Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Production of different composite materials and determination of some technical properties

Farklı kompozit malzemelerin üretilmesi ve bazı teknik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi

Pages
43–50
Publication Date
2015-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that; tensile strengths of the composite samples are lower than unreinforced polyethylene but corn stalk, sunflower stalk and reedmace reinforced sample’s tensile strengths are very close to the composite samples reinforced with glass and carbon fibers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, five different natural reinforce materials as flax fiber, corn stalk, sunflower stalk, reedmace, barley straw and two different synthetic reinforce materials as glass fibers and carbon fibers with different ratios (2.5 g fiber/72.5 g PE, 5 g fiber/70 g PE, 7.5 g fiber/67.5 g PE and 10 g fiber/65 g PE) were placed inside high density polyethylene matrix to produce fiber reinforced composite.
📊
Key Findings & Data:No chemical pretreatment were made to the fibers or the matrix.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that; tensile strengths of the composite samples are lower than unreinforced polyethylene but corn stalk, sunflower stalk and reedmace reinforced sample’s tensile strengths are very close to the composite samples reinforced with glass and carbon fibers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Composite material High density polyethylene Natural fibers Synthetic fibers

Abstract

In this study, five different natural reinforce materials as flax fiber, corn stalk, sunflower stalk, reedmace, barley straw and two different synthetic reinforce materials as glass fibers and carbon fibers with different ratios (2.5 g fiber/72.5 g PE, 5 g fiber/70 g PE, 7.5 g fiber/67.5 g PE and 10 g fiber/65 g PE) were placed inside high density polyethylene matrix to produce fiber reinforced composite. No chemical pretreatment were made to the fibers or the matrix. Composite laminate sheets were produced by compression molding process, then tensile tests and heat tests were conducted. Results show that; tensile strengths of the composite samples are lower than unreinforced polyethylene but corn stalk, sunflower stalk and reedmace reinforced sample’s tensile strengths are very close to the composite samples reinforced with glass and carbon fibers. Furthermore most composites show lower deformation against high temperature than unreinforced polyethylene.

Özet

Bu çalışmada; keten lifi, mısır sapı, ayçiçeği sapı, su kamışı, arpa samanı gibi beş farklı doğal destek malzemesi ile cam yünü ve karbon lifi gibi iki farklı sentetik destek malzemesi belirli oranlarda (2.5 g lif/72.5 g PE, 5 g lif/70 g PE, 7.5 g lif/67.5 g PE ve 10 g lif/65 g PE) yüksek yoğunluklu polietilen matris içerisine yerleştirilerek, lif takviyeli kompozit lamine levhalar üretilmiştir. Liflere ya da matrise herhangi bir ön kimyasal işlem uygulanmamıştır. Kompozit lamine levhalar presle kalıplama yöntemi ile üretilmiş, sonrasında ise çekme ve ısı testlerine tabi tutulmuşlardır. Sonuçlar; kompozit numunelerin çekme mukavemetlerinin desteklenmemiş polietilen numunelere göre daha düşük olduğunu fakat mısır sapı, ayçiçeği sapı ve su kamışı ile desteklenmiş kompozit numunelerin, cam yünü ve karbon lifi ile desteklenmiş kompozit numunelere çok yakın çekme mukavemetine sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca kompozit numuneler yüksek sıcaklığa karşı, desteklenmemiş polietilene göre daha az deformasyon göstermişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Engin, K., Koyuncu, T., Lüle, F. (2015). Production of different composite materials and determination of some technical properties. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 43–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/135742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Achilias, D.S., Roupakias, C., Megalokonomos, P., Lappas, A.A., Antonakou, V. 2007. Chemical recycling of plastic wastes made from polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE) and polypropylene (PP). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149(3): 536-542.
  2. Ahmad, I., Lane, C. E., Mohd, D. H., Abdullah, I. 2012. Electron- beam-ırradiated rice husk powder as reinforcing filler in natural rubber/high-density polyethylene (NR/HDPE) composites. Composites Part B-Engineering, 43(8): 3069- 3075. Akpinar, O., Levent, O., Sabanci, S., Uysal, R.S., Sapci, B. 2011. Optimization and comparison of dilute acid pretreatment of selected agricultural residues for recovery of xylose. BioResources, 6(4): 4103-4116.
  3. Aldousiri, B., Alajmi, M., Shalwan, A. 2013. Mechanical properties of palm fibre reinforced recycled HDPE. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. Anonim, 2013a. 2012 Y ılı Ayçiçe ğ i Raporu. T. C. Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığ ı Kooperatifçilik Genel Müdürlü ğ ü, 3-4, http://koop.gtb.gov.tr/ [Ula şım: 15.04.2014]. Anonim, 2013b. Kolektör Şiltesi Ürün Katalo ğ u. İzocam, 1-2, http://www.izocam.com.tr/tr-tr/urunler/yalitim- uygulamalari/teknikyalitim/kollektor-siltesi.aspx. [Erişim tarihi: 16.04.2014].
  4. Araujo, J.R., Waldman, W.R., De Paoli, M.A. 2008. Thermal properties of high density polyethylene composites with natural fibres: Coupling agent effect. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 93(10): 1770-1775. ASTM D4703-10, 2010. Standard practice for compression molding thermoplastic materials into test specimens, plaques, or sheets. Azwa, Z.N., Yousif, B.F., Manalo, A.C., Karunasena, W. 2013. A Review on the Degradability of Polymeric Composites Based on Natural Fibres. Materials & Design, 47: 424-442.
  5. Badr, A., Müller, K., Schäfer-Pregl, R., El Rabey, H., Effgen, S., Ibrahim, H.H., Pozzi, C., Rohde, W., Salamini, F. 2000. On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17(4): 499-510.
  6. Baley, C., Bourmaud, A. 2014. Average Tensile Properties of French Elementary Flax Fibers. Materials Letters, 122: 159- 161. Barone, J.R., Schmidt, W.F., Liebner, C.F.E. 2005. Compounding and molding of polyethylene composites reinforced with keratin feather fiber. Composites Science and Technology, 65(3-4): 683-692.
  7. Chai, M.W., Bickerton, S., Bhattacharyya, D., Das, R. 2012. Influence of Natural Fibre Reinforcements on the Flammability of Bio-Derived Composite Materials. Composites B,. 43(7): 2867-2874.
  8. Chianelli, R., Reis, J.M.L., Cardoso, J.L., Cast