Journals / Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2

Investigation of Thermal Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of Gypsum Particleboard Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymers

Fiber Takviyeli Polimerlerle Güçlendirilmiş Alçılı Levhaların Isıl İletkenlik ve Mekanik Özelliklerinin Araştırılması

Halil Turgut Şahin(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5633-6505
Esen Çam(ISPARTA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9914-2097
Yasemin Şimşek Türker(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3080-0215
Şemsettin Kılınçarslan(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8253-9357
Pages
309–322
Publication Date
2025-10-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the material composition significantly affects these properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Engineering composites such as particleboard have widespread use in various fields, but low mechanical strength and sensitivity to environmental factors limit the performance of these materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results showed that the material composition significantly affects these properties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings show the positive effects of FRP on wood-reinforced gypsum boards boards and its high performance potential in the construction industry.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fiber takviyeli polimer · Yonga levha · Alçı

Abstract

Engineering composites such as particleboard have widespread use in various fields, but low mechanical strength and sensitivity to environmental factors limit the performance of these materials. In this study, mechanical and thermal properties such as thermal conductivity, density, flexural strength, and modulus of elasticity of wood-reinforced gypsum boards reference boards and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) applied wood-reinforced gypsum boards were investigated according to wood and bark ratios. The results showed that the material composition significantly affects these properties. Thermal conductivity increased with increasing wood ratio, while it decreased with increasing bark ratio. FRP application increased thermal conductivity in all samples and was found to be related to density. In terms of density, samples with high wood ratios were heavier and denser with FRP. While flexural strength decreased with increasing bark ratio, FRP application increased the flexural strength. These findings show the positive effects of FRP on wood-reinforced gypsum boards boards and its high performance potential in the construction industry.

