Journals / Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Intramedullary Screw and Plate-Screw Fixation in Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fractures: A Comparative Study

Ekstraartiküler Metakarp Kırıklarında İntramedüller Vida ile Plak-Vida Kombinasyonunun Klinik ve Radyolojik Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Ali Said Nazlıgül(Sincan Training and Research Hospital)0000-0003-3451-3691
Nuri Koray Ülgen(Sincan Training and Research Hospital)0000-0003-0301-3432
Nihat Yiğit(Sincan Training and Research Hospital)0009-0002-8670-5484
Şahan Güven(Bilkent City Hospital)0000-0001-5174-7970
Mehmet Orçun Akkurt(Sincan Training and Research Hospital)0000-0003-4935-0143
Pages
520–528
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Fracture Fixation; Hand Injuries; Metacarpal Bones

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of intramedullary headless compression screw fixation and plate-screw fixation in metacarpal shaft and neck fractures, and to evaluate the effectiveness of both treatment methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods Fifty-three patients (aged 18–65) treated between June 2023 and June 2025 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Fracture Fixation; Hand Injuries; Metacarpal Bones
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:El Yaralanmaları · Metakarp Kırıkları · Kırık Fiksasyonu

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of intramedullary headless compression screw fixation and plate-screw fixation in metacarpal shaft and neck fractures, and to evaluate the effectiveness of both treatment methods. Methods Fifty-three patients (aged 18–65) treated between June 2023 and June 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a minimum of 6 months follow-up who were treated with either an intramedullary (IM) headless compression screw or plate-screw (PS) fixation were included in the study. Demographic data, the affected metacarpal, QuickDASH scores, grip strength, total active motion (TAM), time to return to work, time to union, and postoperative complications were recorded. Statistical significance was set at p 0.05). The IM group demonstrated significantly lower QuickDASH scores (p=0.029), higher grip strength (p=0.025), and greater TAM (p 0.05). Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that IM screw fixation may provide better functional outcomes, along with shorter times to return to work and fracture union, compared with plate-screw fixation for extra-articular metacarpal fractures. Its minimally invasive nature and comparable safety profile make it an effective treatment option for appropriately selected patients. Keywords: Fracture Fixation; Hand Injuries; Metacarpal Bones

Özet

Özet Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı, metakarp şaft ve boyun kırıklarında intramedüller başsız kompresyon vidası fiksasyonu ile plak-vida fiksasyonunun klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarını karşılaştırmak ve her iki tedavi yönteminin etkinliğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Haziran 2023 ile Haziran 2025 tarihleri arasında tedavi edilen 18-65 yaş arası 53 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Çalışmaya, intramedüller (IM) başsız kompresyon vidası veya plak-vida (PS) fiksasyonu ile tedavi edilen ve en az 6 aylık klinik ve radyolojik takibi olan hastalar dahil edildi. Demografik veriler, etkilenen metakarp, QuickDASH skorları, kavrama gücü, toplam aktif hareket (TAM), işe dönüş süresi, kaynama süresi ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. İstatistiksel anlamlılık düzeyi p 0.05). IM grubu, anlamlı derecede daha düşük QuickDASH skorları (p=0.029), daha yüksek kavrama gücü (p=0.025) ve daha fazla TAM (p 0.05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bulguları, ekstra-artiküler metakarp kırıklarında IM vida fiksasyonunun, plak-vida fiksasyonuna kıyasla daha iyi fonksiyonel sonuçlar sağlamanın yanı sıra işe dönüş ve kırık kaynaması sürelerini kısalttığını düşündürmektedir. Minimal invaziv doğası ve benzer güvenlik profili ile IM fiksasyon, uygun şekilde seçilmiş hastalar için etkili bir tedavi seçeneği olarak değerlendirilebilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kırık Tespiti; El Yaralanmaları; Metakarp Kemikleri

