SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 2026

Ultrasonic Emulsion Copolymerization of Styrene and 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate without an Exogenous Chemical Initiator

Emine Tomrun Güçlü(GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-8096-1043
Çiğdem Taşdelen-Yücedağ(GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1232-5462
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The copolymer structure of spherical latex nanoparticles was confirmed via FTIR and ¹H-NMR, while the average diameter was measured as approximately 80 nm through SEM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the complementary combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties, copolymers of styrene (St) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) have been widely employed in coating applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ultrasound (US) energy generates acoustic cavitation, leading to the formation of radicals through water sonolysis and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) decomposition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The copolymer structure of spherical latex nanoparticles was confirmed via FTIR and ¹H-NMR, while the average diameter was measured as approximately 80 nm through SEM.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ultrasound-assisted polymerization · acoustic cavitation · initiator-free emulsion copolymerization

Abstract

Due to the complementary combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties, copolymers of styrene (St) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) have been widely employed in coating applications. However, their emulsion polymerization remains challenging because of the strong hydrophilicity of HEMA, which exhibits poor compatibility with hydrophobic St. Ultrasound (US) energy generates acoustic cavitation, leading to the formation of radicals through water sonolysis and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) decomposition. Providing a simpler and greener approach, US-assisted polymerization eliminates the need for chemical initiators while mitigating oxygen inhibition. In this study, an emulsion copolymer was synthesized with styrene (St) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) in aqueous medium using SDS as a surfactant via ultrasonic initiation without using an exogenous chemical initiator. The effects of five key parameters on polymerization yield were studied by employing a one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approach to assess the direct effect of individual parameters on polymerization yield. The St-to-HEMA molar ratio, monomer (M)-to-water (W) ratio, and SDS-to-M ratio were varied within the ranges of 1:1-3:1, 5-15 wt%, and 5-15 wt%, respectively. Additionally, the US intensity and temperature were examined between 20-50 W and 30-70 °C, respectively. The optimal conditions were obtained as St/HEMA molar of 1.5, M/W ratio of 10 (w/w)%, and SDS/M ratio of 10 (w/w)%, US power of 34-37 W, and the reaction temperature of 50 °C. Under these conditions, the highest polymerization yield was achieved as 89.10.3%. The copolymer structure of spherical latex nanoparticles was confirmed via FTIR and ¹H-NMR, while the average diameter was measured as approximately 80 nm through SEM.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güçlü, E. T., Taşdelen-Yücedağ, Ç. (2026). Ultrasonic Emulsion Copolymerization of Styrene and 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate without an Exogenous Chemical Initiator. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering, Volume: 2026. https://doi.org/10.58692/jotcsb.1888377

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (59)

  1. Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Hassan, S. E. D., El-Din, M. N., Azab, M. S., El-Belely, E. F., Alrefaey, H. M. A., & Elsakhawy, T. (2020). One-factor-at-a-time and response surface statistical designs for improved lactic acid production from beet molasses by Enterococcus hirae ds10. SN Applied Sciences, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2351-x
  2. Ahmad, H., Islam, A. H. M. T., Hossain, M. A., Miah, M. A. J., & Tauer, K. (2006). Emulsion copolymerization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic monomers: an experimental study with styrene and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. http://www.e-polymers.org
  3. Altinok, H., Aksoy, S., Tümtürk, H., & Hasirci, N. (2008). Covalent immobilization of invertase on chemically activated poly (styrene-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) microbeads. Journal of Food Bi oChemistry, 32(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2008.00156.x
  4. Arunbabu, D., & Jana, T. (2011). Charged polystyrene nanoparticles: Role of ionic comonomers structures. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 361(2), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.06.005
