SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Dijital bilgi çağı: Dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler

Aras Bozkurt(Anadolu Üniversitesi)0000-0002-4520-642X
Nazire Burçin Hamutoğlu(ESKİŞEHİR TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0941-9070
Aysegul Liman Kaban(BAHÇEŞEHİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3813-2888
Gülşah Taşçı(İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0701-2824
Mona Aykul(TÜRK-ALMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9050-3917
Pages
35–63
Publication Date
2021-04-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dolayısıyla dijital bilgi çağında dijitalleşmeyi doğru yorumlamak, doğru anlamak ve dönüşüm sürecinde doğru bağlamda konumlandırmak son derece önemlidir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dijital bilgi çağında, enformasyon bilgiyi, bilgi ise bilgeliği sağladığı için, veriyi işleyip enformasyona dönüştürme en temel eylemlerden birisidir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bilgi, dönüşümün tetikleyicisi ve hızlandırıcısıdır ve bu süreçte hayatta kalabilmenin bir yolu da dijital dönüşüm sürecine uyum sağlamaktır.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dolayısıyla dijital bilgi çağında dijitalleşmeyi doğru yorumlamak, doğru anlamak ve dönüşüm sürecinde doğru bağlamda konumlandırmak son derece önemlidir.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dijital bilgi çağı · dijital dönüşüm · dijital toplum

Özet

Dijital bilgi çağında, enformasyon bilgiyi, bilgi ise bilgeliği sağladığı için, veriyi işleyip enformasyona dönüştürme en temel eylemlerden birisidir. Bilgi, dönüşümün tetikleyicisi ve hızlandırıcısıdır ve bu süreçte hayatta kalabilmenin bir yolu da dijital dönüşüm sürecine uyum sağlamaktır. Bu çalışma bağlamında dijital bilgi çağında dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler kavramı ele alınmış ve bir araştırma sentezine ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışma dijital toplum ve dijital dönüşüm kavramlarının merkezinde insan olduğu sonucuna varmaktadır. Dijital eğitim süreçlerinde somut ve soyut teknolojilerin birbirini tamamlayacak şekilde kullanılması gerektiği, dijital eğitimin dijital yeterlilik ve okuryazarlık ile operasyonel olabileceği ayrıca vurgulanmaktadır. Dijitalleşme doğru yorumlanmadığında sağlayacağı avantajlardan çok dezavantajlar da sağlayabilecek bir kavramdır. Dolayısıyla dijital bilgi çağında dijitalleşmeyi doğru yorumlamak, doğru anlamak ve dönüşüm sürecinde doğru bağlamda konumlandırmak son derece önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N. B., Kaban, A. L., Taşçı, G., Aykul, M. (2021). Dijital bilgi çağı: Dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 35–63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (111)

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1994). Systems thinking and thinking systems. System Dynamics Review, 10(2‐3), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100206
  2. Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. European Union. http://www.dctest.org/uploads/6/8/7/0/68701431/jrc67075_tn.pdf
  3. Ataş, H., & Gündüz, S. (2019). Yükseköğretimde Dijital Dönüşüm. (Ed: Çelik, İ.E.) Dijital Dönüşüm Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Boyutuyla. Gazi Kitabevi.
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
  5. Bertalanffy, L. V. (1969). General System Theory. George Braziller lnc. Publishing.
  6. Bigum, C., & Kenway, J. (2005). New information technologies and the ambiguous future of schooling-Some possible scenarios. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Extending educational change (p. 95–115). Cham, NL: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4453-4_5
  7. Blaschke, L. M., Bozkurt, A., & Cormier, D. (2021). Learner agency and the learner-centered theories for online networked learning and learning ecologies. In Stewart, H., & Lisa B. (Eds.), Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency. EdTech Books.
  8. Bonfour, A. (2016). Digital Futures, Digital Transformation From Lean Production to Acceluction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23279-9
  9. Bozkurt, A. (2014a). Ağ toplumu ve bilgi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(4), 510-525. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tk/issue/48744/620176
  10. Bozkurt, A. (2014b). Ağ Toplumu ve Öğrenme: Bağlantıcılık. Akademik Bilişim 2014 (s. 601-606). Mersin Üniversitesi, Mersin.
  11. Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açık Öğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 3(2), 85-124. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/34117/378446
  12. Bozkurt, A. (2019a). Açık eğitsel kaynaklardan açık eğitsel uygulamalara: Türk yükseköğretimi bağlamında ekolojik bakış açısıyla bir değerlendirme. Açık Öğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 5(3), 127-150.
