SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1

Modeling of the distribution of Purple-flowered Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum L.) under the current and future climate conditions

Mor Çiçekli Ormangülünün (Rhododendron ponticum L.) günümüz ve gelecekteki iklim koşullarına göre yayılış alanlarının modellenmesi

Ömer K. Örücü(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2162-7553
Derya Gülçin(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7118-0174
İrem Özçifçi(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7095-012X
E. Seda Arslan(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1592-5180
Pages
26–41
Publication Date
2021-05-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, this study suggested using produced knowledge and transforming them from theory to practice for underpinning sustainable landscape management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to model the present and future potential distribution of Rhododendron ponticum L. species according to diverse climate scenarios using maximum entropy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first stage, we determined variables of the climate models and focused on 19 bioclimatic variables (in 2.5 minute, or approximately 20 km2, spatial resolution in Wordclim version 2.1) obtained for presence data from sample points.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, this study suggested using produced knowledge and transforming them from theory to practice for underpinning sustainable landscape management.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2041-2060 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rhododendron ponticum L. · CNRM-1 · tür dağılım modeli

Abstract

This study aims to model the present and future potential distribution of Rhododendron ponticum L. species according to diverse climate scenarios using maximum entropy. Carried out in two stages, the present study utilized presence data representing natural distribution of R. ponticum L. species in Turkey, Georgia, and Russia. In the first stage, we determined variables of the climate models and focused on 19 bioclimatic variables (in 2.5 minute, or approximately 20 km2, spatial resolution in Wordclim version 2.1) obtained for presence data from sample points. In order to prevent from high correlation and multi-collinearity, bioclimatic variables were reduced to 8 variables by performing Pearson correlation analysis. In the second stage, CNRM-CM6-1 climate change model, which is one of the CMIP6 models, was used to determine how the distribution areas of the species will be affected by climate change. Within this scope, the potential distribution areas of the species under the SSP2 4.5 and SSP5 8.5 scenarios in the periods 2041-2060 and 2081-2100 were modelled by means of the MaxEnt 3.4.1 software. Furthermore, spatial differences between the present and future potential distribution of the species were assessed by change analysis. In conclusion, this study suggested using produced knowledge and transforming them from theory to practice for underpinning sustainable landscape management.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı mor çiçekli orman gülü Rhodendron ponticum L. 'nin maximum entropi algoritması kullanılarak günümüz ve gelecek potansiyel yayılış alanlarının iklim senaryolarına göre modellenmesidir. İki aşamalı olarak yürütülen bu çalışmanın birinci aşamasında R. ponticum L.’nin çalışma alanı (Türkiye, Gürcistan ve Rusya sınırları) içerisindeki yayılışını temsil eden örnek noktalara ait (presence data) veriler ve biyoklimatik değişkenler kullanılmıştır. Yüksek korelasyonu ve çoklu doğrusallığı önlemek amacıyla, Worldclim 2.1 versiyonu 2.5 dakika (yaklaşık 20 km2) konumsal çözünürlükteki 19 biyoklimatik değişken Pearson Korelasyon analizi yapılarak 8 değişkene indirgenmiştir. İkinci aşamada ise türün yayılış alanlarının iklim değişiminden nasıl etkileneceğini belirlemek için CMIP6 modellerinden olan CNRM-CM6-1 iklim değişikliği modeli kullanılmış, SSP2 4.5 ve SSP5 8.5’e senaryolarına göre 2041-2060 ve 2081-2100 periyotlarına ait potansiyel yayılış alanı MaxEnt 3.4.1 programı kullanılarak modellenmiştir. Ayrıca, tür için tahmin edilen günümüz ve gelecekteki potansiyel yayılış alanları arasındaki alansal ve konumsal farklar, değişim analizi ile ortaya konulmuştur. Sonuçta, R. ponticum L.’nin potansiyel yayılış alanlarına göre üretilen bilginin teoriden pratiğe dönüşmesindeki temel faydalar sürdürülebilir peyzaj yönetimi kapsamında tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Örücü, Ö. K., Gülçin, D., Özçifçi, İ., Arslan, E. S. (2021). Modeling of the distribution of Purple-flowered Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum L.) under the current and future climate conditions. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.834174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (72)

