Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

AMALGAM RESTORASYONUN TAT ALMA YETENEĞİNE ERKEN DÖNEMDEKİ ETKİSİ

EARLY EFFECTS OF AMALGAM RESTORATION ON TASTING ABILITY

Pages
19–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was also difference between the sour scores pre-restoration and after 1 day (p<0.05).Conclusion: In the present study, sweet and salty tastes were affected by amalgam restoration; however, further studies are needed to obtain more information about amalgam restoration on tasting ability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aim: The aim of this study is to test the possible side effects of amalgam restorations on gustatory function with a whole-mouth, above threshold test (with bitter, sour, sweet and salty taste solutions) 1 to 7 days after their placement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Subjects and Methods: Measurements were recorded before Class II amalgam fillings, after 24h and after 1 week.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was also difference between the sour scores pre-restoration and after 1 day (p<0.05).Conclusion: In the present study, sweet and salty tastes were affected by amalgam restoration; however, further studies are needed to obtain more information about amalgam restoration on tasting ability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of this study is to test the possible side effects of amalgam restorations on gustatory function with a whole-mouth, above threshold test (with bitter, sour, sweet and salty taste solutions) 1 to 7 days after their placement. Subjects and Methods: Measurements were recorded before Class II amalgam fillings, after 24h and after 1 week. Interevaluation period comparisons were performed using Friedman Test. (p=0.05). Results: For female subjects, there was a difference between the sweet and salty scores pre-restoration and after 1 day (p<0.05). For male subjects, there was a difference between the salty scores pre-restoration and after 1 day (p<0.05). There was a difference between the sweet scores pre-restoration and after 7 day (p<0.05). There was also difference between the sour scores pre-restoration and after 1 day (p<0.05).Conclusion: In the present study, sweet and salty tastes were affected by amalgam restoration; however, further studies are needed to obtain more information about amalgam restoration on tasting ability.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, amalgam restorasyonlarının tat alma hissi üzerindeki olası yan etkilerini, tüm ağız, eşik testi ile (acı, ekşi, tatlı ve tuzlu tat çözeltileri kullanarak) dolgu yerleştirildikten sonra 1. ve 7. günlerde test etmektir.Bireyler ve Yöntem: Ölçümler, Sınıf II amalgam dolgular yapılmadan önce, 24 saat sonra ve 1 hafta sonra kaydedildi. Dönemler arası karşılaştırmalar Friedman Testi kullanılarak yapıldı (p= 0.05).Bulgular: Kadın denekler için, restorasyon öncesi ve 1 gün sonrasında; tatlı ve tuzlu skorlar arasında bir fark bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Erkek denekler için restorasyon öncesi tuzlu skorları ile 1 gün sonrası arasında bir fark bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Tatlı skorlarında restorasyon öncesi ile 7 gün sonra arasında fark gözlenmiştir (p<0.05). Ekşi skorları için restorasyon öncesi ve 1 gün sonrası arasında da fark gözlenmiştir (p<0.05).Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre tatlı ve tuzlu hisleri amalgam restorasyonundan etkilenmiştir; bununla birlikte, amalgam restorasyonların tat alma kabiliyeti üzerine olan etkileri hakkında daha fazla çalışmalara ihityaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALTACIOĞLU, İ. H., BAĞIŞ, N., BAĞIŞ, Y. H. (2017). AMALGAM RESTORASYONUN TAT ALMA YETENEĞİNE ERKEN DÖNEMDEKİ ETKİSİ. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 19–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/144850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Fark T, Hummel C, Hahner A, Nin T, Hummel T. Characteristics of taste disorders. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 6: 1855-1860.
  2. Feng P, Huang L, Wang H. Taste bud homeostasis in health, disease, and aging. Chem Senses 2014; 1: 3-16.
  3. Hummel T, Landis BN, Huttenbrink KB. Dysfunction of the chemical senses smell and taste. Laryngorhinootologie 2011; (90 Suppl 1): S44-55. Berteretche MV, Dalix AM, d'Ornano AM, Bellisle F, Khayat D, Faurion A. Decreased taste sensitivity in cancer patients under chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2004; 8: 571-576.
  4. Rathore M, Singh A, Pant VA. The dental amalgam toxicity fear: a myth or actuality. Toxicol Int 2012; 2: 81-88.
  5. Berry TG, Summitt JB, Chung AK, Osborne JW. Amalgam at the new millennium. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 11: 1547-1556.
  6. Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 2006; 8: 609-662.
  7. Sallsten G, Thoren J, Barregard L, Schutz A, Skarping G. Long- term use of nicotine chewing gum and mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings. J Dent Res 1996; 1: 594-598.
  8. Armstrong CW, Moore LW, Jr., Hackler RL, Miller GB, Jr., Stroube RB. An outbreak of metal fume fever. Diagnostic use of urinary copper and zinc determinations. J Occup Med 1983; 12: 886-888. Halpern BP. Environmental factors affecting chemoreceptors: an overview. Environ Health Perspect 1982; 44: 101-105.
  9. Kachru DN, Tandon SK, Misra UK, Nag D. Occupational lead poisoning among silver jewellery workers. Indian J Med Sci 1989; 4: 89-91.
  10. Bains VK, Loomba K, Loomba A, Bains R. Mercury sensitisation: review, relevance and a clinical report. Br Dent J 2008; 7: 373-378.
  11. Koch P, Bahmer FA. Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: a clinical, allergological, and histologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41(3 Pt 1): 422-430. Clarkson TW. The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; (110 Suppl 1): 11-23.
  12. Langworth S, Stromberg R. A case of high mercury exposure from dental amalgam. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 3: 320-321.
  13. Bellinger DC, Daniel D, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, McKinlay S. Dental amalgam restorations and children's neuropsychological function: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 3: 440-446.
  14. Akal UK, Kucukyavuz Z, Nalcaci R, Yilmaz T. Evaluation of gustatory function after third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 6: 564-568.
  15. Delilbasi C, Cehiz T, Akal UK, Yilmaz T. Evaluation of gustatory function in postmenopausal women. Br D