Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 44

Revisiting the Finance-Growth Nexus in Turkey: Bayer-Hanck Combined Cointegration Approach over the 1970-2016 Period

Türkiye’de Finans-Büyüme Bağıntısının Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi: 1970-2016 Dönemi için Bayer-Hanck Bileşik Eşbütünleşme Yaklaşımı

Pages
41–68
Publication Date
2020-04-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, it can be argued that financial development does not contribute to the economic growth process by way of higher levels of economic globalization and technological progress in the long-run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study revisits the finance-growth nexus in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample covers the period between 1970 and 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, it can be argued that financial development does not contribute to the economic growth process by way of higher levels of economic globalization and technological progress in the long-run.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Gelişme · Ekonomik Büyüme · Ekonomik Küreselleşme

Abstract

This study revisits the finance-growth nexus in Turkey. The sample covers the period between 1970 and 2016. The econometric analysis is based on the Bayer-Hanck combined cointegration test to examine whether the cointegration exists or not between the variables. The results of the Bayer-Hanck combined cointegration test show that there is no cointegration between financial development and economic growth even in the control of other variables such as economic globalization and technological progress. The estimation results also reveal that the long-run linkage is not prevailing between the variables. In other words, it can be argued that financial development does not contribute to the economic growth process by way of higher levels of economic globalization and technological progress in the long-run.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki finans-büyüme bağıntısını tekrar ele almaktadır. Örneklem 1970 ve 2016 arası dönemi kapsamaktadır. Ekonometrik analiz, değişkenler arasında eşbütünleşmenin var olup olmadığını incelemek için Bayer-Hanck bütünleşik eşbütünleşme testine dayanmaktadır. Bayer-Hanck bileşik eşbütünleşme testi sonuçları, ekonomik küreselleşme ve teknolojik ilerleme gibi kontrol değişkenlerinin varlığında dahi finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasında eşbütünleşme olmadığını göstermektedir. Tahmin sonuçları ayrıca değişkenler arasında uzun vadeli bir ilişkinin olmadığını ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Diğer bir deyişle, finansal gelişmenin, uzun vadede, yüksek ekonomik küreselleşme ve teknolojik ilerleme yoluyla ekonomik büyüme sürecine katkıda bulunmadığı ileri sürülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, O. (2020). Revisiting the Finance-Growth Nexus in Turkey: Bayer-Hanck Combined Cointegration Approach over the 1970-2016 Period. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 44, 41–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/139232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. (2001), “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”, American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401.
  2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A (2004), “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 10481, May. Ağır, H., Peker, O. & Kar, M. (2009), “Finansal Gelişmenin Belirleyicileri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme: Literatür Taraması”, BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 3(2), 31-62.
  3. Allen, F. & Gale, D. (1999),
  4. Comparing Financial Systems, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  5. Altuzarra, A. (2015), “Measuring Unemployment Persistence by Age and Gender”, Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4, 110-133.
  6. Andersen, T. B. & Tarp, F. (2003), “Financial Liberalization, Financial Development and Economic Growth in LDCs”, Journal of International Development, 15(2), 189-209.
  7. Andrianova, S., Demetriades, P. & Shortland, A. (2008), “Government ownership of banks, institutions and financial development”, Journal of Development Economics, 85(1-2), 218-252.
  8. Arcand, J., Berkes, E. & Panizza, U. (2015), “Too Much Finance?”, Journal of Economic Growth, 20(2), 105-148.
  9. Arestis, P., Demetriades, P. O. & Luintel, K. B. (2001), “Financial Development and Growth: The Role of Stock Markets”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33(1), 16-41.
  10. Arestis, P., Demetriades, P. O., Fattouh, B. & Mouratidis, K. (2002), “The Impact of Financial Liberalization Policies on Financial Development: Evidence from Developing Economies”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 7(2), 107-121.
  11. Aziz, J. & Duenwald, C. (2002), “Growth-Financial Intermediation Nexus in China”, International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper WP/02/194, November. Bagehot, W. [1873] (2015), Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market, Altenmünster: Jazzybee Verlag. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. & Mestre, R. (1998), “Error-Correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single-Equation Framework”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
  12. Barthelemy, J. C. & Varoudakis, A. (1996), “Economic Growth, Convergence Clubs, and the Role of Financial Development”, Oxford Economic Papers, 48(2), 300-328.
  13. Barro, R. (1990), “Government Spending in a Sample Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-125.
  14. Bayer, C. & Hanck, C. (2013), “Combining Non-Cointegration Tests”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34, 83-95.
  15. Beck, T. & Levine, R. (2004), “Stock Markets, B