SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Fiduciary Internationalism: Reimagining the Trusteeship Council as a Representative Organ for the Voiceless

Vekaletçi Uluslararasıcılık: Vesayet Konseyi’ni Sessizlerin Temsilcisi Olarak Yeniden Tasarlamak

Abdulkadir Nacar(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5763-0498
Pages
1033–1104
Publication Date
2026-10-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ultimately, this article proposes a pragmatic reform that strengthens the inclusiveness of international law without requiring radical institutional overhaul.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Trusteeship Council, originally established under Chapter XIII of the UN Charter to supervise trust territories and guide them toward self-government or independence, has become largely dormant since the completion of decolonization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Through doctrinal analysis of the UN Charter, relevant jurisprudence, and institutional practice, the article demonstrates that repurposing the Trusteeship Council could bridge the divide between the formal recognition of rights and their effective real-world enforcement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ultimately, this article proposes a pragmatic reform that strengthens the inclusiveness of international law without requiring radical institutional overhaul.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vesayet Konseyi · Temsil Boşluğu · Actio Popularis

Abstract

The Trusteeship Council, originally established under Chapter XIII of the UN Charter to supervise trust territories and guide them toward self-government or independence, has become largely dormant since the completion of decolonization. This article argues that the Council, rather than being treated as a historical relic, can be reconceptualized as a functional institutional mechanism to address persistent representation gaps in international adjudication. By drawing on the Roman law concept of mandatum and situating the proposal within broader doctrinal debates on actio popularis and locus standi, the study explores how the Trusteeship Council could serve as a neutral representative body for non-state actors, including stateless peoples, climate-displaced populations, and multinational corporations. The article analyses the fundamental structural limitations within the existing international legal framework, especially the traditional state-centric approach to locus standi before international courts and tribunals, including the ICJ and proposes an institutional solution that preserves the Charter framework while enhancing procedural access to justice. Through doctrinal analysis of the UN Charter, relevant jurisprudence, and institutional practice, the article demonstrates that repurposing the Trusteeship Council could bridge the divide between the formal recognition of rights and their effective real-world enforcement. Ultimately, this article proposes a pragmatic reform that strengthens the inclusiveness of international law without requiring radical institutional overhaul.

Özet

Birleşmiş Milletler Şartı’nın XIII. Bölümü uyarınca kurulan Vesayet Konseyi, vesayet altındaki toprakların yönetimini denetlemek ve bu toprakları kendi kaderini tayin hakkı doğrultusunda bağımsızlığa yönlendirmek amacıyla kurulmuştur. Dekolonizasyon sürecinin tamamlanmasıyla birlikte büyük ölçüde işlevsiz hale gelen Konsey, bu makalede tarihsel bir kalıntı olarak değil, uluslararası yargıdaki temsil boşluklarını giderebilecek işlevsel bir kurumsal mekanizma olarak yeniden kavramsallaştırılmaktadır. Makale, Roma hukukundaki mandatum kavramından yola çıkarak Vesayet Konseyi’ne atfedilebilecek temsil işlevini, actio popularis ve locus standi tartışmaları içinde konumlandırmaktadır. Vatansız halklar, iklim mültecileri ve çok uluslu şirketler gibi devlet-dışı aktörlerin uluslararası mahkemelerde etkili temsil edilememesi sorununa odaklanan çalışma, Vesayet Konseyi’nin kurumsal bir temsil organı olarak yeniden yapılandırılmasını önermektedir. Doktrinel analiz yöntemiyle BM Şartı, ilgili içtihatlar ve kurumsal pratikler incelenerek, Konsey’in mevcut yapısı korunarak nasıl işlevsel bir temsil mekanizmasına dönüştürülebileceği ortaya konulmaktadır. Çalışma, uluslararası hukukun normatif iddiaları ile kurumsal kapasitesi arasındaki boşluğu kapatmaya yönelik pragmatik bir reform önerisi sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Nacar, A. (2026). Fiduciary Internationalism: Reimagining the Trusteeship Council as a Representative Organ for the Voiceless. İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 1033–1104. https://doi.org/10.58733/imhfd.1932172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (183)

  1. Books Anghie A, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005).
  2. Arend AC, and Beck RJ, International Law and the Use of Force: Beyond the UN Charter Paradigm (Routledge 1993).
  3. Bain W, Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power (Oxford University Press 2003).
  4. Ben-Ari T, The Legal Status of International Non-Governmental Organizations: Analysis of Past and Present Practices (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).