Özet

Yonga levha gibi mühendislik kompozitleri çeşitli alanlarda yaygın kullanıma sahiptir, ancak düşük mekanik dayanım ve çevresel faktörlere karşı duyarlılıkları bu malzemelerin performansını sınırlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, alçı referans levhalar ve fiber takviyeli polimer (FRP) uygulanmış alçı levhaların ısıl iletkenlik, yoğunluk, eğilme dayanımı ve elastisite modülü gibi mekanik ve termal özellikleri odun ve kabuk oranlarına göre incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar, malzeme kompozisyonunun bu özellikleri önemli ölçüde etkilediğini göstermiştir. Isıl iletkenlik, odun oranı arttıkça artarken, kabuk oranı arttıkça azalır. FRP uygulaması, tüm numunelerde ısıl iletkenliği artırmış ve yoğunlukla ilişkili bulunmuştur. Yoğunluk açısından, odun oranı yüksek numuneler FRP ile daha ağır ve yoğun olmuştur. Eğilme dayanımı, kabuk oranı arttıkça azalırken, FRP uygulaması dayanımı artırmıştır. Bu bulgular, FRP'nin ahşap takviyeli alçılı levhalar üzerindeki olumlu etkilerini ve inşaat sektöründeki yüksek performans potansiyelini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, H. T., Çam, E., Türker, Y. Ş., Kılınçarslan, Ş. (2025). Investigation of Thermal Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of Gypsum Particleboard Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymers. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 309–322. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1628563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Ahmed A, Ugai K (2011) Environmental effects on durability of soil stabilized with recycled gypsum. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 66 (2-3): 84-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.12.004
  2. Akgül T, Apay A, Sarıbıyık M (2009) Investigation of the use of carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheets in the joints of wooden structures. In: 5th international advanced technologies symposium (IATS’09), Karabük, Turkey. pp 13–15.
  3. Akyürek S (2019) Investigation of the effect of heat treatment on the cell wall components and solubilities of larch (Pinus nigra J. F. var. seneriana) wood. Master’s Thesis, Kutahya Dumlupınar University Institute of Science and Technology, Kütahya.
  4. Al-Hokabi A, Hasan M, Amran M, Fediuk R, Vatin NI, Klyuev S (2021) Improving the early properties of treated soft kaolin clay with palm oil fuel ash and gypsum. Sustainability, 13 (19): 10910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910910
  5. Ameta NK, Purohit D, Wayal A, Sandeep D (2007) Economics of stabilizing bentonite soil with lime-gypsum. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 12 (1): 1-8.
  6. Ango TG, Börjeson L, Senbeta F, Hylander K (2014) Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers’ use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in Southwestern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society, 19(1):30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06279-190130
  7. Ango TG, Hylander K, Börjeson L (2020) Processes of forest cover change since 1958 in the coffee-producing areas of Southwest Ethiopia. Land, 9(8): 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land9080278
  8. As N, Goker Y, Dundar T (2006) Effect of knots on the physical and mechanical properties of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L). Wood Research, 51(3):51–58.
  9. ASTM C518‑21 (2021) American Society for Testing and Materials: Standard test method for steady‑state thermal transmission properties by means of the heat flow meter apparatus. ASTM International.
  10. Balée W, de Oliveira VH, dos Santos R (2020) Ancient transformation, current conservation: traditional forest management on the Iriri River, Brazilian Amazonia. Human Ecology, 48:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020- 00139-3
  11. Battistoni A (2017) Bringing in the work of nature: from natural capital to hybrid labor. Political Theory, 45(1): 5-31. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0090591716638389
  12. Bisby LA (2015) Fire behaviour of fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite materials and their composites in buildings. Polymers, 7(11): 2400–2433. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7111513
  13. Boonstra MJ, Tjeerdsma B (2006) Chemical analysis of heat treated softwoods. Holz Als Roh-und Werkst, 64(3):204–211. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00107-005-0078-4
  14. Brookfield HC (2001) Intensification, and alternative approaches to agricultural change. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 42(2-3):181–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8373.00143
  15. Brookfield HC (2007) Working with and for Plants: Indigenous Fallow Management in Perspective. In Cairns, M. (ed.), Voices from the Forest: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge into Sustainable Upland Farming. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  16. Bui DK, Nguyen TN, Ngo TD (2019) An artificial neural network (ANN) expert system enhanced with the electromagnetism-based firefly algorithm (EFA) for predicting the energy consumption in buildings. Energy, 116370. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116370.
  17. Campbell AH, Harder T, Nielsen S, Kjelleberg S, Steinberg, PD (2011) Climate change and disease: bleaching of a chemically defended seaweed. Glob. Chang. Biol, 17: 2958–2970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02456.x
