SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Comparative Shading Analysis of Public Open Spaces in Mixed-Use Developments

Karma Kullanım Projelerinde Kamusal Açık Alanların Karşılaştırmalı Gölgeleme Analizi

Saliha Erdurmuş(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7245-7152
Pages
111–122
Publication Date
2026-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the more compact, fragmented mass arrangement in Mahall Ankara causes solar radiation to concentrate in spatially limited areas and creates large shaded areas, especially during the winter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Shading in public open spaces within mixed-use developments is a critical design component, as it directly affects user comfort.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, shading performance must be evaluated in light of seasonal variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the more compact, fragmented mass arrangement in Mahall Ankara causes solar radiation to concentrate in spatially limited areas and creates large shaded areas, especially during the winter.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamusal açık alan · Gölgeleme · Karma Kullanımlı Yapılar

Abstract

Shading in public open spaces within mixed-use developments is a critical design component, as it directly affects user comfort. While shading limits excessive heating in hot climates, it can reduce solar gains during winter months in cold climate regions, potentially negatively affecting outdoor comfort. Therefore, shading performance must be evaluated in light of seasonal variables. This study aims to comparatively examine the shading performance of the public open spaces of two mixed-use developments (Tepe Prime Avenue and Mahall Ankara) located side by side in Ankara, which has a continental climate with hot summers and cold winters. Within the scope of the study, the public open spaces and surrounding building masses of both projects were modeled parametrically. Using Grasshopper, direct sun hours analyses were performed for summer and winter periods using the same climate data (EPW). The cumulative direct sun hours obtained from grid points placed in open spaces were normalized by area to calculate sun exposure per unit area. Furthermore, the distribution of solar radiation within the area was evaluated using spatial distribution maps. The results show that the more compact, fragmented mass arrangement in Mahall Ankara causes solar radiation to concentrate in spatially limited areas and creates large shaded areas, especially during the winter. In contrast, the more open configuration at Tepe Prime Avenue ensured a more balanced, homogeneous distribution of solar exposure during both winter and summer. The findings reveal that open space performance is directly related not only to area size but also to urban morphology, mass placement, and building density.

Özet

Kentsel açık alanlarda gölgelendirme, özellikle kullanıcı konforunu doğrudan etkilediği karma kullanımlı merkezlerde, tasarımın kritik bileşenlerinden biridir. Gölgelendirme, sıcak iklimlerde aşırı ısınmayı sınırlandırırken, soğuk iklim bölgelerinde kış aylarında güneş kazanımlarının azalmasına bağlı olarak dış mekân konforunu olumsuz yönde etkileyebilmektedir. Bu nedenle, gölgeleme performansının mevsimsel değişkenler dikkate alınarak değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, Ankara gibi yazları sıcak ve kışları soğuk geçen karasal iklim koşullarında yer alan ve yan yana konumlanan iki karma kullanımlı merkezin (Tepe Prime Avenue ve Mahall Ankara) ortak açık alanlarının gölgelendirme performansını karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, her iki projenin ortak açık alanları ve çevreleyen yapı kütleleri Rhinoceros ortamında modellenmiş; Grasshopper aracılığıyla, aynı iklim verileri (EPW) kullanılarak yaz ve kış dönemleri için direct sun hours analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Açık alanlara yerleştirilen grid noktaları üzerinden elde edilen kümülatif güneşlenme süreleri, alan büyüklüğüne göre normalize edilerek birim alan başına güneş maruziyeti hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca, mekânsal dağılım haritaları aracılığıyla güneşlenmenin alan içindeki dağılımı değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Mahall Ankara’da daha kompakt ve parçalı kütle düzeninin, güneşlenmenin mekânsal olarak sınırlı bölgelerde yoğunlaşmasına ve özellikle kış döneminde geniş gölgeli alanların oluşmasına neden olduğunu göstermektedir. Tepe Prime Avenue’de ise daha açık kütle yerleşimi, kış ve yaz dönemlerinde güneşlenmenin daha dengeli ve homojen olmasını sağlamıştır. Özetle, gölgeleme performansının; sadece açık alanın büyüklüğü ile değil, kentsel morfoloji, yapılaşma yoğunluğu ve kütle yerleşimi ile ilgili olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdurmuş, S. (2026). Comparative Shading Analysis of Public Open Spaces in Mixed-Use Developments. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 111–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/1486762

