SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 70 Issue: 1

Effect of nano-selenium and different stocking densities on performance, carcass yield, meat quality, and feathering score of broilers

Ömer Sevim(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6123-4159
Umair Ahsan(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4741-3745
Onur Tatlı(Aydın adnan menderes üniversitesi veteriner fakültesi)0000-0003-2733-1937
Eren Kuter(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4536-9058
Ehsan Karimiyan Khamseh(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3324-1364
Artun Reman Temiz(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3974-6312
Özge Sayın Özdemir(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3952-6769
Aybala Kübra Aydın(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7420-7117
Bekir Hakan Köksal(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5676-446X
Özcan Cengiz(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9526-8656
Ahmet Gökhan Önol(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7520-7423
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, dietary nano-Se improved the WHC and had no significant effect on other parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effects of nano-selenium (nano-Se) and stocking density (SD) on growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality, and feathering score of broilers were investigated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One-day-old 480 broiler chickens (45.32.4 g body weight) (Ross 308) were randomly divided into 4 treatments each comprising of 8 replicates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, dietary nano-Se improved the WHC and had no significant effect on other parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:broiler · feathering · high stocking density

Abstract

Effects of nano-selenium (nano-Se) and stocking density (SD) on growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality, and feathering score of broilers were investigated in this study. One-day-old 480 broiler chickens (45.32.4 g body weight) (Ross 308) were randomly divided into 4 treatments each comprising of 8 replicates. In the experiment, treatments consisted of a 2  2 factorial arrangement of dietary Se form (inorganic or nano) and SD (low = 12 birds/m2; LSD, and high = 18 birds/m2; HSD). No interaction was noted between Se form and SD for any trait. Nano-Se had no effect on growth performance, however, HSD decreased the body weight gain (BWG) (P0.05) and feed intake (FI) (P0.001) while feed conversion ratio (FCR) was unaffected. Neither nano-Se nor HSD had any effect on the relative carcass, breast, and thigh yields. Nano-Se improved the water-holding capacity (WHC) of breast meat 72-hpost-mortem (P0.05). However, pH, colour, and cooking loss of meat remained unaffected by Se form or SD. There were no differences between nano- or inorganic Se and LSD or HSD regarding feathering scores for back and wing. In conclusion, dietary nano-Se improved the WHC and had no significant effect on other parameters. In addition, HSD may negatively affect the growth performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sevim, Ö., Ahsan, U., Tatlı, O., Kuter, E., Khamseh, E. K., Temiz, A. R., Özdemir, Ö. S., Aydın, A. K., Köksal, B. H., Cengiz, Ö., Önol, A. G. (2022). Effect of nano-selenium and different stocking densities on performance, carcass yield, meat quality, and feathering score of broilers. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 70 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.838120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Adeyemo GO, Fashola OO, Ademulegun TI (2016): Effect of stocking density on the performance, carcass yield and meat composition of broiler chickens. Br Biotechnol J, 14, 1-7.
  2. Ahmadi M, Ahmadian A, Seidavi AR (2018): Effect of different levels of nano-selenium on performance, blood parameters, immunity and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult Sci J, 6, 99-108.
  3. AOAC (2000): Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 17th Ed., AOAC International, Maryland, USA.
  4. Astaneh IY, Chamani M, Mousavi SN, et al (2018): Effects of stocking density on performance and immunity in Ross 308 broiler chickens. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak, 24, 483-489.
  5. Aviagen (2014): Ross 308 Broiler: Nutrition Specifications. Ross 308 broiler nutrition specifications. Aviagen Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  6. Azzam MMM, El-Gogary MR (2015): Effects of dietary threonine levels and stocking density on the performance, metabolic status and immunity of broiler chickens. AJAVA, 10, 215-225.
  7. Bakhshalinejad R, Hassanabadi A, Swick RA (2019): Dietary sources and levels of selenium supplements affect growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality and tissue selenium deposition in broilers. Anim Nutr, 5, 256-263.
  8. Beaulac K, Schwean-Lardner K (2018): Assessing the effects of stocking density on turkey tom health and welfare to 16 weeks of age. Front Vet Sci, 5, 213.
  9. Boostani A, Sadeghi AA, Mousavi SN, et al (2015): Effects of organic, inorganic, and nano-Se on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens exposed to oxidative stres. Livest Sci, 178, 330-336.
  10. Cai SJ, Wu CX, Gong LM, et al (2012): Effects of nano-selenium on performance, meat quality, immune function, oxidation resistance, and tissue selenium content in broilers. Poult Sci, 91, 2532–2539.
