SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2

Adaptation of Small Scale Sport Events Brand Personality Scale to Turkish Culture

Küçük Ölçekli Spor Etkinlikleri Marka Kişiliği Ölçeğinin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması

Orçun Ocakoğlu(MARMARA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS MANAGEMENT)0000-0002-0905-2785
Pages
311–333
Publication Date
2026-08-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, adapted scale can be considered a valid and reliable tool that can be used in research on the Turkish population to make meaningful comments about the personality of sport events organized in Türkiye.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since sports event personality is known to influence many variables (such as distinctiveness, finding suitable and appropriate sponsors, and creating a profile of satisfied and loyal participants) it is extremely critical for event organizers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In terms of practical application, the study’s findings can assist sports managers and event organizers in evaluating the personality of their events and developing positioning strategies that will set them apart from the competition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, adapted scale can be considered a valid and reliable tool that can be used in research on the Turkish population to make meaningful comments about the personality of sport events organized in Türkiye.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Spor etkinlikleri · spor etkinlikleri marka kişiliği · spor etkinlik kişiliği

Abstract

Since sports event personality is known to influence many variables (such as distinctiveness, finding suitable and appropriate sponsors, and creating a profile of satisfied and loyal participants) it is extremely critical for event organizers. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to test the suitability of the brand personality scale developed for small-scale sports events within the context of Turkish culture. In terms of practical application, the study’s findings can assist sports managers and event organizers in evaluating the personality of their events and developing positioning strategies that will set them apart from the competition. The study included cyclists competing in the “VeloTürk Gran Fondo” event held in the Çeşme district of Izmir. In the study, the criterion sampling technique was employed. The inclusion criteria were registering for the event, completing at least one of the race courses, and being 18 years of age or older. A total of 239 volunteer cyclists who met these criteria and agreed to participate in the study formed the sample. Data were collected using a cross-sectional study design via paper based questionnaires. CFA was conducted to assess the construct validity of the scale; Cronbach’s Alpha was examined for reliability, while CR and AVE values were analyzed to test convergent and discriminant validity. In addition, a multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess criterion validity. The findings showed that the “Small-Scale Sports Events Brand Personality Scale”, adapted in this study, retained the psychometric properties of the original scale. The scale exhibits adequate CFA fit indices and high internal consistency coefficients. Furthermore, the tests conducted revealed that the scale also meets the criteria for convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity. As a result, adapted scale can be considered a valid and reliable tool that can be used in research on the Turkish population to make meaningful comments about the personality of sport events organized in Türkiye.

Özet

Spor etkinlik kişiliği, ayırt edicilik, uygun ve doğru sponsor bulma, memnun ve sadık katılımcı profili yaratma gibi birçok değişkeni etkilediği bilindiğinden; etkinlik düzenleyiciler için son derece kritiktir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmanın amacı, küçük ölçekli spor etkinlikleri için geliştirilen marka kişiliği ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uygunluğunun sınanmasıdır. Uygulama açısından araştırmanın bulguları spor yöneticilerine ve etkinlik sorumlularına etkinliklerinin kişiliğini değerlendirmede ve rekabette farklılık yaratacak konumlandırma stratejileri geliştirmede yardımcı olabilir. Araştırmaya İzmir’in Çeşme ilçesinde gerçekleşen “VeloTürk Gran Fondo” etkinliğinde mücadele eden bisiklet sporcuları katılmıştır. Araştırmada, olasılıksız örnekleme yöntemlerinden biri olan amaçlı örnekleme içinde yer alan ölçüt örnekleme tekniği tercih edilmiştir. Etkinliğine kayıt olmak, yarışma parkurlarından en az birini tamamlamak ve 18 yaşından büyük olmak araştırmaya alınma ölçütüdür. Bu ölçütleri sağlayan ve araştırmaya katılmayı kabul eden 239 gönüllü bisiklet sporcusu araştırmanın örneklemi olmuştur. Kesitsel araştırma tasarımıyla veriler kağıt-kalem ile anket doldurma şeklinde toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği için Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmış, yakınsak ve ayrışım geçerliğini sınamak için CR, AVE değerleri ve güvenirliği için ise iç tutarlılık katsayısı olan Cronbach Alpha değerlerine bakılmıştır. İlave olarak yapılan ölçüt geçerliği için çoklu regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, bu çalışmayla uyarlanmış olan “Küçük Ölçekli Spor Etkinlikleri Marka Kişiliği Ölçeği” (KÖSEMKÖ)'nin, özgün ölçekteki psikometrik özelliklerini koruduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçek, yeterli DFA uyum indekslerine ve yüksek düzeyde iç tutarlılık katsayılarına sahiptir. Ayrıca yapılan testler ölçeğin yakınsak, ayrışım ve ölçüt geçerliğini de sağladığını ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak KÖSEMKÖ; Türkiye'de düzenlenen küçük ölçekli spor etkinliklerinin marka kişiliği hakkında anlamlı yorumlar yapabilmek için, Türk halkı üzerinde yapılacak çalışmalarda kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olarak kabul edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ocakoğlu, O. (2026). Adaptation of Small Scale Sport Events Brand Personality Scale to Turkish Culture. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 311–333. https://doi.org/10.61962/bsd.1845836

