SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Yield and Fiber Quality Characteristics of Mutation-Based IMI Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Lines

Mutasyon Yoluyla Elde Edilmiş IMI Toleranslı Pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Hatlarının Verim ve Lif Kalite Özellikleri

Volkan Mehmet Çınar(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-5822-5649
Şerife Balcı(Pamuk Araştırma Enstitüsü)0000-0001-8348-3674
Aydın Ünay(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TARLA BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7278-4428
Pages
9–15
Publication Date
2024-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Five IMI-tolerant genotypes with high yield and favourable fiber quality were transferred to further generations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The economical and effective weed control in cotton can succeed by breeding IMI-tolerant genotypes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, we treated seeds with gamma rays at different doses and sprayed the plants with imazamox in M1-M5 generations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Five IMI-tolerant genotypes with high yield and favourable fiber quality were transferred to further generations.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gama ışınları · IMI-Toleranslı · Lif Kalite Özellikleri

Abstract

The economical and effective weed control in cotton can succeed by breeding IMI-tolerant genotypes. For this purpose, we treated seeds with gamma rays at different doses and sprayed the plants with imazamox in M1-M5 generations. Thirty-three M4 lines in 2020 and seventeen M5 lines in 2021 with two comparative varieties were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. M4 lines generally had superior fiber properties than standard varieties. We transferred 17 M4 lines, superior in terms of yield, ginning out-turn and fiber quality, to the M5 generation. All M5 lines exhibited finer fibers than comparative varieties. Seed cotton yield and ginning out-turn of eight M5 lines were superior to the comparative varieties. Five IMI-tolerant genotypes with high yield and favourable fiber quality were transferred to further generations.

Özet

IMI-toleranslı pamuk ıslahı ile pamukta etkin ve ekonomik bir şekilde yabancı ot mücadelesi gerçekleştirilebilir. Bu amaçla pamuk tohumları farklı dozlarda gama ışınları ile muamele edildi ve M1-M5 generasyonlarında bitkilere imazamox uygulandı. 2020 yılında 33 M4 ve 2021 yılında 17 M5 hattı 2 kontrol çeşit ile birlikte 3 tekerrürlü olarak Tesadüf Blokları Deneme Desenine göre ekildi. M4 hatlarının kalite özellikleri çoğunlukla kontrol çeşitlerden daha üstün bulundu. Verim, çırçır randımanı ve lif kalite özellikleri yönünden 17 M4 hattı M5 generasyonuna aktarıldı. Tüm M5 hatlarının lif incelikleri kontrol çeşitlerden daha düşük bulundu. Benzer şekilde 8 M5 hattının kütlü pamuk verimi ve çırçır randımanı performansı kontrol çeşitlerden daha yüksek olarak belirlendi. IMI-toleranslı ve verim ve lif kalite özellikleri üstün 5 hattın sonraki generasyonlara aktarılması gerektiği sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çınar, V. M., Balcı, Ş., Ünay, A. (2024). Yield and Fiber Quality Characteristics of Mutation-Based IMI Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Lines. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.1265542

