Journals / Animal Health Production and Hygiene / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Waterborne Major Bacterial Zoonoses

Su Kaynaklı Başlıca Bakteriyel Zoonozlar

Uğur Parın(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Aydın)
Şükrü Kırkan(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Aydın)
Göksel Erbaş(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Aydın)
H. Tuğba Yüksel Dolgun(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Aydın)
Abuzer Işık(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, SağlıkBilimleri Ensti tüsü Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Aydın, TÜRKİYE)
Pages
634–637
Publication Date
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The present review inspects specific zoonotic bacterial agents that transmit from faeces to a contaminated host and are facilitated by waterborne transmission.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: Reports of case investigations just as assessments of disease determinants in local and territorial populaces give us examples of diseases that are dependent upon an assortment of local, ecological, cultural, and biological impacts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To treatment and prevention strategies for outbreaks that occur with the environmental and public health effects of waterborne zoonotic agents, each bacterial agent should be examined individually first.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The present review inspects specific zoonotic bacterial agents that transmit from faeces to a contaminated host and are facilitated by waterborne transmission.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Su Kaynaklı Zoonozlar · Escherichia coli · Salmonella sp.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Reports of case investigations just as assessments of disease determinants in local and territorial populaces give us examples of diseases that are dependent upon an assortment of local, ecological, cultural, and biological impacts. Environmental conditions are fundamentally impacted thusly by the atmosphere and organic activities. These impacts can be exceptionally variable, bringing about altogether different examples of disease burden among populaces. To treatment and prevention strategies for outbreaks that occur with the environmental and public health effects of waterborne zoonotic agents, each bacterial agent should be examined individually first. Conclusion: The present review inspects specific zoonotic bacterial agents that transmit from faeces to a contaminated host and are facilitated by waterborne transmission.

