SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Identification of Quality Characteristics of Different Blackberry Varieties under Bursa-Kestel Ecological Conditions

Melike Urfalı(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6566-521X
Cenap Yılmaz(ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5652-7675
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to this, some other parameters also had strong positive relationships, such as SSC and pH, DPPH also between TEA and AsA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Blackberry is one of the most important fruit species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Its production has been increasing in Turkey in recent years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to this, some other parameters also had strong positive relationships, such as SSC and pH, DPPH also between TEA and AsA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:blackberry · quality · DPPH

Abstract

Blackberry is one of the most important fruit species. Its production has been increasing in Turkey in recent years. This study was conducted in the Kestel/Bursa region, where blackberry cultivation is intense in Turkey. In the study, the physical and chemical properties of three blackberry varieties (Chester, Jumbo and Prime-Jim) were examined. Priority results were obtained in terms of fruit quality criteria for the examined traits. According to correlation studies the highest positive correlations were found between fruit weight and F. Lenght, TEA, AsA and TPS. In addition to this, some other parameters also had strong positive relationships, such as SSC and pH, DPPH also between TEA and AsA.

🔖

Cite This Article

Urfalı, M., Yılmaz, C. (2024). Identification of Quality Characteristics of Different Blackberry Varieties under Bursa-Kestel Ecological Conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1493389

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Ağaoğlu, Y. S. (2003). Türkiye’de Üzümsü Meyvelerin dünü bugünü ve yarını. Ulusal Kivi ve Üzümsü Meyveler Sempozyumu, 23-25 Ekim 2003, Ordu. s: 1-14.
  2. Ağaoğlu, S., Eyduran, S. P., Eyduran, E. (2007). Ayaş koşullarında yetiştirilen böğürtlen çeşitlerinin bazı pomolojik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(1), 69-74.
  3. Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., Berset, C. L. W. T. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food science and Technology, 28(1), 25-30.
  4. Cemeroglu, B. (2007). Food analysis. Food Technology Society Publication, 34, 168-171.
  5. Costantino, L., Albasino, A., Rastelli, G., Benvenuti, S. (1992) Activityof polyphenolic crude extracts as scavengers of superoxideradicals and inhibitors of xanthine oxidase.Planta Medica,58, 342-344.
  6. Çağlar, M., Demirci, M. (2017). Üzümsü meyvelerde bulunan fenolik bileşikler ve beslenmedeki önemi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 7(11), 18-26.
  7. Fidan M.S., Öz A., Adanur H., Turan B. (2013). Gümüşhane yöresinde yetişen bazı önemli odun dışı orman ürünleri ve kullanım miktarları. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2).
  8. Gecer, M. K., Akin, M., Gundogdu, M., Eyduran, S. P., Ercisli, S., Eyduran, E. (2016). Organic acids, sugars, phenolic compounds, and some horticultural characteristics of black and white mulberry accessions from Eastern Anatolia. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96(1), 27-33.
  9. Giusti, M. M., Wrolstad, R. E. (2001). Anthocyanins characterization and measurement with UV-visible spectroscopy. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry, 1, 1-13.
  10. Halvorsen, B. L., Holte, K., Myhrstad, M. C., Barikmo, I., Hvattum, E., Remberg, S. F., Blomhoff, R. (2002). A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. The Journal of nutrition, 132(3), 461-471.
  11. Heinonen, I. M., Meyer, A. S., Frankel, E. N. (1998). Antioxidant activity of berry phenolics on human low-density lipoprotein and liposome oxidation. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 46(10), 4107-4112.
  12. Kähkönen, M.P., Hopia, A.I., Heikki, J.V., Rauha, J.P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T.S., Heinonen, M. (1999). Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 3954–3962.
  13. Koca, I., Karadeniz, B., Çelik, H., Demirsoy, L. (2008). Karadeniz bölgesinde yetişen bazı üzümsü meyvelerin özellikleri, Türkiye 10. Gıda Kongresi, 21-23 Mayıs, Erzurum.
  14. Mishra, K., Ojha, H., Chaudhury, N. K. (2012). Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay: A critical review and results. Food chemistry, 130(4), 1036-1043.
  15. Strik, B.C., Clark, J.R., Finn, C.E., Bañados, M.P. (2007). Worldwide blackberry production. HortTechnology, 17(2), 205-213.
  16. Somparn, P., Phisalaphong, C., Nakornchai, S., Unchern, S., Morales, N.P. (2007). Comparative antioxidant activities of curcumin and its demethoxy and hydrogenated derivatives. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 30(1), 74-78.
  17. Thompson, E., Strik, B. C., Finn, C. E., Zhao, Y., Clark, J. R. (2009). High tunnel versus open field: management of primocane-fruiting blackberry using pruning and tipping to increase yield and extend the fruiting season. HortScience, 44(6), 1581-1587.
  18. Tosun, İ., Ustun, N.S., Tekguler, B. (2008). Physical and chemical changes during ripening of blackberry fruits. Scientia Agricola. 87-90
  19. Velde, F., Grace, M.H., Esposito, D., Pirovani, M.E. (2016). Quantitative Comparison of Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant, Andanti-İnflammatory properties of blackberry fruits adapted to Argentina. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (47) 82–91
  20. Yetgin, M.A. (2009). Üzümsü meyveler. Samsun İl Tarım Müdürlüğü Çiftçi Eğitimi ve Yayım Şubesi Yayını, Samsun.