SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 5

Fetal foot biometry in mid-gestation: values for foot length, toe lengths, and proportional indices in a Turkish population

Burak Bayraktar(Turgut Ozal University Malatya Training and Research Hospital)0000-0001-6233-4207
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reference values generated in this study provide normative data for fetal foot biometry and may support future clinical and research applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To establish gestational age-specific reference values for fetal foot length, first toe length, second toe length, second-to first toe length ratio, and foot length-to-femur length ratio in mid-gestation, and to evaluate their relationships with gestational age and conventional fetal biometric parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 155 singleton pregnancies between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reference values generated in this study provide normative data for fetal foot biometry and may support future clinical and research applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fetal foot length · first toe length · second toe length

Abstract

Aims: To establish gestational age-specific reference values for fetal foot length, first toe length, second toe length, second-to first toe length ratio, and foot length-to-femur length ratio in mid-gestation, and to evaluate their relationships with gestational age and conventional fetal biometric parameters. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 155 singleton pregnancies between 18 and 24 weeks of gestation. Fetal foot, first toe, and second toe lengths were measured sonographically. The second-to-first toe length ratio and foot length-to femur length ratio were calculated. Reference values were generated, and regression and correlation analyses were performed. Results: Fetal foot, first toe, and second toe lengths increased progressively with advancing gestation. Foot length showed strong positive correlations with gestational age and conventional biometric parameters, including biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference, femur length, and estimated fetal weight (all p<0.001). First and second toe lengths demonstrated similar significant associations with gestational age and fetal biometric measurements (all p<0.001). In contrast, the second-to-first toe length ratio and foot length-to-femur length ratio remained relatively stable throughout the study period and showed no clinically meaningful relationship with gestational age. Intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for all measurements (ICCs: 0.958-0.991). No significant gender-related differences were observed in any fetal foot measurements. Conclusion: Fetal foot, first toe, and second toe lengths increase during mid-gestation and are strongly associated with conventional fetal biometric parameters. Conversely, the second-to-first toe length ratio and foot length-to-femur length ratio remain stable. The reference values generated in this study provide normative data for fetal foot biometry and may support future clinical and research applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bayraktar, B. (2026). Fetal foot biometry in mid-gestation: values for foot length, toe lengths, and proportional indices in a Turkish population. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 5. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1975804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Wong HS. A revisit of the fetal foot length and fetal measurements in early pregnancy sonography. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:199-204. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S122586
  2. Murrin EM, Nelsen G, Apostolakis-Kyrus K, Hitchings L, Wang J, Gomez LM. Evaluation of first trimester ultrasound fetal biometry ratios femur length/biparietal diameter, femur length/abdominal circumference and femur length/foot for the screening of skeletal dysplasia. Prenat Diagn. 2023;43(7):919-928. doi:10.1002/pd.6295
  3. Stembalska A, Dudarewicz L, Śmigiel R. Lethal and life-limiting skeletal dysplasias: selected prenatal issues. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2021;30(6):641-647. doi:10.17219/acem/134166
  4. Hirst JE, Ha LTT, Jeffery HE. The use of fetal foot length to determine stillborn gestational age in Vietnam. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;116(1): 22-25. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.013
  5. Mercer BM, Sklar S, Shariatmadar A, Gillieson MS, D’Alton ME. Fetal foot length as a predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156(2):350-355. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(87)90282-1
  6. Drey EA, Kang MS, McFarland W, Darney PD. Improving the accuracy of fetal foot length to confirm gestational duration. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):773-778. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000154159.75022.11
  7. Malas MA, Dogan S, Evcil EH, Desdicioglu K. Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Hum Dev. 2006;82(7):469-475. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.12.002
  8. Barrett CK, Case DT. Use of 2D:4D digit ratios to determine sex. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(5):1315-1320. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12450
  9. Yüksel K, Günyeli İ, Doğanay M, Uğur M, Mollamahmutoğlu L. Ultrasonographic assessment of the fetal foot length for gestational age estimation. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. 2006;12(1):27-29.
  10. Mhaskar R, Agarwal N, Takkar D, Buckshee K, Anandalakshmi, Deorari A. Fetal foot length-a new parameter for assessment of gestational age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1989;29(1):35-38. doi:10.1016/0020-7292(89)90126-4
  11. Xiao S, Zhang X, Deng L, Zhang S, Cui K, Fu W. Relationships between foot morphology and foot muscle strength in healthy adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1274. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041274
  12. Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S. The fetal femur/foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72(2):181-184.
  13. Joshi K, Marahatta SB, Karki S, Tamrakar S, Shrestha NC. Fetal foot length and femur/foot length ratio: significance in Nepalese context. Nep J Radiology. 2011;1(1):15-22. doi:10.3126/njr.v1i1.6317
  14. Mital M, Gupta P, Nanda V. Fetal gestational age estimation by fetal foot length measurement and fetal femur to foot length ratio in Indian population-a prospective study. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014;3(10):2620-2625. doi:10.14260/jemds/2014/2183
  15. Ravisankar G, Sivalingam SJ, Keerthi BP, Srinivasan S. Estimation of fetal foot length and femur-to-foot length ratio in Indian population for estimating gestational age on sonography during second trimester (17-25 weeks). Cureus. 2025;17(5):e84515. doi:10.7759/cureus.84515
  16. Suganya L, Sarvesh R, Shriram T. Ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal foot length and the ratio of the fetal femur to foot length to determine the fetal gestational age. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025;17(suppl 2):S1858-S1860. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_575_25
  17. Smolin A, Weinraub Z, Hod E, Hermam A, Maymon R. P39.03: Is fetal foot length affected by fetal gender? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 32(3):445. doi:10.1002/uog.6083