  5. Asua, J. M. (2004). Emulsion Polymerization: From Fundamental Mechanisms to Pr oCess Developments. In Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry (Vol. 42, Number 5, pp. 1025–1041). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.11096
  6. Bhangu, S. K., & Ashokkumar, M. (2016). Theory of Son oChemistry. In Topics in Current Chemistry (Vol. 374, Number 4). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-016-0054-y
  7. Bhanvase, B. A., Pinjari, D. V., Sonawane, S. H., Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2012). Analysis of semibatch emulsion polymerization: Role of ultrasound and initiator. Ultrasonics Son oChemistry, 19(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.05.016
  8. Bhanvase, B. A., & Sonawane, S. H. (2014). Ultrasound assisted in situ emulsion polymerization for polymer nan oComposite: A review. In Chemical Engineering and Pr oCessing: Pr oCess Intensification (Vol. 85, pp. 86–107). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2014.08.007
  9. Bhanvase, B. A., Sonawane, S. H., Pinjari, D. V., Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2014). Kinetic studies of semibatch emulsion copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and styrene in the presence of high intensity ultrasound and initiator. Chemical Engineering and Pr oCessing: Pr oCess Intensification, 85, 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2014.08.014
  10. Bhaturiwala, R., Bagban, M., Mansuri, A., & Modi, H. (2022). Successive approach of medium optimization using one-factor-at-a-time and response surface methodology for improved β-mannanase production from Streptomyces sp. Bioresource Technology Reports, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101087
  11. Biggs, S., & Grieser, F. (1995). Preparation of Polystyrene Latex with Ultrasonic Initiation. Macromolecules, 28(14), 4877–4882. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00118a013
  12. Bradley, M. A., Prescott, S. W., Schoonbrood, H. A. S., Landfester, K., & Grieser, F. (2005). Miniemulsion copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and butyl acrylate by ultrasonic initiation. Macromolecules, 38(15), 6346–6351. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0473622
  13. Cai, B., Mazahreh, J., Ma, Q., Wang, F., & Hu, X. (2022). Ultrasound-assisted fabrication of biopolymer materials: A review. In International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (Vol. 209, pp. 1613–1628). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.055
  14. Cardoso, A. H., Alberto, C., Leite, P., Elisabete, M., Zaniquelli, D., & Galembeck, F. (1998). Easy polymer latex self-assembly and colloidal crystal formation: the case of poly[styrene-co-(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)]. In Colloids and Surfaces A: Physic oChemical and Engineering Aspects (Vol. 144).
  15. Chern, C. S. (2006). Emulsion polymerization mechanisms and kinetics. In Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford) (Vol. 31, Number 5, pp. 443–486). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.02.001
  16. Chou, H. C. J., & Stoffer, J. O. (1999). Ultrasonically Initiated Free Radical-Catalyzed Emulsion Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate (I). Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 72(6), 797–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990509)72:6 3.0.CO;2-Z
  17. Fang, J., Xuan, Y., & Li, Q. (2010). Preparation of polystyrene spheres in different particle sizes and assembly of the PS colloidal crystals. Science China Technological Sciences, 53(11), 3088–3093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4110-5
  18. Frey, D. D., Engelhardt, F., & Greitzer, E. M. (2003). A role for “one-factor-at-a-time” experimentation in parameter design. Research in Engineering Design, 14(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0026-9
  19. Furuncuoǧlu Özaltin, T., Dereli, B., Karahan, O., Salman, S., & Aviyente, V. (2014). Solvent effects on free-radical copolymerization of styrene and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate: A DFT study. New Journal of Chemistry, 38(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nj00820g
  20. He, Y., Cao, Y., & Liu, Y. (2005). Initiation mechanism of ultrasonically irradiated emulsion polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science, Part B: Polymer Physics, 43(18), 2617–2624. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.20544
  21. Hu, X., Yin, R., Jeong, J., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2024). Robust Miniemulsion PhotoATRP Driven by Red and Near-Infrared Light. Journal of the American Chemical S oCiety, 146(19), 13417–13426. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c02553
  22. Ivanchev, S. S., Pavlyuchenko, V. N., Byrdina, N. A., Skrifvars, M., & Koskinen, J. (2001). Water-Resistant Films and Coatings Based on Cross-Linking Styrene-Acrylate Latex Copolymers. Macromolecular Chemistry and Polymeric Materials, 74(2), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012750923739
