circular Economy. In Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Product Design (pp. 1-10). American Chemical Society.
  11. Elkington, J., Rowlands, I.H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal. 25(4), 42-43.
  12. Ernst, M. (2022). Adding value to plant production - An overview. CCD-MP-14. Lexington, KY: Center for Crop Diversification, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment. http://www.uky.edu/ccd/ sites/www.uky.edu.ccd/files/vaoverview.pdf
  13. Fidan, A. (2014). Bir Atık Kültürü ve Atık Değerlendirme Yöntemi Olarak Kaynağından Ayrıştırma, Standart, 53(623), 27-36.
  14. Gurbuz, I. B., Ozkan, G. (2021). A holistic approach in explaining farmers' intentional behaviour on manure waste utilization. New Medit, 20(4). 83-99. https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2104g
  15. Gürbüz, İ.B., Özkan, G. (2019, October). Hayvancılığın geleceğine eleştirel bir bakış: geleneksel ve modern hayvancılığın karbon ayak izi karşılaştırması. In XIII International Balkan and Near Eastern Congress Series on Economics, Business and Management, Tekirdag, Turkey, October (pp. 5-6).
  16. Hendrickson, M., Howard, P.H., Constance, D. (2017). Power, food and agriculture: Implications for farmers, consumers and communities; Consumers and Communities, Division of Applied Social Sciences Working Paper; University of Missouri, College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources: Columbia. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066005
  17. Hu, W., Batte, M.T., Woods, T., Ernst, S. (2012). Consumer preferences for local production and other value-added label claims for a processed food product. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(3), 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr039
  18. Izaba, O.F.R., Thompson, A.W., Torres, A.P., Marshall, M.I. (2023). Market Access and Value added Strategies in the Specialty Crops Industry. Hort Science, 58(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16909-22
  19. Jabareen, Y. (2008). A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
  20. Jablonski, B.B.R., Thilmany McFadden, D. (2019). What is a ‘multiplier’ anyway? Assessing the local foods economic impacts toolkit. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 8(Suppl. 3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2019.08C.013
  21. Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., Schösler, H. (2016). Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability, 8(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2019.08C.013
  22. Karaman, N., Uyanık, Y. (2023). Refah karması yaklaşımı çerçevesinde Türkiye’de gıda bankacılığı: Refah sunumundaki yerinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik nitel bir araştırma. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (45), 636-682. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1356033
  23. Kim, S.H., Kuo, W.Y. (2022). The role of beliefs, pride, and perceived barriers in decision-making regarding purchasing value-added pulse products among US consumers. Foods, 11(6), 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ foods11060824
  24. Loring, P.A. (2022). Regenerative food systems and the conservation of change. Agriculture and Human Values, 39(2), 701–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10282-2
  25. Lu, R., Dudensing, R. (2015). What do we mean by value-added agriculture? Choices, 30(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.229438
  26. Mui, Y., Khojasteh, M., Judelsohn, A., Sirwatka, A., Kelly, S., Gooch, P., Raja, S. (2021). Planning for regional food equity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2020.1845781
  27. Nizam Bilgic, D. (2021). Kooperatifler, belediyeler ve gıda ağları: Tire süt kooperatifi örneği. Journal of Business, Innovation and Governance, 4(1), 113-131.
  28. Renting, H., Marsden, T.K., Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3510
  29. Rhodes, C. J. (2017). The imperative for regenerative agriculture. Science Progress, 100(1), 80–129. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685017X14876775256165.
  30. Sadovska, V., Ekelund Axelson, L., Mark-Herbert, C. (2020). Reviewing value creation in agriculture—A conceptual analysis and a new framework. Sustainability, 19(12), 5021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125021
  31. Schreefel, L., Schulte, R.P.O., De Boer, I.J.M., Schrijver, A.P., Van Zanten, H.H.E. (2020). Regenerative agriculture–the soil is the base. Global Food Security, 26, 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404
  32. Silvestre, B.S., Ţîrcă, D.M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244
  33. Sustainable Food Center. (2023). Local Supply Chain website. https://sustainablefoodcenter.org/
  34. TXFED (2024). Making Money at the Farmers Market; Online course. Texas Center for Local Food, Elgin, TX, https://www.txfed.org/courses/MakingMoneyAtTheFarmersMarket
  35. Thilmany, D., Canales, E., Low, S.A., Boys, K. (2021). Local food supply chain dynamics and resilience during COVID‐19. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13121
  36. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2015). Value-Added Producer Grant Program, Final Rule, 7 CFR Part 4284. Federal Register, 80 (89), 26788-26811. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-05-08/ pdf/2015-10441.pdf
  37. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future; Oxford University Press, pp 1−91.
  38. Zazo-Moratalla, A., Troncoso-González, I., Moreira-Muñoz, A. (2019). Regenerative food systems to restore urban-rural Relationships: insights from the Concepción Metropolitan Area Foodshed (Chile). Sustainability, 11(10):2892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102892