  1. Abdelaal M, Fois M, Fenu G, Bacchetta G (2019) Using MaxEnt modeling to predict the potential distribution of the endemic plant Rosa arabica Crép. in Egypt. Ecological Informatics 50:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.01.003
  2. Akkemik Ü (2014) Türkiye’nin doğal-egzotik ağaç ve çalıları I. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara
  3. Akyol A, Orucu OK, Arslan ES (2020) Habitat suitability mapping of stone pine (Pinus pineaL.) under the effects of climate change. Biologia
  4. Arslan ES, Akyol A, Örücü ÖK, Sarıkaya AG (2020) Distribution of rose hip (Rosa canina L.) under current and future climate conditions. Reg Environ Change 20:107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01695-6
  5. Austin M (2007) Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005
  6. BIYOD (2020) BİYOD - Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Odun DIşı Orman Ürünleri Veri Tabanı. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara
  7. Bouchard M, Aquilué N, Périé C, Lambert M-C (2019) Tree species persistence under warming conditions: A key driver of forest response to climate change. Forest Ecology and Management 442:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.040
  8. Cao B, Bai CK, Zhang LL, et al (2016) Modeling habitat distribution of Cornus officinalis with Maxent modeling and fuzzy logics in China. J Plant Ecol 9:742–751. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw009
  9. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, et al (2011) Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming. Science 333:1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206432
  10. Çoban HO, Örücü ÖK, Arslan ES (2020) MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Current and Future Potential Geographical Distribution of Quercus libani Olivier. Sustainability 12:2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072671
  11. Dagnino D, Guerrina M, Minuto L, et al (2020) Climate change and the future of endemic flora in the South Western Alps: relationships between niche properties and extinction risk. Reg Environ Change 20:121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01708-4
  12. Dai J, Roberts DA, Stow DA, et al (2020) Mapping understory invasive plant species with field and remotely sensed data in Chitwan, Nepal. Remote Sensing of Environment 250:112037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112037
  13. Davis PH (1965) Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands - I. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
  14. Dawson TP, Jackson ST, House JI, et al (2011) Beyond Predictions: Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing Climate. Science 332:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303
  15. Dimobe K, Ouédraogo A, Ouédraogo K, et al (2020) Climate change reduces the distribution area of the shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa CF Gaertn.) in Burkina Faso. Journal of Arid Environments 181:104237
  16. Djalante R (2019) Key assessments from the IPCC special report on global warming of 1.5 °C and the implications for the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science 1:100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100001
  17. Dyderski MK, Paź S, Frelich LE, Jagodziński AM (2018) How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Global Change Biology 24:1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13925
  18. Ehrlén J, Morris WF (2015) Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change. Ecology Letters 18:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12410
  19. Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual review of ecology, evolution, systematics 40:677–697
  20. Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl GA, et al (2016) Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development 9:1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
  21. Fei S, Desprez JM, Potter KM, et al (2017) Divergence of species responses to climate change. Science Advances 3:e1603055. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603055
  22. Ferrarini A, Alsafran MHSA, Dai J, Alatalo JM (2019) Improving niche projections of plant species under climate change: Silene acaulis on the British Isles as a case study. Clim Dyn 52:1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4200-9
  23. Fortunel C, Paine CET, Fine PVA, et al (2014) Environmental factors predict community functional composition in Amazonian forests. Journal of Ecology 102:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12160
  24. Garcia K, Lasco R, Ines A, et al (2013) Predicting geographic distribution and habitat suitability due to climate change of selected threatened forest tree species in the Philippines. Applied Geography 44:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.005
  25. Garzón MB, Robson TM, Hampe A (2019) ΔTraitSDMs: species distribution models that account for local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. New Phytologist 222:1757–1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15716
