SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Postmortem Redistribution of Tetrahydrocannabinol: A Data Reconstruction Comparison of Controlled Animal Models and Human Casework

İsmail Ethem Gören(ANKARA UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY)0000-0002-0219-1598
Pages
1432–1443
Publication Date
2026-05-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings indicate that controlled animal models may overestimate the magnitude and predictability of postmortem redistribution for THC in real-world forensic settings and support interpretation strategies that prioritize peripheral sampling and metabolite context when assessing postmortem cannabinoid results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Postmortem redistribution of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) remains controversial because controlled animal experiments often show pronounced central-to-peripheral concentration gradients, whereas human casework exhibits highly variable patterns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Animal models showed consistently elevated central-to-peripheral ratios, whereas human casework clustered near unity with frequent values below 1.0.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings indicate that controlled animal models may overestimate the magnitude and predictability of postmortem redistribution for THC in real-world forensic settings and support interpretation strategies that prioritize peripheral sampling and metabolite context when assessing postmortem cannabinoid results.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Postmortem redistribution · Tetrahydrocannabinol · Animal models

Abstract

Postmortem redistribution of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) remains controversial because controlled animal experiments often show pronounced central-to-peripheral concentration gradients, whereas human casework exhibits highly variable patterns. This study applied retrospective data reconstruction to compare the central-to-peripheral blood ratio of THC and its metabolites between animal models and human forensic casework and to test whether postmortem interval explains the observed variability. A raw dataset was reconstructed from peer-reviewed literature, comprising paired central and peripheral measurements from porcine and rabbit models and a large set of paired measurements from autopsy caseworks. Central-to-peripheral ratios were calculated from matched cardiac and femoral blood concentrations, and nonparametric group comparisons and correlation analyses were performed. Animal models showed consistently elevated central-to-peripheral ratios, whereas human casework clustered near unity with frequent values below 1.0. In animal models, postmortem interval was strongly associated with increasing central-to-peripheral ratio, but no such relationship was observed in human casework. In contrast to THC, the central-to-peripheral ratio for the major carboxy metabolite was near 1.0 in both cohorts. These findings indicate that controlled animal models may overestimate the magnitude and predictability of postmortem redistribution for THC in real-world forensic settings and support interpretation strategies that prioritize peripheral sampling and metabolite context when assessing postmortem cannabinoid results.

