SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dijital Çağda İşletmecilik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

AN INVESTIGATION OF PHUBBING BEHAVIORS IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE SOSYOTELİZM (PHUBBİNG) DAVRANIŞLARININ İNCELENMESİ

Berkin Hanaylı(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi)0000-0001-6590-2038
Güler Tozkoparan(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9082-7092
Pages
14–32
Publication Date
2025-08-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that phubbing tendencies among university students have a multidimensional structure, sub-dimensions are related to demographic variables, and this situation provides an important infrastructure for future intervention, awareness raising studies and policy development processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reveal the prevalence and sub-dimensions of phubbing behaviors among university students and the relationship between this behavior and demographic variables in a holistic manner.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consisted of a total of 500 university students studying at Dokuz Eylül University and Aydın Adnan Menderes University, representing different grade levels, age groups, gender and education types.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that phubbing tendencies among university students have a multidimensional structure, sub-dimensions are related to demographic variables, and this situation provides an important infrastructure for future intervention, awareness raising studies and policy development processes.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyotelizm · Üniversite Öğrencileri · Teknoloji

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the prevalence and sub-dimensions of phubbing behaviors among university students and the relationship between this behavior and demographic variables in a holistic manner. The study aims to go beyond the partial and limited findings in the literature by drawing attention to the potential of communication and interaction habits acquired during the higher education period to affect future social and professional life. The sample of the study consisted of a total of 500 university students studying at Dokuz Eylül University and Aydın Adnan Menderes University, representing different grade levels, age groups, gender and education types. The data were obtained through the survey method, and the 15-item General Phubbing Scale (GSO) developed by Chotpitayasunondh and Douglas (2018) and adapted into Turkish by Göksün (2019) was used to measure phubbing behaviors. The scale includes four sub-dimensions: nomophobia, interpersonal conflict, self-isolation and problem awareness. SPSS Statistics and SPSS Amos programs were used for statistical analysis of the data. The findings of the study revealed that phubbing behaviors differed according to the demographic characteristics of the students. The results show that phubbing tendencies among university students have a multidimensional structure, sub-dimensions are related to demographic variables, and this situation provides an important infrastructure for future intervention, awareness raising studies and policy development processes. In this respect, the study aims to contribute to a deeper and holistic understanding of the phenomenon of phubbing.

Özet

Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencileri arasındaki sosyotelizm (phubbing) davranışlarının yaygınlığını, alt boyutlarını ve bu davranışın demografik değişkenlerle ilişkisini bütüncül bir biçimde ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, yükseköğretim dönemi boyunca edinilen iletişim ve etkileşim alışkanlıklarının gelecekteki sosyal ve mesleki yaşantıyı etkileme potansiyeline dikkat çekerek, literatürdeki kısmi ve sınırlı bulguların ötesine geçmeyi hedeflemektedir. Çalışmanın örneklemini, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi ve Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi’nde öğrenim gören, farklı sınıf düzeyleri, yaş grupları, cinsiyet ve öğrenim türlerini temsil eden toplam 500 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Veriler, survey yöntemiyle elde edilmiş, sosyotelizm davranışlarını ölçmek amacıyla Chotpitayasunondh ve Douglas (2018) tarafından geliştirilen, Göksün (2019) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan 15 maddelik Genel Sosyotelist Olma (GSO) Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ölçek, nomofobi, kişilerarası çatışma, kendini yalnızlaştırma ve problem farkındalığı olmak üzere dört alt boyutu kapsamaktadır. Verilerin istatistiksel analizinde SPSS Statistics ve SPSS Amos programlarından yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, sosyotelizm davranışlarının öğrencilerin demografik özelliklerine göre farklılaştığını ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencileri arasındaki sosyotelizm eğilimlerinin çok boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğunu, alt boyutların demografik değişkenlerle ilişkili olduğunu ve bu durumun ileride uygulanabilecek müdahale, farkındalık artırma çalışmaları ve politika geliştirme süreçleri için önemli bir altyapı sağladığını göstermektedir. Bu yönüyle çalışma, sosyotelizm olgusunun daha derinlikli ve bütüncül biçimde anlaşılmasına katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hanaylı, B., Tozkoparan, G. (2025). AN INVESTIGATION OF PHUBBING BEHAVIORS IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Dijital Çağda İşletmecilik Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 14–32. https://doi.org/10.46238/jobda.1618406