  18. Candelier K, Thevenon MF, Petrissans A, Dumarcay S, Gerardin P (2016) Control of wood thermal treatment and its effects on decay resistance: a review. Ann for Sci, 73:571–583. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13595-016-0541-x
  19. Cavus V, Sahin S, Esteves B, Ayata U (2019) Determination of thermal conductivity properties in some wood species obtained from Turkey. BioResources, 14(3):6709–6715. https://doi.org/10. 15376/biores.14.3.6709-6715
  20. Chen H, Ginzburg VV, Yang J, Yang Y, Liu W, Huang Y (2016) Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites: fundamentals and applications. Prog Polym Sci, 59:41–85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.001
  21. Chou JS, Tran DS (2018) Forecasting energy consumption time series using machine learning techniques based on usage patterns of residential householders. Energy, 165:709–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.144
  22. Chu D, Mu J, Avramidis S, Rahimi S, Lai Z, Ayanleye S (2020) Effect of heat treatment on bonding performance of poplar via an insight into dynamic wettability and surface strength transition from outer to inner layers. Holzforschung, 74(8):777–787. https:// doi.org/10.1515/hf-2019-0145
  23. Davraz M, Kılınçarslan S, Koru M (2024) Investigation of the effects of density on physical, mechanical and thermal properties of foam concrete. Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 12(3):585-594. https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.1178373
  24. Deb C, Zhang F, Yang J, Lee SE, Shah KW (2017) A review on time series forecasting techniques for building energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 74: 902–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.085
  25. Dubrovina TA, Losev AA, Karpukhin MM, Vorobeichik EL, Dovletyarova EA, Brykov VA (2021) Gypsum soil amendment in metal-polluted soilsdan added environmental hazard. Chemosphere, 281:130889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130889
  26. Dutta S, Sahana M, Guchhait SK (2017) Assessing anthropogenic disturbance on forest health based on fragment gradingin Dur- gapur Forest Range, West Bengal, India. Spat. Inf. Res., 25: 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0117-3
  27. Dutta RK, Yadav JS (2022) The impact of variation of gypsum and water content on the engineering properties of expansive soil. Transport. Infrastruc. Geo- technol., 9 (5):631-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-021-00192-5
  28. EN 310 (1999) Wood-based panels: Determination of modulus of elasticity in bending and of bending strength. European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
  29. EN 326-1 (1993) Wood-based panels: Sampling, cutting and inspection-Part 1: Sampling and cutting of test pieces and expression of test results. European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
  30. Hastuty IP (2019) Comparison of the use of cement, gypsum, and limestone on the improvement of clay through unconfined compression test. J. Civil Eng. Forum, 5:131-138. https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.43792
  31. Hidayat W, Aprilliana N, Asmara S, Bakri S, Hidayati S, Banuwa IS (2022) Performance of eco-friendly particleboard from agro-industrial residues bonded with formaldehyde-free natural rubber latex adhesive for interior applications. Polym Compos, 43(4):22-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26535
  32. Huang X, Iizuka T, Jiang P, Ohki Y, Tanaka T (2012) Role of interface on the thermal conductivity of highly filled dielectric epoxy/AlN composites. J Phys Chem C, 116(25):13629–13639. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3026545
  33. Ismail A, Hilo WJ (2008) Deformation of gypsum sand during cyclic soaking and drying. J. Appl. Sci., 8 (24): 4610-4616.
  34. ISO 8301 (1991) International Organization for Standardization: Thermal insulation Determination of steady‑state thermal resistance and related properties-Heat flow meter apparatus.
  35. Jafarian A, Chamani L, Memari A, Moradian M, Gholamnia A (2016) Evaluation of land degradation and environmental status in Haloxylon persicum planted area in Bardaskan region, Iran. Arab. J. Geosci., 9:1–14.
  36. Jain RK, Smith KM, Culligan PJ, Taylor JE (2014) Forecasting energy consumption of multi-family residential buildings using support vector regression: investigating the impact of temporal and spatial monitoring granularity on performance accuracy. Appl Energy, 123:168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.057
  37. Jaksa MB (2010) Treatment of Expansive Soil Using Gypsum Solution. In: Pro-ceedings from the 3rd International Conference on Problematic Soils, Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 197-206.
  38. Jasmee S, Omar G, Othaman SSC, Masripan NA, Hamid H (2021) Interface thermal resistance and thermal conductivity of polymer composites at different types, shapes, and sizes of fillers: a review. Polym Compos., 42(6):2629-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26029
  39. Kardas T (2014) Examining the geothermal resources of Kütahya- Simav region in terms of impregnation materials and investi- gating the effects of these resources on some properties of wood. Master’s Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Science and Technology, Isparta.
  40. Kaya AI, Yalcın OU, Turker Y (2021) Physical, mechanical and thermal properties of red pine wood-gypsum particleboard. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 5(2): 139-145. https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.956352