Özet

Postmortem redistribution of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) remains controversial because controlled animal experiments often show pronounced central-to-peripheral concentration gradients, whereas human casework exhibits highly variable patterns. This study applied retrospective data reconstruction to compare the central-to-peripheral blood ratio of THC and its metabolites between animal models and human forensic casework and to test whether postmortem interval explains the observed variability. A raw dataset was reconstructed from peer-reviewed literature, comprising paired central and peripheral measurements from porcine and rabbit models and a large set of paired measurements from autopsy caseworks. Central-to-peripheral ratios were calculated from matched cardiac and femoral blood concentrations, and nonparametric group comparisons and correlation analyses were performed. Animal models showed consistently elevated central-to-peripheral ratios, whereas human casework clustered near unity with frequent values below 1.0. In animal models, postmortem interval was strongly associated with increasing central-to-peripheral ratio, but no such relationship was observed in human casework. In contrast to THC, the central-to-peripheral ratio for the major carboxy metabolite was near 1.0 in both cohorts. These findings indicate that controlled animal models may overestimate the magnitude and predictability of postmortem redistribution for THC in real-world forensic settings and support interpretation strategies that prioritize peripheral sampling and metabolite context when assessing postmortem cannabinoid results.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gören, İ. E. (2026). Postmortem Redistribution of Tetrahydrocannabinol: A Data Reconstruction Comparison of Controlled Animal Models and Human Casework. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1432–1443. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1861324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Andrews, R., & Paterson, S. (2012). A validated method for the analysis of cannabinoids in post-mortem blood using liquid–liquid extraction and two-dimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Forensic Science International, 222(1–3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.007
  2. Andrews, R., Murphy, K. G., Nahar, L., & Paterson, S. (2015). Cannabinoid concentrations detected in fatal road traffic collision victims compared with a population of other postmortem cases. Clinical Chemistry, 61(10), 1256–1264. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.240846
  3. Beirness, D. J., Gu, K. W., Lowe, N. J., Woodall, K. L., Desrosiers, N. A., Cahill, B., Porath, A. J., & Peaire, A. (2021). Cannabis, alcohol and other drug findings in fatally injured drivers in Ontario. Traffic Injury Prevention, 22(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1847281
  4. Brunet, B., Hauet, T., Hébrard, W., Papet, Y., Mauco, G., & Mura, P. (2010). Postmortem redistribution of THC in the pig. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 124(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0403-2
  5. Charles, A.-L., Giannini, M., Meyer, A., Charloux, A., Talha, S., Vogel, T., Raul, J.-S., Wolff, V., & Geny, B. (2024). Cannabis (THC) aggravates the deleterious effects of alcohol (EtOH) on skeletal muscles’ mitochondrial respiration: Modulation by age and metabolic phenotypes. Biology, 13(12), Article 1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13121080
  6. Chu, M., Rago, M. Di, Mantinieks, D., Glowacki, L., Woodford, N. W., Gerostamoulos, D., & Drummer, O. H. (2021). Time-dependent changes in THC concentrations in deceased persons. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa052
  7. Cliburn, K. D., Huestis, M. A., Wagner, J. R., & Kemp, P. M. (2021). Cannabinoid distribution in fatally-injured pilots’ postmortem fluids and tissues. Forensic Science International, 329, Article 111075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111075
  8. Cliburn, K. D., Kemp, P. M., Huestis, M. A., Wagner, J. R., Payton, M., Liu, L., Liang, Y., & Maxwell, L. K. (2023). Time- and temperature-dependent postmortem Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration changes in rabbits following controlled inhaled cannabis administration. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 47(9), 850–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkad076
  9. Delteil, C., Sastre, C., Piercecchi, M.-D., Faget-Agius, C., Deveaux, M., Kintz, P., Devooght, M.-A., Leonetti, G., Bartoli, C., & Pélissier-Alicot, A.-L. (2018). Death by self-mutilation after oral cannabis consumption. Legal Medicine, 30, 5–9. [suspicious link removed]
  10. Drummer, O. H. (2008). Postmortem toxicological redistribution. In Essentials of autopsy practice (ss. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-835-7_1
  11. Gaunitz, F., Lehmann, S., Thomas, A., Thevis, M., Rothschild, M. A., & Mercer-Chalmers-Bender, K. (2018). Post-mortem distribution of the synthetic cannabinoid MDMB-CHMICA and its metabolites in a case of combined drug intoxication. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 132(6), 1645–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1911-8
  12. Giroud, C., Michaud, K., Sporkert, F., Eap, C., Augsburger, M., Cardinal, P., & Mangin, P. (2004). A fatal overdose of cocaine associated with coingestion of marijuana, buprenorphine, and fluoxetine: Body fluid and tissue distribution of cocaine and its metabolites determined by hydrophilic interaction chromatography-mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS). Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 28(6), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/28.6.464
  13. Gronewold, A., & Skopp, G. (2011). A preliminary investigation on the distribution of cannabinoids in man. Forensic Science International, 210(1–3), e7–e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.04.010
  14. Guyot, P., Ades, A., Ouwens, M. J. N. M., & Welton, N. J. (2012). Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: Reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-9
  15. Hansen, S. L., Nielsen, M. K. K., Linnet, K., & Rasmussen, B. S. (2023). Suitability of cardiac blood, brain tissue, and muscle tissue as alternative matrices for toxicological evaluation in postmortem cases. Drug Testing and Analysis, 15(5), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3439