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Asfour, O. S., Mohsen, O., & Al-Qawasmi, J. (2023). Shading Performance of Public Open Spaces: A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Housing Projects. Buildings, 13(12), 3099. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123099
  2. Almutairi, M. (2015) Derivation of Urban Heat Island for Landsat-8 TIRS Riyadh City (KSA). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 3, 18-23 https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2015.39003
  3. Givoni, B. (1998). Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Lai, D., Lian, Z., Liu, W., Guo, C., Liu, W., Liu, K., & Chen, Q. (2020). A comprehensive review of thermal comfort studies in urban open spaces. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140092
  5. Galal, O. M., Sailor, D. J., & Mahmoud, H. (2020). The impact of urban form on outdoor thermal comfort in hot arid environments during daylight hours, case study: New Aswan. Building and Environment, 184, 107222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107222.
  6. Mi, J., Hong, B., Zhang, T., Huang, B., & Niu, J. (2020). Outdoor thermal benchmarks and their application to climate‒responsive designs of residential open spaces in a cold region of China. Building and Environment, 169, 106592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106592.
  7. Filion, P. (2001). Suburban Mixed-Use Centres and Urban Dispersion: What Difference do they Make?. Environment and Planning A, 33, 141 - 160. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3375.
  8. Cysek-Pawlak, M. (2018). Mixed use and diversity as a New Urbanism principle guiding the renewal of post-industrial districts. Urban Development Issues, 57, 53 - 62. https://doi.org/10.2478/udi-2018-0017.
  9. Grant, J. (2002). Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, 71 - 84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208977192.
  10. Liu, H., Pan, Y., Yang, Y., & Huang, Z. (2021). Evaluating the impact of shading from surrounding buildings on heating/cooling energy demands of different community forms. Building and Environment, 206, 108322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108322
  11. Vartholomaios, A. (2017). A parametric sensitivity analysis of the influence of urban form on domestic energy consumption for heating and cooling in a Mediterranean city. Sustainable cities and society, 28, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.006.
  12. Mangan, S. D., Oral, G. K., Kocagil, I. E., & Sozen, I. (2021). The impact of urban form on building energy and cost efficiency in temperate-humid zones. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101626
  13. Muhaisen, A. S., & Gadi, M. B. (2006). Shading performance of polygonal courtyard forms. Building and environment, 41(8), 1050-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.027
  14. Mutani, G., Todeschi, V., Beltramino, S. (2022). Improving outdoor thermal comfort in built environment assessing the impact of urban form and vegetation. International Journal of Heat and Technology, 40 (1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.400104
  15. Wai, K. M., Yuan, C., Lai, A., & Yu, P. K. (2020). Relationship between pedestrian-level outdoor thermal comfort and building morphology in a high-density city. Science of the total environment, 708, 134516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134516
  16. Soflaei, F., Shokouhian, M., Abraveshdar, H., & Alipour, A. (2017). The impact of courtyard design variants on shading performance in hot-arid climates of Iran. Energy and Buildings, 143, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.027
  17. URL-1. Direct Sun Hours. https://docs.ladybug.tools/ladybug-primer/components/3_analyzegeometry/direct_sun_hours
  18. URL-2. Mahall Ankara. https://www.turkerler.com/proje/mahall-ankara/74. [19] Bilge, F. U. (2020). A comparative study about the evaluation of the urban space qualities and urban activities in the relationship between public realm and private space. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8(2), 565-575.
  19. Güven, E. (2017). Neoliberal Reproduction of Public Space and (“New”) Middle Class Spatiality: The Case of Tepe Prime. İdealkent, 8(21).
  20. Bian, C., Lee, C. C., Chen, X., Li, C. Y., & Hu, P. (2025). Quantifying the Thermal and Energy Impacts of Urban Morphology Using Multi-Source Data: A Multi-Scale Study in Coastal High-Density Contexts. Buildings, 15(13), 2266. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132266
  21. URL-2. Mahall Ankara. https://www.turkerler.com/proje/mahall-ankara/74. [19] Bilge, F. U. (2020). A comparative study about the evaluation of the urban space qualities and urban activities in the relationship between public realm and private space. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 8(2), 565-575.