  5. Biermann F, and Lövbrand E, (eds) Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking (Cambridge University Press 2019).
  6. Callahan MD, ‘Mandates and Empire’ in The League of Nations and Africa, 1914-1931 (Liverpool University Press 2008).
  7. Cassese A, International Law in a Divided World (Oxford University Press 1986).
  8. Cassese A, Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge University Press 1995).
  9. Clapham A, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press 2006).
  10. Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance (Oxford University Press 1995).
  11. Corpus Iuris Civilis: Digesta, ed Theodor Mommsen and Paul Krüger (Berlin 1870).
  12. Corten O, The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Hart Publishing 2021).
  13. Crawford J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press 2002).
  14. Crawford J, The Creation of States in International Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2006).
  15. Crawford J, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press 2013).
  16. Crawford J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th edn, Oxford University Press 2019).
  17. Criddle EJ, and Fox-Decent E, Fiduciaries of Humanity: How International Law Constitutes Authority (Oxford University Press 2016).
  18. de Marco G, and Bartolo M, A Second Generation United Nations: For Peace in Freedom in the 21st Century (Kegan Paul International 1997).
  19. Desai BH, Institutionalizing International Environmental Law (Brill | Nijhoff 2003).
  20. Dinstein Y, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (7th edn, Cambridge University Press 2021).
  21. Dolzer R, and Schreuer C, Principles of International Investment Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2022).
  22. Dupuy PM, and Vierucci L, (eds) NGOs in International Law: Efficiency in Flexibility? (Edward Elgar 2008).
  23. Erkiner HH, Uluslararası Terörizme Karşı Meşru Müdafaa (Seçkin 2024).
  24. Faure MG, and Partain RA, Environmental Law and Economics: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press 2019).
  25. Franck TM, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press 1995).
  26. Frier BW, A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts (Oxford University Press 2021).
  27. Gaius, Institutiones (ed E Poste, 4th edn, Clarendon Press 1904).
  28. Gray C, International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford University Press 2008).
  29. Güven DT, Culpa in Eligendo: Yardımcı Şahsı Seçmede Kusur Nedeniyle Sözleşmeden Doğan Sorumluluk (Der Yayınları 2018).
  30. Higgins R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford University Press 1994).
  31. Justinian, The Institutes of Justinian (trans J B Moyle, 5th edn, Oxford University Press 1913).
  32. Lauterpacht H, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (with Special Reference to International Arbitration) (Longmans, Green and Co 1927).
  33. Lauterpacht H, International Law and Human Rights (Stevens & Sons 1950).
  34. Lindblom AK, Non-Governmental Organisations in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005).
  35. Lugard FD, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa (4th edn, William Blackwood & Sons 1929).
  36. Miller DH, My Diary at the Conference of Paris (Appeal Printing Company 1924).
  37. Nicholas B, An Introduction to Roman Law (Clarendon Press 1962).
  38. Nkrumah K, Towards Colonial Freedom: Africa in the Struggle Against World Imperialism (Heinemann 1962).
  39. Sands P, and Klein P, Bowett’s Law of International Institutions (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2009).
  40. Schreuer C, and others, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009).
  41. Schulz F, Classical Roman Law (Clarendon Press 1951).
  42. Stahn C, The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration: Versailles to Iraq and Beyond (Cambridge University Press 2008).
  43. Tams CJ, Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005).
  44. Thirlway H, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Fifty Years of Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press 2013) vol 1.
  45. Weiss EB, In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity (Transnational Publishers/United Nations University 1989).
  46. Wilde R, International Territorial Administration: How Trusteeship and the Civilizing Mission Never Went Away (Oxford University Press 2008).
