SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Organizational Fairness and Staff Extra-Role Contributions in Higher Education

Yükseköğretimde Kurumsal Adalet ve Personelin Ek Görev Katkıları

Hüsnü Akın Özcan(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3604-4198
İsmail Safa Aydın(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4716-8586
Pages
118–146
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results support the "honeymoon effect" trend previously identified in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Employees' perceptions of equitable treatment and their voluntary contributions to their work naturally increase productivity and motivation in the workplace.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our research results revealed a statistically significant, moderately positive correlation between OJ and OCB.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results support the "honeymoon effect" trend previously identified in the literature.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organizasyon · Örgütsel Adalet · Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı

Abstract

Employees' perceptions of equitable treatment and their voluntary contributions to their work naturally increase productivity and motivation in the workplace. This study explores the relationship between employees' perceptions of organizational justice (OJ) and their exhibit of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Another objective of this research is to analyze interactions among sub-dimensions of OCB exhibited by employees, such as conscientiousness, altruism, and courtesy. Our research results revealed a statistically significant, moderately positive correlation between OJ and OCB. These results support the "honeymoon effect" trend previously identified in the literature.

Özet

Çalışanların organizasyon içindeki adalet algısı ve görevlerinin ötesinde gönüllü olarak yaptıkları katkılar, işyerinde motivasyon ve verimliliğin artmasına önemli ölçüde katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, örgütsel adalet (ÖA) algısının üniversite çalışanlarının organizasyonel vatandaşlık davranışları (ÖDV) üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Çalışma, özellikle ÖA'nin alt boyutlarının, çalışanların vicdanlılık, fedakârlık, nezaket ve yurttaşlık erdemleri gibi vatandaşlık davranışlarını nasıl etkilediğini ele almaktadır. Araştırma bulguları, ÖA ve ÖVD arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı, orta derecede pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmanın bulguları, literatürde “balayı etkisi” olarak adlandırılan eğilimle uyumludur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özcan, H. A., Aydın, İ. S. (2025). Organizational Fairness and Staff Extra-Role Contributions in Higher Education. Ekonomi İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 118–146. https://doi.org/10.7596/jebm.1844528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
  2. Adamovic, M. (2023) Organizational justice research: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(4), 762–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12564
  3. Aggarwal, A., & Mittal, A. (2021). Modeling the effect of Organizational Justice on employee’s well-being, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover intentions through employee engagement. The Open Psychology Journal, 14, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102114010238
  4. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048015
  5. Al-shami, S. A., Al mamun, A., Rashid, N., & Cheong, C. B. (2023). Happiness at workplace on innovative work behaviour and organisational citizenship behaviour through moderating effect of innovative behaviour. Heliyon, 9(4), e15614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15614
  6. Alriyami, H. M., Alneyadi, K., Alnuaimi, H., & Kampouris, I. (2024). Employees trust, perceived justice, on task performance: Mediating and moderating role of autonomy and organizational culture. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 104, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103647
  7. Basım, H., & Şeşen, H. (2015). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeği uyarlama ve karşılaştırma çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4), 83-101.
  8. Başköy, Y. H., Yeter, U., & Sezgül, F. S. (2023). Örgütsel adalet algısı ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisinde örgütsel sinizmin aracılık rolü: tekstil sektöründe bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. Erişim Linki: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3069688
  9. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between effect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/255908
  10. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In B. H. Sheppard (Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  11. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2023). Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) above and beyond: Teachers’ OCB during COVID-19. Teaching and Teacher Education, 130, 104183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104183
  12. Boswell, W. R., Shipp, A. J., Payne, S. C., & Culbertson, S. S. (2005). Changes in newcomer job satisfaction over time: Examining the pattern of honeymoon and hangover effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.882
  13. Bursal, M. (2019). SPSS ile Temel Veri Analizleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  14. Changaranchola, M. N. & Samantara, R. (2024). Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: exploring the mediating role of psychological well-being at work. Rajagiri Management Journal, 18(3), 233–250.
  15. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of OJ: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
  16. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of OJ theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437
  17. Greenberg, J. (1990). OJ: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208
  18. Greenberg, J. (1993). The intellectual adolescence of organizational justice: You’ve come a long way, maybe. Social Justice Research, 6(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048736
  19. Gürbüz, S. (2024), Amos ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi- temel ilkeler ve uygulamalı analizler. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  20. Karacan Doğan, P. (2018). Analysis of the relation between organizational identification levels and organizational justice perceptions of academicians. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(4), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.766287
  21. Lee, Y., Li, J.Y., & Tao, W. (2024). Toward an authentic corporate social advocacy (CSA): An internal perspective of BLM advocacy. Public Relations Review. Erişim Linki: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124000870
  22. Liu, C.-H., Lin, W.-P., Ng, Y.-L., Hsieh, A.-L., & Lin, J.-Y. (2024). The relevance of vision sharing and innovative behavior on transformational leadership, charismatic influence and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). International Journal of Hospitality Management, 123, 103891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103891
  23. Mallick, E., Pradhan, R. K., Tewari, H. R., & Jena, L. K. (2014). Organizational citizenship behaviour, job performance and hr practices: a relational perspective. Management and Labour Studies, 39(4), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X15578023
  24. Mavibaş, M. (2023). Spor Bilimleri Fakültelerindeki akademisyenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının incelenmesi. Sportive: Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.53025/sportive.1496430
  25. Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington. Örücü, E., Korkmaz, E., & Kırboğa, R. (2020). Örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışına etkisinde örgüt kültürünün rolü. Academia. Erişim Linki: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1082867
  26. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  27. Rahman, M. H. A., & Karim, D. N. (2022). Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of work engagement. Heliyon, 8(1), e09450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09450
  28. Ramos, Arquimino, & Ellitan, Lena. (2023). Organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance: a literature review. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 2(4), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v2i4.1709
  29. Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74
  30. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Bussiness: A Skill Building Approach, Second Edition. New York: John Wileyand sons, inc.
  31. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
  32. Subongkod, M., Sinlapasaweta, W., Lalaenga, C., & Hongsakul, B. (2024). The relationship between organizational politics and organizational citizenship behavior in the management perspective: Evidence in Thailand. Procedia Computer Science, 237, 819-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.170
  33. Sümer, N. (2000) Yapısal esitlik modelleri: temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, (3), 49-73.
  34. Şahbudak, M. (2016). Örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel güven algılarının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerine etkileri: Türk spor örgütü örneği (Doktora tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana, Türkiye.
  35. Tabachnick, B., & Fidel, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. USA: Pearson Education Limited.
  36. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  37. Tutar, H., & Erdem, A. T. (2020). Örnekleriyle Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri ve SPSS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık San. ve Tic. A.Ş.
  38. Üçok, D. I., & Erbay, E. Ö. (2022). Organizational citizenship behavior: the other side of the coin. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 44(1), 162-182. https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1135558
  39. Veličkovska, I. (2017). Organizational citizenship behavior- definition, determinants and effects. Engineering Management, 3(1), 40-51. Erişim adresi: https://menadzment.tfbor.bg.ac.rs/english/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/02/3_1_40-51.pdf
  40. Vey, M. A., & Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1701_6
  41. Williams, S. and Shiaw, W. T. (1999), Mood and organizational citizenship behavior: the effects of positive affect on employee ocb intentions, The Journal of Psychology, 133(6): 656-668.
  42. Yean, T. F., & Yusof, A. A. (2016). OJ: A conceptual discussion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 798–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.082
  43. Yıldırım, F. (2007). İş doyumu ile örgütsel adalet ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 62(01), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002016