Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Ultrasonographic assessment of masseter muscle thickness and its association with TMD risk, neck disability, and mouth opening: a cross-sectional study

Ümit Erkut(İSTANBUL RUMELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5889-4495
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings support the clinical value of masseter morphology as a potential indicator of cervicomandibular functional impairment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aims to examine the associations between muscle thickness (MMT) and the risk of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), as well as the relationship between MMT and neck disability, cervical range of motion, and maximum mouth opening (MMO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirty adults (mean age: 30.3±7.2 years) underwent evaluation using B-mode ultrasonography (US) to measure bilateral MMT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings support the clinical value of masseter morphology as a potential indicator of cervicomandibular functional impairment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Range of motion · masseter muscle · neck pain

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to examine the associations between muscle thickness (MMT) and the risk of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), as well as the relationship between MMT and neck disability, cervical range of motion, and maximum mouth opening (MMO). Methods: Thirty adults (mean age: 30.3±7.2 years) underwent evaluation using B-mode ultrasonography (US) to measure bilateral MMT. TMD risk was assessed using the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI), neck-related disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and functional mobility was assessed using MMT and cervical range of motion (ROM) measurements. Spearman correlation analyses were performed. Results: MMT demonstrated positive correlations with MMO (right: r=0.91, p 0.05). Conclusion: MMT is linked to MMO and TMD risk. These findings support the clinical value of masseter morphology as a potential indicator of cervicomandibular functional impairment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erkut, Ü., Bingöl, H. (2026). Ultrasonographic assessment of masseter muscle thickness and its association with TMD risk, neck disability, and mouth opening: a cross-sectional study. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1891709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Ohrbach R, Sharma S. Temporomandibular disorders: definition and etiology. Semin Orthod. 2024; 30: 237-242. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.011
  2. Klasser GD, Goulet JP, Moreno-Hay I. Classification and diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders and temporomandibular disorder pain. Dent Clin North Am. 2023;67(2):211-225. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2022.12.001
  3. Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC, et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(2):441-453. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w
  4. Zieliński G, Pająk-Zielińska B, Ginszt M. A meta-analysis of the global prevalence of temporomandibular disorders. J Clin Med. 2024;13(5):1365. doi:10.3390/jcm13051365
  5. Sciote JJ, Raoul G, Ferri J, Close J, Horton MJ, Rowlerson A. Masseter function and skeletal malocclusion. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2013;114(2):79-85. doi:10.1016/j.revsto.2013.01.015
  6. Widmer CG, English AW, Morris-Wiman J. Developmental and functional considerations of masseter muscle partitioning. Arch Oral Biol. 2007; 52(4):305-308. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.09.015
  7. Dag C, Demirel A, Özalp N. Can temporomandibular joint disorders be diagnosed beforehand by assessment of postural irregularities? J Pediatr Res. 2019;6(2):104-109. doi:10.4274/jpr.galenos.2018.14890
  8. Okeson JP. Occlusion and functional disorders of the masticatory system. Dent Clin North Am. 1995;39(2):285-300. doi:10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01779-7
  9. Giannakopoulos NN, Hellmann D, Schmitter M, Krüger B, Hauser T, Schindler HJ. Neuromuscular interaction of jaw and neck muscles during jaw clenching. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27(1):61-71. doi:10.11607/jop.915
  10. Thorp JN, Willson J. The neck disability index is not correlated with some parameters of temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019;33(1):39-46. doi:10.11607/ofph.1992
  11. Silveira A, Gadotti IC, Armijo-Olivo S, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Magee D. Jaw dysfunction is associated with neck disability and muscle tenderness in subjects with and without chronic temporomandibular disorders. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:512792. doi:10.1155/2015/512792
  12. Trawitzki LV, Dantas RO, Mello-Filho FV, Elias-Júnior J. Effect of treatment of dentofacial deformity on masseter muscle thickness. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51(12):1086-1092. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.06.004