  13. Bozkurt, A. (2019b). From Distance Education to Open and Distance Learning: A Holistic Evaluation of History, Definitions, and Theories. In S. Sisman-Ugur, & G. Kurubacak (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp. 252-273). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch016
  14. Bozkurt, A. (2020). Educational technology research patterns in the realm of the digital knowledge age. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.570
  15. Brooks, D. C., & McCormack, M. (2020). Driving Digital Transformation in Higher Education. EDUCAUSE. https://e-learning-teleformacion.blogspot.com/2020/06/driving-digital-transformation-in.html
  16. Capurro, R., & Hjorland, B. (2003). The Concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 343-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370109
  17. Cárdenas-Robledo, L. A., & Peña-Ayala, A. (2018). Ubiquitous learning: A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1097-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.009
  18. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
  19. Castells, M. (2004). The network society: A cross cultural perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421663
  20. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5), 2. http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/06/03/rhizomatic-education-community-as-curriculum
  22. Cormier, D. (2015). What was #rhizo15. The Association for Learning Technology (ALT) Newsletter. https://newsletter.alt.ac.uk/2015/07/what-was-rhizome15/
  23. Corngold, S. (1973). The Commentators' Despair: The Interpretation of Kafka's Metamorphosis. Kennikat Press.
  24. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
  25. Davis, A., Fidler, D., & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future work skills 2020. Institute for the Future for University of Phoenix Research Institute.
  26. Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 7-12. https://people.wou.edu/~girodm/middle/Dede_on_neo-millenials.pdf
  27. Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Stephen Downes: Knowledge, Learning, Community. http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf
  28. Duderstadt, J. J. (1998). Transforming the university to serve the digital age. Cause/Effect, 20(4), 21-32.
  29. Duderstadt, J. J. (2019). T The Future of the University in an Age of Knowledge. Online Learning, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v1i2.1933
  30. EDUCAUSE. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE.
  31. El Saddik, A. (2018). Digital twins: The convergence of multimedia technologies. IEEE Multimedia, 25(2), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167
  32. European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe's schools.
  33. European Commission. (2016). The Digital Competence Framework 2.0. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomp/digital-competence-framework
  34. European Union. (2006). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, European Communities, Belgium.
  35. Ferrel, M. N., & Ryan, J. J. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7492
  36. Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27, 47-50.
  37. Fuller, R. B. (1982). Critical path. St Martin’s Press.
  38. Gibson, R. (2011). Rethinking the future: rethinking business, principles, competition, control & complexity, leadership, markets and the world. Hachette UK.
  39. Granrath, L. (2017). Japan’s Society 5.0: Going Beyond Industry 4.0.https://www.japanindustrynews.com/2017/08/japans-society-5-0-going-beyond-industry-4-0/
  40. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
  41. Guetl, C., & Chang, V. (2008). Ecosystem-based Theoretical Models for Learning in Environments of the 21st Century. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 3(1), 50-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v3i1.742
  42. Gümüşoğlu, E. K. (2017). Yükseköğretimde dijital dönüşüm. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 30-42.
  43. Gür, E. D., Canan, G. Ö., Hamutoğlu, N. B., Kaya, U. G., & Demirtaş T. T. (2019). The Relation of Lifelong Learning Trends, Digital Literacy Levels and Usage of Web 2.0 Tools, with Social Entrepreneurship Characteristics. Croation Journal of Education, 21(1), 45-76.
  44. Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2016). The Role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization’s Digital Transformation. In ICIS 2016 Proceedings (pp. 1–20).
  45. Hall, R., Atkins, L., & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: the DigiLit Leicester project. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440
  46. Hamutoğlu, N. B., Güngören, Ö. C., Uyanık, G. K., & Erdoğan, D. G. (2017). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeği: Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(1), 408-429. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.329432
  47. Haugerud, T. (2011). Student teachers learning to teach: The mastery and appropriation of digital technology. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 226-239.
  48. Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015
  49. Hilbert, M., & López, P. (2011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332(6025), 60-65.
  50. Hirumi, A. (2002). A Framework for Analyzing, Designing, and Sequencing Planned Elearning Interactions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 141. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95270/
  51. Howell, J. (2012). Teaching with ICT: Digital pedagogies for collaboration and creativity. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  52. Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
  53. Instefjord, E. (2014). Appropriation of digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 313–329.
  54. Instefjord, E. (2015). Appropriation of digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 155-171.
  55. Jee, Y. S. (2017). Exercise rehabilitation in the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1735012.506
  56. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MIT Press.
  57. JISC. (2012). Developing Digital Literacies: Briefing Paper. https://elearning.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2012/06/26/new-jisc-developing-digital-literacies-briefing-paper/
  58. JISC. (2019). Teacher profile (higher education): Six elements of digital capabilities. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7278/1/BDCP-DC-Framework-Individual-6E-110319.pdf
  59. Kafka, F. (1915). The metamorphosis. Kurt Wolff Verlag.
  60. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14(1-25).