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Aaker, D.A. (1972). A measure of brand acceptance. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(2), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243772009002
  2. Aaker, D.A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.
  3. Aaker, J.L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304
  4. Alexandris, K. (2016). Testing the role of sport event personality on the development of event involvement and loyalty: The case of mountain running races. International Journal of Festivals and Event Management, 7(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-10-2015-0041
  5. Alexandris, K., Du, J., & Funk, D. (2016). The influence of sport activity personality on the stagebased development of attitude formation among recreational mountain skiers. Managing Sport and Leisure, 21(4), 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2016.1255155
  6. Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
  7. Bentler, P.M., Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  8. Blank, S.A., Koenigstorfer, J., & Baumgartner, H. (2018). Sport team personality: It’s not all about winning. Sport Management Review, 21(2), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2017.05.004
  9. Brakus, J.J., Schmitt, B.H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.052
  10. Braunstein, J.R. & Ross, S.D. (2010). Brand personality in sport: Dimension analysis and general scale development. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19(1), 8-16.
  11. Brislin, R.W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2(2), 349-444.
  12. Brown, T.A. & Moore, M.T. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  14. Byrne, B.M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Amos basic concepts, applications and programming. NY: Routledge.
  15. Carlson, B.D. & Donavan, T. (2013). Athlete brand personality and identification. Journal of Sport Management, 2(3), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.27.3.193
  16. Carlson, B.D., Donavan, D.T., & Cumiskey, K.J. (2009). Consumer-brand relationships in sport: Brand personality and identification. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 37(4), 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550910948592
  17. Caslavova, E. & Petrackova, J. (2011). The brand personality of large sport events. Kineziologija, 43(1), 91-106.
  18. Chang, P.L. & Chieng, M.H. (2006). Building consumer-brand relationship: A cross-cultural experiential view. Psychology and Marketing, 23(11), 927-959. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20140
  19. Chen, C. & Phou, S. (2013). A closer look at destination: image, personality, relationship and loyalty. Tourism Management, 36(1), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.015
  20. Cheung, G.W. & Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
  21. Choi, Y.G., Ok, C.M., & Hyun, S.S. (2017). Relationships between brand experiences, personality traits, prestige, relationship quality, and loyalty: An empirical analysis of coffeehouse brands. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(4), 1185-1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2014-0601
  22. Çevik, H., Şimşek, K.Y., Mercanoğlu, A.O., & Bayram, A. (2018). Spor etkinlik kişiliği ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Spormetre, 16(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000370
  23. DeVellis, R.F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Eisend, M. & Stokburger-Sauer, N.E. (2013). Brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences. Marketing Letters, 24(3), 205-216
  25. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage Publications.
  26. Freling, T.H. & Forbes L.P. (2005). An empirical analysis of the brand personality effect. Journal of Product and Brand Management,14(7), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510633350
  27. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 Giroux, M., Pons, F., & Maltese, L. (2017). The role of perceived brand personality in promotion effectiveness and brand equity development of professional sports teams. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 18(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-05-2017-092
  28. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. NY: Prentice Hall.
  29. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). CA: Sage Publications.
  30. Hallmann, K., Kaplanidou, K., & Breuer, C. (2010). Event image perceptions among active and passive sport tourists at marathon races. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 12(1), 37-52.
  31. Hambleton, R.K. & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
  32. Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  33. İmrak, S. (2015). Marka kişiliğinin; marka imajı, genel memnuniyet ve sadakat üzerindeki etkisi ve cam eşyası sektörü üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 91-104.