  47. Zimmermann R, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford University Press 1996, online edn, Oxford Academic 22 March 2012).
  48. Book Chapters Baber WF, and Bartlett RV, ‘Equivocal Democratic Accountability in the Anthropocene: Where Effective Legislatures Do Not Exist’ in Democratic Norms of Earth System Governance (Cambridge University Press 2021) 123-137.
  49. Brower CN, and Bekker PHF, ‘Understanding “Binding” Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice’ in N Ando, E McWhinney and R Wolfrum, (eds) Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002) 351-368.
  50. Redgwell C, ‘Reforming the United Nations Trusteeship Council’ in W Bradnee Chambers and Jessica F Green, (eds) Reforming International Environmental Governance: From Institutional Limits to Innovative Reforms (United Nations University Press 2005) 178-203.
  51. Spivak GC, ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (University of Illinois Press 1988) 271-313.
  52. Journals Alter KJ, Gathii JT and Helfer LR, ‘Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 293-328.
  53. Bates ML, ‘Tanganyika: The Development of a Trust Territory’ (1955) 9 International Organization 32-51.
  54. Benvenisti E, ‘Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders’ (2013) 107(2) American Journal of International Law 295-333.
  55. Bo M, ‘Autonomous Weapons and the Responsibility Gap in light of the Mens Rea of the War Crime of Attacking Civilians in the ICC Statute’ (2021) 19(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice 275-299.
  56. Burleson E, and Wu DP, ‘Non-State Actor Access and Influence in International Legal and Policy Negotiations’ (2010) 21(1) Fordham Environmental Law Review 193-208.
  57. Coase RH, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1-44.
  58. Cockayne J, ‘Regulating Private Military and Security Companies: The Content, Negotiation, Weaknesses and Promise of the Montreux Document’ (2009) 13 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 401-428.
  59. de Schutter O, ‘Towards a New Treaty on Business and Human Rights’ (2015) 29 Business and Human Rights Journal 41-67.
  60. de Wet E, ‘The Direct Administration of Territories by the United Nations and its Member States in the Post Cold War Era’ (2004) 8 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 291-340.
  61. Desai BH, ‘The Repurposed UN Trusteeship Council for the Future+’ (2022) 52 Environmental Policy and Law 223-235.
  62. Erdölen YE, and Kejanlıoğlu AM, ‘Güney Afrika Cumhuriyeti’nin Sui Generis Hükümet Sistemi Ve Demokratik İşleyişi’ (2025) 83(3) İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası 1038-1075.
  63. Ferns N, ‘Development and Decolonisation: the 1964 UN Conference on Trade and Development and the Independence of Papua New Guinea’ (2024) 52 Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 158-180.
  64. Fox-Decent E, and Criddle EJ, ‘A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens’ (2009) 34 Yale Journal of International Law 331-387.
  65. Frumhoff PC, Heede R, and Oreskes N, ‘The Climate Responsibilities of Industrial Carbon Producers’ (2015) 132 Climatic Change 157-171.
  66. Heede R, ‘Tracing Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide and Methane Emissions to Fossil Fuel and Cement Producers, 1854-2010’ (2014) 122 Climatic Change 229-241.
  67. Helman GB, and Ratner SR, ‘Saving Failed States’ (1992-93) 89 Foreign Policy 3-20.
  68. Kotzé LJ, and others, ‘Earth system law: Exploring new frontiers in legal science’ (2022) 11 Earth System Governance 100126.
  69. Lange F, ‘An International Anomaly. Colonial Accession to the League of Nations, by Thomas Gidney’ (2026) European Journal of International Law (advance access) chaf072.
  70. Letsas G, ‘The European Court’s Legitimacy After KlimaSeniorinnen’ (2024) 5(4) European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 444-453.
  71. Luck EC, ‘Reforming the United Nations: Lessons from a History in Progress’ (2003) 1 International Relations Studies and the United Nations Occasional Papers 1-74.
  72. Matz N, ‘Civilization and the Mandate System under the League of Nations as Origin of Trusteeship’ (2005) 9(1) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 47-95.
