SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 28

The Stress of the Digital Age: A Bibliometric Analysis of Technostress Research in Management and Business Studies

Dijital Çağın Stresi: Yönetim ve İşletme Alanında Tekno-Stres Araştırmaları Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Nurdanur Tavlan Soydan(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4320-2257
Pages
40–51
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The bibliometric indicators examined in the study include publication trends over the years, the most productive authors, the most cited studies, prominent journals, keyword analyses, and collaboration networks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Digital technologies provide significant conveniences such as faster access to information, reduced dependence on time and space, and increased efficiency in work processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 505 publications were identified, including 247 from WoS and 258 from Scopus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The bibliometric indicators examined in the study include publication trends over the years, the most productive authors, the most cited studies, prominent journals, keyword analyses, and collaboration networks.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tekno-Stres · Dijital Stres · Bibliyometrik Analiz

Abstract

Digital technologies provide significant conveniences such as faster access to information, reduced dependence on time and space, and increased efficiency in work processes. However, constant, intense, and often compulsory interaction with these technologies may also lead to adverse effects on individuals. In this context, technostress refers to the cognitive, behavioral, and emotional challenges individuals experience when using digital tools. In this study, a bibliometric analysis was conducted on the body of scientific publications addressing technostress within the field of management and business. Two major international academic databases—Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus—were used in the data collection process. A total of 505 publications were identified, including 247 from WoS and 258 from Scopus. During the data processing stage, duplicate records were removed, and incomplete or inaccurate data were cleaned and verified. Consequently, 331 valid records were retained for analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the R Studio software, employing the bibliometrix and biblioshiny packages. The bibliometric indicators examined in the study include publication trends over the years, the most productive authors, the most cited studies, prominent journals, keyword analyses, and collaboration networks.

Özet

Dijital teknolojiler bilgiye daha hızlı ulaşım sağlama, zaman ve mekân bağlılığını azaltma, daha hızlı çalışma gibi kolaylıklar sağlamasıyla birlikte sürekli, yoğun ve zorunlu bir şekilde etkileşim halinde olmaya neden olarak bireyler üzerinde olumsuz etkiler oluşturabilmektedir. Bu bağlamda tekno-stres, bireylerin dijital araçları kullanırken karşılaştıkları bilişsel, davranışsal ve duygusal zorlukları ifade etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, yönetim ve işletme alanında tekno-stres konusuna ilişkin bilimsel yayınların bibliyometrik analizi yapılmıştır. Veri toplama sürecinde iki farklı uluslararası akademik veri tabanı olan Web of Science (WoS) ve Scopus kullanılmıştır. WoS veri tabanından 247, Scopus veri tabanından ise 258 olmak üzere toplam 505 yayın elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analiz süreci, R Studio programında, bibliometrix ve biblioshiny paketleri aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri birleştirilmesinde yinelenen kayıtların ayıklanması, eksik/hatalı verilerin temizlenmesi sonrasında 331 veri analiz için hazır hale getirilmiştir. Analiz kapsamında yıllara göre yayın eğilimleri, en üretken yazarlar, en çok atıf alan çalışmalar, öne çıkan dergiler, anahtar kelime analizleri ve iş birliği ağları gibi bibliyometrik göstergeler değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Soydan, N. T. (2025). The Stress of the Digital Age: A Bibliometric Analysis of Technostress Research in Management and Business Studies. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 28, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.55589/bsbd.1817658

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Akman, A. Z. (2023). Türkiye’deki Teknostres Konusunda Yapılan Çalışmalara Yönelik Sistematik Bir İnceleme. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Inquiries, 7(2), 71-86.
  2. Aktan, O., & Toraman, Ç. (2022). The Relationship Between Technostress Levels and Job Satisfaction of Teachers Within the Covid-19 Period. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10429-10453.
  3. Allik, J., Lauk, K., & Realo, A. (2020). Factors Predicting the Scientific Wealth of Nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 54(4), 364-397.
  4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  5. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
  6. Bernburg, M., Gebhardt, J. S., Groneberg, D. A., & Mache, S. (2025). Impact of Digitalization in Dentistry on Technostress, Mental Health, and Job Satisfaction: A Quantitative Study. Healthcare, 13(1), 72-90.
  7. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
  8. Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. USA: Addison-Wesley.
  9. Camacho, S., & Barrios, A. (2022). Teleworking and Technostress: Early Consequences of A Covid-19 Lockdown. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24(3), 441-457.
  10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  12. Galaş, C., & Kaygısız, E. G. (2025). Teknostres ve İşe Adanmışlık Kavramlarına İlişkin Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi. Ekinoks Ekonomi İşletme ve Siyasal Çalışmalar Dergisi, 12(1), 14-41.
  13. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship. In H.F. Moed et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics İn Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  14. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double Effort= Double Impact? A Critical View at International Co-Authorship in Chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
  15. Grummeck-Braamt, J. V., Nastjuk, I., Najmaei, A., & Adam, M. (2021). A Bibliometric Review of Technostress: Historical Roots, Evolution and Central Publications of a Growing Research Field. In: Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii.
  16. Hanaylı, B., & Tozkoparan, G. (2024). Teknostres Kavramı Üzerine Yazılmış Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 39(4), 972-995.
  17. Kumar, P. S. (2024). Technostress: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Dimensions, Impacts, and Management Strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100475.
  18. Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer
  19. Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2025). An Integrated Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review Modelling Students’ Technostress in Higher Education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(4), 631-655.
  20. Malcolm T. I. (1970). The Luddites: Machine-Breaking in Regency England. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.
  21. May, R. M. (1997). The Scientific Wealth of Nations. Science, 275(5301), 793-796.
  22. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  23. Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2006). Computing Communities in Large Networks Using Random Walks. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 10(2), 191-218.
  24. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
  25. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
  26. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q. & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2010) Impact of Technostress on End-User Satisfaction and Performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 303-334
  27. Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative Effect on Performance and Possible Mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132.
  28. Wang, H., Ding, H., & Kong, X. (2023). Understanding Technostress and Employee Well-Being in Digital Work: The Roles of Work Exhaustion and Workplace Knowledge Diversity. International Journal of Manpower, 44(2), 334-353.
  29. Warner, W. L., & Lunt, P. S. (1941). The Social Life of A Modern Community. Yankee City Series, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  30. Warner, W. L., & Low, J. O. (1947). The Social System of the Modern Factory. The Strike: Social Analysis. Yankee City Series, New Haven: Yale University Press
  31. Uddin, M. J., Ferdous, M., Rahaman, A., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Mapping of Technostress Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis. In: 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems. India.
  32. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  33. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and A Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
  34. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.