SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

Landscape-based Camouflage Strategies: Intelligence Approaches in the Context of Strategic Concealment and Environmental

Peyzaj Temelli Kamuflaj Stratejileri: Stratejik Gizlilik ve Çevresel Entegrasyon Bağlamında İstihbarat Yaklaşımları

Barbaros Özkaraca(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA, LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0006-0726-2785
Ayça Yeşim Çağlayan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA, ORMAN FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9681-6228
Pages
197–206
Publication Date
2026-03-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this research provides an original contribution to the literature on intelligence studies with its focus on the spatial design dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the role of landscape-based camouflage strategies in managing spatial visibility and ensuring strategic area concealment in intelligence operations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the study addresses the concept of camouflage from the perspective of landscape architecture, evaluating how environmental integration contributes to intelligence and security strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this research provides an original contribution to the literature on intelligence studies with its focus on the spatial design dimension.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamuflaj · Peyzaj mimarlığı · Stratejik gizlilik

Abstract

This study examines the role of landscape-based camouflage strategies in managing spatial visibility and ensuring strategic area concealment in intelligence operations. Modern intelligence activities require not only information-gathering processes but also the effective use of concealment and camouflage techniques in physical areas. In this context, the study addresses the concept of camouflage from the perspective of landscape architecture, evaluating how environmental integration contributes to intelligence and security strategies. A qualitative method was adopted in the research, and an interdisciplinary literature review was carried out. The historical development of camouflage, its relationship with art and architecture, its integration into landscape architecture, and its use in the context of ecological sustainability were analyzed. In particular, elements such as natural cover, topographic forms, color-texture harmony, and perceptual strategies were discussed in terms of how they serve area concealment for both military and civilian intelligence purposes. The study reveals that camouflage is not only a tool for military defense or environmental aesthetics but also a strategic instrument for intelligence-based area protection and visibility management. In addition, it emphasizes that landscape-based camouflage practices offer new opportunities in the context of sustainable urbanization, climate adaptation, and green infrastructure systems. Thus, this research provides an original contribution to the literature on intelligence studies with its focus on the spatial design dimension.

Özet

Bu çalışma, istihbarat operasyonlarında mekânsal görünürlüğün yönetimi ve stratejik alan gizliliğinin sağlanmasında peyzaj temelli kamuflaj stratejilerinin rolünü incelemektedir. Modern istihbarat faaliyetleri, bilgi toplama süreçlerinin yanı sıra fiziksel alanlarda gizlilik ve kamuflaj tekniklerini etkin biçimde kullanmayı da zorunlu kılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, kamuflaj kavramını peyzaj mimarlığı perspektifiyle ele alarak, çevresel entegrasyonun istihbarat ve güvenlik stratejilerine nasıl katkı sunduğunu değerlendirmektedir. Araştırmada niteliksel yöntem benimsenmiş ve disiplinler arası bir literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kamuflajın tarihsel gelişimi, sanat ve mimarlıkla ilişkisi, peyzaj mimarlığına entegrasyonu ve ekolojik sürdürülebilirlik bağlamındaki kullanımı analiz edilmiştir. Özellikle doğal örtü, topoğrafik biçimler, renk- doku uyumu ve algı stratejileri gibi unsurların, hem askeri hem de sivil istihbarat amaçlı alan gizliliğine nasıl hizmet ettiği tartışılmıştır. Çalışma, kamuflajın sadece askeri savunma veya çevresel estetik için değil, istihbarat temelli alan koruması ve görünürlük yönetimi için de stratejik bir araç olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca peyzaj temelli kamuflaj uygulamalarının, sürdürülebilir kentleşme, iklim adaptasyonu ve yeşil altyapı sistemleri bağlamında da yeni olanaklar sunduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Böylece bu araştırma, istihbarat çalışmaları literatüründe mekânsal tasarım boyutuna özgün bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkaraca, B., Çağlayan, A. Y. (2026). Landscape-based Camouflage Strategies: Intelligence Approaches in the Context of Strategic Concealment and Environmental. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1794195