  41. Khan Z, Yousif BF (2017) Islam M, Fracture behaviour of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng., 116:186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.015
  42. Kilincarslan S, Simsek Türker Y, Ince M (2020) Predictionusing different classification methods of tree species depending on contact angle values. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 22(3):861–870. https://doi. org/10.24011/barofd.697098
  43. Kilincarslan S, Turker YS (2020) The effect of heat treatment application on wettability properties of wood materials. J Eng Sci Des, 8(2):460–466. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed. 791589
  44. Kurtoglu A, Sofuoglu SD (2013) Wooden materials used in furniture and woodworking 1: selection and processing of wood materials, their use in the production of furniture and building elements, wood-based materials used in furniture production. Furnit Décor, 22(118):62–78.
  45. Lukomski M, Zając B (2017) Thermophysical properties of OSB boards versus equilibrium moisture content. Construction and Building Materials, 139:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.071
  46. Neto AH, Fiorelli FAS (2008) Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption. Energy Build, 40: 2169–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.06.013
  47. Ocampo Batlle EA, Escobar Palacio JC, Silva Lora EE, Martínez Reyes AM, Melian Moreno M, Morejo ́n MB (2019) A methodology to estimate baseline energy use and quantify savings in electrical energy consumption in higher education institution buildings: case study, Federal University of Itajuba ́ (UNIFEI). J Clean Prod, 244 (20). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118551.
  48. Odegard IYR, Van der Voet E (2014) The future of food—scenarios and the effect on natural resource use in agriculture in 2050. Ecol. Econ., 97:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.005
  49. Oluwalowo A, Nguyen N, Zhang S, Gyu J (2019) Electrical and thermal conductivity improvement of carbon nanotube and silver composites. Carbon, 146: 224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.073
  50. Pásztory Z, Tsalagkas D, Horváth N, Börcsök Z (2019) Insulation panels made from thermally modified bark. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 15(1):47–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/aslh-2019-0005
  51. Pedzik M, Janiszewska D, Rogozinski T (2021) Alternative lignocellulosic raw materials in particleboard production: a review. Ind Crop Prod, 174:114162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114162
  52. Qiu L, Ouyang Y, Feng Y, Zhang X (2018) Thermal conductivity measurement of individual porous polyimide fibers using a modified wire-shape 3ω method. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(9): 096112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5052692
  53. Qiu L, Zhang X, Gu Z, Li Q (2021) Interfacial heat transport in nano-carbon assemblies. Carbon, 178:391–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.105
  54. Slätmo E, Nilsson K, Turunen E (2019) Implementing green in frastructure in spatial planning in Europe. Land, 8:62. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8040062
  55. Sugiman S, Martino A, Setyawan PD, Anshari B (2020) Tensile, flexural and water absorption properties of bamboo fiber/unsaturated polyester composites: effect of calcium carbonate content. Key Eng. Mater. 867:68–74. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.867.68
  56. Tsalagkas D, Börcsök Z, Pásztory Z (2019) Thermal, physical and mechanical properties of surface overlaid bark-based insulation panels. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 77:721–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-019-01436-5
  57. TS EN 322 (1996) Turkish Standards Institute: Wood‑based panels Determination of moisture content.
  58. TS EN 13279-1 (2009) Turkish Standards Institution: Gypsum-based binders - Part 1: Definitions and specifications.
  59. TS EN 634‑2 (2009) Turkish Standards Institute: Cement‑bonded particle boards-Specifications. Part 2: Requirements for OPC bonded particleboards for use in dry, humid and external conditions.
  60. Vinod A, Vijay R, Singaravelu DL (2018) Thermo mechanical characterization of calotropis gigantea stem powder-filled jute fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J. Nat. Fibers, 15:648–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2017.1354740
  61. Xiao J, Li Y, Xie L, Liu D, Huang J (2019) A hybrid model based on selective ensemble for energy consumption forecasting in China. Energy, 159:534–546. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.161.
  62. Yalcin OU, Kaya AI (2022) Properties of gypsum particleboard with added mineral dolomite. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología, 24. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-221x2022000100428
  63. Yang J, Qi GQ, Liu Y, Bao RY, Liu ZY, Yang W (2016) Hybrid graphene aerogels/phase change material composites: thermal conductivity, shape-stabilization and light-to-thermal energy storage. Carbon, 100:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.01.063
  64. Yang T, Jiang Z, Han H, Cai X, Liu Y, Zhang X (2021) Welding dopamine modified graphene nanosheets onto graphene foam for high thermal conductive composites. Compos Pt B-Eng, 205:108509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108509
  65. Zhou Y, Liu F, Wang H (2017) Novel organic-inorganic composites with high thermal conductivity for electronic packaging applications: a key issue review. Polym Compos, 38(4):803–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23641