Journals / Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Transgenic Forest Trees

Transgenik Orman Ağaçları

Pages
232–240
Publication Date
2012-02-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This together with applications, positive and negative effects of transgenic trees to the environment is discussed and it was tried to be provided on the auditing legal regulations concerned with these studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biotechnological methods are used in many areas nowadays and one of these areas is applications of biotechnology in forest trees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Biotechnological methods are used frequently on vital issues such as gaining resistance against diseases and herbicide of forest trees, increasing tree growth rates and development of resistance against environmental stresses (drought, salinity, climate change etc.).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This together with applications, positive and negative effects of transgenic trees to the environment is discussed and it was tried to be provided on the auditing legal regulations concerned with these studies.
🔬Design:Teknik Not
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyoteknoloji · GDO · transgenik ağaç

Abstract

Biotechnological methods are used in many areas nowadays and one of these areas is applications of biotechnology in forest trees. Biotechnological methods are used frequently on vital issues such as gaining resistance against diseases and herbicide of forest trees, increasing tree growth rates and development of resistance against environmental stresses (drought, salinity, climate change etc.). Also, for improving the quality of wood that reducing lignin content and increasing the amount of cellulose draws attention. This together with applications, positive and negative effects of transgenic trees to the environment is discussed and it was tried to be provided on the auditing legal regulations concerned with these studies.