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Alper H, Yılmaz S (2004) Peyzaj mimarlığında ışık ve renk kullanımının Erzurum kenti örneğinde incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1-2): 79-87. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunizfd/article/40896
  2. Altınçekiç H (2000) Peyzaj mimarlığında renk ve önemi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri B, 50(2): 59-78. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.65143
  3. Aşur F, Alphan H (2018) Görsel peyzaj kalite değerlendirmesi ve alan kullanım planlamasına olan etkileri. YYÜ Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(1):117–125. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.333878
  4. Behrens RR (2002) False Colors: Art, Design, and Modern Camouflage. Bobolink Books, Dysart, Iowa.
  5. Bignall S, Patton P (2010) Deleuze and the Postcolonial. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  6. Boyd GA, Linehan DJ (2013) Ordnance: War+Architecture & Space. Ashgate Publishing, 1 October, 275p.
  7. Breckenridge RW (1942) Concealment by Landscaping. The Engineering News Record, ABD.
  8. Briolat, E. S., Arenas, L. M., Hughes, A. E., Liggins, E., & Stevens, M. (2021). Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments. BMC Ecology and Evolution, 21(151). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01883-w
  9. Brunn SD, Andersson H, Dahlman CT (2000) Landscaping for Power and Defence. In: Gold JR, Revill G (Eds) Landscapes of Defence. Pearson Education, Harlow, pp. 176–184.
  10. Bucher A (2014) War-Scapes: Landscape Perception, Fortification, and Camouflage in Times of War. In: Treib B (Ed) Landscape Architecture and Violence. Routledge, London & New York, pp. 137–156.
  11. Bucher A (2016) Disruptive Dissolution: The Ability to Naturalize in the Landscape. Special Issue, War-Scapes. ETH Zurich: ILA.
  12. Crowe S (1958) The Landscape of Power. The Architectural Press, London.
  13. Dalí S (1942) Total camouflage for total war. Esquire, 18(2):64–67.
  14. Duarte RC, Flores AAV, Stevens M (2017) Camouflage through colour change: mechanisms, adaptive value and ecological significance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1724):20160342. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0342
  15. Dupont E, Cluzel F, Yannou B (2023) Barriers and Drivers for an Efficient Integration of Eco-design of Complex Systems: Case Study in the French Military Industry. In: Proceedings of the 33rd CIRP Design Conference, 24–28 July 2023, Bordeaux, France.
  16. Dümpelmann S (2013) The Art and Science of Invisible Landscapes: Camouflage for War and Peace. In: Misselwitz A, Lüscher A (eds) Ordnance: War + Architecture & Space. Routledge, London, pp. 1–20.
  17. Fitzhugh A (1943) Camouflage: Adaptation of basic principles of landscape architecture. Landscape Architecture Magazine, 33(4):119–124.
  18. Forsyth IM (2012) From dazzle to the desert: a cultural-historical geography of camouflage. University of Glasgow PhD Thesis.
  19. Francis RA, Lorimer J (2011) Urban reconciliation ecology: the potential of living roofs and walls. Journal of Environmental Management,92:1429–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.012
  20. Getter KL, Rowe DB (2006) The role of extensive green roofs in sustainable development. HortScience, 41(5): 1276–1285. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.5.1276
  21. Gold JR, Revill G (2000) Landscapes of Defence. Ashgate, Aldershot.
  22. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864): 756-760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
  23. Harmon BA, Goran WD, Harmon RS (2014) Military Installations and Cities in the Twenty-First Century. In: Linkov I (Ed) Sustainable Cities and Military Installations. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 21–46.
  24. Herndon JM, Whiteside M (2020) Global Environmental Warfare. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(4):411–422. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.74.8173
  25. Hewitt R, Nassar H (2021) Design research based development of camouflage landscape features to prevent criminal UAV activity. Landscape Research Record, 8:402–410.
