SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 38

Determinants of Bank Stability: A Financial Statement Analysis of Turkish Banks

Banka İstikrarının Belirleyicileri: Türkiye’deki Bankaların Mali Tabloları Üzerinde Bir İnceleme

Gamze DANIŞMAN
Pages
87–103
Publication Date
2018-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results indicate that the significant determinants of NPLs that are able to explain the credit risk of Turkish banks include return on assets (ROA), loans to asset ratio, inefficiency index, non-interest income share and loan loss provisions share.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper attempts a financial statement analysis of Turkish banks and explores the determinants of bank stability, as proxied by non-performing loans ratio, using annual data on 27 Turkish banks for the years 2007-2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our results indicate that the significant determinants of NPLs that are able to explain the credit risk of Turkish banks include return on assets (ROA), loans to asset ratio, inefficiency index, non-interest income share and loan loss provisions share.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We contribute to the literature by properly accounting for endogeneity with adequate specification and validation tests.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Banka İstikrarı · Kredi Riski · Takipteki Krediler

Abstract

This paper attempts a financial statement analysis of Turkish banks and explores the determinants of bank stability, as proxied by non-performing loans ratio, using annual data on 27 Turkish banks for the years 2007-2015. We employ dynamic panel data estimation techniques by using the system GMM estimation techniques. Our results indicate that the significant determinants of NPLs that are able to explain the credit risk of Turkish banks include return on assets (ROA), loans to asset ratio, inefficiency index, non-interest income share and loan loss provisions share. We contribute to the literature by properly accounting for endogeneity with adequate specification and validation tests.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türk bankalarının mali tablo analizi ve takipteki kredilerin belirleyicileri incelenmektedir. 2007-2015 yılları için 27 adet Türk bankasının yıllık verileri kullanılmıştır. Sistem GMM yöntemiyle dinamik panel veri analizi metodolojisi kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, bankalara özgü belirleyiciler aktif kârlılık, krediler-varlık toplamı oranı, verimsizlik endeksi, faiz dışı gelir oranı ve kredi zararı karşılıkları oranı olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma ile endojenite spesifikasyon ve doğrulama testleri uygun bir şekilde kontrol edilerek literatüre katkıda bulunmak amaçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DANIŞMAN, G. (2018). Determinants of Bank Stability: A Financial Statement Analysis of Turkish Banks. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 38, 87–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/139359

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
  2. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
  3. Beck, R., Jakubik, P., & Piloiu, A. (2013). Non-performing loans: what matters in addition to the economic cycle? (Working Paper Series No. 1515). European Central Bank. Berger, A.N. & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(6), 849-870.
  4. Bernanke, B., & Gertler, M. (1989).
  5. Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations. The American Economic Review, 79(1), 14–31.
  6. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
  7. Blundell, R., Bond, S., & Windmeijer, F. (2000). Estimation in dynamic panel data models: improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator (IFS Working Paper No. W00/12). Institute for Fiscal Studies. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: a guide to microdata methods and practice (CeMMAP working paper No. CWP09/02). Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies. Bond, S., Windmeijer, F., 2002. Finite sample inference for GMM estimators in linear panel data models. CeMMAP working papers no. CWP04/02. Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, UK. Boudriga, A., Taktak, N. B., & Jellouli, S. (2009). Banking supervision and nonperforming loans: a cross‐country analysis. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 1(4), 286–318.
  8. Castro, V. (2013). Macroeconomic determinants of the credit risk in the banking system: The case of the GIPSI. Economic Modelling, 31, 672–683.
  9. CBRT (2013).
  10. Financial Stability Report, May, available at http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/1e6711f8-5dc8-463d-bd22-bad590904c8a/foreword16.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-1e6711f8-5dc8-463d-bd22-bad590904c8a-m3fw7tk
  11. CBRT (2017).
  12. Financial Stability Report, November, available at http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/37d4a3c3-f8f9-4973-aa85-93a5ce138c50/foreword25.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-37d4a3c3-f8f9-4973-aa85-93a5ce138c50-m52fcfI
  13. Espinoza, R., & Prasad, A. (2010). Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking System and their Macroeconomic Effects (IMF Working Paper No. 10/224). Internation