SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF STUDIES ON NEUROACCOUNTING USING VOSVIEWER SOFTWARE BASED ON TURKISH AND INTERNATIONAL INDEXES

ULUSAL VE ULUSLARARASI İNDEKSLER TEMELİNDE NÖROMUHASEBE ÜZERİNE YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALARIN VOSVİEWER YAZILIMI İLE BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Zeliha Sünbül Koçak(BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6801-982X
Hayrettin Usul(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3930-0866
Pages
21–64
Publication Date
2026-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study examines the overall structure and current state of the neuroaccounting field by analyzing its development over time, research productivity, emerging trends, collaboration patterns among researchers and institutions, and the level of interdisciplinary cooperation using SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Dergipark indices utilizing VOSviewer software.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the overall structure and current state of the neuroaccounting field by analyzing its development over time, research productivity, emerging trends, collaboration patterns among researchers and institutions, and the level of interdisciplinary cooperation using SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Dergipark indices utilizing VOSviewer software.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By doing so, it aims to provide insights into the future development of the field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A review of the existing literature indicates that no previous study has conducted a bibliometric analysis exclusively using the keyword “neuroaccounting.” Therefore, the findings of this study are expected to make a meaningful contribution to the academic literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Nöromuhasebe · Davranışsal Muhasebe · Karar Alma

Abstract

This study examines the overall structure and current state of the neuroaccounting field by analyzing its development over time, research productivity, emerging trends, collaboration patterns among researchers and institutions, and the level of interdisciplinary cooperation using SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Dergipark indices utilizing VOSviewer software. By doing so, it aims to provide insights into the future development of the field. A review of the existing literature indicates that no previous study has conducted a bibliometric analysis exclusively using the keyword “neuroaccounting.” Therefore, the findings of this study are expected to make a meaningful contribution to the academic literature.

Özet

Bu çalışma, nöromuhasebe alanının mevcut yapısını ve genel görünümünü; tarihsel gelişimini, yayın performansını, öne çıkan araştırma eğilimlerini, araştırmacılar ve kurumlar arasındaki iş birliği ağlarını ve disiplinlerarası etkileşim düzeyini SCOPUS, Google Scholar ve DergiPark verileri temelinde VOSviewer yazılımı aracılığıyla incelemektedir. Bu kapsamda, alanın gelecekteki yönelimlerine ilişkin analitik bir çerçeve sunulması amaçlanmaktadır. Yapılan literatür taraması, yalnızca “nöromuhasebe” anahtar kelimesine odaklanan kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik çalışmanın daha önce gerçekleştirilmediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda, elde edilen bulguların literatüre özgün ve önemli bir katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koçak, Z. S., Usul, H. (2026). BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF STUDIES ON NEUROACCOUNTING USING VOSVIEWER SOFTWARE BASED ON TURKISH AND INTERNATIONAL INDEXES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 21–64. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.1595505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (53)

