Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 32

Sectoral Inequalities and Relations With The Digital Divide in Turkey

Türkiye’de Sektörel Eşitsizlikler ve Sayısal Bölünme İlişkisi

Pages
31–50
Publication Date
2017-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In analysis result, It was found that maximum intersectoral inequality level is in production value and the lowest in computer usage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Inequalities are the leading factors that effect the social and economic structure negatively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the context of inequalities, personal, regional and global dimensions of income differences are investigated, rarely sectoral analysis in researches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In analysis result, It was found that maximum intersectoral inequality level is in production value and the lowest in computer usage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilişim sistemleri · sektörel eşitsizlikler · sayısal bölünme

Abstract

Inequalities are the leading factors that effect the social and economic structure negatively. In the context of inequalities, personal, regional and global dimensions of income differences are investigated, rarely sectoral analysis in researches. Aim of the study is that determining of intersectoral and intrasectoral inequality levels and relations by using indicators of number of employees, wages, production value, added value as well as having computers, internet usage and having web page. Gini method has been used to calculate the level of inequalities and in correlation analysis to determine relationships between inequalities. In analysis result, It was found that maximum intersectoral inequality level is in production value and the lowest in computer usage.

Özet

Eşitsizlikler sosyal ve ekonomik yapıyı olumsuz etkileyen faktörlerin başında gelmektedir. Eşitsizlikler bağlamında kişisel, bölgesel ve küresel boyutta, gelir eşitsizliklerin incelendiği araştırmalarda, sektörel analizlere nadiren rastlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, çalışan sayısı, ücretler, üretim değeri ve katma değer göstergelerinin yanı sıra bilgisayar ve internet kullanımları ile web sayfası sahipliğinde, sektörler arası ve sektör içi eşitsizlik düzeylerinin ve eşitsizlikler arası ilişkilerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Eşitsizlik seviyelerinin belirlenmesinde Gini yöntemi, eşitsizlikler arasındaki ilişkileri belirlemek için korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda sektörler arası eşitsizliklerin en fazla üretim değerlerinde, en düşük bilgisayar kullanımlarında olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİDAN, H., ŞEN, H. (2017). Sectoral Inequalities and Relations With The Digital Divide in Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 32, 31–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/139383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Angel, U. & K.D. Tanabe (2012), “Micro Determinants of Informal Economy in the Middle East and North Africa Region”, Social Protection and Labor: The World Bank, SP Discussşon Paper, No: 1201. Atkinson, A. (1970), “On the Measurement of Inequality”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol 2, 244-263.
  2. Blais, A. & D.E. Blake & S. Dion (1990), “The Public/Private Sector Cleavage in North America”, Comparative Political Studies, 23: 381-403.
  3. Ceriani, L. & P. Verme (2012), “The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini”, J Econ Inequal, 10: 421–443.
  4. Chakraborty, J. & M.M. Bosman (2005), “Measuring the Digital Divide in the United States: Race, Income and Personel Computer Ownership”, The Professional Geographer, 57(3), 395-410.
  5. Cowell, F. A. & S.P. Jenkins (1995), “How Much Inequality Can we Explain? A Methodology and an Application to the United States”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 105, No. 429, 421-430.
  6. Currie, W. L. (1996), “Organizational structure and the use of information technology: Preliminary findings of a survey in the private and public sector”, International Journal of Information Management, Volume 16, Issue 1, 51–64.
  7. Çelik, O. & S. Selim (2014), “Türkiye’de Kamu ve Özel Sektör Ücret Farklılıklarının Kantil Regresyon Yaklaşımı ile Analizi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, Cilt:21 Sayı:1, 205-232.
  8. Deininger, K. & L. Squire (1998), “New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 57, 259–287.
  9. Dickens, W. & L. Katz (1987), “Interindustry Wage Differences and Industry Characteristics”, NBER Working Paper, 2014,
  10. Cambridge, Mass. Dreher, A. & N. Gaston (2008), “Has Globalization Increased Inequality?”, Review of International Economics, 16, 516-536.
  11. Uppenberg, K. (2011), “Economic growth in the US and the EU: A Sectoral Decomposition”, EIB Papers, Volume 16, No:1, 18-51. Elveren A. Y. & J.K. Galbraith (2009), “Pay Inequality in Turkey in the Neo- Liberal Era, 1980-2001”, European Journal of Comparative Economics, c.6, s.2, 177-206.
  12. Filiztekin, A. & M.A. Çelik (2010), “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Gelir Eşitsizliği”, Megaron, 5(3):116-127.
  13. Freeman, R. (1995), “Are Your Wages Set in Beijing?”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 15-32. Galbraith J. K. & T. Hale (2007), “Between-Sector Earnings Inequality in the United States”, UTIP Working Paper, 43. Goodman, L. A., & W.H. Kruskal (1959), “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications. II: Further Discussion and References”, Journ