Özet

Biyoteknolojik yöntemler günümüzde pek çok alanda kullanılmaktadır ve bu alanlardan biride orman ağaçlarındaki biyoteknoloji uygulamalarıdır. Orman ağaçlarının hastalıklara ve herbisitlere karşı direnç kazanması, ağaç büyüme hızlarının artırılması ve çevresel streslere (kuraklık, tuzluluk, iklim değişikliği vb.) karşı dirençlerinin geliştirilmesi gibi hayati konularda biyoteknolojik yöntemler sıkça kullanılmaktadır. Ayrıca, odun kalitesinin artırılmasına yönelik lignin içeriklerinin azaltılması ve selüloz miktarının artırılmasıyla ilgili çalışmalarda dikkat çekmektedir. Bu uygulamalarla birlikte, transgenik ağaçların çevreye pozitif ve negatif etkileri tartışılmakta ve bu çalışmalarla ilgili yasal düzenlemeler yapılarak denetim sağlanmaya çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Filiz, E., Çiçek, E., Kulaç, Ş. (2012). Transgenic Forest Trees. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 232–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/1367873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Balocchi C, Valenzuela S (2004) Introduction to GMOs and Biosafety in Forestry. In: Proceedings of the Forestry Biotechnology Workshop, Global Forum, (2–5 March, Concepción, Chile)
  2. Bishop-Hurley SL, Zabkievicz RJ, Grace LJ, Gardner RC, Walter C (2001) Conifer genetic engineering: transgenic Pinus radiata (D Don) and Picea abies (Karst) plants are resistant to the herbicide Buster. Plant Cell Rep 20:235–243
  3. Bittsanszky A. et al. (2005) Ability of transgenic poplars with elevated S glutathione content to tolerate zinc(2+) stress. Environ. Int. 31:251–254
  4. Boerjan W (2005) Biotechnology and the domestication of forest trees. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16:159–166 Brown JR (2003) Ancient horizontal gene transfer. Nature Reviews Genetics 4(2):121–132
  5. Burley J (2001) Genetics in sustainable forestry: the challenges for forest genetics and tree breeding in the new millennium. Canadian Journal of Forest Research Vol. 31 no. 4:561–565
  6. Coleman HD, Canam T, Kang KY, Ellis DD, Mansield SD (2007) Overexpression of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in hybrid poplar affects carbon allocation. Journal of Experimental Botany 58:4257–4268
  7. Confalonieri M, Belenghi B, Balestrazzi A, Negri S, Facciotto G, Schenone G, Delledonne M (2000) Transformation of elite white poplar (Populus alba L.) cv. ‘Villafranca’ and evaluation of herbicide resistance. Plant Cell Reports 10:978–982
  8. Dgany O. et al. (2004) The structural basis of the thermostability of SP1, a novel plant (Populus tremula) boiling stable protein. J. Biol. Chem. 279:51516–51523
  9. Ellis DD, McCabe DE, McInnis S, Ramachandran R, Russell DR, Wallace KM, Martinell BJ, Roberts DR, Raffa KF, McCown BH (1993) Stable transformation of Picea glauca by particle acceleration. Bio-Technology 11:84–89
  10. FAO (2004) Preliminary review of biotechnology in forestry including genetic modifications, Rome, Italy.
  11. FAO (2010) Forests and Genetically Modified Trees, Rome, Italy
  12. Farnum P, Lucier A, Meilan R (2007) Ecological and population genetics research imperatives for transgenic trees. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3(2):119-133
  13. Fu J, Sampalo R, Gallardo F, Canovas FM, Kirby EG (2003) Assembly of a cytosolic pine glutamine synthetase holoenzyme in leaves of transgenic poplar leads to enhanced vegetative growth in young plants. Plant Cell & Environment 26:411–418
  14. Genissel A, Leple JC, Millet N, Augustin S, Jouanin L, Pilate G (2003) High tolerance against Chrysomela tremulae of transgenic poplar plants expressing a synthetic cry3Aa gene from Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebrionis. Molecular Breeding 1:103–110
  15. Gleeson D, Lelu-Walter MA and Parkinson M (2005) Overproduction of proline in transgenic hybrid larch (Larix × leptoeuropaea (Dengler)) cultures renders them tolerant to cold, salt and frost. Molecular Breeding 15:21–29
  16. Grace LJ, Charity JA, Gresham B, Kay N, Walter C (2005) Insect-resistant transgenic Pinus radiata. Plant Cell Reports 24:103–111
  17. Gray-Mitsumune M, Blomquist K, McQueen-Mason S, Teeri TT, Sundberg B, Mellerowicz EJ (2007) Ectopic expression of a wood-abundant expansion PttEXPA1 promotes cell expansion in primary and secondary tissues in aspen. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6:62–72
  18. Guo XH (2009) A ThCAP gene from Tamarix hispida confers cold tolerance in transgenic Populus (P. davidiana X P. bolleana). Biotechnol. Lett. 31, 1079–1087
  19. Halpin C, Thain SC, Tilston EL, Guiney E, Lapierre C, and Hopkins DW (2007) Ecological impacts of trees with modified lignin. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3(2):101-110
  20. Harfouche A, Meilan R, Altman A (2011) Tree genetic engineering and applications to sustainable forestry and biomass production. Trends in Biotechnology Vol. 29:46-52
  21. Henderson AR, Walter C (2006) Genetic engineering in conifer plantation forestry. Silvae Genetica 55(6):253–262
  22. Hu L, Lu H, Liu Q, Chen X, Jiang X (2005) Overexpression of mtlD gene in transgenic Populus tomentosa improves salt tolerance through accumulation of mannitol. Tree Physiology 25:1273–1281
  23. Jia Z (2010) The chitinase gene (Bbchit1) from Beauveria bassiana enhances resistance to Cytospora chrysosperma in Populus tomentosa Carr. Biotechnol. Lett. 32:1325–1332
