SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF THE EXPECTATIONS, ASSIGNMENTS AND ACQUISITIONS OF ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT ATELIER PARTICIPANTS

Can Güngör(GAZI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE)0000-0002-0393-4293
Pages
607–624
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The second survey at the middle of the semester results showed that the students’belief in their project preparation for the critical day decreased in time and resulted in lower valued answers to the Assignments survey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Architectural Projects Lessons are the main applied courses of the Architectural Curriculum The main purpose of this Study is to understand the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early Expectations, gains from Assignments and final Acquisitions from the Architectural Project as an important shareholder of the Architectural education by applying a group of atelier participants that consist of varying age and experience levels a questionnaire that value their opinions on their personal gains on varying aspects of Architectural Design at three different stages of the semester.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The second survey at the middle of the semester results showed that the students’belief in their project preparation for the critical day decreased in time and resulted in lower valued answers to the Assignments survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a Result, by applying a questionnaire to a group of atelier participants it is possible to understand and evaluate the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their work and this is an effective method to understand and reshape the structure of the Atelier in a way that the student would benefit more from it.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Architectural Education · Architectural Project Atelier · Student Feedback

Abstract

Architectural Projects Lessons are the main applied courses of the Architectural Curriculum The main purpose of this Study is to understand the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early Expectations, gains from Assignments and final Acquisitions from the Architectural Project as an important shareholder of the Architectural education by applying a group of atelier participants that consist of varying age and experience levels a questionnaire that value their opinions on their personal gains on varying aspects of Architectural Design at three different stages of the semester. At the beginning of the semester all the students were highly expectant of the atelier, the subject and the earnings they believed they would derive from the semesters’ project study. The second survey at the middle of the semester results showed that the students’belief in their project preparation for the critical day decreased in time and resulted in lower valued answers to the Assignments survey. At the end of the semester It is possible to understand that the students were mostly satisfied by their final projects and were only disappointed by their understanding of the manifest of the Atelier and the final level of their models. As a Result, by applying a questionnaire to a group of atelier participants it is possible to understand and evaluate the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their work and this is an effective method to understand and reshape the structure of the Atelier in a way that the student would benefit more from it.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güngör, C. (2020). EVALUATION OF THE EXPECTATIONS, ASSIGNMENTS AND ACQUISITIONS OF ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT ATELIER PARTICIPANTS. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 607–624. https://ajindex.com/articles/1486979

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Casakin, H., Davidovitch, N., “Social-academic Climate and Academic Satisfaction in Architectural Design Education”, Problems of education in the 21stcentury Volume 56, 16-31. (2013
  2. Casakin, H., Kreitler, S., “Correspondences and Divergences between Teachers and Students in the Evaluation of Design Creativity in the Design Studio.”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35.(4), 666–678. (2008
  3. Çıkış, Ş., Çil, E., “Problematization of assessment in the architectural design education: First year as a case study”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2103-2110. (2009
  4. De La Harpe, B., Peterson, J.F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave, E., McDermott, R., “Assessment Focus in Studio: What is Most Prominent in Architecture, Art and Design?.” International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28, 37-51. (2009
  5. Denson, N., Loveday, T., Dalton, H., “Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction?”, Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), 339-356. (2010
  6. Eshun, E.F., Osei-Poku, P., “Design Students Perspectives on Assessment Rubric in Studio-Based Learning”, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(1),1-13. (2013
  7. Fasli, M., Hassanpour, B., “Rotational critique system as a method of culture change in an architecture design studio: urban design studio as case study”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 194-205. (2017
  8. Gunday Gul,C.G., Afacan, Y., “Analysing the Effects of Critique Techniques on the Success of Interior Architecture Students”. Int J Art Des Educ, 37, 469-479. (2018
  9. Groat, L.N., Ahrentzen, S., “Reconceptualizing Architectural Education for a More Diverse Future: Perceptions and Visions of Architectural Students”, Journal of Architectural Education, 49(3), 166-183. (1996
  10. Kurt, S., “An analytic study on the traditional studio environments and the use of the constructivist studio in the architectural design education”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume 1, Issue 1, 401-408. (2009
  11. Németh, J., Long, J.G., “Assessing Learning Outcomes in U.S. Planning Studio Courses”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), 476–490. (2012
  12. Tucker, R., Abbasi, N., “The architecture of teamwork: examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes”, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), 405-422 (2015
  13. Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Handryant, A., Nur, I.,,Adi Ani, C., “Upgrading Education Architecture by Redefining Critique Session in Design Studio”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume 102, Pages 42-47. (2013
  14. Dinç Kalaycı, P., “Etkileşimden Bütünleşmeye: Bir Mimari Tasarım Stüdyosu Pratiğinin Anatomisi”. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, (2016)
  15. Casakin, H., Davidovitch, N., “Social-academic Climate and Academic Satisfaction in Architectural Design Education”, Problems of education in the 21stcentury Volume 56, 16-31. (2013
  16. Casakin, H., Kreitler, S., “Correspondences and Divergences between Teachers and Students in the Evaluation of Design Creativity in the Design Studio.”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35.(4), 666–678. (2008
  17. Çıkış, Ş., Çil, E., “Problematization of assessment in the architectural design education: First year as a case study”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2103-2110. (2009
  18. De La Harpe, B., Peterson, J.F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave, E., McDermott, R., “Assessment Focus in Studio: What is Most Prominent in Architecture, Art and Design?.” International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28, 37-51. (2009
  19. Denson, N., Loveday, T., Dalton, H., “Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction?”, Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), 339-356. (2010
  20. Eshun, E.F., Osei-Poku, P., “Design Students Perspectives on Assessment Rubric in Studio-Based Learning”, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(1),1-13. (2013
  21. Fasli, M., Hassanpour, B., “Rotational critique system as a method of culture change in an architecture design studio: urban design studio as case study”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 194-205. (2017
  22. Gunday Gul,C.G., Afacan, Y., “Analysing the Effects of Critique Techniques on the Success of Interior Architecture Students”. Int J Art Des Educ, 37, 469-479. (2018
  23. Groat, L.N., Ahrentzen, S., “Reconceptualizing Architectural Education for a More Diverse Future: Perceptions and Visions of Architectural Students”, Journal of Architectural Education, 49(3), 166-183. (1996
  24. Kurt, S., “An analytic study on the traditional studio environments and the use of the constructivist studio in the architectural design education”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume 1, Issue 1, 401-408. (2009
  25. Németh, J., Long, J.G., “Assessing Learning Outcomes in U.S. Planning Studio Courses”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), 476–490. (2012
  26. Tucker, R., Abbasi, N., “The architecture of teamwork: examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes”, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), 405-422 (2015
  27. Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Handryant, A., Nur, I.,,Adi Ani, C., “Upgrading Education Architecture by Redefining Critique Session in Design Studio”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume 102, Pages 42-47. (2013
  28. Dinç Kalaycı, P., “Etkileşimden Bütünleşmeye: Bir Mimari Tasarım Stüdyosu Pratiğinin Anatomisi”. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, (2016).