  61. Karabacak, Z. İ., & Sezgin, A. A. (2019). Türki̇ye’de di̇ji̇tal dönüşüm ve di̇ji̇tal okuryazarlik. Türk İdare Dergisi, 1(488), 319-343.
  62. Kazu, İ. Y., & Erten, P. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının sayısal yetkinlik düzeyleri. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 132-152. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buefad/issue/3815/51196
  63. Kivunja, C. (2013). Embedding digital pedagogy in pre-service higher education to better prepare teachers for the digital generation. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p131
  64. Kocaman-Karoğlu, A., Bal-Çetinkaya, K., & Çimşir, E. (2020). Toplum 5.0 Sürecinde Türkiye’de Eğitimde Dijital Dönüşüm. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 147-158. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uad/issue/57871/815428
  65. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
  66. Lissitsa, S., & Chachashvili-Bolotin, S. (2019). The effect of digital variables on perceived employability in an ethnic minority and the hegemonic group. Israel Affairs, 25(6), 1082-1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2019.1670471
  67. Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press.
  68. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit–a European framework for digital literacy: a progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130-136.
  69. Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “digital society”. Digital literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 30(2008), 151-176.
  70. McEwen, R., & Wellman, B. (2013). Relationships, community, and networked individuals. In Teigland R., Power D. (eds), The immersive internet (pp. 168-179). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283023_15
  71. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
  72. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: Extensions of man. Routledge.
  73. McLuhan, M. (2011). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. University of Toronto Press. Merriam-Webster. (2021). Technology. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technology
  74. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  75. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship. The internet, society, and participation. The MIT Press.
  76. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
  77. Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1-10.
  78. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0 – Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  79. O’Reilly, T., & Battelle, J. (2009). Web squared: Web 2.0 five years on (V. 20, No. 1). O’Reilly Media.
  80. Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2018, September). Digital Transformation: Drivers, Success Factors, and Implications. In MCIS (p. 37).
  81. Oz, O., & Ozdamar, N. (2020). Academic’s Views on Industry 4.0 within the Scope of Open and Distance Education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 58-85. http://asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/477
  82. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791
  83. Peters, M. A. (2017). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1177412
  84. Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts–a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
  85. Pirzada, K., & Khan, F. (2013). Measuring relationship between digital skills and employability. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(24).
  86. QAA. (2020). Building a Taxonomy for Digital Learning. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/guidance/building-a-taxonomy-for-digital-learning.pdf
  87. Quinn, C. N. (2011). Designing mLearning: tapping into the mobile revolution for organizational performance. Wiley.
  88. Rainie, H., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
  89. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commission. Y. Punie (Ed.), JRC science for policy report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  90. Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., & Matos, P. (2018, March). Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In World Conference On Information Systems And Technologies (pp. 411-421). Springer.
  91. Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know. International Society for Technology in Education.
  92. Sánchez-Caballé, A., Gisbert Cervera, M., & Esteve-Mon, F. M. (2020). The digital competence of university students: a systematic literature review. Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport, 38(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.1.63-74
  93. Schallmo, D. R., & Williams, C. A. (2018). History of digital transformation. In Digital Transformation Now! (pp. 3-8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72844-5_2
  94. Schwab, K. (2016a). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab
  95. Schwab, K. (2016b). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond
  96. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. eLearnSpace. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
  97. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Lulu Press.
  98. Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2018.1519143
  99. Stolterman, E., & Fors, A. C. (2004). Information technology and the good life. In Information systems Research (pp. 687-692). Springer.
  100. Taşçı, G., & Çelebi, M. (2020). Eğitimde yeni bir paradigma: “Yükseköğretimde yapay zeka”. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(29), 2346-2370. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.747634
  101. TDK. (2021). Teknoloji. Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  102. Teichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
  103. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. Bantam.
  104. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. William Morrow & Co., Inc.
  105. Tømte, C. E. (2013). Educating Teachers for the New Millennium?-Teacher training, ICT and digital competence. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 138-154. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-01-01
  106. Traxler, J. (2010). Distance education and mobile learning: Catching up, taking stock. Distance Education, 31(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.503362
  107. UN. (2015). Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
  108. UNSECO. (2019). Futures of Education: Learning to Become. https://en.unesco.org/futuresofeducation/
  109. We Are Social. (2021). Digital 2021: Global Overview Report. https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2021-local-country-headlines-report-january-2021-v03
  110. WEF. (2019). Platform for shaping the future of the new economy and society. Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Schools_of_the_Future_Report_2019.pdf
  111. YÖK. (2010). Türkiye Yükseköğretim Yeterlilikleri Çerçevesi (TYYÇ). http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/?pid=10