  73. Miller DH, ‘The Origin of the Mandates System’ (1928) 6 Foreign Affairs 277-289.
  74. Miller S, ‘Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS): Meaningful Human Control, Collective Moral Responsibility and Institutional Design’ (2025) 27 Ethics and Information Technology 1-13.
  75. Mohamed S, ‘From Keeping Peace to Building Peace: A Proposal for a Revitalized United Nations Trusteeship Council’ (2005) 105(3) Columbia Law Review 809-840.
  76. Nasiritousi N, Hjerpe M, and Linnér BO, ‘The Roles of Non-State Actors in Climate Change Governance: Understanding Agency through Governance Profiles’ (2016) 16 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 109-126.
  77. Nörr D, ‘Reflections on Faith, Friendship, Mandate’ (1990-1992) 25-27 Irish Jurist 302-310.
  78. Ruggie J, ‘Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda’ (2007) 101 American Journal of International Law 819-840.
  79. Savaresi A, ‘Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland: Making climate change litigation history’ (2025) 34 Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 279-287.
  80. Spadaro A, ‘A Weapon is No Subordinate: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Scope of Superior Responsibility’ (2023) 21(5) Journal of International Criminal Justice 1119-1136.
  81. Stone CD, ‘Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects’ (1972) 45 Southern California Law Review 450-501.
  82. Trapp KN, ‘Back to Basics: Necessity, Proportionality, and the Right of Self-Defence Against Non-State Terrorist Actors’ (2007) 56(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 141-156.
  83. Vidmar J, ‘The Kosovo Advisory Opinion Scrutinized’ (2011) 24(2) Leiden Journal of International Law 355-383.
  84. Weiss EB, ‘The Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational Equity’ (1984) 11(4) Ecology Law Quarterly 495-582.
  85. Wulf A, ‘Repurposing the United Nations Trusteeship Council to Govern the Establishment of Outer Space Settlements’ (2024) 45 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 127-155.
  86. Online Resources ‘Mandatum’ (OED Online, Oxford University Press) Accessed 12 March 2026.
  87. Anthropic, ‘Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War’ (26 February 2026) Accessed 24 March 2026.
  88. Chan I, ‘Further Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes (Partes) in the ICJ Climate Change Advisory Opinion: Duty of Non-Recognition and Article 62 Intervention’ (EJIL: Talk!, 28 October 2025) Accessed 18 March 2026.
  89. Conner A, ‘The Department of Defense’s Conflict With Anthropic and Deal With OpenAI Are a Call for Congress To Act’ (CAP, 4 March 2026) Accessed 24 March 2026
  90. Fabricius P, ‘The Complex Politics of South Africa’s Genocide Case Against Israel’ (The Nation, 1 February 2024) Accessed 17 March 2026.
  91. Grootes S, ‘ICJ decision brought ANC-led government to the right side of history- and will help at the 2024 elections’ (Daily Maverick, 28 January 2024) Accessed 17 March 2026.
  92. Horowitz MC, and Scharre P, ‘Meaningful Human Control in Weapon Systems: A Primer’ (Center for a New American Security, March 2015) Accessed 24 March 2026.
  93. Hunter Q, ‘Will Israel’s war on Gaza sway South Africa’s election?’ (Al Jazeera, 13 May 2024) Accessed 17 March 2026.
  94. Imray G, ‘After South Africa’s historic election, what now for its global role on issues like the war in Gaza?’ (AP News, 2 June 2024) Accessed 17 March 2026.
  95. International Criminal Court, ‘The State of Palestine accedes to the Rome Statute’ (Press Release, 7 January 2015) Accessed 17 March 2026.
  96. Isilow H, ‘South Africa elections: How Israel’s war on Gaza could sway voters’ (Anadolu Ajansı, 28 May 2024) Accessed 17 March 2026.
  97. Letsas G, ‘Did the Court in KlimaSeniorinnen Create an Actio Popularis?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 13 May 2024) Accessed 18 March 2026.
  98. Peters A, ‘Advisory Opinions’ in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online edn, Oxford University Press 2011, last updated 2020).