  13. Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1019):1435-1445. doi: 10.1259/bjr/93042867
  14. Lee K, Chon S. Assessments of muscle thickness and tonicity of the masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles and maximum mouth opening in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(12):1640. doi:10.3390/healthcare9121640
  15. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  16. Cohen J 1998 Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. In: Sample Size Tables (2nd), p. 19-20. New York: New York University Press
  17. Kaynak BA, Taş S, Salkın Y. The accuracy and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fonseca anamnestic index in temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2023;41(1):78-83. doi:10.1080/08869634.2020.1812808
  18. Arikan H, Citaker S, Ucok C. Psychometric properties of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) for temporomandibular disorders: Turkish version, responsiveness, reliability, and validity study. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(7):1408-1415. doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2199221
  19. An YJ, Choung SD, Yang NY. Comparison of mouth opening length and masseter thickness in subjects with and without temporomandibular joint pain. J Musculoskelet Sci Technol. 2021;5(2):54-58. doi:10.29273/jmst.2021.5.2.54
  20. Chang MY, Lee G, Jung YJ, Park JS. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on masseter muscle thickness and maximal bite force among healthy community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and older: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3783. doi:10.3390/ijerph17113783
  21. Kesiktas N, Ozcan E, Vernon H. Clinimetric properties of the Turkish translation of a modified neck disability index. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-25
  22. Cuellar ME, Oommen E. Objective physiological measures of lingual and jaw function in healthy individuals and individuals with dysphagia due to neurodegenerative diseases. MethodsX. 2021;8:101461. doi:10. 1016/j.mex.2021.101461
  23. Araujo GGC, Pontes-Silva A, Leal PDC, et al. Goniometry and fleximetry measurements to assess cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain: a validity and reliability study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):651. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07775-6
  24. Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69-71.
  25. Strini PJ, Strini PJ, Barbosa Tde S, Gavião MB. Assessment of thickness and function of masticatory and cervical muscles in adults with and without temporomandibular disorders. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(9):1100-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.04.006
  26. Lee YH, Chun YH, Bae H, Lee JW, Kim HJ. Comparison of ultrasonography-based masticatory muscle thickness between temporomandibular disorders bruxers and temporomandibular disorders non-bruxers. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):6923. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-57696-6
  27. Lee K, Chon S. Assessments of muscle thickness and tonicity of the masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles and maximum mouth opening in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(12):1640. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121640
  28. Castelo PM, Pereira LJ, Bonjardim LR, Gavião MB. Changes in bite force, masticatory muscle thickness, and facial morphology between primary and mixed dentition in preschool children with normal occlusion. Ann Anat. 2010;192(1):23-26. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2009.10.002
  29. De Miguel-Hernando N, Pecos-Martín D, Cámara-Calmaestra R, et al. Factors associated with pain, disability, and quality of life in adults aged 18-65 with nonspecific chronic neck pain: a single-center observational study. Healthcare (Basel). 2026;14(8):1030. doi:10.3390/healthcare14081030
  30. Majcen Rosker Z, Rosker J. Machine learning identifies distinct movement control impairment clusters in patients with chronic neck pain. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):12993. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43903-z
  31. Tatsios PI, Grammatopoulou E, Dimitriadis Z, Koumantakis GA. The effectiveness of manual therapy in the cervical spine and diaphragm, in combination with breathing re-education exercises, on the range of motion and forward head posture in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13(14):1765. doi:10. 3390/healthcare13141765
  32. Arıkan H, Citaker S, Batıbay S, Ucok C, Günendi Z. Investigation of the masseter and temporalis muscles thicknesses in individuals with and without temporomandibular disorders by ultrasonography: a randomized controlled study. Adıyaman Üniv Sağlık Bilimleri Derg. 2024;10(1):35-44. doi:10.30569/adiyamansaglik.1365037
  33. Petronis Z, Pliatkute I, Janovskiene A, Leketas M. The relationship between cervical spine abnormalities and temporomandibular joint internal disorders: a systematic review of literature. Annals of Dental Speciality. 2023;11(4):20-28. doi:10.51847/sGUN5P9OQA