Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

FARKLI ÇALIŞMA BOYLARINDA İKİ DÖNER EĞE SİSTEMİ İLE GENİŞLETME SONRASI KÖKLERİN KIRILMA DİRENCİNİN İNCELENMESİ

FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ROOTS AFTER INSTRUMENTATION WITH TWO NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY SYSTEMS AT DIFFERENT WORKING LENGTHS

Pages
49–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Fracture resistance could decrease whilst the active 16 mm of the instrument is used inside the canal especially with PTU rotary system in two-rooted maxillary premolars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of roots after instrumentation with two nickeltitanium rotary systems at different working lengths.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Teeth were divided into 2 main groups according to their working lengths, (14 or 16 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Fracture resistance could decrease whilst the active 16 mm of the instrument is used inside the canal especially with PTU rotary system in two-rooted maxillary premolars.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of roots after instrumentation with two nickeltitanium rotary systems at different working lengths. Materials and Methods: One hundred-twelve human maxillary two-rooted premolars were used. Teeth were divided into 2 main groups according to their working lengths, (14 or 16 mm). Each group was then assigned into 3 subgroups to be prepared with different root canal instruments [ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProFile GT Series X (GTX), and K-flexofiles] (n=16). The remaining teeth were used as the control groups. The specimens were loaded vertically at 1 mm/min crosshead speed until root fracture occurred. Data were evaluated statistically using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U (p < 0.001) tests. Results: Fracture resistance of control groups were higher than that of all experimental groups (p< 0.001). PTU+16 mm group was found less resistant to fracture than other groups (p< 0.001) whereas no statistically significant differences were found among other experimental groups (p= 0.012). Conclusion: Fracture resistance could decrease whilst the active 16 mm of the instrument is used inside the canal especially with PTU rotary system in two-rooted maxillary premolars.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; iki döner eğe sistemi ile farklı çalışma boylarında genişletilmesi sonrasında köklerin gösterdikleri kırılma direncini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 112 adet iki köklü üst küçük azı dişi kullanıldı. Tüm dişler çalışma boyları 14 mm ve 16 mm olacak şekilde iki ana gruba ayrldı. Her bir ana grup her birinde 16 diş olacak şekilde ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProFile GT Series X (GTX) ve K-flexofiles ile genişletilmek üzere 3 alt gruba ayrıldı (n=16). 14 mm ve 16 mm çalışma boyuna ayarlanmış 2 kontrol grubunda ise genişletme yapılmayan 8’er diş bulunmaktaydı. Dişler genişletildikten sonra her bir örneğe dik gelecek şekilde dakikada 1 mm hızla yük uygulandı ve kırılmanın gerçekleştiği değer kaydedildi. Verilerin istatistiksel analizi için Kruskal-Wallis (p< 0.05) ve Mann Whitney U testleri (p< 0.001) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Kontrol grupları deney gruplarına göre kırılmaya istatistiksel olarak daha fazla direnç gösterdi (p< 0.001). PTU+16 mm grubu diğer gruplara göre kırılmaya istatistiksel olarak daha az direnç gösterirken (p< 0.001) diğer deney grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p= 0.012). Sonuç: İki köklü üst küçük azı dişlerin kanalları genişletilirken PTU döner eğelerin 16 mm’lik aktif çalışan kısmının tamamının kullanıldığı köklerin kırılmaya yatkın hale gelebileceği gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, D., SERPER, A., ER, K., TAŞDEMİR, T., KAHRAMAN, S. A. (2015). FARKLI ÇALIŞMA BOYLARINDA İKİ DÖNER EĞE SİSTEMİ İLE GENİŞLETME SONRASI KÖKLERİN KIRILMA DİRENCİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/148264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hurmuzlu F, Serper A, Siso SH, Er K. In vitro fracture resistance of root-filled teeth using new-generation dentine bonding adhesives. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 770-773
  2. Wu MK, Van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. Comparison of mandibular premolars and canines with respect to their resistance to vertical root fracture. J Dent 2004; 32: 265-268
  3. Lam PP, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2005; 31: 529-532
  4. Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Topics 2006; 13: 57-83
  5. Siso SH, Hurmuzlu F, Turgut M, Altundasar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 161-168
  6. Kivanc BH, Alacam T, Ulusoy OI, Genc O, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of thin-walled roots restored with different post systems. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 997-1003
  7. Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, Suda H. The effect of working length and root canal preparation technique on crack development in the apical root canal wall. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 321-327
  8. Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2010; 36: 609-617
  9. Kim HC, Lee MH, Yum J, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kim BM. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture. J Endod 2010; 636: 1195-1199
  10. Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, Suda H. Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths. J Endod 2011; 37: 522-525
  11. Er K, Tasdemir T, Siso SH, Celik D, Cora S. Fracture resistance of retreated roots using different retreatment systems. Eur J Dent 2011; 5: 387-392
  12. Sathorn C, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. A comparison of the effects of two canal preparation techniques on root fracture susceptibility and fracture pattern. J Endod 2005; 31: 283-287
  13. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Load and strain during lateral condensation and vertical root fracture. J Endod 1999; 25: 99-104
  14. Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Versluis A. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different crosssectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 593-602
  15. Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper technique. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 187-190
  16. Gambarini G,