  26. Gassó N, Thuiller W, Pino J, Vilà M (2012) Potential Distribution Range of Invasive Plant Species in Spain. NeoBiota 12:25
  27. GBIF (2020) Rhododendron ponticum L. in GBIF Secretariat (2019). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei accessed via GBIF.org on 2020-12-01
  28. Hausfather Z (2019) CMIP6: the next generation of climate models explained. In: Carbon Brief. https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained. Accessed 8 Oct 2020
  29. Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29:773–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x
  30. Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons
  31. iNaturalist (2020a) Gözlemci Grzegorz Grzejszczak Tarih: Mayıs 31, 2016 12:11 PM HST Yer: Adżaria, Gruzja (Google, OSM). In: iNaturalist. https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/15547467. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
  32. iNaturalist (2020b) Gözlemci Grzegorz Grzejszczak Tarih: Mayıs 31, 2016 12:11 PM HST Yer: Adżaria, Gruzja (Google, OSM). In: iNaturalist. https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/15546233. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
  33. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland
  34. Kaky E, Nolan V, Alatawi A, Gilbert F (2020) A comparison between Ensemble and MaxEnt species distribution modelling approaches for conservation: A case study with Egyptian medicinal plants. Ecological Informatics 60:101150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101150
  35. Kim J, Lee DK, Kim HG (2020) Suitable trees for urban landscapes in the Republic of Korea under climate change. Landscape and Urban Planning 204:103937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103937
  36. Kramer-Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD, et al (2013) The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Divers Distrib 19:1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12096
  37. Kumar P (2012) Assessment of impact of climate change on Rhododendrons in Sikkim Himalayas using Maxent modelling: limitations and challenges. Biodivers Conserv 21:1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0279-1
  38. Li G, Huang J, Guo H, Du S (2020) Projecting species loss and turnover under climate change for 111 Chinese tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 477:118488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118488
  39. Manzoor SA, Griffiths G, Iizuka K, Lukac M (2018) Land Cover and Climate Change May Limit Invasiveness of Rhododendron ponticum in Wales. Front Plant Sci 9:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00664
  40. Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA (2013) A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36:1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
  41. Moukrim S, Lahssini S, Rhazi M, et al (2019) Climate change impacts on potential distribution of multipurpose agro-forestry species: Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels as case study. Agroforest Syst 93:1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0232-8
  42. Nascimbene J, Benesperi R, Casazza G, et al (2020) Range shifts of native and invasive trees exacerbate the impact of climate change on epiphyte distribution: The case of lung lichen and black locust in Italy. Science of the Total Environment 735:139537
  43. Norberg A, Abrego N, Blanchet FG, et al (2019) A comprehensive evaluation of predictive performance of 33 species distribution models at species and community levels. Ecological Monographs 89:e01370. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1370
  44. Oliver TH, Smithers RJ, Beale CM, Watts K (2016) Are existing biodiversity conservation strategies appropriate in a changing climate? Biological Conservation 193:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.024
  45. Örücü ÖK (2019) Phoenix theophrasti Gr.’nin iklim değişimine bağlı günümüz ve gelecekteki yayılış alanlarının MaxEnt Modeli ile tahmini ve bitkisel tasarımda kullanımı. Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi 20:274–283. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.613205
  46. Özbucak TB, Türkiş S, Çakmak A (2009) Ordu çevresinde yayılış gösteren bazı Rhododendron türleri üzerine ekolojik bir çalışma. Research Journal of Biology Sciences 2:71–77
  47. Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Townsend Peterson A %J J of biogeography (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. 34:102–117
  48. Peterson ML, Doak DF, Morris WF (2019) Incorporating local adaptation into forecasts of species’ distribution and abundance under climate change. Global Change Biology 25:775–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14562
  49. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE %J E modelling (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. 190:231–259