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Altintas D, Unay A (2021) Evaluation of Possibilities to Improve Herbicide Tolerant Genotype in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through Mutation Breeding. The Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 8(10): 11-17
  2. Bechere E, Auld DL, Dotray PA, Gilbert LV, Kebede H (2009) Imazamox Tolerance in Mutation‐derived Lines of Upland Cotton. Crop Science 49(5): 1586-1592. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.09.0528
  3. Borojevic K (1991) Induced Mutations and Their Genetic Aspects in Wheat (Triticum aestivum vulgare). In International Symposium on the Contribution of Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement; Vienna (Austria); 18-22 Jun 1990. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria); Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (Italy); Proceeding series; p. 317-326, ISBN 92-0-010191-7.
  4. Chen L, Gu G, Wang, CX, Chen ZF, Yan W, Jin M, Xie G, Zhou JL, Deng XW, Tang XY (2021) Trp548Met Mutation of Acetolactate Synthase in Rice Confers Resistance to A Broad Spectrum of Als-Inhibiting Herbicides. The Crop Journal 9(4): 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.11.003
  5. Cutts GS (2013) Genetic Analysis, Inheritance and Stability of Mutation-based Herbicide Tolerance in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.
  6. De Mendiburu F, De Mendiburu MF (2019) Package ‘agricolae’. R Package, Version, 1, 3. Available from: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/agricolae/agricolae.pdf
  7. Herring AD, Auld DL, Ethridge MD, Hequet EF, Bechere E, Green CJ, Cantrell RG (2004) Inheritance of Fiber Quality and Lint Yield in A Chemically Mutated Population of Cotton. Euphytica 136: 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000032747.97343.54
  8. Hu ML, Pu HM, Gao JQ, Long WH, Chen F, Zhou XY, Zhang W, Peng Q, Chen S, Zhang JF (2017) Inheritance and Molecular Characterization of Resistance to Ahas-Inhibiting Herbicides in Rapeseed. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16(11): 2421–2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61659-9
  9. Inis-XA X (1972) Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Atomic Energy in Food and Agriculture. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Mutation Breeding Newsletter No. 3. ISSN 1011-260X.
  10. Jankowicz-Cieslak J, Mba C, Till BJ (2017) Mutagenesis for Crop Breeding and Functional Genomics. In: Jankowicz-Cieslak J, Thomas HT, Jochen K, Bradley JT (eds.), Biotechnologies for Plant Mutation Breeding: Protocols, Springer, Switzerland, 3-18. ISBN 978-3-319-45019-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45021-6
  11. Key CA, Dever JK, Auld DL, Baker RJ (1998) Selection of Stovepipe Lines from Chemically Mutated Cotton. In Beltwide Cotton Conferences (USA).
  12. Khan S, Goyal S (2009) Improvement of Mungbean Varieties Through Induced Mutations. African Journal of Plant Science 3(8): 174-180.
  13. Khan S, Hamza A, Khan F, Subhan M, Khan A, Shah IA, Khan SS (2017) Effects of Gamma Irradiation on some Growth Attributes in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 30(3): 233-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2017.30.3.233.241
  14. Li YM, Zhu JJ, Wu H, Liu CL, Huang CL, Lan JH, Zhao YM, Xie CX (2020) Precise Base Editing of Non-Allelic Acetolactate Synthase Genes Confers Sulfonylurea Herbicide Resistance in Maize. The Crop Journal 8(3): 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2019.10.001
  15. Li Z, Liu ZB, Xing A, Moon BP, Koellhoffer JP (2015). Cas9-Guide RNA Directed Genome Editing in Soybean. Plant Physiology 169(2): 960-970. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00783
  16. Liu C, Zhang T, Yang X, Wang L, Long Y, Hasi A, Pei X (2023) A LuALS Mutation with High Sulfonylurea Herbicide Resistance in Linum usitatissimum L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24(3): 2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032820
  17. Muthusamy A, Vasanth K, Jayabalan N (2005) Induced High Yielding Mutant in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mutation Breeding Newsletter 1: 6–8.
  18. Muthusamy A, Jayabalan N (2011) In Vitro Induction of Mutation in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Isolation of Mutants with Improved Yield and Fiber Characters. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33: 1793-1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0718-8
  19. Raffat M (1995) Effect of Seed Irradiation on Genetic Variability and Recombination of Some Economic Yield Components in Egyptian Cotton. In: Proc Beltwide Cotton Prod Res Conf Memphis, TN, pp 492–498.
  20. R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  21. Sala CA, Bulos M (2012) Inheritance and Molecular Characterization of Broad Range Tolerance to Herbicides Targeting Acetohydroxyacid Synthase in Sunflower. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1710-9
  22. Sarkar HK (1986) Induced Variability of Quantitative Characters of Wheat in M2 and M3 Generations. Environment and Ecology 4: 725-729.
  23. Tan S, Evans RR, Dahmer ML, Singh BK, Shaner DL (2005) Imidazolinone‐tolerant Crops: History, Current Status and Future. Pest Management Science: Formerly Pesticide Science 61(3): 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.993
  24. Tcach MA, Landau AM, Montenegro A, Díaz D, Acuña C, Prina AR (2022) Isolation and Characterization of a New Imidazolinone‐tolerant Mutant in Cotton. Crop Science 62(6): 2222-2232. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20814
  25. Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5(2): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001913.
  26. Ustun R, Uzun B (2023) Development of a High Yielded Chlorsulfuron-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max L.) Variety through Mutation Breeding. Agriculture 13(3): 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030559
  27. Vila-Aiub MM, Neve P, Powles SB (2009) Fitness Costs Associated with Evolved Herbicide Resistance Alleles in Plants. New Phytologist 184(4): 751-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03055.x
  28. Yilmaz A, Haliloglu H, Beyyavas V, Cevheri CI, Copur O (2018) The Effect of Gamma Irradiation at Different Doses Applied to Sayar-314 and Acalpi-1952 Cotton Varieties Seeds on Yield, Yield Components and Fiber Technological Properties in M5 Generation. Feb-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27(12B): 9887-9893.
  29. York AC, Jordan DL, Batts RB, Culpepper AS (2000) Cotton Response to Imazapic and Imazethapyr Applied to a Preceding Peanut Crop. Journal of Cotton Science 4: 210–216.
  30. Zhang R, Liu JX, Chai ZZ, Chen S, Bai Y, Zong Y, Chen KL, Li JY, Jiang LJ, Gao CX (2019) Generation of Herbicide Tolerance Traits and a New Selectable Marker in Wheat Using Base Editing. Nature Plants 5(5): 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0405-0