  1. Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50(2), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2274239
  2. Alkan, B. Ş., & Bayramoğlu, G. (2021). Muhasebe araştırmalarında göz izleme yönteminin kullanılması üzerine kavramsal bir çalışma. Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 31(167), 167–185.
  3. Artienwicz, N. (2016). Behavioral stream in Polish accounting: Its relation to behavioral finance and the perspectives for neuroaccounting development in Poland. In B. Christiansen & E. Lechman (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the decision-making process (pp. 246–261). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9989-2.ch013
  4. Ayboğa, H., & Koç, Ş. (2022). İşletmelerde hilenin önlenmesi ve tespitinde davranışsal muhasebe ve nöromuhasebe tekniğinin uygulama süreci ve öneriler. Uluslararası Beşeri ve Sosyal Bilimler İnceleme Dergisi, 6(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.55243/ihssr.1025683
  5. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
  6. Barton, J., Berns, G. S., & Brooks, A. M. (2014). The neuroscience behind the stock market’s reaction to corporate earnings news. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 1945–1977. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr- 50841
  7. Basu, S. (2012). How can accounting researchers become more innovative? Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 851–870. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10311
  8. Basu, S., & Waymire, G. B. (2006). Recordkeeping and human evolution. Accounting Horizons, 20(3), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.3.201
  9. Baxter, R. J., & Hunton, J. E. (2011). Capturing affect via the experience sampling method: Prospects for accounting information systems researchers. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2010.12.002
  10. Birnberg, J. G. (2011). A proposed framework for behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2011.23.1.1
  11. Birnberg, J. G., & Ganguly, A. R. (2012). Is neuroaccounting waiting in the wings? An essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.11.004
  12. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
  13. Carvalho, C. V. D. O., Cornacchione, E., Rocha, A. F. D., & Rocha, F. T. (2017). Cognitive brain mapping of auditors and accountants in going concern judgments. Revista Contabilidade &Finanças, 28, 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201703430
  14. Cesar, A. M. R. V. C., Perez, G., Vidal, P. G., & Marin, R. D. S. (2010). Neuroaccounting contribution to understanding the decision-making: An example from an innovative company. Anais doCongresso IAAR/ANPCONT, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 4.
  15. Chen, Y., Jermias, J., & Panggabean, T. (2016). The role of visual attention in the managerial judgment of balanced scorecard performance evaluation: Insights from using an eye-tracking device. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 113–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12102
  16. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  17. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413– 1420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
  18. Demircioğlu, N. E., & Ever, D. (2021). Nörobilimin muhasebeye etkisi: Nöromuhasebe. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(2), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.756086
  19. Dickhaut, J. (2009). The brain as the original accounting institution. The Accounting Review, 84(6), 1703–1712. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.6.1703
  20. Dickhaut, J., Basu, S., McCabe, K., & Waymire, G. (2010). Neuroaccounting: Consilience between the biologically evolved brain and culturally evolved accounting principles. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 221–255. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.221
  21. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  22. Eskenazi, P. I., Hartmann, F. G., & Rietdijk, W. J. (2016). Why controllers compromise on their fiduciary duties: EEG evidence on the role of the human mirror neuron system. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.02.003
  23. Farrell, A. M., Goh, J. O., & White, B. J. (2014). The effect of performance-based incentive contracts on system 1 and system 2 processing in affective decision contexts. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 1979–2010. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50852
  24. Fehrenbacher, D. D., Schulz, A. K. D., & Rotaru, K. (2018). The moderating role of decision mode in subjective performance evaluation. Management Accounting Research, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2018.03.001
  25. Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2014). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
  26. Grigg, L., & Griffin, A. L. (2014). A role for eye-tracking research in accounting and financial reporting. In M. Horsley, M. Eliot, B. Knight, & R. Reilly (Eds.), Current trends in eye tracking research (pp. 225–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02868-2_17
  27. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  28. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  29. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In L. C. MacLean & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006
  30. Kırhasanoğlu, Ş., & Özdemir, M. (2021). Nöromuhasebeye teorik bir bakış. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, 9(2), 178–187.
  31. Kostrzewa-Nowak, D., Nowak, R., Kubaszewska, J., & Gos, W. (2022). Interdisciplinary approach to biological and health implications in selected professional competences. Brain Sciences, 12(2), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020236
  32. Kramer, S., & Maas, V. S. (2020). Selective attention as a determinant of escalation bias in subjective performance evaluation judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 32(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-18-021
  33. Lynch, E. J., & Andiola, L. M. (2019). If eyes are the window to our soul, what role does eye-tracking play in accounting research? Behavioral Research in Accounting, 31(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-52283
  34. Mackowiak, E. (2018). From behavioral accounting to aggressive accounting. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 153–161.
  35. Marşap, B., & Gökten, P. O. (2016). Davranışsal muhasebe: Kuramsal yaklaşım. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 345–359.
  36. Olsen, C., & Gold, A. (2018). Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors' professional skepticism. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.03.006
  37. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115
  38. Öztürk, S., & Gürler, İ. (2022). Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
  39. Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
  40. Silva, E. M., de Lacerda Moreira, R., & Bortolon, P. M. (2023). Mental accounting and decision making: A systematic literature review. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 107, 102092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102092
  41. Sirois, L. P., Bédard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor's report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52047
  42. Suryati, T., & Mooduto, W. (2021). The role of neuroaccounting (the science of neural-based accounting) in decision making. BRAIN, 1(12), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.1/169
  43. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  44. Şenel, S. A., & Darıcı, S. (2018). Psikofizyolojik tekniklerin adli muhasebe alanında ve suçun ortaya çıkarılmasında kullanılmasına ilişkin bir tartışma: Nöromuhasebe kavramına farklı bir bakış. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(67), 381–391.
  45. Tank, A., & Farrell, A. (2022). Is neuroaccounting taking a place on the stage? A review of the influence of neuroscience on accounting research. European Accounting Review, 31(1), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1866634
  46. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183– 206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3 3.0.CO;2-F
  47. Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239
  48. Usul, H., & Çağlan, E. (2018). Nöromuhasebe. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(2), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.392119
  49. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  50. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior (60th anniversary commemorative ed.). Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1r2gkx
  51. Wang, B. (2018). Analysis of corporate social responsibility decision-making behavior based on cognitive neuroscience. NeuroQuantology, 16(6), 326-333. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2018.16.6.1577
  52. Waymire, G. B. (2014). Neuroscience and ultimate causation in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 2011–2019. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50881
  53. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629