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (88)

  1. Aagaard, J. (2019). Digital akrasia: A qualitative study of phubbing. AI & Society, 35(1), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00876-0
  2. Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics of distressing disclosures in close relationships: The transformational nature of disclosure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 619–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155002
  3. Akbağ, M., & Sayıner, B. (2021). Dijital teknolojinin yansımaları: Ebeveyn teknoferansı ve sosyotelizmi. Humanistic Perspective, 3(3), 753-778. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.996220
  4. Alcaide García, M., Félix Lerma, M. V., Gainza Perez, M. A., Rodriguez-Crespo, A., & Cooper, T. V. (2023). Psychosocial and personality trait associates of phubbing and being phubbed in Hispanic emerging adult college students. Current Psychology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04767-y
  5. Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi. (2024). Bir bakışta üniversite. https://www.adu.edu.tr/tr/bir-bakista-universite
  6. Aykaç, S., & Yıldırım, Ş. (2021). Gelişen dünyada nomofobi ve sosyotelist olma – sosyotelizme maruz kalmanın etkileri. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021.21.60703-780598
  7. Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132076
  8. Bakır, V., & Dilmaç, B. (2023). Examining the relationship between phubbing and mental health among university students: A mixed study. Research on Education and Psychology, 7(3), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1331114
  9. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1–40). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60211-7
  10. Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons. Bebermeier, S. (2023). Validierung der deutschsprachigen Versionen der Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) und der Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/00/2023.06.02.x
  11. Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309346065
  12. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00706.x
  13. Büttner, C., Gloster, A., & Greifeneder, R. (2021). Your phone ruins our lunch: Attitudes, norms, and valuing the interaction predict phone use and phubbing in dyadic social interactions. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211059914
  14. Büyükgebiz Koca, E. (2019). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve sosyotelizm üzerine bir yazın taraması. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(6), 399–411.
  15. Chi, L. C., Tang, T. C., & Tang, E. (2022). The phubbing phenomenon: A cross-sectional study on the relationships among social media addiction, fear of missing out, personality traits, and phubbing behavior. Current Psychology, 41(2), 1112-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02468-y
  16. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the generic scale of phubbing (GSP) and the generic scale of being phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.020
  17. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
  18. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506 Çaka, C. (2021). Çağın teknolojik bağımlılığı: Sosyotelizm (kavramsal bir bakış). Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(3), 464-476.
  19. Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(3), 196-205.
  20. David, M., & Roberts, J. (2021). Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38, 3590-3609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996454
  21. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. (2024). Öğrenci sayısı ve dağılımı. https://sayilarla.deu.edu.tr/ogrenci-sayisi-ve-dagilim/
  22. Eroğlu, H., Aygün, H. E., & Aksoy, S. (2024). Sosyal duygusal yalnızlık ve sosyotelist davranış [phubbing] arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.1451388
  23. Escalera-Chávez, M. E., García-Santillán, A., & Molchanova, V. S. (2020). Phubbing behavior: Is there a gender difference in college students? European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(3), 546-551. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.3.546
  24. Fang, J., Wang, X., Wen, Z., & Zhou, J. (2020). Fear of missing out and problematic social media use as mediators between emotional support from social media and phubbing behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 107, 106430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106430
  25. Farber, M. (2016). Smartphones are making you slack off at work. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2016/06/09/smartphones-making-you-slack-at-work-survey/
  26. Fleming, L. (2024). How phubbing is hurting your relationships. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-phubbing-8647390
  27. Floyd, K., & Voloudakis, M. (1999). Affectionate behavior in adult platonic friendships: Interpreting and evaluating expectancy violations. Human Communication Research, 25(3), 341–369. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00449.x
  28. Franchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., Van Rooij, A. J., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018). Fear of missing out as a predictor of problematic social media use and phubbing behavior among sFlemish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102319
  29. Gao, B. (2023). Why cannot I stop phubbing? Boredom proneness and phubbing: A multiple mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 3727-3738. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423371
  30. Garcia, M. A., Lerma, M., Perez, M. G., Medina, K. S., Rodriguez-Crespo, A., & Cooper, T. V. (2023). Psychosocial and personality trait associates of phubbing and being phubbed in hispanic emerging adult college students. Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 1–14. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04767-y
