SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

Urban Children's Playgrounds beyond the Pandemic: A Longitudinal Field Study of Shifting User Experiences

Pandemi Ötesinde Kentsel Çocuk Oyun Alanları: Değişen Kullanıcı Deneyimleri Üzerine Boylamsal Bir Alan Çalışması

Yiğit Can Yardımcı(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3785-4195
Burcu Buram Çolak(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7932-6422
Pages
397–415
Publication Date
2026-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal a radical demographic inversion; traditional parent-supervised child usage declined, while the 16–25 age cohort surged from 10% to 46%, appropriating these spaces as psychological buffers against confinement fatigue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed a profound structural shift in the conceptualization and utilization of urban green spaces, transitioning them from elective aesthetic amenities into critical, health-promoting infrastructures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Employing structured Post-Occupancy Evaluations (POE) across 14 neighborhood parks, the research compares pre- and post-pandemic user data (n=280) across eight core spatial dimensions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal a radical demographic inversion; traditional parent-supervised child usage declined, while the 16–25 age cohort surged from 10% to 46%, appropriating these spaces as psychological buffers against confinement fatigue.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kullanım Sonrası Değerlendirme (KSD · Post-Pandemi Kentleşmesi · Salutojenik Tasarım

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed a profound structural shift in the conceptualization and utilization of urban green spaces, transitioning them from elective aesthetic amenities into critical, health-promoting infrastructures. Despite extensive literature on this paradigm shift, empirical research utilizing continuous spatial datasets to measure evolving user expectations remains exceedingly limited. This study addresses this critical gap through a repeated cross-sectional field study in Nilüfer, Bursa (Turkey). Employing structured Post-Occupancy Evaluations (POE) across 14 neighborhood parks, the research compares pre- and post-pandemic user data (n=280) across eight core spatial dimensions. The findings reveal a radical demographic inversion; traditional parent-supervised child usage declined, while the 16–25 age cohort surged from 10% to 46%, appropriating these spaces as psychological buffers against confinement fatigue. Concurrently, primary visitation motivations shifted from residential proximity to the deliberate pursuit of restorative aesthetic qualities. Crucially, the data exposes an acute, unmet demand for health-promoting infrastructure, particularly institutional-grade sanitary facilities (WCs) and social amenities. Bivariate correlation analysis further demonstrates that perceived spatial security is now inextricably linked to material quality (r = 0.570) and ergonomics (r = 0.596), indicating that the haptic experience of the built environment is strongly associated with users' perceived environmental safety. Ultimately, this research establishes that contemporary urban planning must abandon superficial play equipment templates in favor of Children Green Infrastructure (CGI), integrating hybrid materiality and multisensory comfort to ensure socio-ecological resilience in a post-pandemic reality.

Özet

COVID-19 pandemisi, kentsel yeşil alanların kavramsallaştırılması ve kullanımında derin bir ontolojik değişimi tetikleyerek, bu alanları isteğe bağlı estetik donatılardan kritik, sağlığı geliştirici altyapılara dönüştürmüştür. Bu paradigma değişimine dair kapsamlı literatüre rağmen, evrilen kullanıcı beklentilerini ölçmek için sürekli mekânsal veri setlerini kullanan boylamsal ampirik araştırmalar son derece sınırlı kalmaktadır. Bu çalışma, söz konusu kritik boşluğu Bursa, Nilüfer'de (Türkiye) gerçekleştirilen boylamsal bir doğal deney aracılığıyla ele almaktadır. Araştırma, 14 mahalle parkında yapılandırılmış Kullanım Sonrası Değerlendirme (KSD) anketleri uygulayarak, sekiz temel mekânsal boyut