  26. Jones DR, Wall T, Kenworthy AL, Hurd F, Dyer S, Hedges P, Sankaran S (2023) Hiding in plain sight: exploring the complex pathways between tactical concealment and relational wellbeing. Organization, 30(3): 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221150356
  27. Khakzand M, Jafari Khaledi H (2023) Landscape as architecture. Scientific Journal of Passive Defence, 14(2):99–109. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  28. Muzalevsky R (2017) Strategic Landscape 2050: Preparing the U.S. Military for New Era Dynamics. U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, PA.
  29. Pardela T, Kolouszek S (2014) Historical vegetation used as camouflage at Festung Breslau (Fortress Wroclaw). Proceedings of the Latvia University of Agriculture Landscape Architecture and Art, 3 (3):63-71.
  30. Pradika B, Mahardika RA, Wibowo BA, Rahmawati AA (2024) Biomimicry strategy in the design of building form to support sustainable urban drainage system (SUDS). E3S Web of Conferences, 438:05004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202443805004
  31. Price N, Green S, Troscianko J, Tregenza T, Stevens M (2019) Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage. Scientific Reports, 9: 7840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44349-2
  32. Rausch K (2019) Pattern and design as camouflage. California State University Master’s Thesis, Northridge.
  33. Reit S (1978) Masquerade: The Amazing Camouflage Deceptions of World War II. Hawthorn Books, New York.
  34. Rickard C (1942) Paper delivered to the Conference on Aerial Bombardment Protection. Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 19 April. Edward Farmer Papers, Box 1, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.
  35. Root RR (1942) Camouflage with Planting. R.F. Seymour, Chicago
  36. Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W. D., & Slosberg, R. B. (2006). Mitigating New York City’s Heat Island with Urban Forestry, Living Roofs, and Light Surfaces (NYSERDA Rapor No. 06-06). New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA).
  37. Serwatko O, Pawłowska K, Jawecki B (2023) The use of camouflage colours to reduce the visual impact of industrial facilities on open landscape. Sustainability, 15(3):2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032343
  38. Shell HR (2012) Hide and Seek: Camouflage, Photography, and the Media of Reconnaissance. Zone Books, New York.
  39. Shirer WL (1941) Berlin Diary: The Journal of a Foreign Correspondent. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  40. Shulyk V, Shevchenko L, Cherniyavskyi V, Davydov A, Boborykin O (2024) About the concept of improving border defense lines by means of landscape architecture. Landscape Architecture and Art, 24(24):89–96. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2024.24.12
  41. Spirn AW (1995) The Authority of Nature: Conflict and Confusion in Landscape Architecture. In: Cronon W (Ed) Uncommon Ground: Reinventing Nature. WW Norton, New York, pp:249–261.
  42. Stanley II C (1998) WWII’s deception tactics. Military History Quarterly, 10(4):171–175.
  43. Środulska-Wielgus J (1999) Zespoły zieleni fortecznej jako element fenomenu krajobrazu warownego Twierdzy Przemyśl. Fortyfikacja Europejskim Dziedzictwem Kultury, 10:57–79.
  44. Thayer AH (1920) Camouflage. The Scientific Monthly, 7:481–494. http://www.jstor.org/stable/7086
  45. Warhol A (2018) Camouflage Sound Activity. The Andy Warhol Museum. https://www.warhol.org/lessons/camouflage-sound-activity/, Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2025.
  46. Wikipedia (2025) Operation Bertram. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bertram, Erişim tarihi: 24.09.2025.
  47. Wilkie B (2016) Bombs and biodiversity: A case study of military environmentalism in Australia. Australian Humanities Review, 59:1–12.
  48. Woodward R (2013) Military landscapes: Agendas and approaches for future research. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1):40–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513493219
  49. Warhol A (2018) Camouflage Sound Activity. The Andy Warhol Museum. https://www.warhol.org/lessons/camouflage-sound-activity/, Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2025.
  50. Wikipedia (2025) Operation Bertram. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bertram, Erişim tarihi: 24.09.2025.