  31. Gavcar, E., Büber, A., Balkis, M., & Simsek, C. (2023). The psychometric properties of the General Phubbing Scale in adolescents. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1232372
  32. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
  33. Göksün, D. O. (2019). Sosyotelist olma ve sosyotelizme maruz kalma ölçeklerinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(3), 657-671. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.505642
  34. Grieve, R., & March, E. (2020). ‘Just checking’: Vulnerable and grandiose narcissism subtypes as predictors of phubbing. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920942276
  35. Grieve, R., March, E., & Watkinson, J. (2020). Inauthentic self-presentation on facebook as a function of vulnerable narcissism and lower self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.020
  36. Güley, B., Ulutaş Keskinkılıç, A., & Emre, O. (2023). Üniversite öğrencilerinde takıntılı mesajlaşma ve sosyotelizm ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(4), 1233-1242. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1077080
  37. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  38. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  39. Han, J. H., Park, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2022). Phubbing as a millennials’ new addiction and relating factors among nursing students. Psychiatry Investigation, 19(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2021.0163
  40. Harianti, W. S., & Kurniawan, I. N. (2022). Parental phubbing and mental well-being: Preliminary study in Indonesia. Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.2.2.2022.34
  41. Hashempour-Sadeghian, M., & Shavazi, M. (2021). Internet and social isolation: A comparative study of the effect of internet use on social isolation between young and middle-aged individuals. Shiraz E-Medical Journal, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.5812/semj.114601
  42. Isrofin, B., & Munawaroh, E. (2021). The effect of smartphone addiction and self-control on phubbing behavior. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 6(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v6i12021p015
  43. Ivanova, A., Gorbaniuk, O., Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., Mraka, N., Polishchuk, V., & Gorbaniuk, J. (2020). Mobile phone addiction, phubbing, and depression among men and women: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91(3), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09723-8
  44. Kadylak, T. (2020). An investigation of perceived family phubbing expectancy violations and well being among U.S. older adults. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919872238
  45. Karadağ, E. (2017). Sanal dünyanın kronolojik bağımlılığı: Sosyotelizm (phubbing). Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3(2), 223-231.
  46. Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.005
  47. Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  48. Liu, R., Wang, J., Gu, D., Ding, Y., Oei, T., Hong, W., & Li, Y. (2019). The effect of parental phubbing on teenager’s mobile phone dependency behaviors: The mediation role of subjective norm and dependency intention. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S224133
  49. Kelly, L., Miller-Ott, A. E., & Duran, R. L. (2019). Phubbing friends: Understanding face threats from, and responses to, friends’ cell phone usage through the lens of politeness theory. Communication Quarterly, 67(4), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2019.1668443
  50. Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012958
  51. Nuñez, T., Radtke, T., & Eimler, S. (2020). A third-person perspective on phubbing: Observing smartphone-induced social exclusion generates negative affect, stress, and derogatory attitudes. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(3).
  52. Özdemir, A. (2008). Yönetim biliminde ileri araştırma yöntemleri ve uygulamalar. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  53. Parmaksız, İ. (2021). The mediating role of social anxiety in the relationship between phubbing and mindfulness. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 22(2), 1387-1420. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.904379
  54. Parmaksız, İ. (2022). Romantik ilişkilerde modern engel: Partner sosyotelizmi (phubbing) üzerine bir derleme. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(11), 59-76.
  55. Peleg, O., & Boniel-Nissim, M. (2024). Exploring the personality and relationship factors that mediate the connection between differentiation of self and phubbing. Scientific Reports, 14, 6572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55560-1
  56. Permata, B., Rahaju, S., & Yunanto, T. A. R. (2023). Phubbing in millennial generation: The influence of fear of missing out and self-control. Journal of Educational, Health, and Community Psychology, 12(1), 220-235.
  57. Rahmah, M., & Sanyata, S. (2024). Phubbing and its impact on student communication and relationship: A qualitative study on coping strategies and social implications. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5801
  58. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
  59. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.021
  60. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2020). Boss phubbing, trust, job satisfaction and employee performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109702
  61. Sanders, G. S., Baron, R. S., & Moore, D. L. (1978). Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90017-3
  62. Sarı, E. S., Kırbaş, Z. Ö., Güneş, H., Akeren, Z., & Semerci, V. (2023). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyotelizme maruz kalma ve sosyotelist olma durumlarının incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.1225455
