Journals / Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics / 2025 / Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Characterization of Turkish Edible Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Gene Resources and Their Utilisation in Breeding Programs

Dürdane Mart(Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute)0000-0002-2944-1227
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that there are promising genotypes in terms of breeding, and selection work should be continued in these genotypes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Total 70 different genotypes sourced from local edible pea (Pisum sativum L.) populations were obtained from the Izmir gene bank and sown in the Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute to morphologically characterize the genotypes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This trial was conducted in 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that there are promising genotypes in terms of breeding, and selection work should be continued in these genotypes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pea · genetic resources · morphological characterization

Abstract

Total 70 different genotypes sourced from local edible pea (Pisum sativum L.) populations were obtained from the Izmir gene bank and sown in the Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute to morphologically characterize the genotypes. This trial was conducted in 2013. Morphological characterization studies were carried out according to the identification list published by IPGRI for peas and the UPOV feature document for peas. The characteristics of the pea plants and their seeds were examined and the differences between these characteristics were determined. It was aimed to determine the vegetative characteristics of the related pea populations, to assist selections of pre-breeding material and start breeding studies for cultivar development. Plant height, first pod height, number of main branches and number of pods per plant of the examined pea populations were 32-135 cm; 17-85 cm; 1-4; 1-26, respectively. The number of full pods per plant, pod length, number of grains per plant, grain weight per plant and plot yields values were varied between 1-30; 3-9 cm; 2-118; 1-83 g and 50-434 kg/9 m2, respectively. It was determined that the number of pods, number of full pods, number of grains, plant straw weight and plant grain weight were effective on the first main component. Seed color, pod length, seed color, hilum color and plot yield were found to be effective on the second main component. In the third main component, the effect of plant height and first pod height characteristics was determined. It was concluded that there are promising genotypes in terms of breeding, and selection work should be continued in these genotypes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mart, D. (2025). Characterization of Turkish Edible Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Gene Resources and Their Utilisation in Breeding Programs. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Volume: 11 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1477727

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Anonymous, (1993). Descriptors for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International board for plant genetic resources, Rome, Italy, 31. http://www. bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/ detail/descriptors-for-chickpea-cicer-arietinum-l/
  2. Anonymous, (2003). Broad bean (Vicia faba L. var. major Harz) guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. http:// www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/en/tg206.pdf Boukid F, Rosell CM & Castellari M, (2021). Pea protein ingredients: A mainstream ingredient to (re)formulate innovative foods and beverages.
  3. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 110, 729- 742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.040 Bozoğlu H & Sözen Ö, (2007). Some agronomic properties of the local population of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Artvin province.
  4. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31, 327–334.
  5. Ferranti P, (2016). Food sustainability, security, and effects of global change. In reference module in food science. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-08-100596-5.03445-4
  6. Mart D, (2023). Characterization and principle component analysis for some characteristics of local spring sown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2):420-430. https://doi.org/10.30910/ turkjans.1129493
  7. Mart D, (2022a). Investigation of the morphological characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars cultivated under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions sown in winter and early spring. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 3(2):75-83. https://doi.org/10.51801/ turkjrfs.1207788
  8. Mart D, (2022b). Characterization of Turkey local winter sown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) populations using principle component analysis. ISPEC Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2):407-418. https://doi. org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol6iss2id316
  9. Mart D, (2022c). Determination of some characteristics of eding pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(2):506-518. https://doi.org/10.52520/masjaps. v7i2id202
  10. Mart D, Cansaran E, Karaköy T & Şimşek M, (2007). Çukurova ve Orta Anadolu Bölgesinden toplanan yerel nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) populasyonlarının bazı önemli özelliklerinin belirlenmesi, seleksiyonu ve kalitatif karakterlerinin karekterizasyonu. Tarla Bitkileri Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1-2), 61-72 (in Turkish).
  11. Pandey AK, Rubiales D, Wang Y, Fang P, Sun T, Liu N & Xu P, (2021). Omics resources and omics-enabled approaches for achieving high productivity and improved quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134(3): 755-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122- 020-03751-5
  12. Parihar AK, Dixit GP, Bohra A, Gupta DS, Singh AK, Kumar N & Singh NP, (2020). Genetic advancement in dry pea (Pisum sativum L.): Retrospect and prospect. In S. S. Gosal & S. H. Wani (Eds.), Accelerated plant breeding (Vol. 3, Food legumes, pp. 283-341). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47306-8_10
  13. Renáta Š, Nicolette V, Monika B, Stanislav K, Eliška G, Veronika M & Ľudmila S, (2021). Enhanced in situ activity of peroxidases and lignification of root tissues after exposure to non-thermal plasma increases the resistance of pea seedlings. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 41, 903-922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-021-10160-z
  14. Sapre S, Gontia-Mishra I, & Tiwari S, (2022). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria ameliorates salinity stress in pea (Pisum sativum). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41(2):647-656. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10329-y
  15. Shahzad R, Waqas M, Khan AL, Hamayun M, Kang SM & Lee IJ, (2015). Foliar application of methyl jasmonate induced physio-hormonal changes in Pisum sativum under diverse temperature regimes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 96:406-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.08.020
  16. Shen Y & Li Y, (2021). Acylation modification and/or guar gum conjugation enhanced functional properties of pea protein isolate. Food Hydrocolloids, 117, 106686. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106686
  17. Tan A, (2010). Türkiye gıda ve tarım bitki genetik kaynaklarının durumu: Gıda ve tarım için bitki kaynaklarının muhafazası ve sürdürülebilir kullanımına ilişkin Türkiye ikinci ülke raporu. ETAE Yayın, 141. Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü, Menemen, İzmir (in Turkish).
  18. Tan A, (1983). Sayısal taksonomik yöntemlerle varyasyonun saptanması. EBZAE, 30. Menemen (in Turkish).
  19. Taylor SL, Marsh JT, Koppelman SJ, Kabourek JL, Johnson PE & Baumert JL, (2021). A perspective on pea allergy and pea allergens. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 116, 186-198. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.07.017
  20. Tugay Karagül E, Niksarlı İnal F & Kaya E, (2024). Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) yerel çeşitlerinin agro-morfolojik karakterizasyonu. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 34 (Özel Sayı), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.18615/ anadolu.1464905 (in Turkish)
  21. Ülker M & Ceyhan E, (2008). Determination of some agricultural characters of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in Central Anatolian ecological condition. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(46):77-89 (in Turkish).