  34. Jaccard, J. & Wan, C.K.W. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage Publications.
  35. Kaplanidou, K. & Vogt, C. (2007). The interrelationship between sport event and destination image and sport tourists’ behaviours. Journal of Sport and Tourism, 12(3), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080701736932
  36. Karagiorgos, T., Ntovoli, A., & Alexandris, K. (2022). Developing a brand personality framework in the context of outdoor small-scale sport events. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 24(3), 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2022.2158153
  37. Karjaluoto, H., Munnukka, J., & Salmi, M. (2016). How do brand personality, identification, and relationship length drive loyalty in sports? Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(1), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-09-2014-0206
  38. Kim, D., Kim, H., Huang, Y., & Jeon, Y.K. (2020). Structural relationship between brand personality of Winter Olympics and host nation, image fit and loyalty. International Journal of Human Movement Science, 14(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.23949/ijhms.2020.12.14.2.7
  39. Kim, H. & Stepchenkova, S. (2017). Understanding destination personality through visitors experience: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(4), 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.06.010
  40. Kim, J.W., Lee, F., & Suh, Y.G. (2015). Satisfaction and loyalty from shopping mall experience and brand personality. Services Marketing Quarterly, 36(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2015.976523
  41. Kim, Y.M., Kim, K.C., & Kim, W.S. (2009). The effect of the brand personality of sporting goods on brand satisfaction, brand identification and brand loyalty. Korean Society for Sport Management, 14(3), 233-246.
  42. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London: Guilford Publications.
  43. Kogoya, K., Guntoro, T.S., & Putra, M.F.P. (2022). Sports event image, satisfaction, motivation, stadium atmosphere, environment, and perception: A study on the biggest multi-sport event in Indonesia during the pandemic. Social Sciences MDPI, 11(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060241
  44. Koo, S.K., Byon, K.K., & Baker, T.A. (2014). Integrating event image, satisfaction, and behavioral intention; small-scale marathon event. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 23(3), 127-137.
  45. Kotler, P. (1999). Kotler on marketing: How to create, win and dominate markets. The Free Press. Lee, H.S. & Cho, C.H. (2009). The matching effect of brand and sporting event personality: Sponsorship implications. Journal of Sport Management, 23(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.23.1.41
  46. Lee, H.S. & Cho, C.H. (2012). Sporting event personality: Scale development and sponsorship implications. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 14(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-14-01-2012-B005
  47. Lee, J. & Back, K. (2010). Examining antecedents and consequences of brand personality in the upper-upscale business hotel segment. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 27(2), 32-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548400903579688
  48. Lee, Y., Back, K., & Kim, J. (2009). Family restaurant brand personality and its impact on customer’s emotion, satisfaction and brand loyalty. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 33(3), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348009338511
  49. Lianopoulos, Y., Theodorakis, N.D., Alexandris, K., & Papanikolaou, M. (2021). Testing the relationships among event personality, event image and runners’ loyalty: A study of an international running event. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal 12(1), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-12-2020-0135
  50. Lin, L. (2010). The relationship of consumer personality trait, brand personality and brand loyalty: An empirical study of toys and video games buyers. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 19(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421011018347
  51. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
  52. Marsh, H.W. & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(1), 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
  53. Martinez, G., Marin, B.V., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (2006). Translating from English to Spanish: The 2002 national survey of family growth. Hispanic Journal of Behaviour Science, 28(1), 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986306292293
  54. Meenaghan, T. (2001) Understanding sponsorship effects. Psychology & Marketing 18(2), 95-122. Mustamil, N.B., Chung, H., & Ariff, M.S. (2014). Determining brand personality of Nike sports shoes using Aaker's brand personality scale. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss6.201