üzerinden pandemi öncesi ve sonrası kullanıcı verilerini (n=280) karşılaştırmaktadır. Bulgular radikal bir demografik tersine dönüşü ortaya koymaktadır; geleneksel ebeveyn gözetimli çocuk kullanımı azalırken, 16-25 yaş grubunun oranı %10'dan %46'ya fırlamış ve bu kitle parkları izolasyon yorgunluğuna karşı psikolojik tamponlar olarak sahiplenmiştir. Eşzamanlı olarak, temel ziyaret motivasyonları konuta yakınlıktan ziyade restoratif estetik niteliklerin bilinçli arayışına kaymıştır. En önemlisi, veriler başta kurumsal standartlarda sıhhi tesisler (WC) ve sosyal donatılar olmak üzere, salutojenik (sağlık üreten) altyapıya yönelik karşılanmamış akut bir talebi gözler önüne sermektedir. İki değişkenli korelasyon analizi ayrıca, algılanan mekânsal güvenliğin artık malzeme kalitesi (r = 0.570) ve ergonomi (r = 0.596) ile ayrılmaz bir şekilde bağlantılı olduğunu kanıtlamakta ve yapılı çevrenin dokunsal (haptik) deneyiminin kullanıcıların biyolojik güvenini belirlediğini göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak bu araştırma, post-pandemi gerçekliğinde sosyo-ekolojik dirençliliği sağlamak için çağdaş kent planlamasının yüzeysel oyun ekipmanı şablonlarını terk etmesi ve hibrit materyalite ile çok duyulu konforu entegre eden Çocuk Yeşil Altyapısı (ÇYA) yaklaşımını benimsemesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yardımcı, Y. C., Çolak, B. B. (2026). Urban Children's Playgrounds beyond the Pandemic: A Longitudinal Field Study of Shifting User Experiences. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 397–415. https://ajindex.com/articles/1486745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Ashinze, U. K., Edeigba, B. A., Umoh, A. A., Biu, P. W., & Daraojimba, A. I. (2024). Urban green infrastructure and its role in sustainable cities: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 928-936.
  2. Hansen, R., & Pauleit, S. (2014). From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio, 43(4), 516-529.
  3. Zhai, J., Blom, S. M., Dillon, J., Wu, S., & Yan, X. (2025). Early childhood immersion in nature: Chinese kindergarten educators’ perspectives on nature play. Environmental education research, 31(2), 460-479.
  4. Alizadeh, H., Doostvandi, M., & Zandsalimi, M. (2024). Redefining sustainable urban development: A critical analysis in the wake of COVID‐19. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 6163-6181.
  5. Zabaniotou, A. (2020). A systemic approach to resilience and ecological sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Human, societal, and ecological health as a system-wide emergent property in the Anthropocene. Global transitions, 2, 116-126.
  6. Lak, A., Asl, S. S., & Maher, A. (2020). Resilient urban form to pandemics: Lessons from COVID-19. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34, 71.
  7. Tu, K. (2024). Post-pandemic Urban Planning: Innovations in Cities and Neighborhoods (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pécs (Hungary)).
  8. Salama, A. M. (2023). Coronavirus questions that will not go away: interrogating urban and socio-spatial implications of COVID-19 measures. Emerald Open Research, 1(5).
  9. Tabrizi, N., Lak, A., & Moussavi. A, S. M. R. (2023). Green space and the health of the older adult during pandemics: a narrative review on the experience of COVID-19. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1218091.
  10. Litsmark, A., Rahm, J., Mattsson, P., & Johansson, M. (2023). Children's independent mobility during dark hours: a scoping review. Frontiers in public health, 11, 1110224.
  11. Liu, R., & Xiao, J. (2021). Factors affecting users’ satisfaction with urban parks through online comments data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 253.
  12. Dushkova, D., Ignatieva, M., Konstantinova, A., Vasenev, V., Dovletyarova, E., & Dvornikov, Y. (2022). Human-nature interactions during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Moscow, Russia: exploring the role of contact with nature and main lessons from the city responses. Land, 11(6), 822.
  13. Cardoso, R., Sobhani, A., & Meijers, E. (2022). The cities we need: Towards an urbanism guided by human needs satisfaction. Urban Studies, 59(13), 2638-2659.