🔖

Cite This Article

Nazlıgül, A. S., Ülgen, N. K., Yiğit, N., Erdoğan, Y., Güven, Ş., Akkurt, M. O. (2026). Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Intramedullary Screw and Plate-Screw Fixation in Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fractures: A Comparative Study. Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 520–528. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1944513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. MacDermid JC, McClure JA, Richard L, Faber KJ, Jaglal S. Fracture profiles of a 4-year cohort of 266,324 first incident upper extremity fractures from population health data in Ontario. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):996. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04849-7
  2. Ülgen NK, Nazlıgül AS, Yiğit N, Erginoglu SE, Akkurt MO. Epidemiologic Patterns of Musculoskeletal Disorders by Body Region Across 1.2 Million Orthopedic Visits: A 15-Year Experience From a Middle-Income Country. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025;31(5):e70230. doi:10.1111/jep.70230
  3. Deuschl J, Alfort H, Wilcke M. The Epidemiology of Metacarpal Fractures: A Descriptive Study Based on 18,802 Fractures From the Swedish Fracture Register. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025;7(4):100725. doi:10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.015
  4. Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, Wolf JM. Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population. Hand (N Y). 2012;7(4):426-430. doi:10.1007/s11552-012-9442-0
  5. Kollitz KM, Hammert WC, Vedder NB, Huang JI. Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand (N Y). 2014;9(1):16-23. doi:10.1007/s11552-013-9562-1
  6. Bezirgan U, Acar E, Ülgen N, Dursun Savran M, Armangil M. Comparison of plaster cast and open reduction internal fixation in delayed fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(2):315-324. doi:10.52312/jdrs.2023.851
  7. Jiang Z, Huang D, Cui J, Liu B. Current Opinions on the Management of Non Thumb Metacarpal Fractures. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021;26(1):1-9. doi:10.1142/S2424835521400014
  8. Lundquist KF, Jodoin ZN, McDonald CD, Bethiel J, Rose R. Comparing Fixation Techniques in Metacarpal Fractures: Intramedullary Screw Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation With Plate and Screw Construct. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025;33(24):1388-1393. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00241
  9. Carreño A, Ansari MT, Malhotra R. Management of metacarpal fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(4):554-561. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.043
  10. Gehring MB, Wolfe B, Kahan R, et al. Intramedullary Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Outcomes Study. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025;7(1):48-55. doi:10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.08.020
  11. Hui C, Watzig B, Nicholson L, Hustedt JW. Cartilage Defect Articulation With the Proximal Phalanx After Retrograde Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures: A Cadaveric Study. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2026;8(1):100847. doi:10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100847
  12. Fusetti C, Meyer H, Borisch N, Stern R, Santa DD, Papaloïzos M. Complications of plate fixation in metacarpal fractures. J Trauma. 2002;52(3):535-539. doi:10.1097/00005373-200203000-00019
  13. Burnikel A, Faucher G. Treatment of Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures: Intramedullary Screw Technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025;15(4). doi:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00032
  14. Kamath JB, Harshvardhan, Naik DM, Bansal A. Current concepts in managing fractures of metacarpal and phalanges. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44(2):203-211. doi:10.4103/0970-0358.85341
  15. Kozin SH, Thoder JJ, Lieberman G. Operative treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(2):111-121. doi:10.5435/00124635-200003000-00005
  16. DelPrete CR, Chao J, Varghese BB, Greenberg P, Iyer H, Shah A. Comparison of Intramedullary Screw Fixation, Plating, and K-Wires for Metacarpal Fracture Fixation: A Meta-Analysis. Hand (N Y). 2025;20(5):691-700. doi:10.1177/15589447241232094
  17. Beck CM, Horesh E, Taub PJ. Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures Results in Excellent Functional Outcomes: A Literature Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(4):1111-1118. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005478
  18. Ruchelsman DE, Puri S, Feinberg-Zadek N, Leibman MI, Belsky MR. Clinical outcomes of limited-open retrograde intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(12):2390-2395. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.016
  19. Eisenberg G, Clain JB, Feinberg-Zadek N, Leibman M, Belsky M, Ruchelsman DE. Clinical Outcomes of Limited Open Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures in 91 Consecutive Patients. Hand (N Y). 2020;15(6):793-797. doi:10.1177/1558944719836235
  20. del Piñal F, Moraleda E, Rúas JS, de Piero GH, Cerezal L. Minimally invasive fixation of fractures of the phalanges and metacarpals with intramedullary cannulated headless compression screws. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(4):692-700. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.023
  21. Page SM, Stern PJ. Complications and range of motion following plate fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(5):827-832. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80157-3
  22. Baumgartner RE, Federer AE, Guerrero EM, Mithani SK, Ruch DS, Richard MJ. Complications of Low-Profile Plate Fixation in Metacarpal Fractures. Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e91-e94. doi:10.3928/01477447-20200925-02
  23. ten Berg PW, Mudgal CS, Leibman MI, Belsky MR, Ruchelsman DE. Quantitative 3-dimensional CT analyses of intramedullary headless screw fixation for metacarpal neck fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(2):322-330.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.029
  24. Bachoura A, Gaspar M, Kane P, Bernstein D, Rekant MS, Osterman AL. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Metacarpal Head Articular Defects Created by Headless Screws. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(11):684-689. doi:10.22038/abjs.2023.69368.3265