  24. Jing ZP, Gallardo F, Pascual MB, Sampalo R, Romero J, de Navarra AT, Canovas FM (2004) Improved growth in a yield trial of transgenic hybrid poplar overexpressing glutamine synthetase. New Phytologist 164:137–145
  25. Leple JC (2007) Downregulation of cinnamoyl-coenzyme A reductase in poplar: multiple-level phenotyping reveals effects on cell wall polymer metabolism and structure. ThePlant Cell 19:3669–3691
  26. Li J, Meilan R, Ma C, Barish M, Strauss SH (2008) Stability of herbicide resistance over 8 years of coppice in ield-grown, genetically engineered poplars. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 23(2):89–93
  27. Li L, Zhou Y, Cheng X, Sun J, Marita J, M, Ralph J, Chiang VL (2003) Combinatorial modification of multiple lignin traits in trees through multigene cotransformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 4939–4944
  28. Liu FH, Sun ZX, Cui DC, Du BX, Wang CR, Chen SY (2000) Cloning of E. coli mtl-D genes and its expression in transgenic Balizhuangyang (Populus) (in Chinese with an English abstract). Acta Genetica Sinica 27:428−433
  29. Meilan R, Ma C, Cheng S, Eaton JA, Miller LK, Crockett RP, DiFazio SP, Strauss SH (2000) High levels of Roundup® and leaf-beetle resistance in genetically engineered hybrid cottonwoods. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Bulletin MISC0272 Pullman Washington, USA 29–38
  30. Meng L, Li HS, Jin DM, Cui DC, Wang B (2004) Transformation of Populus deltoids with CH5B gene. Biotechnology Bulletin 3:48–51
  31. Mentag R, Luckevich M, Morency MJ, Seguin A (2003) Bacterial disease resistance of transgenic hybrid poplar expressing the synthetic antimicrobial peptide D4E1. Tree Physiology 23:405–411
  32. Merkle SA, Nairn CJ (2005) Hardwood tree biotechnology. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 41:602–619
  33. Mohamed R, Meilan R, Ostry ME, Michler CS, Strauss SH (2001) Bacterio-opsin gene overexpression fails to elevate fungal disease resistance in transgenic poplar (Populus). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31:1–8
  34. Mullin TJ, Bertrand S (1998) Environmental release of transgenic trees in Canada -Potential benefits and assessment of biosafety. The Forestry Chronicle 74(2):203–219
  35. O'Callaghan M, Glare TR, Gurgess E, Malone LA (2005) Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms. Annual Review of Entomology 50:271-292
  36. Park YW, Baba K, Furuta Y, Iida I, Sameshima K, Arai M, Hayashi T (2004) Enhancement of growth and cellulose accumulation by overexpression of xyloglucanase in poplar. FEBS Letters 564:183–187
  37. Pascual MB, Jing ZP, Kirby EG, Canovas FM, Gallardo F (2008) Response of transgenic poplar overexpressing cytosolic glutamine synthetase to phosphinothricin. Phytochemistry 69(2):382–389
  38. Pilate G, Guiney E, Holt K, Petit-Conil M, Lapierre C, Leplé J.-C, Pollet B, Mila I, Webster EA, Marstorp HG, Hopkins DW, Jouanin L, Boerjan W, Schuch W, Cornu DC (2002) Field and pulping performances of transgenic trees with altered lignifications. Nature Biotechnology 20:607–612
  39. Polin LD (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of American chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 84: 69–78
  40. Shani Z, Dekel M, Tsabary G, Goren R, Shoseyov O (2004) Growth enhancement of transgenic poplar plants by overexpression of Arabidopsis thaliana endo-1,4-b-glucanase (cel1). Molecular Breeding 14:321–330
  41. Tang W, Newton RJ, Li C, Charles TM (2007) Enhanced stress tolerance in transgenic pine expressing the pepper CaPF1 gene is associated with the polyamine biosynthesis. Plant Cell Reports 26:115–124
  42. Tournier V, Grat S, Marque C, El Kayal W, Penchel R, de Andrade G, Boudet AM, Teulières C (2003) An efficient procedure to stably introduce genes into an economically important pulp tree (Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla). Transgenic Research12:403–411
  43. Trontin JF, Walter C, Klimaszewska K, Park YS, Walter MA (2007) Recent progress in genetic transformation of four Pinus spp. Transgenic Plant Journal 1(2):314–329
  44. Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr & Gray). Science 313(5793):1596–1604
  45. Valenzuela S ve Strauss S (2005) Lost in the woods. Nature Biotechnology vol. 23:531-532
  46. Van Frankenhuyzen K, Beardmore T (2004) Current status and environmental impact of transgenic forest trees, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34:1163-1180
  47. Volenberg DS, Stoltenberg DE, Boerboom CM (2001) Biochemical mechanism and inheritance of cross-resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors in giant foxtail. Weed Science 49:635–641
  48. Wadenback J, von Arnold S, Egertsdotter U, Walter M, Grima-Pettenati J, Goffner D, Gellerstedt G, Gullion T, Clapham D (2008) Lignin biosynthesis in transgenic Norway spruce plants harboring an antisense construct for cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR). Transgenic Research 17(3):379–392
  49. Yu X, Kikuchi A (2009) Establishment of the evaluation system of salt tolerance on transgenic woody plants in the special netted-house. Plant Biotechnol. 26:135–141
  50. Zhang BY, Su XH, Li YL, Huang QJ, Zhang XH, Zhang L (2006) Regeneration of vgn-transgenic poplar (Populus alba × P. glandulosa) and the primary observation of growth. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 3:59–64