Özet

Özbilgi/Amaç: Vaka raporu incelemelerinin yanı sıra, yerel ve bölgesel popülasyonlardaki hastalık determinantları, bize çeşitli çevresel, toplumsal ve biyolojik etkilere maruz kalan hastalık modellerini sunmaktadır. Çevresel koşullar, iklim ve organik faaliyetlerinden sırasıyla etkilenmektedir. Bu etkilerin tümü oldukça değişkenlik gösterebilmekte, bu durum da popülasyonlar arasında çok farklı hastalık kaynaklarını ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Su kaynaklı zoonotik ajanların çevre ve halk sağlığı etkileri ile birlikte ortaya çıkan salgınların tedavi ve koruma stratejilerinin geliştirilebilmesi için her bakteriyel ajan öncelikle bireysel olarak incelenmelidir. Sonuç: Bu derlemede, dışkı ile kontaminasyon yoluyla konakçıya geçen ve suyla taşınan spesifik zoonotik bakteriyel ajanları incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Parın, U., Kırkan, Ş., Erbaş, G., Dolgun, H. T. Y., Işık, A. (2019). Waterborne Major Bacterial Zoonoses. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 634–637. https://ajindex.com/articles/1450721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Adler B, Faine S (2006). The Genus Leptospira. In: The Prokaryotes.
  2. Vol 7, M Dworkin, Falkow S, Schleifer KH, Rosenberg E, Stakebrandt E (Eds.), Minneapolis, MN, USA, Springer, pp.294-317. Bhar� ARJE, Nally JN, Ricaldi MA, Ma� hias MM, Diaz MA, Love� PN
  3. Leve� RH, Gilman MR, Willig ve E. Gotuzzo (2003). Leptospirosis
  4. a zoono� c disease of global importance. The Lancet infec� ous
  5. diseases, 3(12), 757-771. Bopp DJ, Sauders BD, Waring AL, Ackelsberg J, Dumas N, Braun- Howland E, Dziewulski D, Wallace BJ, Kelly M, Halse T, Musser KA, Smith PF, Morse
  6. DL, Limberger RJ (2003). Detec� on, isola� on, and molecular
  7. subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni
  8. associated with a large waterborne outbreak. Journal of Clinical
  9. Microbiology, 41(1), 174-180. Byrne C, Erol I, Call J, Buege D, Kaspar CW, Hiemke C, Fedorka
  10. Cray P, Hermosillo J, Ball T, Wallace M, Handy M, Luchansky
  11. JB (2003). Characteriza� on of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from
  12. downer and healthy dairy ca� le in the upper Midwest region
  13. of the United States. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4683-4688. Caprioli A, Morabito S, Brugere H, Oswalt E (2005).
  14. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli: Emerging Issues on
  15. Virulence and Modes of Transmission. Veterinary Research, 36, 289-311. Chalmers RM, Aird H and Bolton FJ (2000). Waterborne
  16. Escherichia coli O157. Symposium Series Society for Applied
  17. Microbiology, 29, 124-132. Çarlı KT, Kahya S (2011). Kanatlı Hayvanların İnfeksiyöz
  18. Hastalıkları. Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi
  19. Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı Yayınları, Bursa, 15. Deshmukh RA, Joshi K, Bhand S, Roy U (2016). Recent
  20. developments in detec� on and enumera� on of waterborne
  21. bacteria: a retrospec� ve minireview. MicrobiologyOpen, 5, 6, 901-922. Farrokh C, Jordan K, Auvray F, Glass K, Oppegaard H, Raynaud
  22. S, Thevenot D, Condron R, De Reu K, Govaris A, Heggum
  23. K, Heyndrickx M, Hummerjohann J, Lindsay D, Miszczycha
  24. S, Moussiegt S, Verstraete K, Cerf O (2013). Review of
  25. Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and their
  26. signiŞ cance in dairy produc� on. Interna� onal Journal of
  27. Food Microbiology, 162, 190-212. Ferens WA and Hovde CJ (2011). Escherichia coli O157:H7
  28. animal reservoir and sources of human infec� on. Foodborne
  29. Pathogens and Disease, 8, 465-487. Friedrich AW, Köck R, Bielaszewska M, Zhang W, Kacch H
  30. Mathys W (2005). Distrubu� on of the Urease Gene
  31. Cluster Among and Ureas Ac� vi� es of Enterohemorrhogic
  32. Escherichia coli O 157 Isolates fron Humans. Journal of
  33. Clinical Microbiology, 43(2), 546-550. Griffi n PM, Mead PS, Sivapalasingam S (2002). Escherichia coli
  34. O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic E. coli. In: Infec� ons
  35. of the Gastrointes� nal Tract, 2nd Edit., Blaser MJ, Smith PD
  36. Ravdin JI, Greenberg BH and Guerrant RL (Eds.), Lippinco�
  37. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 627–637. Haake DA, Dundoo M, Cader R, Kubak BM, Hartskeerl RA
  38. Sejvar JJ, Ashford D (2002). Leptospirosis, water sports, and
  39. chemoprophylaxis. Clinical Infec� ous Diseases, 34, 40-43. İzgür M (2010). Kanatlı Salmonella Enfeksiyonlarının
  40. Epidemiyolojisi. Türkiye Klinikleri, 1(2), 61-78. Lammerding AM (2006). Modeling and risk assessment
  41. for Salmonella in meat and poultry. Journal of AOAC
  42. Interna� onal, 89, 543-552. Ligh� oot D (2004). Waterborne Zoonoses, IWA Publishing
  43. London, 228-241. Poppe C. Salmonella in the domes� c fowl. In: Salmonella in
  44. Domes� c Animals, Wray C, Wray A (Eds.), CABI Publishing, Oxon, 2000. Sanders EJ, Rigau-Perez JG, Smits HL, Deseda CC, Vorndam VA
  45. Aye T, Spiegel RA, Weyant RS, Bragg SL (1999). Increase of
  46. Leptospirosis in dengue-nega� ve pa� ents a� er a hurricane
  47. in Puerto Rico in 1996. American Journal of Tropical
  48. Medicine Hygiene, 61, 399-404. Simbizi V, Saulez MN, Po� s A, Lo� er C, Gummow B (2016). A
  49. study of Leptospirosis in South African horses and associated
  50. risk factors. Preven� ve Veterinary Medicine, 134, 6-15. Srisawat N, Sitprija V (2019). Leptospirosis and the Kidney: An
  51. Overview. Transla� onal Research in Biomedicine, 7, 1-9. Tarr PI, Gordon CA, Chandler WL (2005). Shiga-toxin producing
  52. Escherichia coli and haemoly� c uraemic syndrome. Lancet
  53. Trevejo RT, Rigau-Perez JG, Ashford DA, McClure EM, Jarquin
  54. Gonzalez C, Amador JJ, de los Reyes JO, Gonzalez A, Zaki SR
  55. Shieh WJ, McLean RG, Nasci RS, Weyant RS, Bolin CA, Bragg
  56. SL, Perkins BA, Spiegel RA (1998). Epidemic Leptospirosis
  57. associated with pulmonary hemorrhage — Nicaragua.
  58. Journal of Infec� ous Diseases, 178, 1457-1463. Wang G, Doyle MP (1998). Survival of enterohemorrhagic
  59. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in water. Journal of Food
  60. Protec� on, 61(6), 662-667.