  99. Registry Announcement, ‘Filing of written statements’ Accessed 10 July 2026.
  100. Stone M, ‘AI contract restrictions could threaten military missions, US official says’ (Reuters, 3 March 2026) Accessed 24 March 2026.
  101. Cases Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Advisory Opinion) [2010] ICJ Rep 403.
  102. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v Democratic Republic of the Congo) (Judgment) [2007] ICJ Rep 582.
  103. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v Democratic Republic of the Congo) (Judgment) [2012] ICJ Rep 324.
  104. Application for Review of Judgement No 158 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Advisory Opinion) [1973] ICJ Rep 166.
  105. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v Myanmar) (Preliminary Objections, Judgment) [2022] ICJ Rep 477.
  106. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v Israel) (Provisional Measures, Order) [2024] ICJ Rep (26 January 2024).
  107. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), ICJ, Case No. 192, Application filed 29 December 2023.
  108. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro) (Judgment) [2007] ICJ Rep 43.
  109. Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda) (Judgment) [2005] ICJ Rep 168.
  110. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (Second Phase) [1970] ICJ Rep 3.
  111. Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v France) (Judgment) [2008] ICJ Rep 177.
  112. Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v Albania) (Merits) [1949] ICJ Rep 4.
  113. East Timor (Portugal v Australia) (Judgment) [1995] ICJ Rep 90, 135 (Separate Opinion of Judge Vereshchetin).
  114. Interhandel Case (Switzerland v United States of America) (Judgment) [1959] ICJ Rep 6.
  115. International Status of South West Africa (Advisory Opinion) [1950] ICJ Rep 128.
  116. Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening) (Judgment) [1992] ICJ Rep 351.
  117. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16.
  118. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) [2004] ICJ Rep 136.
  119. Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict (Advisory Opinion) [1996] ICJ Rep 66.
  120. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14.
  121. Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change (Advisory Opinion) [2024] ICJ Rep.
  122. Oposa v Factoran (1993) GR No 101083, 224 SCRA 792 (Supreme Court of the Philippines).
  123. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal) (Judgment) [2012] ICJ Rep 422.
  124. Prosecutor v Tadić (Appeal Judgment) ICTY-94-1-A (15 July 1999).
  125. Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217 (Supreme Court of Canada).
  126. Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) [1949] ICJ Rep 174.
  127. Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Advisory Opinion) [1951] ICJ Rep 15.
  128. Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with respect to Activities in the Area (Advisory Opinion) ITLOS Reports 2011, 10 (Seabed Disputes Chamber, 1 February 2011).
  129. Urbaser SA and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/07/26, Award, 8 December 2016).
  130. Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland App no 53600/20 (ECtHR Grand Chamber, 9 April 2024).
  131. Legal Documents 2005 World Summit Outcome, UNGA Res 60/1 (16 September 2005).
  132. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility, Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, UN Doc A/59/565 (2 December 2004).
  133. Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Ireland (Good Friday Agreement/ Belfast Agreement) (signed 10 April 1998).
  134. American Convention on Human Rights (adopted 22 November 1969, entered into force 18 July 1978) 1144 UNTS 123.
  135. Annan K, Renewing the United Nations: A Programme for Reform UN Doc A/51/950 (1997).
  136. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), International Court of Justice, Case No. 192, Application filed 29 December 2023; Order on Provisional Measures of 26 January 2024.
  137. Charter of the United Nations (adopted 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945) XV UNCIO 335.
  138. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights) (adopted 4 November 1950, entered into force 3 September 1953) 213 UNTS 221.
  139. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (adopted 9 December 1948, entered into force 12 January 1951) 78 UNTS 277 (Genocide Convention).
  140. Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (opened for signature 18 March 1965, entered into force 14 October 1966) 575 UNTS 159 (ICSID Convention).
  141. Covenant of the League of Nations (adopted 28 April 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920) 1 League of Nations Official Journal 3.