  14. Pacheco, M., Madureira, H., & Monteiro, A. (2024). Examining post-pandemic urban transformations: a literature review on COVID-19’s influence on urban design. Sustainability, 16(23), 10381.
  15. Crandall, A. K., Madhudi, N., Osborne, B., Carter, A., Williams, A. K., & Temple, J. L. (2022). The effect of food insecurity and stress on delay discounting across families: a COVID-19 natural experiment. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1576.
  16. Yaralioglu, I., & Kara, C. (2024). Sustainable urban design approach for public spaces using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Land, 14(1), 19.
  17. Marvin, S., McFarlane, C., Guma, P., Hodson, M., Lockhart, A., McGuirk, P.,. & Wiig, A. (2023). Post‐pandemic cities: An urban lexicon of accelerations/decelerations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 48(3), 452-473.
  18. Connolly, C., & Kythreotis, A. (2026). Building back better through urban blue and green space? A critical review of post-pandemic urban planning and climate governance. Urban Studies, 63(1), 3-21.
  19. Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., & Hu, S. (2025). Assessing perception and equity of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks using social media data. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 33127.
  20. Jennings, V., Rigolon, A., Thompson, J., Murray, A., Henderson, A., & Gragg, R. S. (2024). The dynamic relationship between social cohesion and urban green space in diverse communities: opportunities and challenges to public health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 21(6), 800.
  21. Zhang, W., Yang, B., Wang, R., & Guo, X. (2024). An analysis of the effects of different urban park space environment construction on national health. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1433319.
  22. Edeigba, B. A., Ashinze, U. K., Umoh, A. A., Biu, P. W., Daraojimba, A. I., Edeigba, B. A.,. & Daraojimba, A. I. (2024). Urban green spaces and their impact on environmental health: A Global Review. World J. Adv. Res. Rev, 21(2), 917-927.
  23. El-Didy, M. H., Hassan, G. F., Afifi, S., & Ismail, A. (2024). Crowding between urban planning and environmental psychology: Guidelines for bridging the gap. Open House International, 49(4), 670-695.
  24. Li, J., Fu, J., Gao, J., Zhou, R., Wang, K., & Zhou, K. (2023). Effects of the spatial patterns of urban parks on public satisfaction: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Landscape Ecology, 38(5), 1265-1277.
  25. van Dinter, M., Kools, M., Dane, G., Weijs-Perrée, M., Chamilothori, K., van Leeuwen, E.,. & van den Berg, P. (2022). Urban green parks for long-term subjective well-being: empirical relationships between personal characteristics, park characteristics, park use, sense of place, and satisfaction with life in the Netherlands. Sustainability, 14(9), 4911.
  26. Duanmu, S., Yin, H., & Liu, D. (2026). Exploration of Factors That Reduce Residents’ Willingness to Use Different Types of Urban Parks in Beijing. Sustainability, 18(7), 3276.
  27. Jiang, S., Ma, H., Yang, L., & Luo, S. (2023). The influence of perceived physical and aesthetic quality of rural settlements on tourists’ preferences—A case study of zhaoxing dong village. Land, 12(8), 1542.
  28. Ali, S. H., Connolly, C., & Keil, R. (2022). Pandemic urbanism: Infectious diseases on a planet of cities. John Wiley & Sons.
  29. Moghaddam, S. N. M. (2024). Introduction—navigating pandemics in urban spaces: challenges, strategies, and the future of urban planning. In Making sense of planning and development for the post-pandemic cities (pp. 1-26). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  30. Lee, K. O., Mai, K. M., & Park, S. (2023). Green space accessibility helps buffer declined mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from big data in the United Kingdom. Nature Mental Health, 1(2), 124-134.
  31. Noszczyk, T., Gorzelany, J., Kukulska-Kozieł, A., & Hernik, J. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of urban green spaces to the public. Land use policy, 113, 105925.
  32. Zhao, H., Mailloux, B. J., Cook, E. M., & Culligan, P. J. (2023). Change of urban park usage as a response to the COVID-19 global pandemic. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 19324.