  63. Sayıner, B., & Akbağ, M. (2023). Sosyotelizm: Farklı bağlamlarda bir değerlendirme. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 10(21), 80-115. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1224292
  64. Schokkenbroek, J. M., Hardyns, W., & Ponnet, K. (2022). Phubbed and curious: The relation between partner phubbing and electronic partner surveillance. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107425
  65. Sepetçi, P., Özdemir, S., & Sever, M. (2021). Canım sıkılıyor! Can sıkıntısı, sosyotelizm ve gelişmeleri kaçırma korkusu. Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.55044/meusbd.962572
  66. Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları. Süzer, E., & Koç, M. (2022). An examination of phubbing and being phubbed behaviors among Turkish teachers. Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.47602/josep.v2i1.11
  67. Sülü Akgül, C. (2023). İnternet ve akıllı telefon bağımlılığından sosyotelizme: Sosyal hizmet perspektifinden derinlemesine bir inceleme. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(31), 69-101. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.1328519
  68. Şahin, S., Demirhan, İ., Arıöz, A., & Ünsal, A. (2024). Assessment of the relationship between phubbing and personality types among university students. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1394592
  69. T’ng, S. T., Ho, K. H., & Low, S. K. (2018). Are you “phubbing” me? The determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement invariance across sex differences. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2018.3318
  70. Tedeschi, J. T., & Harris, M. B. (2001). Impression management and influence in the organization. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 193–237). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  71. Tong, W., Jia, J., Wang, P., & He, W. (2023). The associations between parental phubbing, adolescent phubbing, and adolescents’ adjustments: A cross-lagged panel network analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01909-0
  72. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., & Brock, D. P. (2003). Huh, what was I doing? A metacognitive model of the effects of interruptions on task performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 5(4), 1–12.
  73. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  74. Uyar, P., & Ayar, D. (2024). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanımı ve aile iletişiminin sosyotelist olma ve sosyotelizme maruz kalma durumlarına etkisi. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer, 14(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1206855
  75. Ünalan, D., & Yıldırım, O. (2020). Dijital yerlilerin sosyotelizm (phubbing) eğilimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 8(1), 276-297. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.644279
  76. Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2020a). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 30(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa024
  77. Vanden Abeele, M. (2020b). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. W. Campbell, & Y. Ricci (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 158–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  78. Wang, X., Wang, S., Wang, H., & Dong, W. (2024). Females suffer more from partner phubbing? The roles of romantic jealousy and relational aggression between partner phubbing and intimacy quality. Current Psychology, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05826-8
  79. Wang, X., Zhao, F., & Lei, L. (2021). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology, 40, 3365-3375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00275-0
  80. Xie, X., & Xie, J. (2019). Parental phubbing accelerates depression in late childhood and adolescence: A two‐path model. Journal of Adolescence, 78(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.004
  81. Xie, X., Wang, Y. J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2023). Parent phubbing and adolescent depressive symptoms: The role of parent–child attachment and self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107530
  82. Yaman, Z., & Kavuncu, B. (2019). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal gelişmeleri kaçırma korkusunun ve sosyal ağ kullanım amacının nomofobi düzeyine etkisi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 555-570.
  83. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
  84. Yıldız, E. P., Çengel, M., & Alkan, A. (2020). Öğretmenlerin nomofobi düzeylerinin demografik özelliklerine ve akıllı telefon kullanım alışkanlıklarına göre incelenmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(1), 5096-5120. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.676329
  85. Zhan, S., Shrestha, S., & Zhong, N. (2022). Romantic relationship satisfaction and phubbing: The role of loneliness and empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 967339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967339
  86. Zhan, M., Zhao, J., & Chao, D. (2022). The relationship between phubbing, empathy, and social well-being among Chinese college students: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107119.
  87. Zhang, J., Dong, C., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, H., & Li, Y. (2023). Parental phubbing and child social-emotional adjustment: A meta-analysis of studies conducted in China. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 4267-4285.
  88. Zhao, J., Guo, Z., Shi, H., Yu, M., Jiao, L., & Xu, Y. (2023). The relationship between parental phubbing and interpersonal aggression in adolescents: The role of rejection sensitivity and school climate. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(11-12), 7630-7655. http://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221145722