  50. Phillips SJ, Elith J (2010) POC plots: calibrating species distribution models with presence‐only data. Ecology 91:2476–2484
  51. Qin AL, Liu B, Guo QS, et al (2017) Maxent modeling for predicting impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of Thuja sutchuenensis Franch., an extremely endangered conifer from southwestern China. Glob Ecol Conserv 10:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.02.004
  52. Reside AE, Critchell K, Crayn DM, et al (2019) Beyond the model: expert knowledge improves predictions of species’ fates under climate change. Ecological Applications 29:e01824. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1824
  53. Rogers BM, Jantz P, Goetz SJ (2017) Vulnerability of eastern US tree species to climate change. Global Change Biology 23:3302–3320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13585
  54. Rojas Briceño NB, Cotrina Sánchez DA, Barboza Castillo E, et al (2020) Current and Future Distribution of Five Timber Forest Species in Amazonas, Northeast Peru: Contributions towards a Restoration Strategy. Diversity 12:305. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12080305
  55. Romero GQ, Gonçalves-Souza T, Kratina P, et al (2018) Global predation pressure redistribution under future climate change. Nature Climate Change 8:1087–1091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0347-y
  56. Sarıkaya A, Örücü ÖK (2019) Prediction Of Potential And Future Distribution Areas Of Anatolian Chesnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) By Usıng Maximum Entropy (Maxent) Modeling Depending On Climate Change In Turkey. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES) 9:699–708
  57. Scheffers BR, Meester LD, Bridge TCL, et al (2016) The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354:. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7671
  58. Scheper J, Holzschuh A, Kuussaari M, et al (2013) Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss – a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 16:912–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12128
  59. Shcheglovitova M, Anderson RP (2013) Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling 269:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011
  60. Sillero N (2011) What does ecological modelling model? A proposed classification of ecological niche models based on their underlying methods. Ecological Modelling 222:1343–1346
  61. Simi E, Moreno PI, Villa‐Martínez R, et al (2017) Climate change and resilience of deciduous Nothofagus forests in central–east Chilean Patagonia over the last 3200 years. Journal of Quaternary Science 32:845–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2948
  62. Thapa A, Wu RD, Hu YB, et al (2018) Predicting the potential distribution of the endangered red panda across its entire range using MaxEnt modeling. Ecol Evol 8:10542–10554. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4526
  63. Timpane-Padgham BL, Beechie T, Klinger T (2017) A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration. PLOS ONE 12:e0173812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173812
  64. von Holle B, Yelenik S, Gornish ES (2020) Restoration at the landscape scale as a means of mitigation and adaptation to climate change. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 5:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-020-00056-7
  65. Walentowski H, Falk W, Mette T, et al (2017) Assessing future suitability of tree species under climate change by multiple methods: a case study in southern Germany. Annals of Forest Research 60:101-126–126. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2016.789
  66. Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1890/070037
  67. WorldClim (2020) Global climate and weather data — WorldClim. https://worldclim.org/data/index.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2020
  68. Yang J, Pedlar JH, McKenney DW, Weersink AJ (2015) The development of universal response functions to facilitate climate smart regeneration of black spruce and white pine in Ontario, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.001
  69. Yang XQ, Kushwaha SPS, Saran S, et al (2013) Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of medicinal plant, Justicia adhatoda L. in Lesser Himalayan foothills. Ecol Eng 51:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.004
  70. Yu F, Wang T, Groen TA, et al (2019) Climate and land use changes will degrade the distribution of Rhododendrons in China. Science of The Total Environment 659:515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.223
  71. Zhang T, Liu G (2017) Study of methods to improve the temporal transfer ability of niche model. Journal of China Agricultural University 22:98–105
  72. Zhao H, Zhang H, Xu C (2020) Study on Taiwania cryptomerioides under climate change: MaxEnt modeling for predicting the potential geographical distribution. Global Ecology and Conservation 24:e01313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01313