  23. Kalita, U., Jafari, V. F., Ashokkumar, M., Singha, N. K., & Qiao, G. G. (2024). Synthesis of ultra-high molecular weight homo- and copolymers via an ultrasonic emulsion pr oCess with a fast rate. Communications Chemistry, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-024-01191-6
  24. Karayil Shaji, D., Othayoth Kottaron, O. A., Ranganath, S. P., Torris, A., Bhat, S., & Badiger, M. V. (2025). Inverse emulsion polymerization: a strategy for synthesizing acrylamide copolymer to enhance kaolin fl oCculation. Polymer International. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.70032
  25. Khalil, A., Sensan, T., Passin, A., Ben Belaiche, M., Duclos, A., Tournat, V., Fontaine, L., Pascual, S., & Piogé, S. (2024). Sono-Activated RAFT Ab Initio Emulsion Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate: Toward an Exogenous Initiator-Free and Surfactant-Free Pr oCess. Macromolecules, 57(5), 2295–2305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c02545
  26. Korkut, I., & Bayramoglu, M. (2014). Various aspects of ultrasound assisted emulsion polymerization pr oCess. Ultrasonics Son oChemistry, 21(4), 1592–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.12.028
  27. Kwon, S., Oh, K., Shin, S. J., & Lee, H. L. (2019). Structural Changes of the Coating Layer by Styrene/Acrylate Latex with Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate. ACS Omega, 4(19), 18405–18412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02671
  28. Liang, K., Dossi, M., Moscatelli, D., & Hutchinson, R. A. (2009). An investigation of free-radical copolymerization propagation kinetics of styrene and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Macromolecules, 42(20), 7736–7744. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma901355u
  29. Liao, Y., Wang, Q. I., Xia, H., Xu, X. I., Baxter, S. M., Slone, R. V, Wu, S., Swift, G., & Westmoreland, D. G. (2001). Ultrasonically Initiated Emulsion Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.0000
  30. Lovell, P. A., & Schork, F. J. (2020). Fundamentals of Emulsion Polymerization. In Biomacromolecules (Vol. 21, Number 11, pp. 4396–4441). American Chemical S oCiety. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00769
  31. Lu, C., Xiao, H., & Chen, X. (2021). Simple pyrolysis of polystyrene into valuable chemicals. E-Polymers, 21(1), 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2021-0037
  32. Martin-Rodriguez, A., Cabrerizo-Vilchez, M. A., & Hidalgo-Alvarez, R. (1996). COLLOIDS A Surface characterization of latexes with different interfacial properties. In A: Physic oChemical and Engineering Aspects (Vol. 108).
  33. McKenzie, T. G., Karimi, F., Ashokkumar, M., & Qiao, G. G. (2019). Ultrasound and Son oChemistry for Radical Polymerization: Sound Synthesis. In Chemistry - A European Journal (Vol. 25, Number 21, pp. 5372–5388). Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201803771
  34. Monroy-Barreto, M., Pérez-Vázquez, M. del C., Briseño-Terán, M., & Esturau-Escofet, N. (2014). Microstructural Characterization of Dibl oCk Copolymers Formed by Styrene and Different Methacrylic Units. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, 19(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2014.850904
  35. Moon, S., Saboe, A., & Smanski, M. J. (2024). Using design of experiments to guide genetic optimization of engineered metabolic pathways. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuae010
  36. Nie, M., Wang, Q., & Qiu, G. (2008). Enhancement of ultrasonically initiated emulsion polymerization rate using aliphatic alcohols as hydroxyl radical scavengers. Ultrasonics Son oChemistry, 15(3), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.03.010
  37. Ooi, S. K., & Biggs, S. (2000). Ultrasonic initiation of polystyrene latex synthesis. In Ultrasonics Son oChemistry (Vol. 7). www.elsevier.nl/l oCate/ultsonch
  38. Özbilenler, C., Yilmaz, E., & Altundağ, E. M. (2024). Evaluation of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(N-hydroxyethyl acrylamide) cryogels as potential quercetin release matrices. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, 29(3), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023666X.2024.2349628
  39. Padmakumar, A. K., Singha, N. K., Ashokkumar, M., Leibfarth, F. A., & Qiao, G. G. (2023). Ultrasound-Assisted RAFT Polymerization in a Continuous Flow Method. Macromolecules, 56(17), 6920–6927. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00816
  40. Pugacheva, T. A., Kurbatov, V. G., Vaganov, E. V., Malkov, G. V., Tarusina, K. A., Organ, V. M., Mitrofanova, E. V., Tarasov, A. E., & Badamshina, E. R. (2023). Curing of Poly(styrene-co-methyl methacrylate-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) Terpolymers in the Presence of Amino Compounds of Different Structures. Polymers, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092187
  41. Sánchez-Chaves, M., Martínez, G., & Madruga, E. L. (1999). Low- and high-conversion studies of the free radical copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate with styrene in N,N′-dimethylformamide solution. Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 37(15), 2941–2948. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19990801)37:15 3.0.CO;2-M