  16. Hoffman, M. A., Trochta, A., Gary, R. D., Fitzgerald, R. L., & McIntyre, I. M. (2020). An evaluation of postmortem concentrations of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH). Forensic Science International, 315, Article 110414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110414
  17. Holland, M. G., Schwope, D. M., Stoppacher, R., Gillen, S. B., & Huestis, M. A. (2011). Postmortem redistribution of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH). Forensic Science International, 212(1–3), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.028
  18. Huestis, M. A., Barnes, A., & Smith, M. L. (2005). Estimating the time of last cannabis use from plasma Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations. Clinical Chemistry, 51(12), 2289–2295. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.056838
  19. Kacinko, S. L., Isenschmid, D. S., & Logan, B. K. (2024). Are postmortem cannabinoid concentrations forensically reliable? American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, 45(1), 92–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000887
  20. Kamphuis, A. E. M., Borra, L. C. P., van der Hulst, R., Kloos, D.-P., Rijken, D. J., Bosman, I. J., & Touw, D. J. (2021). Postmortem redistribution of morphine in humans: Important variables that might be influencing the central blood/peripheral blood ratio. Forensic Science International, 329, Article 111094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111094
  21. Kemp, P. M., Cardona, P. S., Chaturvedi, A. K., & Soper, J. W. (2015). Distribution of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol acid in postmortem biological fluids and tissues from pilots fatally injured in aviation accidents. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60(4), 942–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12751
  22. Lemos, N. P., & Ingle, E. A. (2011). Cannabinoids in postmortem toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 35(7), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/anatox/35.7.394
  23. Mantinieks, D., Gerostamoulos, D., Glowacki, L., Di Rago, M., Schumann, J., Woodford, N. W., & Drummer, O. H. (2021). Postmortem drug redistribution: A compilation of postmortem/antemortem drug concentration ratios. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa107
  24. Meneses, V., & Hernandez, M. (2021). Cannabinoid distribution in postmortem samples. Forensic Chemistry, 23, Article 100303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2020.100303
  25. Palazzoli, F., Santunione, A. L., Marchesi, F., Verri, P., Vandelli, D., Licata, M., & Silingardi, E. (2021). Cannabinoids determination in brain: A supplemental helpful in postmortem evaluation. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 45(9), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa155
  26. Peters, F. T., & Steuer, A. E. (2019). Antemortem and postmortem influences on drug concentrations and metabolite patterns in postmortem specimens. WIREs Forensic Science, 1(1), Article e1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1297
  27. Quenardelle, V., Charles, A.-L., Charloux, A., Raul, J.-S., Wolff, V., & Geny, B. (2025). Young age and concomitant cannabis (THC) and ethanol (EtOH) exposure enhances rat brain damage through decreased cerebral mitochondrial respiration. Molecules, 30(4), Article 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040918
  28. Rock, K. L., Englund, A., Morley, S., Rice, K., & Copeland, C. S. (2022). Can cannabis kill? Characteristics of deaths following cannabis use in England (1998–2020). Journal of Psychopharmacology, 36(12), 1362–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811221115760
  29. Rodda, L. N., Volk, J. A., Moffat, E., Williams, C. M., Lynch, K. L., & Wu, A. H. B. (2018). Evaluation of intraosseous fluid as an alternative biological specimen in postmortem toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 42(3), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx096
  30. Saenz, S. R., Lewis, R. J., Angier, M. K., & Wagner, J. R. (2017). Postmortem fluid and tissue concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC and THC-COOH. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 41(6), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx033
  31. Santunione, A. L., Palazzoli, F., Verri, P., Vandelli, D., Chiapelli, F., & Silingardi, E. (2023). Cannabinoid stability in postmortem brain samples stored at different temperatures. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 47(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkac041
  32. Sastre, C., Bartoli, C., Baillif-Couniou, V., Leonetti, G., & Pelissier-Alicot, A.-L. (2018). Post mortem redistribution of drugs: Current state of knowledge. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 23(36), 5530–5541. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612823666170622111739
  33. Schaefer, N., Kröll, A.-K., Körbel, C., Laschke, M. W., Menger, M. D., Maurer, H. H., Meyer, M. R., & Schmidt, P. H. (2020). Time- and temperature-dependent postmortem concentration changes of the (synthetic) cannabinoids JWH-210, RCS-4, as well as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol following pulmonary administration to pigs. Archives of Toxicology, 94(5), 1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02707-4
  34. Schwerdt, M. K., & Gill, J. R. (2018). The pitfalls of per se thresholds in accurately identifying acute cannabis intoxication at autopsy. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 14(4), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-018-0019-2
  35. Tascon, I., Côté, C., Garneau, B., Desharnais, B., Gosselin, V., & Mireault, P. (2023). Postmortem redistribution of cannabinoids: Statistical analysis of a novel dataset and meta-analysis. Forensic Science International, 353, Article 111873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111873
  36. Wachholz, P., Celiński, R., Skowronek, R., & Pawlas, N. (2024). Comparative analysis of post-mortem drug concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 21(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00801-y
  37. Zughaibi, T. A., Alharbi, H., Al-Saadi, A., Alzahrani, A. E., & Al-Asmari, A. I. (2023). 11-Nor-9-carboxy tetrahydrocannabinol distribution in fluid from the chest cavity in cannabis-related post-mortem cases. Toxics, 11(9), Article 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11090740