SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Evaluation Of the Expectations, And Acquisitions of Architectural Project Atelier Participants in Spring 2020 Semester Regarding Learning Styles of Individuals During a Disrupted Education Period

Can Güngör(Gazi University Faculty of Architecture Department of Architecture)0000-0002-0393-4293
Pages
175–191
Publication Date
2021-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was possible to understand and evaluate the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early expectations, and final acquisitions from the architectural project and how varying types of learning styles of each student is significantly reflected when their primary expectations and final acquisitions are comparatively evaluated in a disrupted education period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This Study emphasizes on the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early Expectations and final Acquisitions from the Architectural Project and how the way of learning tyoes of each student is efected by their expectations and acquisitions (or vica versa) in a distrupded education period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first to be the face-to face start to the spring 2020 semester ant the second is the online conclusion of the project lessons in Summer 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was possible to understand and evaluate the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early expectations, and final acquisitions from the architectural project and how varying types of learning styles of each student is significantly reflected when their primary expectations and final acquisitions are comparatively evaluated in a disrupted education period.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Architectural Education · Architectural Project Atelier · Student Feedback

Abstract

This Study emphasizes on the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early Expectations and final Acquisitions from the Architectural Project and how the way of learning tyoes of each student is efected by their expectations and acquisitions (or vica versa) in a distrupded education period. By applying a questionnaire to a group of atelier participants that consist of varying age and experience levels that value their opinions on their personal gains on varying aspects of architectural design at two different stages of the semester. The first to be the face-to face start to the spring 2020 semester ant the second is the online conclusion of the project lessons in Summer 2020. It was possible to understand and evaluate the Atelier participant Students’ ideas and opinions of their early expectations, and final acquisitions from the architectural project and how varying types of learning styles of each student is significantly reflected when their primary expectations and final acquisitions are comparatively evaluated in a disrupted education period.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güngör, C. (2021). Evaluation Of the Expectations, And Acquisitions of Architectural Project Atelier Participants in Spring 2020 Semester Regarding Learning Styles of Individuals During a Disrupted Education Period. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 175–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/1486947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Güngör, C. (2020). “Evaluation Of The Expectations, Assignments And Acquisitions Of Architectural Project Atelier Participants”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8 (2), 607-624. R & Wright, A (2020). National Design Studio Survey: Initial Results, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK 2020
  2. Kolb, D., (1984). “Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development”.
  3. Mumford. A. and Honey P. (1992), “Questions and Answers on Learning Styles Questionnaire”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 24 No. 7. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197859210015426
  4. Smith, M. K. (2001, 2010). ‘David A. Kolb on experiential learning’, The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. [https://infed.org/mobi/david-a-kolb-on-experiential-learning/. Retrieved: 3.2.2021]
  5. Wayne Attoe & Robert Mugerauer (1991): Excellent studio teaching in architecture, Studies in Higher Education, 16:1, 41-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079112331383081
  6. https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/doctoralcollege/training/eresources/teaching/theories/kolb
  7. https://reviewing.co.uk/research/experiential.learning.htm
  8. http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~daniel_schugurensky/faqs/qa8.html
  9. https://www.businessballs.com/self-awareness/kolbs-learning-styles/
  10. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00197859210015426/full/html
  11. Güngör, C. (2020). “Evaluation Of The Expectations, Assignments And Acquisitions Of Architectural Project Atelier Participants”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8 (2), 607-624.