  142. European Court of Human Rights, Analysis of Statistics 2025.
  143. Final Communiqué of the Asian-African Conference, Bandung (adopted 24 April 1955).
  144. General Assembly Resolution 2145 (XXI) (27 October 1966).
  145. International Court of Justice, Yearbook 2006-2007.
  146. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171.
  147. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3.
  148. International Law Commission, ‘Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (ARSIWA) (2001) UN Doc A/56/10.
  149. International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection’ (2006) UN Doc A/61/10.
  150. International Law Commission, ‘Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens)’ (2022) UN Doc A/77/10.
  151. Lauterpacht H, ‘Report on the Law of Treaties’ (24 March 1953) UN Doc A/CN.4/63, reprinted in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1953, vol II, 90.
  152. League of Nations Covenant (adopted 28 April 1919, entered into force 10 January 1920).
  153. Practice Directions I-XIII (adopted from 2001 onwards and periodically updated).
  154. Protocol No 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (opened for signature 11 May 1994, entered into force 1 November 1998) ETS No 155.
  155. Protocol No 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention (opened for signature 13 May 2004, entered into force 1 June 2010) CETS No 194.
  156. Resolution concerning the Internal Judicial Practice of the Court (adopted 12 April 1976).
  157. Statute of the Administrative Tribunal of the United Nations, (originally adopted by UNGA Res 351A (IV) (24 November 1949) and subsequently amended).
  158. Statute of the International Court of Justice (annexed to United Nations Charter).
  159. Statute of the United Nations Appeals Tribunal, UNGA Res 63/253 (24 December 2008).
  160. Statute of the United Nations Dispute Tribunal, UNGA Res 63/253 (24 December 2008).
  161. Trusteeship Agreement for the Territory of the Pacific Islands (approved by UN Security Council 18 July 1947).
  162. UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries, ‘Report on the Use of Private Military and Security Companies’ (2019) UN Doc A/HRC/42/42.
  163. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (opened for signature 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November 1994) 1833 UNTS 3 (UNCLOS).
  164. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761 (XVII) (6 November 1962).
  165. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2396 (XXIII) (2 December 1968).
  166. United Nations General Assembly, ‘Terms of Reference, Guidelines and Rules of the Secretary-General’s Trust Fund to Assist States in the Settlement of Disputes through the International Court of Justice’ (1989); cf UNGA Res 44/23 (17 November 1989).
  167. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 63/253 (24 December 2008).
  168. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012).
  169. United Nations General Assembly, ‘Our Common Agenda: Report of the Secretary-General’ (2021) UN Doc A/75/982.
  170. United Nations General Assembly, Res 79/1 ‘The Pact for the Future’ (22 September 2024) UN Doc A/RES/79/1, Annex: Declaration on Future Generations.
  171. United Nations General Assembly, Report of the International Court of Justice, 1 August 2024-31 July 2025, Official Records Eightieth Session Supplement No. 4, A/80/4.
  172. United Nations General Assembly, Relationship between the United Nations and South Africa (A/RES/3207 (XXIX) (30 September 1974).
  173. United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) (adopted 16 June 2011) UN Doc A/HRC/17/31.
  174. United Nations, Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization UN Doc A/49/1 (1994).
  175. United Nations, Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization UN Doc A/50/1 (1995).
  176. United Nations Trusteeship Council, Report on the Administration of the Trust Territory of Tanganyika, 1960 (A_4484-E, 1960).
  177. United Nations Trusteeship Council, Report of the United Nations Visiting Mission to the Trust Territory of New Guinea, 1971 (T/1728, 1971).
  178. United Nations Trusteeship Council, Provisional Verbatim Record of the 1720th Meeting UN Doc T/PV.1720 (12 December 2025).
  179. United Nations, United Nations Reform: Measures and Proposals UN Doc A/53/463 (1998).
  180. UNSC Res 541 (18 November 1983) UN Doc S/RES/541.
  181. UNSC Res 550 (11 May 1984) UN Doc S/RES/550.
  182. UNSC Res 1368 (12 September 2001) UN Doc S/RES/1368.
  183. UNSC Res 1373 (28 September 2001) UN Doc S/RES/1373.