  11. Cemin HS, Vieira SL, Stefanello C, et al (2018): Broiler responses to increasing selenium supplementation using Zn-L-selenomethionine with special attention to breast myopathies. Poult Sci, 97, 1832-1840.
  12. Cengiz Ö, Köksal BH, Tatlı O, et al (2015): Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult Sci, 94, 2395-2403.
  13. Cengiz Ö, Köksal BH, Tatlı O, et al (2018): Supplemental boric acid does not prevent the development of footpad dermatitis in broilers subjected to high stocking density. Poult Sci, 97, 4342-4350.
  14. Choct M, Naylor AJ, Reinke N (2004): Selenium supplementation affects broiler growth performance, meat yield and feather coverage. Br Poult Sci, 45, 677-683.
  15. Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Branton SL, et al (2005): Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poult Sci, 84, 1332-1338.
  16. Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Purswell JL, et al (2006): Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poult Sci, 85, 344–351.
  17. Edens EW, Parkhurst CR, Havenstein GB (2000): Housing and selenium influences on feathering in broilers. J Appl Poult Res, 10, 128-134.
  18. El-Deep MH, Ijiri D, Ebeid TA, et al (2016): Effects of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on growth performance, antioxidative status, and immunity in broiler chickens under thermoneutral and high ambient temperature conditions. J Poult Sci, 53, 274-283.
  19. Estevez I (2007): Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits? Poult Sci, 86, 1265-1272.
  20. Feddes JJ, Emmanuel EJ, Zuidhoft MJ (2002): Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult Sci, 81, 774–779.
  21. Gangadoo S, Stanley D, Hughes RJ, et al (2016): Nanoparticles in feed: progress and prospects in poultry research. Trends Food Sci Tech, 58, 115-126.
  22. Honikel KO (1998): Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci, 49, 447-457.
  23. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM (2005): Mechanism of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci, 71, 194-204.
  24. Joo ST (2018): Determination of water-holding capacity of porcine musculature based on released water method using optimal load. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour, 38, 823-828.
  25. Lai PW, Liang JB, Hsia LC, et al (2010): Effects of varying dietary zinc levels and environmental temperatures on the growth performance, feathering score and feather mineral concentrations of broiler chicks. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 23, 937-945.
  26. Leeson S, Walsh T (2004): Feathering in commercial poultry II Factors influencing feather growth and feather loss. Worlds Poult Sci J, 60, 52-63.
  27. Liu S, Tan H, Wei S, et al (2015): Effect of selenium sources on growth performance and tissue selenium retention in yellow broiler chicks. J Appl Anim Res, 43, 487-490.
  28. Madilindi MA, Mokobane A, Letwaba PB, et al (2018): Effects of sex and stocking density on the performance of broiler chickens in a sub-tropical environment. S Afr J Anim Sci, 48, 459-468.
  29. Mohammadi A, Ghazanfari S, Sharifi SD (2019): Comparative effects of dietary organic, inorganic, and nano-selenium complexes and rosemary essential oil on performance, meat quality and selenium deposition in muscles of broiler chickens. Livest Sci, 226, 21-30.
  30. Moreira J, Mendes AA, Garcia RG, et al (2006): Effect of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler performance. Rev Bras Cienc Avic, 8, 15-22.
  31. Patria CA, Afnan R, Arief II (2016): Physical and microbiological qualities of kampong-broiler crossbred chickens meat raised in different stocking densities. Media Peternakan, 39, 141-147.
  32. Ravindran V, Elliot S (2017): Influence of slenium source on the performnace, feathering and meat quality of broilers. JAAN, 5, 1-8.
  33. Sauter EA, Petersen CF, Steele EE, et al (1981): The airborne microflora of poultry houses. Poult Sci, 60, 569-574.
  34. Selim NA, Radwan NL, Youssef SF, et al (2015): Effect of inclusion inorganic, organic or nano selenium forms in broiler diets on: 1-growth performance, carcass and meat characteristics.Int J Poult Sci, 14, 135-143.
  35. Skrbic Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukic M (2009): Stocking density-factor of production performance, quality and broiler welfare. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 25, 359-372.
  36. Skrbic Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukic M, et al (2009): The effect of stocking density on certain broiler welfare parameters. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 25, 11-21.
  37. Skrbic Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukic M, et al (2011): The effect of stocking density on individual broiler welfare parameters: 2. Different broiler stocking densities. Biotechnol Anim Husb, 27, 17-24.
  38. Suchy P, Strakova E, Herzig I (2014): Selenium in poultry nutrition: a review. Czech J Anim Sci, 59, 495-503.
  39. Surai PF (2018): Selenium in Poultry Nutrition and Health. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
  40. Swain PS, Rajendran D, Rao SBN, et al (2015): Preparation and effects of nano mineral particle feeding in livestock: a review. Vet World, 8, 888-891.
  41. Tong HB, Lu J, Zou JM, et al (2012): Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass yield, and immune status of a local chicken breed. Poult Sci, 91, 667–673.
  42. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74, 3583-3597.