  33. Luo, X. (2022). Protecting and scaffolding: How parents facilitate children's activities in public space in urban China. ECNU Review of Education, 5(2), 242-257.
  34. Barau, A. S., Abubakar, I. R., Kafi, K. M., Olugbodi, K. H., & Abubakar, J. I. (2023). Dynamics of negotiated use of public open spaces between children and adults in an African city. Land Use Policy, 131, 106705.
  35. Davis, M. (2022). The monster enters: COVID-19, avian flu, and the plagues of capitalism. Verso Books.
  36. Sheldrick, M. P., Swindell, N. J., Richards, A. B., Fairclough, S. J., & Stratton, G. (2022). Homes became the “everything space” during COVID-19: impact of changes to the home environment on children’s physical activity and sitting. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1), 134.
  37. Kadury-Slezak, M., Tal, C., Faruchi, S., Levy, I., Tal, P., & Tish, S. (2023). Parents' perceptions of their children's outdoor activities before and during COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 4(3).
  38. Kong, Y., Teng, C., & Liu, C. (2024). Transition design as a strategy for post-pandemic spatial experience enhancement: A sustainability perspective. Sustainability, 16(14), 5834.
  39. Liasidou, A. (2023). Inclusive pedagogies in digital post‐Covid‐19 higher education. British Journal of Special Education, 50(1), 6-27.
  40. Guo, X., Tu, X., Huang, G., Fang, X., Kong, L., & Wu, J. (2022). Urban greenspace helps ameliorate people's negative sentiments during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Beijing. Building and Environment, 223, 109449.
  41. Lai, P., Ou, D., & Zheng, H. (2024). Exploring Acoustic-Visual perception and satisfaction in urban Parks: Based on behavioral analysis. Ecological Indicators, 162, 112022.
  42. Kujundzic, K., Stamatovic Vuckovic, S., & Radivojević, A. (2023). Toward regenerative sustainability: A passive design comfort assessment method of indoor environment. Sustainability, 15(1), 840.
  43. Zhang, S., Adam, M., & Ghafar, N. A. (2024). How satisfaction research contributes to the optimization of urban green space design—A global perspective bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2024. Land, 13(11), 1912.
  44. Lerstrup, I., et al. (2021). Ground cover and play: A video observation study of children's play in outdoor environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126966.
  45. Dindar, D., Yardımcı, Y., & Şenkal Sezer, F. (2023). Covid 19 Pandemisi Sonrası Parkların Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: Bursa / Nilüfer Örneği. Karesi Journal of Architecture, 2(1), 1-16. https://izlik.org/JA24PL24LE
  46. Morgenthaler, T., Lynch, H., Loebach, J., Pentland, D., & Schulze, C. (2024). Using the theory of affordances to understand environment–play transactions: Environmental taxonomy of outdoor play space features—A scoping review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(4). [47] Tang, P., & Woolley, H. (2023). Optimizing urban children’s outdoor play spaces: affordances, supervision, and design dynamics. Sustainability, 15(20), 14661.
  47. Marvin, S., McFarlane, C., Guma, P., Hodson, M., Lockhart, A., McGuirk, P.,. & Wiig, A. (2023). Post‐pandemic cities: An urban lexicon of accelerations/decelerations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 48(3), 452-473.
  48. Edeigba, B. A., Ashinze, U. K., Umoh, A. A., Biu, P. W., Daraojimba, A. I., Edeigba, B. A.,. & Daraojimba, A. I. (2024). Urban green spaces and their impact on environmental health: A Global Review. World J. Adv. Res. Rev, 21(2), 917-927.
  49. van Dinter, M., Kools, M., Dane, G., Weijs-Perrée, M., Chamilothori, K., van Leeuwen, E.,. & van den Berg, P. (2022). Urban green parks for long-term subjective well-being: empirical relationships between personal characteristics, park characteristics, park use, sense of place, and satisfaction with life in the Netherlands. Sustainability, 14(9), 4911.