  42. Sankar, K., & Rajendran, V. (2012). Ultrasound assisted free radical polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate by a new disite phase-transfer catalyst system: A kinetic study. Ultrasonics Son oChemistry, 19(6), 1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.01.015
  43. Sankar, K., & Rajendran, V. (2013). Polymerization of ethyl methacrylate under the influence of ultrasound assisted a new multi-site phase-transfer catalyst system - A kinetic study. Ultrasonics Son oChemistry, 20(1), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.023
  44. Santha Kumar, A. R. S., Padmakumar, A., Kalita, U., Samanta, S., Baral, A., Singha, N. K., Ashokkumar, M., & Qiao, G. G. (2023). Ultrasonics in polymer science: applications and challenges. In Progress in Materials Science (Vol. 136). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101113
  45. Scott, A. J., & Penlidis, A. (2017). Copolymerization. In Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.13901-0
  46. Selvaraj, V., Sakthivel, P., & Rajendran, V. (2015). Effect of ultrasound in the free radical polymerization of acrylonitrile under a new multi-site phase-transfer catalyst - A kinetic study. Ultrasonics Son oChemistry, 22, 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.05.002
  47. Senshu, K., Yamashita, S., Ito, M., Hirao, A., & Nakahama, S. (1995). Surface Characterization of 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate/ Styrene Bl oCk Copolymers by Transmission Electron Microscopic Observation and Contact Angle Measurement. In Langmuir (Vol. 11). https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines
  48. Shen, W. W., Ma, C. N., Wang, S. F., Xiong, H. M., Lu, H. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2010). SnO2@poly(HEMA-co-St-co-VPBA) core-shell nanoparticles designed for selectively enriching glycopeptides followed by MALDI-MS analysis. Chemistry - An Asian Journal, 5(5), 1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.200900542
  49. Suslick, K. S., & Price, G. J. (1999). APPLICATIONS OF ULTRASOUND TO MATERIALS CHEMISTRY.
  50. Teo, B. M., Ashokkumar, M., & Grieser, F. (2011). Son oChemical polymerization of miniemulsions in organic liquids/water mixtures. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13(9), 4095–4102. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp01979h
  51. Teo, B. M., Prescott, S. W., Ashokkumar, M., & Grieser, F. (2008). Ultrasound initiated miniemulsion polymerization of methacrylate monomers. Ultrasonics SonoChemistry, 15(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.01.009
  52. Thickett, S. C., & Gilbert, R. G. (2007). Emulsion polymerization: State of the art in kinetics and mechanisms. In Polymer (Vol. 48, Number 24, pp. 6965–6991). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.031
  53. Tumturk, H., Aksoy, S., & Hasirci, N. (2000). Covalent immobilization of a-amylase onto poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) microspheres and the effect of Ca 2+ ions on the enzyme activity. www.elsevier.com/l oCate/foodchem
  54. Wang, J., Wu, W., & Lin, Z. (2008). Kinetics and thermodynamics of the water sorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/styrene copolymer hydrogels. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 109(5), 3018–3023. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28403
  55. Wang, Q., Xia, H., Liao, Y., Xu, X., Baxter, S. M., Slone, R. V., Wu, S., Swift, G., & Westmoreland, D. G. (2001). Ultrasonically initiated emulsion polymerization of n-butyl acrylate. Polymer International, 50(11), 1252–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.773
  56. Xia, H., Wang, Q., Liao, Y., Xu, X., Baxter, S. M., Slone, R. V, Wu, S., Swift, G., & Westmoreland, D. G. (n.d.). Polymerization rate and mechanism of ultrasonically initiated emulsion polymerization of n-butyl acrylate. Retrieved www.elsevier.com/l oCate/ultsonch
  57. Xu, T. T., Zhu, J., Yuan, C., Yang, Q. L., Cui, K., Li, C. H., Wei, L. H., & Ma, Z. (2014). New polymethylene-b-poly(styrene-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and polymethylene-b-poly(styrene-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-g-poly(ε- caprolactone)) copolymers: Synthesis, characterization and their application in the fabrication of highly ordered porous films. European Polymer Journal, 54(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.014
  58. Xu, X., & Huang, J. (2004). Synthesis and characterization of well-defined poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-styrene)-graft-poly(ε-caprolactone) by sequential controlled polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 42(21), 5523–5529. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.20387
  59. Zhang, J., Cao, Y., & He, Y. (2004). Ultrasonically irradiated emulsion polymerization of styrene in the presence of a polymeric surfactant. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 94(2), 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20948