  55. Nikolaidis, D., Chrysikou, S.C., & Alexandris, K. (2016). Testing the relationship between hotel service quality and hotel brand personality. International Journal of Hospitality and Event Management, 1(4), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHEM.2016.082170
  56. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  57. Ocakoğlu, O., Alay Özgül, S., & Karlı, Ü. (2025). Adaptation of sport event image scale to Turkish culture: A validity and reliability study. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1577086
  58. Ocakoğlu, O., Alay Özgül S., & Karlı, Ü. (2026). Adaptation of sporting event personality scale to Turkish culture. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 17(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1805636
  59. Pan, Y. & De La Puente, M. (2005). Census bureau guideline for the translation of data collection instruments and supporting materials. Washington DC: Educational Research Press.
  60. Papadimitriou, D., Apostolopoulou, A., & Kaplanidou, K. (2015). Destination personality, affective image and behavioral intentions in domestic urban tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 54(3), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513516389 Papadimitriou, D., Kaplanidou, K., Alexandris, K., & Theodorakis, N. (2019). The brand personality of professional football teams: A refined model based on the Greek professional football league. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-03-2018-0021
  61. Putnick, D.L. & Bornstein, M.H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 1(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  62. Rageh, I.A. & Spinelli, G. (2012). Effects of brand love, personality and image on word of mouth: The case of fashion brands among young consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 386- 398. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211265791
  63. Raykov, T., Tomer, A., & Nesselroade, J.R. (1991). Reporting structural equation modeling results in psychology and aging: Some proposed guidelines. Psychology and Aging, 6(1), 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.499
  64. Ross, S.D. (2008). Assessing the use of the brand personality scale in team sport. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 3(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2008.015959
  65. Sargın, S. & Leblebici Koçer, L. (2020). Marka kişiliği ve benlik saygısı kavramlarının tüketici satın alma tarzları üzerindeki etkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 50(1), 23-57. https://doi.org/10.48070/erusosbilder.781624
  66. Schumacker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. London: Sheridan Books.
  67. Simonsen, E. & Elklit, A. (2008). Experiences in translating and validating the MCMI in Denmark. NewYork: Guilford Press.
  68. Sung, Y. & Kim, J. (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology and Marketing, 27(7), 639-661. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20349
  69. Sung, M. & Yang, S.U. (2008). Toward the model of university image: The influence of brand personality, external prestige, and reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(4), 357-376.
  70. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Tiessen-Raaphorst, A. (2016). Running across Europe: The rise and size of the largest sport markets. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(1), 250-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2016.1226032
  71. Usakli, A. & Baloglu, S. (2011). Brand personality of tourist destinations: An application of self-congruity theory. Tourism Management, 32(1), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.006
  72. Walsh, P., Clavio, G., Lovell, M.D., & Blaszka, M. (2013), Differences in event brand personality between social media users and non-users. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22(1), 214-223.
  73. Wang, J.J., Wann, D.L., Lu, Z., & Zhang, JJ. (2018). Self-expression through sport participation: Exploring participant desired self-image. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(5), 583-606.
  74. Wang, J.J., Zhang, J.J., Byon, K.K., Baker, T.A., & Lu, Z. (2016). Promoting brand-event personality fit as a communication strategy to build sponsors’ brand equity. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(1), 294-320. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2016-0016
  75. Westland, J.C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
  76. Wu, A.D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B.D. (2007) Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 1-26.
  77. Yücel, N. & Halifeoğlu, M. (2017). Marka kişiliği algısı: Sosyal medya markaları üzerine üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik bir araştırma. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), 177-192.